why? are we different?
1084281167 = 05/11/2004 14:12:47 as number of seconds since jan 1, 1970. .NET says it is 1084281167 = 05/11/2004 13:12:47 which one is right? which one is wrong? why cant they be the same? time is time. I know there are different implementations etc...but how can we be soo wrong? ...tony tony weeg senior web applications architect navtrak, inc. www.navtrak.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] 410.548.2337 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
Since it's only an hour I'd guess it's a summer time/daylight issue...perhaps? -Original Message- From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 May 2004 14:52 To: CF-Talk Subject: why? are we different? 1084281167 = 05/11/2004 14:12:47 as number of seconds since jan 1, 1970. .NET says it is 1084281167 = 05/11/2004 13:12:47 which one is right? which one is wrong? why cant they be the same? time is time. I know there are different implementations etc...but how can we be soo wrong? ...tony tony weeg senior web applications architect navtrak, inc. www.navtrak.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] 410.548.2337 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
>1084281167 = 05/11/2004 14:12:47 > >as number of seconds since jan 1, 1970. > >.NET says it is > >1084281167 = 05/11/2004 13:12:47 > >which one is right? which one is wrong? > >why cant they be the same? time is time. I know there are different >implementations etc...but how can we be soo wrong? > Looks like it's a Daylight Savings issue? Regards, Dave. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
more of a rhetorical question. I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during redsky beta, however its still not fixed. WTF tw -Original Message- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: why? are we different? >1084281167 = 05/11/2004 14:12:47 > >as number of seconds since jan 1, 1970. > >.NET says it is > >1084281167 = 05/11/2004 13:12:47 > >which one is right? which one is wrong? > >why cant they be the same? time is time. I know there are different >implementations etc...but how can we be soo wrong? > Looks like it's a Daylight Savings issue? Regards, Dave. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
> I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during > redsky beta, however its still not fixed. Soon Weegs, soon. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
ok. so its wrong. will it ever be right? or is it wrong? who is right here? any macromedians that can comment? please. ben, christian, christene?? -Original Message- From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:58 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: why? are we different? more of a rhetorical question. I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during redsky beta, however its still not fixed. WTF tw -Original Message- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: why? are we different? >1084281167 = 05/11/2004 14:12:47 > >as number of seconds since jan 1, 1970. > >.NET says it is > >1084281167 = 05/11/2004 13:12:47 > >which one is right? which one is wrong? > >why cant they be the same? time is time. I know there are different >implementations etc...but how can we be soo wrong? > Looks like it's a Daylight Savings issue? Regards, Dave. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
Did the latest hotfix correct this? Or was that only a different issue? Docs on what was fixed note a bug as "53972 - DateDiff function incorrectly accounts for Daylight Saving Time" Ken -Original Message- From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:58 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: why? are we different? more of a rhetorical question. I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during redsky beta, however its still not fixed. WTF tw -Original Message- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: why? are we different? >1084281167 = 05/11/2004 14:12:47 > >as number of seconds since jan 1, 1970. > >.NET says it is > >1084281167 = 05/11/2004 13:12:47 > >which one is right? which one is wrong? > >why cant they be the same? time is time. I know there are different >implementations etc...but how can we be soo wrong? > Looks like it's a Daylight Savings issue? Regards, Dave. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
> From: Tony Weeg > > I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during > redsky beta, however its still not fixed. I tend to treat it with the GetTimeZoneInfo() and update the value [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
but that's a kludge. isnt it? I mean, if I say, give me the correct day/time when I add these seconds, and I don't care if im in DST or EST, the server should realize this, and give me the correct dateAdd() return value. right? tw -Original Message- From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:46 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: why? are we different? > From: Tony Weeg > > I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during redsky > beta, however its still not fixed. I tend to treat it with the GetTimeZoneInfo() and update the value [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: why? are we different?
The hotfix kind of works. On my developer's edition, which is single user Enterprise, it worked. On my production server, Professional 6.0 upgraded to 6.1, it doesn't. Why am I not surprised? >Did the latest hotfix correct this? Or was that only a different issue? >Docs on what was fixed note a bug as "53972 - DateDiff function >incorrectly accounts for Daylight Saving Time" > >Ken > > >-Original Message- >From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:58 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: why? are we different? > >more of a rhetorical question. > >I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during redsky beta, >however its still not fixed. > >WTF > >tw > >-Original Message- >From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:56 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: why? are we different? > > >Looks like it's a Daylight Savings issue? > >Regards, >Dave. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
whats the difference between the two? besides the obvious? macromedians? anyone? why is this sooo wrong? tony -Original Message- From: Larry White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: why? are we different? The hotfix kind of works. On my developer's edition, which is single user Enterprise, it worked. On my production server, Professional 6.0 upgraded to 6.1, it doesn't. Why am I not surprised? >Did the latest hotfix correct this? Or was that only a different issue? >Docs on what was fixed note a bug as "53972 - DateDiff function >incorrectly accounts for Daylight Saving Time" > >Ken > > >-Original Message- >From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:58 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: why? are we different? > >more of a rhetorical question. > >I knew the answer, mm acknowledged the bug last year during redsky >beta, however its still not fixed. > >WTF > >tw > >-Original Message- >From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:56 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: why? are we different? > > >Looks like it's a Daylight Savings issue? > >Regards, >Dave. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: why? are we different?
On May 11, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Larry White wrote: > The hotfix kind of works. On my developer's edition, which is single > user Enterprise, it worked. On my production server, Professional 6.0 > upgraded to 6.1, it doesn't. You're saying that you applied the exact same hotfix to two different servers -- one development and one production -- and it works in one place, but not the other? Can you confirm that the hotfix was picked up in your production server's classpath? > Why am I not surprised? I certainly am! Christian [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: why? are we different?
christian, I have the hotfix on my production server, I have the following hotfixes and it still doesn't work: hf53398_61 hf53813_61 hf54464_61 hf53486_61 hf53852_61 tony -Original Message- From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:19 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: why? are we different? On May 11, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Larry White wrote: > The hotfix kind of works. On my developer's edition, which is single > user Enterprise, it worked. On my production server, Professional 6.0 > upgraded to 6.1, it doesn't. You're saying that you applied the exact same hotfix to two different servers -- one development and one production -- and it works in one place, but not the other? Can you confirm that the hotfix was picked up in your production server's classpath? > Why am I not surprised? I certainly am! Christian [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
