[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Barry Beattie

I'd throw in if only to hear the dulcet tones of his Irish accent (esp
if we can force feed him a few ales)

but I think he made it clear that he was "constrained" by the "short'n'curleys"

or is that NOT the case?


On 22/02/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Who here is gonna chip in to get spike over here?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Spike
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:46 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?
>
>
> On 2/21/06, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> but a little company over here called Lockheed Martin
> >
> > BASTARD!   couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.
>
> You calling me a BASTARD?
>
> Cheeky monkey!
>
> >
> >
> > >> Since he's such a good mate of mine, I'd be very grateful if you
> > can show him and his wife some aussie hospitality and make sure they
> > enjoy themselves.
> >
> >
> > sounds like a chalenge to me. did you drop any hints on who was more
> > sociable and welcoming - Sydney-siders** or Brisbane-ites? sounds like
> > there'll be a decient number of each...
>
> I didn't take any sides in that particular debate, and I believe that
> it's better to let him and Kristin decide.
>
> I'll be taking notes when he gets back :-)
>
> >
> >
> >
> > ** yeah, trick question, I know.
> >
> >
> > On 22/02/06, Spike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was planning to be there, but a little company over here called
> > > Lockheed Martin have put me in a pair of financial manacles, so I'll
> > > have to pass.
> > >
> > > For all of you who've been promising me CFEclipse beers for the last
> > > couple of years, you can do me a huge favor and take care of Rob
> > > Rohan. I pretty much twisted his arm to get him to go to webDU, now I
> > > feel like a complete turd for dropping out at the last minute and
> > > leaving him there on his own.
> > >
> > > In case you don't already know, Rob is the original founder of the
> > > CFEclipse project and has probably written more code than anyone else
> > > in the project. He's certainly done more to make CFEclipse the tool it
> > > is today than anyone else. He just doesn't make a lot of noise about
> > > it. He's one of only two or three people I've ever met who has my
> > > total respect and that's quite an achievement in itself. There are no
> > > other programmers on that list.
> > >
> > > He's also the author of Neuromancer which is an asynchronous JS
> > > library for talking to webservices. Not forgetting the other 20 or so
> > > projects for various different platforms and environments that he
> > > somehow manages to find time for. Since he's such a good mate of mine,
> > > I'd be very grateful if you can show him and his wife some aussie
> > > hospitality and make sure they enjoy themselves.
> > >
> > > Spike
> > >
> > > On 2/21/06, Gareth Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >  Me, doing the same as Darren, Wednesday morning for a workshop, back
> home
> > > > Friday night.. and I must say.. losing an hour on the way down is a
> bit
> > > > annoying, but the 20-30 minute trip back is like jumping on a concord
> or
> > > > something.
> > > >
> > > >  Hopefully this year I'll be a little less nervous on the flight
> coming home
> > > > ay Darren. (Who might remember from last year, the plane was delayed
> because
> > > > of storms, then the ride was a bit bumpy.).
> > > >
> > > >  Cheers
> > > >  Gareth.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  Rosemary Norwood wrote:
> > > >  Yup, myself and a team colleague are among that number.
> > > >
> > > > Rosemary Norwood
> > > >
> > > > On 2/22/06, Darren Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
> > > > night. Doing the banquet too.
> > > > There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
> > > > for also going.
> > > >
> > > > Darren Tracey
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > 
> > > Stephen Milligan
> > > Do you do the Badger?
> > > http://www.yellowbadger.com
> > >
> > > Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> 
> Stephen Milligan
> Do you do the Badger?
> http://www.yellowbadger.com
>
> Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org
>
>
>
>
>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

Who here is gonna chip in to get spike over here?

-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Spike
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:46 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?


On 2/21/06, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> but a little company over here called Lockheed Martin
>
> BASTARD!   couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

You calling me a BASTARD?

Cheeky monkey!

>
>
> >> Since he's such a good mate of mine, I'd be very grateful if you
> can show him and his wife some aussie hospitality and make sure they
> enjoy themselves.
>
>
> sounds like a chalenge to me. did you drop any hints on who was more
> sociable and welcoming - Sydney-siders** or Brisbane-ites? sounds like
> there'll be a decient number of each...

I didn't take any sides in that particular debate, and I believe that
it's better to let him and Kristin decide.

I'll be taking notes when he gets back :-)

>
>
>
> ** yeah, trick question, I know.
>
>
> On 22/02/06, Spike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I was planning to be there, but a little company over here called
> > Lockheed Martin have put me in a pair of financial manacles, so I'll
> > have to pass.
> >
> > For all of you who've been promising me CFEclipse beers for the last
> > couple of years, you can do me a huge favor and take care of Rob
> > Rohan. I pretty much twisted his arm to get him to go to webDU, now I
> > feel like a complete turd for dropping out at the last minute and
> > leaving him there on his own.
> >
> > In case you don't already know, Rob is the original founder of the
> > CFEclipse project and has probably written more code than anyone else
> > in the project. He's certainly done more to make CFEclipse the tool it
> > is today than anyone else. He just doesn't make a lot of noise about
> > it. He's one of only two or three people I've ever met who has my
> > total respect and that's quite an achievement in itself. There are no
> > other programmers on that list.
> >
> > He's also the author of Neuromancer which is an asynchronous JS
> > library for talking to webservices. Not forgetting the other 20 or so
> > projects for various different platforms and environments that he
> > somehow manages to find time for. Since he's such a good mate of mine,
> > I'd be very grateful if you can show him and his wife some aussie
> > hospitality and make sure they enjoy themselves.
> >
> > Spike
> >
> > On 2/21/06, Gareth Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  Me, doing the same as Darren, Wednesday morning for a workshop, back
home
> > > Friday night.. and I must say.. losing an hour on the way down is a
bit
> > > annoying, but the 20-30 minute trip back is like jumping on a concord
or
> > > something.
> > >
> > >  Hopefully this year I'll be a little less nervous on the flight
coming home
> > > ay Darren. (Who might remember from last year, the plane was delayed
because
> > > of storms, then the ride was a bit bumpy.).
> > >
> > >  Cheers
> > >  Gareth.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Rosemary Norwood wrote:
> > >  Yup, myself and a team colleague are among that number.
> > >
> > > Rosemary Norwood
> > >
> > > On 2/22/06, Darren Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >  I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
> > > night. Doing the banquet too.
> > > There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
> > > for also going.
> > >
> > > Darren Tracey
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 
> > Stephen Milligan
> > Do you do the Badger?
> > http://www.yellowbadger.com
> >
> > Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


--

Stephen Milligan
Do you do the Badger?
http://www.yellowbadger.com

Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Postcode search

2006-02-21 Thread David Pietersen
Whoops... I should have looked at the sample site!
 
Yeah, the QAS tool allows us to check (at the time someone tries to submit an online form) that they are putting in a genuine address.  If it is not a 'real' address as far as Australia Post is concerned, they have to try again.  There is a database behind it which we host here, and they send updates for it on a regular basis.  The version we have is also used for our internal applications.  It works a treat.

 
Super Vision?
 
dp.
 
 
On 22/02/06, Kay Smoljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi DP,Did you like Super Vision the other night? :DOn 2/22/06, David Pietersen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> We use a tool here that checks the whole address to ensure it is real...>> QAS-> 
http://www.auspost.com.au/BCP/0,1080,CH2418%257EMO19,00.htmlIt's actually a postcode search, as in enter your postcode and we'llshow you your nearest stores. Looks like the QAS tool is more forvalidating postcodes, or am I not thinking laterally enough?


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Spike

On 2/21/06, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> but a little company over here called Lockheed Martin
>
> BASTARD!   couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

You calling me a BASTARD?

Cheeky monkey!

>
>
> >> Since he's such a good mate of mine, I'd be very grateful if you
> can show him and his wife some aussie hospitality and make sure they
> enjoy themselves.
>
>
> sounds like a chalenge to me. did you drop any hints on who was more
> sociable and welcoming - Sydney-siders** or Brisbane-ites? sounds like
> there'll be a decient number of each...

I didn't take any sides in that particular debate, and I believe that
it's better to let him and Kristin decide.

I'll be taking notes when he gets back :-)

>
>
>
> ** yeah, trick question, I know.
>
>
> On 22/02/06, Spike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I was planning to be there, but a little company over here called
> > Lockheed Martin have put me in a pair of financial manacles, so I'll
> > have to pass.
> >
> > For all of you who've been promising me CFEclipse beers for the last
> > couple of years, you can do me a huge favor and take care of Rob
> > Rohan. I pretty much twisted his arm to get him to go to webDU, now I
> > feel like a complete turd for dropping out at the last minute and
> > leaving him there on his own.
> >
> > In case you don't already know, Rob is the original founder of the
> > CFEclipse project and has probably written more code than anyone else
> > in the project. He's certainly done more to make CFEclipse the tool it
> > is today than anyone else. He just doesn't make a lot of noise about
> > it. He's one of only two or three people I've ever met who has my
> > total respect and that's quite an achievement in itself. There are no
> > other programmers on that list.
> >
> > He's also the author of Neuromancer which is an asynchronous JS
> > library for talking to webservices. Not forgetting the other 20 or so
> > projects for various different platforms and environments that he
> > somehow manages to find time for. Since he's such a good mate of mine,
> > I'd be very grateful if you can show him and his wife some aussie
> > hospitality and make sure they enjoy themselves.
> >
> > Spike
> >
> > On 2/21/06, Gareth Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  Me, doing the same as Darren, Wednesday morning for a workshop, back home
> > > Friday night.. and I must say.. losing an hour on the way down is a bit
> > > annoying, but the 20-30 minute trip back is like jumping on a concord or
> > > something.
> > >
> > >  Hopefully this year I'll be a little less nervous on the flight coming 
> > > home
> > > ay Darren. (Who might remember from last year, the plane was delayed 
> > > because
> > > of storms, then the ride was a bit bumpy.).
> > >
> > >  Cheers
> > >  Gareth.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Rosemary Norwood wrote:
> > >  Yup, myself and a team colleague are among that number.
> > >
> > > Rosemary Norwood
> > >
> > > On 2/22/06, Darren Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >  I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
> > > night. Doing the banquet too.
> > > There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
> > > for also going.
> > >
> > > Darren Tracey
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 
> > Stephen Milligan
> > Do you do the Badger?
> > http://www.yellowbadger.com
> >
> > Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


--

Stephen Milligan
Do you do the Badger?
http://www.yellowbadger.com

Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Barry Beattie

>> but a little company over here called Lockheed Martin

BASTARD!   couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.


>> Since he's such a good mate of mine, I'd be very grateful if you
can show him and his wife some aussie hospitality and make sure they
enjoy themselves.


sounds like a chalenge to me. did you drop any hints on who was more
sociable and welcoming - Sydney-siders** or Brisbane-ites? sounds like
there'll be a decient number of each...



** yeah, trick question, I know.


On 22/02/06, Spike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was planning to be there, but a little company over here called
> Lockheed Martin have put me in a pair of financial manacles, so I'll
> have to pass.
>
> For all of you who've been promising me CFEclipse beers for the last
> couple of years, you can do me a huge favor and take care of Rob
> Rohan. I pretty much twisted his arm to get him to go to webDU, now I
> feel like a complete turd for dropping out at the last minute and
> leaving him there on his own.
>
> In case you don't already know, Rob is the original founder of the
> CFEclipse project and has probably written more code than anyone else
> in the project. He's certainly done more to make CFEclipse the tool it
> is today than anyone else. He just doesn't make a lot of noise about
> it. He's one of only two or three people I've ever met who has my
> total respect and that's quite an achievement in itself. There are no
> other programmers on that list.
>
> He's also the author of Neuromancer which is an asynchronous JS
> library for talking to webservices. Not forgetting the other 20 or so
> projects for various different platforms and environments that he
> somehow manages to find time for. Since he's such a good mate of mine,
> I'd be very grateful if you can show him and his wife some aussie
> hospitality and make sure they enjoy themselves.
>
> Spike
>
> On 2/21/06, Gareth Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  Me, doing the same as Darren, Wednesday morning for a workshop, back home
> > Friday night.. and I must say.. losing an hour on the way down is a bit
> > annoying, but the 20-30 minute trip back is like jumping on a concord or
> > something.
> >
> >  Hopefully this year I'll be a little less nervous on the flight coming home
> > ay Darren. (Who might remember from last year, the plane was delayed because
> > of storms, then the ride was a bit bumpy.).
> >
> >  Cheers
> >  Gareth.
> >
> >
> >  Rosemary Norwood wrote:
> >  Yup, myself and a team colleague are among that number.
> >
> > Rosemary Norwood
> >
> > On 2/22/06, Darren Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >  I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
> > night. Doing the banquet too.
> > There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
> > for also going.
> >
> > Darren Tracey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> 
> Stephen Milligan
> Do you do the Badger?
> http://www.yellowbadger.com
>
> Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org
>
>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Postcode search

2006-02-21 Thread Kay Smoljak

Hi DP,

Did you like Super Vision the other night? :D

On 2/22/06, David Pietersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use a tool here that checks the whole address to ensure it is real...
>
> QAS-
> http://www.auspost.com.au/BCP/0,1080,CH2418%257EMO19,00.html

It's actually a postcode search, as in enter your postcode and we'll
show you your nearest stores. Looks like the QAS tool is more for
validating postcodes, or am I not thinking laterally enough?

Cheers,
K.


--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Postcode search

2006-02-21 Thread David Pietersen
We use a tool here that checks the whole address to ensure it is real...
 
QAS- http://www.auspost.com.au/BCP/0,1080,CH2418%257EMO19,00.html
 
 
On 22/02/06, Kay Smoljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The client is not happy with their current system and are consideringother alternatives, including going back to the original system which
was basic searching on a list of manually entered postcodes for eachlocation.So basically anything... I'm just after possible alternatives.On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> you want all the bells and whistles that they have? or you just want to do> your own searching and display your own results?>> -Original Message-
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com]On> Behalf Of Kay Smoljak> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:48 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com> Subject: [cfaussie] Postcode search Heyas,>> Does anyone know of a postcode search service like:
> http://tyrepower.business.com.au/profileimages/37176.htm> but not run by business.com.au?>
> Cheers!>> --> Kay Smoljak> http://kay.zombiecoder.com/>>>--Kay Smoljak


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Spike

I was planning to be there, but a little company over here called
Lockheed Martin have put me in a pair of financial manacles, so I'll
have to pass.

For all of you who've been promising me CFEclipse beers for the last
couple of years, you can do me a huge favor and take care of Rob
Rohan. I pretty much twisted his arm to get him to go to webDU, now I
feel like a complete turd for dropping out at the last minute and
leaving him there on his own.

In case you don't already know, Rob is the original founder of the
CFEclipse project and has probably written more code than anyone else
in the project. He's certainly done more to make CFEclipse the tool it
is today than anyone else. He just doesn't make a lot of noise about
it. He's one of only two or three people I've ever met who has my
total respect and that's quite an achievement in itself. There are no
other programmers on that list.

He's also the author of Neuromancer which is an asynchronous JS
library for talking to webservices. Not forgetting the other 20 or so
projects for various different platforms and environments that he
somehow manages to find time for. Since he's such a good mate of mine,
I'd be very grateful if you can show him and his wife some aussie
hospitality and make sure they enjoy themselves.

Spike

On 2/21/06, Gareth Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Me, doing the same as Darren, Wednesday morning for a workshop, back home
> Friday night.. and I must say.. losing an hour on the way down is a bit
> annoying, but the 20-30 minute trip back is like jumping on a concord or
> something.
>
>  Hopefully this year I'll be a little less nervous on the flight coming home
> ay Darren. (Who might remember from last year, the plane was delayed because
> of storms, then the ride was a bit bumpy.).
>
>  Cheers
>  Gareth.
>
>
>  Rosemary Norwood wrote:
>  Yup, myself and a team colleague are among that number.
>
> Rosemary Norwood
>
> On 2/22/06, Darren Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
> night. Doing the banquet too.
> There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
> for also going.
>
> Darren Tracey
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--

Stephen Milligan
Do you do the Badger?
http://www.yellowbadger.com

Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Postcode search

2006-02-21 Thread Kay Smoljak

The client is not happy with their current system and are considering
other alternatives, including going back to the original system which
was basic searching on a list of manually entered postcodes for each
location.

So basically anything... I'm just after possible alternatives.

On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you want all the bells and whistles that they have? or you just want to do
> your own searching and display your own results?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Kay Smoljak
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:48 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [cfaussie] Postcode search
>
>
>
> Heyas,
>
> Does anyone know of a postcode search service like:
> http://tyrepower.business.com.au/profileimages/37176.htm
> but not run by business.com.au?
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Kay Smoljak
> http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Postcode search

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

you want all the bells and whistles that they have? or you just want to do
your own searching and display your own results?

-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Kay Smoljak
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:48 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Postcode search



Heyas,

Does anyone know of a postcode search service like:
http://tyrepower.business.com.au/profileimages/37176.htm
but not run by business.com.au?

Cheers!

--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/





--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Postcode search

2006-02-21 Thread Kay Smoljak

Heyas,

Does anyone know of a postcode search service like:
http://tyrepower.business.com.au/profileimages/37176.htm
but not run by business.com.au?

Cheers!

--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

excellent thanks.

On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the answer is here
>
> onclick=\"" + this.instance + ".getName()\">"
>
> by passing the name of the prototype instance into, or as part of the
> function, the click knows where its supposed to be going to do what it needs
> to do
>
> so in effect the onclick for the link would look like
> onclick="myTabs.getName()"
>
> that's the only way your going to be able to do it, otherwise it doesn't
> know what the hell "this" is or where the doMakeActive function is. the only
> way it will know is to know the instance of the prototype cause that's where
> the function actually is. its not a global document function as it would be
> if your function was just on the page somewhere
>
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Taco Fleur
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:54 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object
>
>
>
> Sorry I can't see the solution in there.
> I am very well aware that what = alert( '' ); would evaluate
> immediately, if you look at my first sample you will see that I have
> it within quotes. I think what I want to do just can't be done, and I
> have to write the function outside the object.
>
> On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > you cant do it like that taco
> >
> > if you have
> > myListItem.onclick = "alert('hello');";
> >
> > you will see the list item gets populated with the alert
> >
> > if you have
> > myListItem.onclick = "alert(this);";
> >
> > it uses the object, in your case the  element as what "this" is, not
> the
> > prototype object
> >
> > you cant have
> > myListItem.onclick = alert(this);
> >
> > because the alrt will run when the function is run, just like whats
> > happening with your function.
> >
> > with your prototype, you cant just reference "this" in your function as
> > though it was still part of the prototype.
> >
> > your onclick needs to have a reference to the prototype so it knows which
> > instance it needs to work with
> >
> > ///
> > 
> >
> >function tab() {
> >this.instance = arguments[0];
> >this.tabs = new Object();
> >}
> >
> >tab.prototype.addTab = function (label, link) {
> >this.tabs[label] = new Object();
> >this.tabs[label].label = label;
> >this.tabs[label].link = link;
> >
> >}
> >
> >tab.prototype.getName = function () {
> >alert(this.instance);
> >}
> >
> >tab.prototype.writeTabs = function () {
> >var htmlStr = "";
> >for (p in this.tabs) {
> >htmlStr = htmlStr + "";
> >}
> >htmlStr = htmlStr + "
this.tabs[p].link + "\" > > onclick=\"" + this.instance + ".getName()\">" + this.tabs[p].label + > > "
"; > >return htmlStr; > >} > > > >myTabs = new tab("myTabs"); > >myTabs.addTab("tab 1", "index.cfm"); > >myTabs.addTab("tab 2", "index.cfm"); > >myTabs.addTab("tab 3", "index.cfm"); > >myTabs.addTab("tab 4", "index.cfm"); > > > >document.write(myTabs.writeTabs()); > > > > > > > > just a quick example > > > > you need to let the onclick know what its suposed to be doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au > Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions > an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 … > > > > > > > -- Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 … --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

the answer is here

onclick=\"" + this.instance + ".getName()\">"

by passing the name of the prototype instance into, or as part of the
function, the click knows where its supposed to be going to do what it needs
to do

so in effect the onclick for the link would look like
onclick="myTabs.getName()"

that's the only way your going to be able to do it, otherwise it doesn't
know what the hell "this" is or where the doMakeActive function is. the only
way it will know is to know the instance of the prototype cause that's where
the function actually is. its not a global document function as it would be
if your function was just on the page somewhere

Steve

-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:54 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object



Sorry I can't see the solution in there.
I am very well aware that what = alert( '' ); would evaluate
immediately, if you look at my first sample you will see that I have
it within quotes. I think what I want to do just can't be done, and I
have to write the function outside the object.

On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you cant do it like that taco
>
> if you have
> myListItem.onclick = "alert('hello');";
>
> you will see the list item gets populated with the alert
>
> if you have
> myListItem.onclick = "alert(this);";
>
> it uses the object, in your case the  element as what "this" is, not
the
> prototype object
>
> you cant have
> myListItem.onclick = alert(this);
>
> because the alrt will run when the function is run, just like whats
> happening with your function.
>
> with your prototype, you cant just reference "this" in your function as
> though it was still part of the prototype.
>
> your onclick needs to have a reference to the prototype so it knows which
> instance it needs to work with
>
> ///
> 
>
>function tab() {
>this.instance = arguments[0];
>this.tabs = new Object();
>}
>
>tab.prototype.addTab = function (label, link) {
>this.tabs[label] = new Object();
>this.tabs[label].label = label;
>this.tabs[label].link = link;
>
>}
>
>tab.prototype.getName = function () {
>alert(this.instance);
>}
>
>tab.prototype.writeTabs = function () {
>var htmlStr = "";
>for (p in this.tabs) {
>htmlStr = htmlStr + "";
>}
>htmlStr = htmlStr + "
onclick=\"" + this.instance + ".getName()\">" + this.tabs[p].label + > "
"; >return htmlStr; >} > >myTabs = new tab("myTabs"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 1", "index.cfm"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 2", "index.cfm"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 3", "index.cfm"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 4", "index.cfm"); > >document.write(myTabs.writeTabs()); > > > > just a quick example > > you need to let the onclick know what its suposed to be doing. > > > > > -- Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 … --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

yes, very cleaver.

I wonder if there is a native function that allows you to get at that
information?

On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> and WALA!
> it works!
>
> /
> 
>   //var activeTab = null;
>function _doMakeActive( object ) {
>var layerType = "iframe";
>
>if ( activeTab != null ){
>activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
>activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
>}
>
>object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
>object.childNodes[0].style.color = "##fff";
>
>activeTab = object;
>
>object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ "display" 
> ] =
> "block";
>var listItemCollection = 
> object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName ( "li" );
>
>for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; i++ ) {
>if (listItemCollection[ i ] != object ) {
>listItemCollection[ i ].getElementsByTagName( 
> layerType )[0].style[
> "display" ] = "none";
>}
>//alert(listItemCollection[ i ].innerHTML );
>}
>}
>
>function TabbedInterface( identity, instanceName ){
>this.activeTab = null;
>this.dom = document.createElement( "ul" );
>this.dom.id = identity;
>
>this.instance = instanceName;
>return this;
>}
>
>TabbedInterface.prototype =
>{
>init:function() {
>return this;
>},
>
>getInstanceName:function() {
>return this.instance;
>},
>
>getActiveTab:function() {
>return this.activeTab;
>},
>
>setActiveTab:function( activeTab ) {
>this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
>return this;
>},
>
>getDOM:function() {
>return this.dom;
>},
>
>doAddTab:function( linkText, source ) {
>var myListItem = document.createElement ( "li" );
>var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
>var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
>//alert(this.getInstanceName());
>myLink.onclick = "return false;";
>myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
>myLink.href = "";
>myListItem.onclick = this.getInstanceName() + ".doMakeActive( 
> this );";
>//myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
>myListItem.appendChild( myLink );
>myIFrame.src = source;
>
>myListItem.appendChild( myIFrame );
>
>this.getDOM().appendChild( myListItem );
>return this;
>},
>
>//Writes the DOM to the document
>doWrite:function() {
>document.write( this.getDOM().outerHTML );
>alert( this.getDOM().outerHTML );
>return this;
>},
>
>doMakeActive:function( object, selfReference ) {
>alert( 'yup' );
>var layerType = "iframe";
>var activeTab = this.activeTab;
>
>if ( activeTab != null ) {
>activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
>activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = 
> "##000";
> }
>
>object.style.backgroundColor = "#0A246A";
>object.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "#fff";
>this.setActiveTab( object );
>object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ 
> "visibility" ] =
> "visible";
>
>var listItemCollection = 
> object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName( "li" );
>for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; i++ ) {
>if ( listItemCollection[ i ] != object ) {
>listItemCollection[ i 
> ].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[0].style[
> "visibility" ] = "hidden";
>}
>}
>return this;
>}
>}
>
>var tabbedInterface = new TabbedInterface("tabbed-interface",
> "tabbedInterface" ).init();
>//doMakeActive = tabbedInterface.doMakeActive;
>tabbedInterface.doAddTab ( "Job", "job-detail.cfm");
>tabbedInterface.doAddTab( "Company","company-detail.cfm" );
>tabbedInterface.doAddTab( "Skills", "job-skill.cfm" );
>tabbedInterface.doAddTab( "Internal","int

[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Gareth Edwards





Me, doing the same as Darren, Wednesday morning for a workshop, back
home Friday night.. and I must say.. losing an hour on the way down is
a bit annoying, but the 20-30 minute trip back is like jumping on a
concord or something.

Hopefully this year I'll be a little less nervous on the flight coming
home ay Darren. (Who might remember from last year, the plane was
delayed because of storms, then the ride was a bit bumpy.).

Cheers
Gareth.

Rosemary Norwood wrote:

  Yup, myself and a team colleague are among that number.

Rosemary Norwood

On 2/22/06, Darren Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
  
I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
night. Doing the banquet too.
There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
for also going.

Darren Tracey



  
  


  



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---





[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

Sorry I can't see the solution in there.
I am very well aware that what = alert( '' ); would evaluate
immediately, if you look at my first sample you will see that I have
it within quotes. I think what I want to do just can't be done, and I
have to write the function outside the object.

On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you cant do it like that taco
>
> if you have
> myListItem.onclick = "alert('hello');";
>
> you will see the list item gets populated with the alert
>
> if you have
> myListItem.onclick = "alert(this);";
>
> it uses the object, in your case the  element as what "this" is, not the
> prototype object
>
> you cant have
> myListItem.onclick = alert(this);
>
> because the alrt will run when the function is run, just like whats
> happening with your function.
>
> with your prototype, you cant just reference "this" in your function as
> though it was still part of the prototype.
>
> your onclick needs to have a reference to the prototype so it knows which
> instance it needs to work with
>
> ///
> 
>
>function tab() {
>this.instance = arguments[0];
>this.tabs = new Object();
>}
>
>tab.prototype.addTab = function (label, link) {
>this.tabs[label] = new Object();
>this.tabs[label].label = label;
>this.tabs[label].link = link;
>
>}
>
>tab.prototype.getName = function () {
>alert(this.instance);
>}
>
>tab.prototype.writeTabs = function () {
>var htmlStr = "";
>for (p in this.tabs) {
>htmlStr = htmlStr + "";
>}
>htmlStr = htmlStr + "
this.tabs[p].link + "\" > onclick=\"" + this.instance + ".getName()\">" + this.tabs[p].label + > "
"; >return htmlStr; >} > >myTabs = new tab("myTabs"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 1", "index.cfm"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 2", "index.cfm"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 3", "index.cfm"); >myTabs.addTab("tab 4", "index.cfm"); > >document.write(myTabs.writeTabs()); > > > > just a quick example > > you need to let the onclick know what its suposed to be doing. > > > > > -- Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 … --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

and WALA!
it works!

/

   //var activeTab = null;
function _doMakeActive( object ) {
var layerType = "iframe";

if ( activeTab != null ){
activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
}

object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
object.childNodes[0].style.color = "##fff";

activeTab = object;

object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ "display" 
] =
"block";
var listItemCollection = object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName 
( "li" );

for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; i++ ) {
if (listItemCollection[ i ] != object ) {
listItemCollection[ i ].getElementsByTagName( 
layerType )[0].style[
"display" ] = "none";
}
//alert(listItemCollection[ i ].innerHTML );
}
}

function TabbedInterface( identity, instanceName ){
this.activeTab = null;
this.dom = document.createElement( "ul" );
this.dom.id = identity;

this.instance = instanceName;
return this;
}

TabbedInterface.prototype =
{
init:function() {
return this;
},

getInstanceName:function() {
return this.instance;
},

getActiveTab:function() {
return this.activeTab;
},

setActiveTab:function( activeTab ) {
this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
return this;
},

getDOM:function() {
return this.dom;
},

doAddTab:function( linkText, source ) {
var myListItem = document.createElement ( "li" );
var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
//alert(this.getInstanceName());
myLink.onclick = "return false;";
myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
myLink.href = "";
myListItem.onclick = this.getInstanceName() + ".doMakeActive( 
this );";
//myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
myListItem.appendChild( myLink );
myIFrame.src = source;

myListItem.appendChild( myIFrame );

this.getDOM().appendChild( myListItem );
return this;
},

//Writes the DOM to the document
doWrite:function() {
document.write( this.getDOM().outerHTML );
alert( this.getDOM().outerHTML );
return this;
},

doMakeActive:function( object, selfReference ) {
alert( 'yup' );
var layerType = "iframe";
var activeTab = this.activeTab;

if ( activeTab != null ) {
activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
 }

object.style.backgroundColor = "#0A246A";
object.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "#fff";
this.setActiveTab( object );
object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ 
"visibility" ] =
"visible";

var listItemCollection = 
object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName( "li" );
for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; i++ ) {
if ( listItemCollection[ i ] != object ) {
listItemCollection[ i 
].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[0].style[
"visibility" ] = "hidden";
}
}
return this;
}
}

var tabbedInterface = new TabbedInterface("tabbed-interface",
"tabbedInterface" ).init();
//doMakeActive = tabbedInterface.doMakeActive;
tabbedInterface.doAddTab ( "Job", "job-detail.cfm");
tabbedInterface.doAddTab( "Company","company-detail.cfm" );
tabbedInterface.doAddTab( "Skills", "job-skill.cfm" );
tabbedInterface.doAddTab( "Internal","internal.cfm" );
tabbedInterface.doAddTab( "Other", "other.cfm" );
tabbedInterface.doWrite();

/



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send

[cfaussie] Re: Ruby on Rails

2006-02-21 Thread Chris Velevitch

On 2/22/06, Gavin Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the subject of WebDU, is anyone going to any of the day 0 training
> sessions? I was considering going to the Ruby on Rails one.
>
> http://www.aviditybytes.com/ruby_on_rails_workshop_sydney_australia/

I too was considering it, but it clashes with Flex workshop.

There are too many good topics on at the same time.


Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
www.flashdev.org.au

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

you cant do it like that taco

if you have
myListItem.onclick = "alert('hello');";

you will see the list item gets populated with the alert

if you have
myListItem.onclick = "alert(this);";

it uses the object, in your case the  element as what "this" is, not the
prototype object

you cant have
myListItem.onclick = alert(this);

because the alrt will run when the function is run, just like whats
happening with your function.

with your prototype, you cant just reference "this" in your function as
though it was still part of the prototype.

your onclick needs to have a reference to the prototype so it knows which
instance it needs to work with

///


function tab() {
this.instance = arguments[0];
this.tabs = new Object();
}

tab.prototype.addTab = function (label, link) {
this.tabs[label] = new Object();
this.tabs[label].label = label;
this.tabs[label].link = link;

}

tab.prototype.getName = function () {
alert(this.instance);
}

tab.prototype.writeTabs = function () {
var htmlStr = "";
for (p in this.tabs) {
htmlStr = htmlStr + "";
}
htmlStr = htmlStr + "
" + this.tabs[p].label + "
"; return htmlStr; } myTabs = new tab("myTabs"); myTabs.addTab("tab 1", "index.cfm"); myTabs.addTab("tab 2", "index.cfm"); myTabs.addTab("tab 3", "index.cfm"); myTabs.addTab("tab 4", "index.cfm"); document.write(myTabs.writeTabs()); just a quick example you need to let the onclick know what its suposed to be doing. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[cfaussie] Re: high res windows logo

2006-02-21 Thread HokeyWhiteBoy

Hi,

Most decent companies have a page on their site that has hi-res images
of logos etc, and detailed rules for how you can use them.  Look for a
Press, or Journalist link.

Here is Microsoft's-
http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/gallery/logoguidelines.mspx

Bye,

dp.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Rosemary Norwood

Yup, myself and a team colleague are among that number.

Rosemary Norwood

On 2/22/06, Darren Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
> night. Doing the banquet too.
> There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
> for also going.
>
> Darren Tracey
>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Ruby on Rails

2006-02-21 Thread Gavin Cooney

On the subject of WebDU, is anyone going to any of the day 0 training
sessions? I was considering going to the Ruby on Rails one.

http://www.aviditybytes.com/ruby_on_rails_workshop_sydney_australia/



Gav

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

Hi Daryl,

any ideas on this, does anyone else get the same output, i.e. there is
no onclick on the list item?

On 2/22/06, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Daryl,
>
> what you are suggesting sounds like a plan, however when I use the
> following syntax
> var thisInstance = this;
> myListItem.onclick = function () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( this ); }
>
> And output the dom as a string, the whole onclick event is not there, any 
> ideas?
>
> thanks.
>
> On 2/21/06, darryl lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your problem is that you need to reference the function in the onclick as
> > part of the INSTANCE of the object. Otherwise, the  onclick event is firing
> > a call to a global method.
> >
> > E.g.
> >
> > TabbedInterface.prototype.doMakeActive = function(obj)
> > {}
> >
> > TabbedInterface.prototype.doAddTab = function()
> > {
> > var thisInstance = this;
> >
> >  var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
> > var myLink =
> > document.createElement( "a" );
> > var myIFrame =
> > document.createElement( "iframe" );
> > myLink.onclick =
> > "return false;";
> > myLink.innerHTML =
> > linkText;
> > myLink.href = "";
> > myListItem.onclick
> > = function () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( this ); }
> >
> > }
> >
> > Darryl
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/21/06, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Doesn't work, see attached;
> > > 
> > > //var activeTab = null;
> > > function _doMakeActive( object )
> > > {
> > > var layerType = "iframe";
> > > if ( activeTab != null )
> > > {
> > >
> > activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
> > >
> > activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
> > > }
> > >
> > object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
> > > object.childNodes[ 0
> > ].style.color = "##fff";
> > > activeTab = object;
> > >
> > object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ "display" ] = "block";
> > > var listItemCollection =
> > object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName ( "li" );
> > > for ( var i = 0; i <
> > listItemCollection.length; i++ )
> > > {
> > > if (
> > listItemCollection[ i ] != object )
> > > {
> > >
> > listItemCollection[ i ].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[
> > 0
> > > ].style[ "display" ] = "none";
> > > }
> > > //alert(
> > listItemCollection[ i ].innerHTML );
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > function TabbedInterface(
> > identity )
> > > {
> > > this.activeTab = null;
> > > this.dom =
> > document.createElement( "ul" );
> > >  this.dom.id = identity;
> > > return this;
> > > }
> > > TabbedInterface.prototype =
> > > {
> > > init:function()
> > > {
> > > return this;
> > > },
> > > getActiveTab:function()
> > > {
> > > return
> > this.activeTab;
> > > },
> > > setActiveTab:function(
> > activeTab )
> > > {
> > >
> > this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
> > > return this;
> > > },
> > > getDOM:function()
> > > {
> > > return this.dom;
> > > },
> > > doAddTab:function(
> > linkText, source )
> > > {
> > > var myListItem =
> > document.createElement ( "li" );
> > > var myLink =
> > document.createElement( "a" );
> > > var myIFrame =
> > document.createElement( "iframe" );
> > > myLink.onclick =
> > "return false;";
> > > 

[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Chris Velevitch

On 2/22/06, Seona Bellamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Sadly, I'm not. :( Still recovering financially from last years interstate
> move. *sigh* Maybe next year...

The national (trans-Tasman) user group meeting on Wed night is free.


Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
www.flashdev.org.au

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Seona Bellamy
On 22/02/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's one week till day zero, so who from the list is going this year?\m/(-_-)\m/

Sadly, I'm not. :( Still recovering financially from last years interstate move. *sigh* Maybe next year...


Seona.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: high res windows logo

2006-02-21 Thread phaddon

On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:12:42PM +1100, Steve Onnis wrote:
> anyone know where i can get a high res windows logo from?

Google. Specifically Google Images.

"windows logo" turned up:

http://www.buildorbuy.org/images/wxp_v_illum_rgb.jpg

amongst others. 

(Copyright is up to you)

Cheers

Paul Haddon
Technical Services Manager 
Formstar Print Technologies



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] high res windows logo

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis



anyone know where i 
can get a high res windows logo from?
 
Steve
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---




[cfaussie] Re: National Adobe UG Meeting

2006-02-21 Thread Barry Beattie

Robin, you really have missed your calling as the "writer of copy" and
"protagonist of prose"

get ye self to the Fairfax publishers and see if there's a sunday
suppliment just waiting for your by-line...

we're expecting a post-webDU report to rival "The Man From Snowy River":

There was movement at the airport, for the word had passed around...

OK, off you go...





On 22/02/06, Robin Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Date:Wednesday 1st March 2006
> Time:5:30 pm early registration and cash bar, for 7:00 pm meeting
> start
> Where:   Star City Casino, Sydney Australia, Webdu conference venue
>
> Topic:   Hello Adobe!
>
> Once again the herds are gathering - the dusty expanse of Australasia
> thunders to the impact of hundreds of developers falling over as they
> rise staggering from their desks for their annual migration to Webdu,
> while the skies of the world fill with the twittering calls of the
> presenters, able to cover astonishing distances over water due to
> their massive bodily reserves of frequent flyer points...
>
> The Adobe team in the Pacific will take folks through how the "new"
> Adobe looks both globally and locally.  To whet your appetite for
> technical possibilities the two Marks will demo an application
> integrating Flex with LiveCycle.  The evening will finish up with an
> "Ask Adobe" session where you can ping local and overseas Adobe types
> with any questions you may have.  Steve Lambley, Mark Szulc and Mark
> Blair will host the session.
>
> Join us for socialising, drinks and early registration from 5:30.
> Note you do not need to attend Webdu to come to the meeting.
>
> See you there!
>
> __
>
> Robin Hilliard
> National UG Coordinator
>
>
>
>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Application.cfc refresh

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis



someone has been codin too much VB it seems

  -Original Message-From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Tom 
  MacKeanSent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:04 PMTo: 
  cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: Application.cfc 
  refresh
  Maybe on your computer... I had to put brackets around my if 
  _expression_
   
  Thanks
   
  Tom 
  On 2/22/06, Robin 
  Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  wrote: 
  On 
22/02/2006, at 1:43 PM, Robin Hilliard wrote:> Probably "best" 
enough...   if 
structKeyExists(url, "reset") 
{   
structClear(application);   
structClear(session);   
onApplicationStart();   
onSessionStart();    
}This improved version will even compile 
without syntax errors! :-P__Robin 
HilliardDirector - RocketBoots Pty LtdProfessional Services for 
Macromedia Technologies http://www.rocketboots.com.auFor 
schedule/availability call Pamela Higgins:w+61 7 
5451 0362m+61 419 677 
151e 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]or Direct:m+61 
418 414 341f+61 2 9798 
0070e[EMAIL PROTECTED]*** 
Quick! Ring Geoff up and beg him to accept your late -- IMPORTANT: 
This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named 
above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or 
unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of 
humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not 
authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating 
social fauxpas. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, 
although the mutt next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Anyone use xcode?

2006-02-21 Thread Haikal Saadh

Anyone used xcode for CF development?

-- 
Haikal Saadh, Applications Programmer
Teaching and Learning Support Services
K405, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Campus
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 3864 8633
CRICOS No. 00213J


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: SQL Server 2005 Giveaway

2006-02-21 Thread Dawes, Chris


Hmmm interesting

Can someone actually confirm or deny before the end of this week
'officially' that the SQL and/or VS versions will be NFR or dev for
delegates.

My desire to register now depends on that answer.

What will Adobe be giving away? Any change of a few video bundles with
Flash going out?

Cheers,

Chris Dawes

Web Systems Administrator
Business Information Services
Information Technology
Commander Australia

Tel: (02) 9030 1163
Fax: (02) 9030 1163
Mob: 0433 99 44 20

Level 3, Tower 1 Darling Park
Sydney, NSW 2000



Order from the widest range of IT equipment for your business at
www.commanderonline.com.au

-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vorn
Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 4:55 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: SQL Server 2005 Giveaway


Forget Microsoft conventions - how about Adobe give away free products
at WebDU?

On 2/17/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Interesting strategy.
>
> Go to competitors fairs and give away your products.
>
> I like it, hope Adobe attend the Microsoft ones and return the favour.
>
> Regards




This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please 
note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient 
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The 
company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by 
this email.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Application.cfc refresh

2006-02-21 Thread Tom MacKean
Maybe on your computer... I had to put brackets around my if _expression_
 
Thanks
 
Tom 
On 2/22/06, Robin Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/02/2006, at 1:43 PM, Robin Hilliard wrote:> Probably "best" enough...
   if structKeyExists(url, "reset") {   structClear(application);   structClear(session);   onApplicationStart();   onSessionStart();
   }This improved version will even compile without syntax errors! :-P__Robin HilliardDirector - RocketBoots Pty LtdProfessional Services for Macromedia Technologies
http://www.rocketboots.com.auFor schedule/availability call Pamela Higgins:w+61 7 5451 0362m+61 419 677 151e
[EMAIL PROTECTED]or Direct:m+61 418 414 341f+61 2 9798 0070e[EMAIL PROTECTED]*** Quick! Ring Geoff up and beg him to accept your late
-- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social fauxpas. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the mutt next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: Application.cfc refresh

2006-02-21 Thread Robin Hilliard


On 22/02/2006, at 1:43 PM, Robin Hilliard wrote:

> Probably "best" enough...


if structKeyExists(url, "reset") {
structClear(application);
structClear(session);
onApplicationStart();
onSessionStart();
}


This improved version will even compile without syntax errors! :-P

__

Robin Hilliard
Director - RocketBoots Pty Ltd
Professional Services for Macromedia Technologies
http://www.rocketboots.com.au

For schedule/availability call Pamela Higgins:
w+61 7 5451 0362
m+61 419 677 151
e[EMAIL PROTECTED]

or Direct:
m+61 418 414 341
f+61 2 9798 0070
e[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  *** Quick! Ring Geoff up and beg him to accept your late  
registration! ***



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Application.cfc refresh

2006-02-21 Thread Robin Hilliard

On 22/02/2006, at 1:17 PM, Tom MacKean wrote:

> What is the best way to clear old values to make this change  
> happen? Anybody got a "best practice"?

In onRequestStart:


if structKeyExists(url, "reset") {
structClear(application);
structClear(session);
onApplicationStart();
onSessionStart();


Probably "best" enough...

__

Robin Hilliard
Director - RocketBoots Pty Ltd
Professional Services for Macromedia Technologies
http://www.rocketboots.com.au

For schedule/availability call Pamela Higgins:
w+61 7 5451 0362
m+61 419 677 151
e[EMAIL PROTECTED]

or Direct:
m+61 418 414 341
f+61 2 9798 0070
e[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  *** What do you mean you haven't registered for Webdu! Fie!! ***

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] National Adobe UG Meeting

2006-02-21 Thread Robin Hilliard

Date:Wednesday 1st March 2006
Time:5:30 pm early registration and cash bar, for 7:00 pm meeting  
start
Where:   Star City Casino, Sydney Australia, Webdu conference venue

Topic:   Hello Adobe!

Once again the herds are gathering - the dusty expanse of Australasia  
thunders to the impact of hundreds of developers falling over as they  
rise staggering from their desks for their annual migration to Webdu,  
while the skies of the world fill with the twittering calls of the  
presenters, able to cover astonishing distances over water due to  
their massive bodily reserves of frequent flyer points...

The Adobe team in the Pacific will take folks through how the "new"  
Adobe looks both globally and locally.  To whet your appetite for  
technical possibilities the two Marks will demo an application  
integrating Flex with LiveCycle.  The evening will finish up with an  
"Ask Adobe" session where you can ping local and overseas Adobe types  
with any questions you may have.  Steve Lambley, Mark Szulc and Mark  
Blair will host the session.

Join us for socialising, drinks and early registration from 5:30.   
Note you do not need to attend Webdu to come to the meeting.

See you there!

__

Robin Hilliard
National UG Coordinator



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Application.cfc refresh

2006-02-21 Thread Tom MacKean
That makes sense. Ta.
On 2/22/06, Shib71 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OnApplicationStart only runs the first time a page with that application name is run. You should only put stuff that will never change, or needs to be initialized there. If you're playing with those settings for development, maybe you should put them in onrequest, then move them back for production. 
Blair 

On 2/22/06, Tom MacKean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 

OK. I'm starting to get the hang of these Application.cfc things. However, if I change a value, that change is not reflected straight away.
 
eg.   if, in my OnApplicationStart function, I define . Later, I want to change this to sydneyivf_server, the change doesn't happen.
 
A cfdump will still show APPLICATION.dsn as being sydneyivf_local
 
What is the best way to clear old values to make this change happen? Anybody got a "best practice"?
 
Thanks,
 
Tom-- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social fauxpas. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the mutt next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: Application.cfc refresh

2006-02-21 Thread Shib71
OnApplicationStart only runs the first time a page with that application name is run. You should only put stuff that will never change, or needs to be initialized there. If you're playing with those settings for development, maybe you should put them in onrequest, then move them back for production.
BlairOn 2/22/06, Tom MacKean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK. I'm starting to get the hang of these Application.cfc things. However, if I change a value, that change is not reflected straight away.
 
eg.   if, in my OnApplicationStart function, I define . Later, I want to change this to sydneyivf_server, the change doesn't happen.
 
A cfdump will still show APPLICATION.dsn as being sydneyivf_local
 
What is the best way to clear old values to make this change happen? Anybody got a "best practice"?
 
Thanks,
 
Tom-- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social fauxpas. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the mutt next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 






--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Application.cfc refresh

2006-02-21 Thread Tom MacKean
OK. I'm starting to get the hang of these Application.cfc things. However, if I change a value, that change is not reflected straight away.
 
eg.   if, in my OnApplicationStart function, I define . Later, I want to change this to sydneyivf_server, the change doesn't happen.
 
A cfdump will still show APPLICATION.dsn as being sydneyivf_local
 
What is the best way to clear old values to make this change happen? Anybody got a "best practice"?
 
Thanks,
 
Tom-- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social fauxpas. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the mutt next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Gavin Cooney

On 2/22/06, Jon Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/22/06, Gavin Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > anyway, i'm gonna stay away from the sambucas this year. They always
> > end in tears.
>
> You say that now...
>
> Someone remember to take a digital camera.

Good idea! i'll try to get everyone at webDU to do a shakey face picture for me

www.flickr.com/photos/gavcooney/tags/shakeyfaces/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Jon Austin

On 2/22/06, Gavin Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyway, i'm gonna stay away from the sambucas this year. They always
> end in tears.

You say that now...

Someone remember to take a digital camera.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Mark Stanton

> anyway, i'm gonna stay away from the sambucas this year. They always
> end in tears.

Yeah right...

--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Gavin Cooney

thanks for reminding me.

"necking"... it's just a word that i never heard used that way before!

anyway, i'm gonna stay away from the sambucas this year. They always
end in tears.

Gav

On 2/22/06, Mark Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone remember this classic http://www.bloginblack.de/archives/000617.cfm?
>
> I guess I'll be down in the casino "necking zambuccas" with Gav &
> Finula again...
>
> --
> Mark Stanton

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread M@ Bourke
it's all really tricky:if you put sydney and melbourne ppl on the same table, it'll start a
punch up. if you seperate them to two tables you'll start an "animalhouse" style food fight.Haha, I recently  bought a ($20)  3 dvd pack with  road trip, Old school and  Animal House, so was just  watching the food fight the other day. 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Mark Stanton

Anyone remember this classic http://www.bloginblack.de/archives/000617.cfm?

I guess I'll be down in the casino "necking zambuccas" with Gav &
Finula again...

--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Barry Beattie

it's all really tricky:

if you put sydney and melbourne ppl on the same table, it'll start a
punch up. if you seperate them to two tables you'll start an "animal
house" style food fight.

damned if you do and 


On 22/02/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be doing the banquet as well.
>
> how is the seating for this arranged, is it first in best seats or are they
> prearranged?
> Maybe we can all sit at the 1 table?
> I have no idea how it works.
>
>
>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Andrew Mercer
Last year you got put into a 'team' which became your dinning buddiesOn 2/22/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:I'll be doing the banquet as well. how is the seating for this arranged, is it first in best seats or are they prearranged?
Maybe we can all sit at the 1 table?I have no idea how it works.





--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread M@ Bourke
I'll be doing the banquet as well. how is the seating for this arranged, is it first in best seats or are they prearranged?Maybe we can all sit at the 1 table?I have no idea how it works.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Darren Tracey

I'm going. Flying down Wednesday morning and flying out late Friday
night. Doing the banquet too.
There's a bunch of other peole from the large banking company I work
for also going.

Darren Tracey


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

is there going to be the chill out room this year and the WI-FI net
connection?

-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Kear
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:30 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?



I'm thrilled to say the world smiled on me, generosity fell my way
this year, and I'm going too.   I can't afford for Bad Mike to go
however.  So all those who were anxious to meet him will be
disappointed.  You'll have to make do with me instead.

I'm told that the fiction about ColdFusion and flash subjects in the
agenda is a ruse, and that the main activities all day are blackjack,
roulette, watching strippers and mudwrestling.   Is that right?   I
mean = really - two full days of coldfusion techniques and tricks?/
Yeah right  LOL!!


Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com



> -- Forwarded message --
> From: M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Feb 22, 2006 9:35 AM
> Subject: [cfaussie] WebDu Who's going ?
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
>
>
> It's one week till day zero,
> so who from the list is going this year?
>
> \m/(-_-)\m/
>
>
>





--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Mike Kear

I'm thrilled to say the world smiled on me, generosity fell my way
this year, and I'm going too.   I can't afford for Bad Mike to go
however.  So all those who were anxious to meet him will be
disappointed.  You'll have to make do with me instead.

I'm told that the fiction about ColdFusion and flash subjects in the
agenda is a ruse, and that the main activities all day are blackjack,
roulette, watching strippers and mudwrestling.   Is that right?   I
mean = really - two full days of coldfusion techniques and tricks?/  
Yeah right  LOL!!


Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com



> -- Forwarded message --
> From: M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Feb 22, 2006 9:35 AM
> Subject: [cfaussie] WebDu Who's going ?
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
>
>
> It's one week till day zero,
> so who from the list is going this year?
>
> \m/(-_-)\m/
>
>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Collins

Quoting "M@ Bourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's one week till day zero,
> so who from the list is going this year?

Yup, I'll be there.  Speaking on Day 1 at 3:00PM.  Come visit if you're
interested!

Oh, and don't forget to say happy birthday to my wife, Alli, who will 
be at the
banquet with us!

Steve
-- 
Steve Collins
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W www.stephencollins.org
ICQ 1014940 | MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo trib
Google Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Skype trib22

The ACME Guide - Best practice development using
Apache - ColdFusion MX - MySQL - Eclipse/CFEclipse
   www.stephencollins.org/acme/


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: Q: BlueDragon

2006-02-21 Thread Charlie Arehart

That is honestly the first time I've heard of any such issue on other than OS 
X. I realize it may be impossible for you
to recreate (not to mention likely not something you want to bother with), but 
just know that we would absolutely want
to understand and resolve whatever issue you had, if we had information to 
recreate the problem. It should install and
uninstall just fine and has for all but OS X customers, to my knowledge. 

Again, though, if you have any more on that or any other issues, do share them 
on the BlueDragon Interest List. I'm
about to head out for 10 days vacation, totally detached for most of it, so 
would not want your questions to linger
unresolved. I can tell you that several folks on this very list (CFAussie) are 
also on the BD Interest List, so you
won't be the lone Aussie. :-)

Charlie Arehart
CTO, New Atlanta Communications, makers of BlueDragon
(678) 256-5395 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.newatlanta.com/bluedragon/

 

> -Original Message-
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:02 PM
> To: cfaussie
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Q: BlueDragon
> 
> 
> Hi Charlie,
> 
> Thanks for the reply. I figured out on my own accord what the 
> issue was. Turns out that the uninstall - doesn't actually 
> uninstall everything. I'm use to my hand being held by 
> Macroer I mean Adobe when it comes to uninstalling applications.
> 
> What I had found is that I had to physically remove each 
> BlueDragon instance from the registry and then re-install. By 
> the way not running OSX, but Windows 2003 SBS. So I got it 
> working in the end. Don't get me wrong I would like to 
> continue working with BlueDragon and Adobe side by side but 
> last few days got me a bit jittery.
> 
> Now on to the next issue. 
> 
> Thanks for your help
> Jeremy


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Andrew Muller

I'm there...

-- Forwarded message --
From: M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 22, 2006 9:35 AM
Subject: [cfaussie] WebDu Who's going ?
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com


It's one week till day zero,
so who from the list is going this year?

\m/(-_-)\m/







--
---
Andrew Muller
http://www.rebelspirit.com.au

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Gavin Cooney

i'll be there. At the Banquet too... the best part last year. It'll be
good to meet you all again.

On 2/22/06, Tom MacKean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be a WebDU virgin this year. Be gentle with me. (Not going to the
> banquet, though)
>
> Tom MacKean
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Jon Austin

I'm flying down to Sydney, but for a weekend of fishing for my birthday. :)

I vote next year to change the date to another weekend so it doesn't
interfere with my birthday weekend.

On 2/22/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> im going

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis



im 
going

  -Original Message-From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Adam 
  ChapmanSent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:40 AMTo: 
  cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going 
  ?
  
  > It's one week till day zero, > so who from 
  the list is going this year?
   
  Myself and Drew 
  Parker are going.. see you there!
  
   
  
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Tom MacKean
I'll be a WebDU virgin this year. Be gentle with me. (Not going to the banquet, though)
 
Tom MacKean 
On 2/22/06, Lindsay Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll be there.Most likely downstairs in the Irish pub, as usual :p-- 
Lindsay Evanshttp://lindsayevans.com/ 

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: Q: BlueDragon

2006-02-21 Thread

Hi Charlie,

Thanks for the reply. I figured out on my own accord what the issue
was. Turns out that the uninstall - doesn't actually uninstall
everything. I'm use to my hand being held by Macroer I mean Adobe
when it comes to uninstalling applications.

What I had found is that I had to physically remove each BlueDragon
instance from the registry and then re-install. By the way not running
OSX, but Windows 2003 SBS. So I got it working in the end. Don't get me
wrong I would like to continue working with BlueDragon and Adobe side
by side but last few days got me a bit jittery.

Now on to the next issue. 

Thanks for your help
Jeremy


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Lindsay Evans
I'll be there.Most likely downstairs in the Irish pub, as usual :p-- Lindsay Evanshttp://lindsayevans.com/



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Adam Chapman








> It's one week till day zero, 
> so who from the list is going this year?

 

Myself and Drew Parker are going.. see you
there!



 

Cheers,
Adam






--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---






[cfaussie] Re: WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread Mark Mandel
I wish I was, but I'm not :o(MarkOn 22/02/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:It's one week till day zero, so who from the list is going this year?
\m/(-_-)\m/-- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]W: www.compoundtheory.comICQ: 3094740

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] WebDu Who's going ?

2006-02-21 Thread M@ Bourke
It's one week till day zero, so who from the list is going this year?\m/(-_-)\m/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

Hi Daryl,

what you are suggesting sounds like a plan, however when I use the
following syntax
var thisInstance = this;
myListItem.onclick = function () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( this ); }

And output the dom as a string, the whole onclick event is not there, any ideas?

thanks.

On 2/21/06, darryl lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your problem is that you need to reference the function in the onclick as
> part of the INSTANCE of the object. Otherwise, the  onclick event is firing
> a call to a global method.
>
> E.g.
>
> TabbedInterface.prototype.doMakeActive = function(obj)
> {}
>
> TabbedInterface.prototype.doAddTab = function()
> {
> var thisInstance = this;
>
>  var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
> var myLink =
> document.createElement( "a" );
> var myIFrame =
> document.createElement( "iframe" );
> myLink.onclick =
> "return false;";
> myLink.innerHTML =
> linkText;
> myLink.href = "";
> myListItem.onclick
> = function () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( this ); }
>
> }
>
> Darryl
>
>
>
> On 2/21/06, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Doesn't work, see attached;
> > 
> > //var activeTab = null;
> > function _doMakeActive( object )
> > {
> > var layerType = "iframe";
> > if ( activeTab != null )
> > {
> >
> activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
> >
> activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
> > }
> >
> object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
> > object.childNodes[ 0
> ].style.color = "##fff";
> > activeTab = object;
> >
> object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ "display" ] = "block";
> > var listItemCollection =
> object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName ( "li" );
> > for ( var i = 0; i <
> listItemCollection.length; i++ )
> > {
> > if (
> listItemCollection[ i ] != object )
> > {
> >
> listItemCollection[ i ].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[
> 0
> > ].style[ "display" ] = "none";
> > }
> > //alert(
> listItemCollection[ i ].innerHTML );
> > }
> > }
> >
> > function TabbedInterface(
> identity )
> > {
> > this.activeTab = null;
> > this.dom =
> document.createElement( "ul" );
> >  this.dom.id = identity;
> > return this;
> > }
> > TabbedInterface.prototype =
> > {
> > init:function()
> > {
> > return this;
> > },
> > getActiveTab:function()
> > {
> > return
> this.activeTab;
> > },
> > setActiveTab:function(
> activeTab )
> > {
> >
> this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
> > return this;
> > },
> > getDOM:function()
> > {
> > return this.dom;
> > },
> > doAddTab:function(
> linkText, source )
> > {
> > var myListItem =
> document.createElement ( "li" );
> > var myLink =
> document.createElement( "a" );
> > var myIFrame =
> document.createElement( "iframe" );
> > myLink.onclick =
> "return false;";
> > myLink.innerHTML
> = linkText;
> > myLink.href = "";
> >
> myListItem.onclick = function () { doMakeActive( this ); }
> >
> >
> //myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
> >
> myListItem.appendChild( myLink );
> > myIFrame.src =
> source;
> >
> myListItem.appendChild( myIFrame );
> >
> this.getDOM().appendChild( myListIte

[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread darryl lyons
Actually, the context of 'this' when passed to the doMakeAction method will be the DOM element. Either way, the code given will work.On 2/21/06, Gary Menzel
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

One tiny change still required...
 
The "this" passed over in the last line of the function should be "myListItem".  Passing over "this" will pass the TabbedInterface object (but it is the LI that is required).
 
e.g.
 
  myListItem. () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( myListItem ); } 
Explaining. you need the "thisInstance" as a var so that it will be available when the inline function (above) is called.  You need the myListItem as a var for the same reason.  The anonymous function created by the function() call requires those to variables to be in scope (varing them will do this) when the function is actually called.  Because the function is declared inline inside another function/method then anything that is declared VAR there will be visible when the function is actually triggered by the onclick call.

 
Gary
 
On 2/21/06, darryl lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Your problem is that you need to reference the function in the onclick as part of the INSTANCE of the object. Otherwise, the  onclick event is firing a call to a global method.
E.g.TabbedInterface.prototype.doMakeActive = function(obj){}TabbedInterface.prototype.doAddTab = function(){var thisInstance = this; var myListItem = document.createElement

( "li" );var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );

myLink. false;"; myLink.innerHTML = linkText;myLink.href = ""
myListItem. () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( this ); }}Darryl
On 2/21/06, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 > wrote: 
Doesn't work, see attached;
//var activeTab = null;
function _doMakeActive( object )
{
var layerType = "iframe";
if ( activeTab != null )
{
activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
}
object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
object.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##fff";
activeTab = object;
object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ "display" ] = "block";
var listItemCollection = object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName ( "li" );
for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; i++ )
{
if ( listItemCollection[ i ] != object )
{
listItemCollection[ i ].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0
].style[ "display" ] = "none";
}
//alert( listItemCollection[ i ].innerHTML );
}
}

function TabbedInterface( identity )
{
this.activeTab = null;
this.dom = document.createElement( "ul" );
this.dom.id = identity;
return this;
}
TabbedInterface.prototype =
{
init:function()
{
return this;
},
getActiveTab:function()
{
return this.activeTab;
},
setActiveTab:function( activeTab )
{
this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
return this;
},
getDOM:function()
{
return this.dom;
},
doAddTab:function( linkText, source )

[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Gary Menzel
 
One tiny change still required...
 
The "this" passed over in the last line of the function should be "myListItem".  Passing over "this" will pass the TabbedInterface object (but it is the LI that is required).
 
e.g.
 
  myListItem. () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( myListItem ); } 
Explaining. you need the "thisInstance" as a var so that it will be available when the inline function (above) is called.  You need the myListItem as a var for the same reason.  The anonymous function created by the function() call requires those to variables to be in scope (varing them will do this) when the function is actually called.  Because the function is declared inline inside another function/method then anything that is declared VAR there will be visible when the function is actually triggered by the onclick call.

 
Gary
 
On 2/21/06, darryl lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your problem is that you need to reference the function in the onclick as part of the INSTANCE of the object. Otherwise, the  onclick event is firing a call to a global method.
E.g.TabbedInterface.prototype.doMakeActive = function(obj){}TabbedInterface.prototype.doAddTab = function(){var thisInstance = this; var myListItem = document.createElement
( "li" );var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
myLink. false;"; myLink.innerHTML = linkText;myLink.href = ""
myListItem. () { thisInstance.doMakeActive( this ); }}Darryl
On 2/21/06, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > wrote: 
Doesn't work, see attached;
//var activeTab = null;
function _doMakeActive( object )
{
var layerType = "iframe";
if ( activeTab != null )
{
activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
}
object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
object.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##fff";
activeTab = object;
object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ "display" ] = "block";
var listItemCollection = object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName ( "li" );
for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; i++ )
{
if ( listItemCollection[ i ] != object )
{
listItemCollection[ i ].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0
].style[ "display" ] = "none";
}
//alert( listItemCollection[ i ].innerHTML );
}
}

function TabbedInterface( identity )
{
this.activeTab = null;
this.dom = document.createElement( "ul" );
this.dom.id = identity;
return this;
}
TabbedInterface.prototype =
{
init:function()
{
return this;
},
getActiveTab:function()
{
return this.activeTab;
},
setActiveTab:function( activeTab )
{
this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
return this;
},
getDOM:function()
{
return this.dom;
},
doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
{
var myListItem = document.createElement ( "li" );
var myLink = documen

[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread darryl lyons
Your problem is that you need to reference the function in the onclick as part of the INSTANCE of the object. Otherwise, the  onclick event is firing a call to a global method.E.g.TabbedInterface.prototype.doMakeActive
 = function(obj){}TabbedInterface.prototype.doAddTab = function(){var thisInstance = this; var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );var myLink = 
document.createElement( "a" );var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );myLink. false;";
myLink.innerHTML = linkText;myLink.href = "">myListItem. () { 
thisInstance.doMakeActive( this ); }}DarrylOn 2/21/06, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Doesn't work, see attached;
//var activeTab = null;
function _doMakeActive( object )
{
var layerType = "iframe";
if ( activeTab != null )
{
activeTab.style.backgroundColor = "##D4D0C8";
activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##000";
}
object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
object.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##fff";
activeTab = object;
object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 ].style[ "display" ] = "block";
var listItemCollection = object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName ( "li" );
for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; i++ )
{
if ( listItemCollection[ i ] != object )
{
listItemCollection[ i ].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0
].style[ "display" ] = "none";
}
//alert( listItemCollection[ i ].innerHTML );
}
}

function TabbedInterface( identity )
{
this.activeTab = null;
this.dom = document.createElement( "ul" );
this.dom.id = identity;
return this;
}
TabbedInterface.prototype =
{
init:function()
{
return this;
},
getActiveTab:function()
{
return this.activeTab;
},
setActiveTab:function( activeTab )
{
this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
return this;
},
getDOM:function()
{
return this.dom;
},
doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
{
var myListItem = document.createElement ( "li" );
var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
myLink. false;";
myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
myLink.href = ""
myListItem. () { doMakeActive( this ); }

//myListItem. this );";
myListItem.appendChild( myLink );
myIFrame.src = "">myListItem.appendChild( myIFrame );
this.getDOM().appendChild( myListItem );

return this;
},
doWrite:function() // W

[cfaussie] Re: Q: BlueDragon

2006-02-21 Thread Charlie Arehart



Jeremy, M@'s right. The BD Interest list really 
is the best place to discuss this:
 
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index.cfm
 
For 
one reason, it's staffed by our engineers and many enthusiastic customers who 
all love to help solve any such problems. For another, there may be some on this 
list who would prefer not to see any extended discussion of BlueDragon. The list 
is free, and very low-volume. Sign up above. Also, there is still more useful 
self-help info (including a search feature that searches all the interest list, 
our FAQs, our docs, and more), all available on this page:
 
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/
 
Finally, as to your problem, I won't make you go to the list just to hear 
at least one possible answer. :-)  Are you using OS X? If so, there was a 
problem in an older release of BD where it would not uninstall one hidden 
file. See this FAQ for more:
 
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon/self_help/faq/detail?faqId=263
 
If 
that's not it, please do send the question instead to the interest list. It's 
really in your interest (pardon the pun) to be hooked up to that list. You'll 
have a whole community of people ready and willing to help with any challenges. 
More than that, you'll learn a lot about working with BD and taking advantage of 
features, etc.
 
Charlie ArehartCTO, New Atlanta 
Communications, makers of BlueDragon(678) 256-5395 [EMAIL PROTECTED]www.newatlanta.com/bluedragon/
 

  
  
  From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M@ 
  BourkeSent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:11 PMTo: 
  cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: Q: 
  BlueDragon
  >Has anyone had this issue? No>If so how did 
  they uninstall it TOTALLY.The Bluedragon list would be best for this, 
  although Charlie does read cfaussie so he might chirp in here or someone else 
  may, but for the best BD help you can get then check out the BD mailing list 

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

Doesn't work, see attached;

//var activeTab = null;
function _doMakeActive( object )
{
var layerType = "iframe";
if ( activeTab != null )
{
activeTab.style.backgroundColor = 
"##D4D0C8";
activeTab.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = 
"##000";
}
object.style.backgroundColor = "##0A246A";
object.childNodes[ 0 ].style.color = "##fff";
activeTab = object;
object.getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0 
].style[ "display" ] = "block";
var listItemCollection = 
object.parentNode.getElementsByTagName( "li" );
for ( var i = 0; i < listItemCollection.length; 
i++ )
{
if ( listItemCollection[ i ] != object )
{
listItemCollection[ i 
].getElementsByTagName( layerType )[ 0
].style[ "display" ] = "none";
}
//alert( listItemCollection[ i 
].innerHTML );
}
}

function TabbedInterface( identity )
{
this.activeTab = null;
this.dom = document.createElement( "ul" );
this.dom.id = identity;
return this;
}
TabbedInterface.prototype =
{
init:function()
{
return this;
},
getActiveTab:function()
{
return this.activeTab;
},
setActiveTab:function( activeTab )
{
this.setActiveTab = activeTab;
return this;
},
getDOM:function()
{
return this.dom;
},
doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
{
var myListItem = 
document.createElement( "li" );
var myLink = document.createElement( 
"a" );
var myIFrame = document.createElement( 
"iframe" );
myLink.onclick = "return false;";
myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
myLink.href = "";
myListItem.onclick = function () { 
doMakeActive( this ); }

//myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( 
this );";
myListItem.appendChild( myLink );
myIFrame.src = source;
myListItem.appendChild( myIFrame );
this.getDOM().appendChild( myListItem );

return this;
},
doWrite:function() // Writes the DOM to the 
document
{
document.write( this.getDOM().outerHTML 
);
alert( this.getDOM().outerHTML );
return this;
},
doMakeActive:function( object, selfReference )
{
alert( 'yup' );
var layerType = "iframe";
var activeTab = this.activeTab;
if ( activeTab != null )
{
activeTab.style.backgroundColor 
= "##D4D0C8";
activeTab.childNodes[ 0 
].style.color = "##000";
}
object.style.backgroundColor = 
"##0A246A";

[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

Then do it like I showed you and it should work

-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:38 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object


I am using prototype;

TabbedInterface.prototype =
{
init:function()
{
return this;
},

.


doMakeActive( this ); is between quotes as it needs to pass in the
object it is attached to, it will be attached to a list item  and
that is what it needs to pass in that function.

The problem is doMakeActive is a method of the object, but we don't
know what the reference name to the object is untill instantiation, if
I knew it before hand I could do myListItem.onclick =
"ReferenceName.doMakeActive( this );"


On 2/21/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try this
>
> doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
> {
>var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
>var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
>var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
>myLink.onclick = "return false;";
>myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
>myLink.href = "";
>myListItem.onclick = function () {
>doMakeActive( this );
>}
>return this;
> },
>
> That is ofcourse you have the doAddTab function associated with the rest
of
> the object.
>
> Probably better to use prototypes for something like this
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
> Of Taco Fleur
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:22 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [cfaussie] [OT] Reference to JS object
>
>
> I have a JS object with the following method;
>
> doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
> {
>var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
>var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
>var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
>myLink.onclick = "return false;";
>myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
>myLink.href = "";
>myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
> 
>return this;
> },
>
> The problem is with myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
> as it should really have a reference to the object itself, eg.
> myListItem.onclick = "SomeObject.doMakeActive( this );";
>
> But ofcourse I don't know what SomeObject is until the object is
> instantiated like so;
> myObject = new SomeName().init();
>
> Does anyone know a way around this?
>
> --
> Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au
> Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet
Solutions
> an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 .
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au
Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions
an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 .




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

I am using prototype;

TabbedInterface.prototype =
{
init:function()
{
return this;
},

.


doMakeActive( this ); is between quotes as it needs to pass in the
object it is attached to, it will be attached to a list item  and
that is what it needs to pass in that function.

The problem is doMakeActive is a method of the object, but we don't
know what the reference name to the object is untill instantiation, if
I knew it before hand I could do myListItem.onclick =
"ReferenceName.doMakeActive( this );"


On 2/21/06, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try this
>
> doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
> {
>var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
>var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
>var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
>myLink.onclick = "return false;";
>myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
>myLink.href = "";
>myListItem.onclick = function () {
>doMakeActive( this );
>}
>return this;
> },
>
> That is ofcourse you have the doAddTab function associated with the rest of
> the object.
>
> Probably better to use prototypes for something like this
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Taco Fleur
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:22 PM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [cfaussie] [OT] Reference to JS object
>
>
> I have a JS object with the following method;
>
> doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
> {
>var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
>var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
>var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
>myLink.onclick = "return false;";
>myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
>myLink.href = "";
>myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
> 
>return this;
> },
>
> The problem is with myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
> as it should really have a reference to the object itself, eg.
> myListItem.onclick = "SomeObject.doMakeActive( this );";
>
> But ofcourse I don't know what SomeObject is until the object is
> instantiated like so;
> myObject = new SomeName().init();
>
> Does anyone know a way around this?
>
> --
> Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au
> Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions
> an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 .
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au
Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions
an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 …

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Steve Onnis

Try this

doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
{
var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
myLink.onclick = "return false;";
myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
myLink.href = "";
myListItem.onclick = function () {
doMakeActive( this );
}
return this;
},

That is ofcourse you have the doAddTab function associated with the rest of
the object.  

Probably better to use prototypes for something like this



-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:22 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] [OT] Reference to JS object


I have a JS object with the following method;

doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
{
var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
myLink.onclick = "return false;";
myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
myLink.href = "";
myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";

return this;
},

The problem is with myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
as it should really have a reference to the object itself, eg.
myListItem.onclick = "SomeObject.doMakeActive( this );";

But ofcourse I don't know what SomeObject is until the object is
instantiated like so;
myObject = new SomeName().init();

Does anyone know a way around this?

--
Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au
Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions
an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 .




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] [OT] Reference to JS object

2006-02-21 Thread Taco Fleur

I have a JS object with the following method;

doAddTab:function( linkText, source )
{
var myListItem = document.createElement( "li" );
var myLink = document.createElement( "a" );
var myIFrame = document.createElement( "iframe" );
myLink.onclick = "return false;";
myLink.innerHTML = linkText;
myLink.href = "";
myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";

return this;
},

The problem is with myListItem.onclick = "doMakeActive( this );";
as it should really have a reference to the object itself, eg.
myListItem.onclick = "SomeObject.doMakeActive( this );";

But ofcourse I don't know what SomeObject is until the object is
instantiated like so;
myObject = new SomeName().init();

Does anyone know a way around this?

--
Taco Fleur - http://www.pacificfox.com.au
Web Design, Web development, Graphic Design and Complete Internet Solutions
an industry leader with commercial IT experience since 1994 …

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: enterprise upgrade - can someone please confirm?

2006-02-21 Thread Robin Hilliard

On 21/02/2006, at 4:44 PM, Steve Onnis wrote:

> is that RRP now??  its gone up bout $600 then has it?

No, that's me getting the price list very wrong (!!) - which is why I  
normally leave the licensing to Pam.  Here are the correct (much  
lower) prices for CFMX7:

ProductBox   TLP Level R
------   ---
CFMX7 Enterprise   $9,991 $9,466
CFMX7 Enterprise upgrade from 6 ent$4,998 $4,733
CFMX7 Enterprise upgrade from 6 std$8,910 $8,440
CFMX7 Enterprise upgrade from 7 std$8,025 $7,600
CFMX7 Standard $2,169 $2,051
CFMX7 Standard upgrade from 6 Standard $1,087 $1,025

These prices include GST and are similar to those on Harris  
Technology's site.  Pam did a lot of work on the new pricing - I  
think she said that across the board it went up slightly, but not  
that much.

Box pricing is the basic off the shelf physical box price.  TLP is  
the Adobe equivalent of the old Macromedia Volume Licensing Program  
(MVLP).  Companies that were on MVLP are supposed to have received  
emails migrating them into the new program although a few of our  
customers seem to have fallen through the gaps.  Generally purchases  
involving CF Enterprise are large enough to get you into the first  
level (R) - there are also S and T levels.  Some teams on this list  
(e.g. Suncorp) are on another licensing program called CLP - if you  
work in government or a large organisation like Suncorp you should  
check with your procurement department or legal department (CLP  
involves a legal contract) to find out what your CLP account number  
is.  Again, if you have any questions about licensing Pam knows a lot  
more than me and she's happy to help out or refer you to the right  
people in Adobe to sort out your licensing status - she'll be walking  
around at Webdu - say hi.

Thanks,
Robin

__

Robin Hilliard
Director - RocketBoots Pty Ltd
Professional Services for Macromedia Technologies
http://www.rocketboots.com.au

For schedule/availability call Pamela Higgins:
w+61 7 5451 0362
m+61 419 677 151
e[EMAIL PROTECTED]

or Direct:
m+61 418 414 341
f+61 2 9798 0070
e[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  *** Register for WebDU http://www.mxdu.com 2-3 March 2006 ***



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---