[cfaussie] Re: Quoting - calculate the planning to dev to testing ratio

2006-04-22 Thread Peter Tilbrook
I agree about the design component. But if the client has no idea of what they want - or even some of the steps to get there...

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.  To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


[cfaussie] Re: Quoting - calculate the planning to dev to testing ratio

2006-04-22 Thread Duncan

There are a lot of people doing 110% around here!

Lately I have been of the impression that generally you should spend
plenty of time in design, and less in dev and about the same again in
testing because if you get the design right, wireframes, func spec etc
then the client can see what they will get before you actually get
dirty. This way the dirty stage doesnt get ugly when you have to
change things because you didnt get the right questions asked in req
gathering stage.

I was wondering how this view is received by others.

Duncan

On 4/18/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The requirement stage is the most important stage of any project
> as the dev and testing stage will refer directly back to the requirement
> stage
> I say
> 30% requirement stage (allowing back and forth crap during dev)
> 55% dev
> 20% testing (allowing back and forth crap)
> 5% maths classes
>
> M@
>
>
>
>
>  >
>


--
Duncan I Loxton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---