[cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101

2007-06-30 Thread Andrew Scott
No, even shared you can cluster instances providing more for your buck.



On 6/30/07, Steve Onnis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Why yes?

 The only reason i can see is a service perspective, being able to offer
 clients their own VS without having to load up racks with equipment.  But
 then what you would be charging a client to do that, you could pick up a
 decent server for a couple of grand and give them that.  You still have all
 the over heads of software licensing.

  --
 *From:* cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
 Behalf Of *Andrew Scott
 *Sent:* Saturday, 30 June 2007 3:41 PM
 *To:* cfaussie@googlegroups.com
 *Subject:* [cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101


  In hosting I would say yes..



 On 6/30/07, Steve Onnis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  So really the only benefits would be hardware costs, but you would need
  to
  be upgrading things like ram, drive capacityy and cpu to maintain
  performance, and I guess data center costs for rack space.
 
  So is it really worth it?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf
  Of Bruce Trevarthen (B2 Limited)
  Sent: Saturday, 30 June 2007 3:36 PM
  To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
  Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101
 
 
  An interesting call for Adobe to make, or perhaps it's in the EULA, but
  I
  would assume you'd need a license per VM since using VMWare basically
  allows
  for several server installs (including OS).  Unless using a
  virtualisation
  method within a single OS install such as the stuff from SWSoft.
 
  Regards
  Bruce
 
  -
  Bruce Trevarthen, CEO
  ZeroOne (NZ) Limited
  ---
  DDI: +64 4 471
  Mobile: +64 21 567967
  ---
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf
  Of Steve Onnis
  Sent: Friday, 29 June 2007 5:29 p.m.
  To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
  Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101
 
 
  So then from a cf server licensing perspective, can anyone tell me if I
  could use the same CF license on multiple VMs?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf
  Of Bruce Trevarthen (B2 Limited)
  Sent: Friday, 29 June 2007 1:11 PM
  To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101
 
 
  Hi Steve
 
  CPU:
  VMWare lets you assign GHz per Virtual Server and they won't go over
  that.
  So if you have dual 2Ghz CPU's then you safely run 3 Virtual Servers at
  1GHz
  each. You need to keep some core processing capacity available for the
  host
  operating system.
 
  RAM:
  Correct, you assign RAM per Virtual Server and to run more Virtual
  Servers
  you need more RAM.  Since with VMWare Windows is not your base host you
  don't need to consider STD versus Enterprise.  But VMWare does have
  three
  versions to choose from with various Virtual Server feature support in
  each.
  For example VMotion is only in the Enterprise edition.
 
  SOFTWARE:
  Again you're correct, each VM is just as if it were a physical server in
  the
  eye's of software licenses, even Microsoft still expect a Processor
  license
  per Virtual Server even though it's only one physical CPU underneath it
  all.
 
  OTHER:
  Yes you can run VMWare farms and you can have things clustered, the
  best
  way to setup VM's is to have consolidated central storage, i.e. a
  SAN.  Then
  the actual server doing the front-end delivery of your services is not
  the
  same hardware housing the virtual machine images, means you can image
  and
  move virtual servers from hardware to hardware without shifting the
  (what
  could be) 100GB virtual machine image.  Enterprise edition VMotion
  allows
  you to shift servers from hardware to hardware whilst still in
  production,
  I've seen this done and the process dropped 3 packets in the process and
  no
  users noticed.  Without enterprise edition you can still do cool stuff
  like
  move a VM to another server for the sake of performance without a
  rebuild,
  but because the VM needs to be offline for imaging you'll have several
  minutes down time in the process.
 
  Cheers
  Bruce
 
  -
  Bruce Trevarthen, CEO
  ZeroOne (NZ) Limited
  ---
  DDI: +64 4 471
  Mobile: +64 21 567967
  ---
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf
  Of Steve Onnis
  Sent: Friday, 29 June 2007 3:02 p.m.
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cfaussie@googlegroups.com
  Subject: [cfaussie] Virtual Servers 101
 
 
  I have posted this in both the water cooler and in cfaussie cause I
  don't
  know who's in who :)  And it sort of follows on from the whole licensing
  costs topic and I guess optimizing cf server setups.
 
 
  Couple of questions RE virtual servers
 
  CPU
  

[cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101

2007-06-30 Thread Paul Kukiel

VM ware server is free and I find it faster and more stable then Virtual PC.

http://www.vmware.com/products/server/


-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bruce Trevarthen (B2 Limited)
Sent: Saturday, 30 June 2007 3:34 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101


Best option there would be VirtualPC since VMware would be cost prohibitive
for that in my opinion.

Regards
Bruce

-
Bruce Trevarthen, CEO
ZeroOne (NZ) Limited
---
DDI: +64 4 471
Mobile: +64 21 567967
---


-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chris Velevitch
Sent: Friday, 29 June 2007 5:04 p.m.
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Virtual Servers 101


On 6/29/07, Bruce Trevarthen (B2 Limited) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm not sure I understand what you're saying sorry Chris.  Why would
anyone put Vista or XP on a VMWare server?

To do client side testing to see how different OSes/Browser
combinations effect an application using WMWrokstation. Saves on
having a room of machines to to client side testing.


Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
m: 0415 469 095
www.flashdev.org.au






--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: CFLocation stopped working

2007-06-30 Thread AJ Mercer
Does the page have a cfflush on it - that will kill cflocation.

On 6/30/07, Mike Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 ok, just to add confusion to what i felt sure was a problem with
 cflocation,  i created a page with nothing on it but a cflocation tag
 and it worked just fine.

 Damn.

 And i thought i had isolated where the problem was.

 Cheers
 Mike Kear
 Windsor, NSW, Australia
 Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
 AFP Webworks
 http://afpwebworks.com
 ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month


 On 6/30/07, Mike Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  No, because it's every cflocation tag that's stopped working,
  including the ones that work fine on the production server.
 
  But since you mention it, i'll do just such a test page.
 
  Cheers
  Mike Kear
  Windsor, NSW, Australia
  Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
  AFP Webworks
  http://afpwebworks.com
  ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month
 
 
 

 



-- 
If you are not living on the edge,
You are taking up too much space.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[cfaussie] Re: CFLocation stopped working

2007-06-30 Thread Peter Tilbrook

If using session vars are you requesting to addtoken?

On 30/06/07, AJ Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does the page have a cfflush on it - that will kill cflocation.

 On 6/30/07, Mike Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
  ok, just to add confusion to what i felt sure was a problem with
  cflocation,  i created a page with nothing on it but a cflocation tag
  and it worked just fine.
 
  Damn.
 
  And i thought i had isolated where the problem was.
 
  Cheers
  Mike Kear
  Windsor, NSW, Australia
  Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
  AFP Webworks
  http://afpwebworks.com
  ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month
 
 
  On 6/30/07, Mike Kear  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   No, because it's every cflocation tag that's stopped working,
   including the ones that work fine on the production server.
  
   But since you mention it, i'll do just such a test page.
  
   Cheers
   Mike Kear
   Windsor, NSW, Australia
   Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
   AFP Webworks
   http://afpwebworks.com
   ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month
  
  
  
 
 



 --
 If you are not living on the edge,
 You are taking up too much space.
  



-- 
Peter Tilbrook
ColdGen Internet Solutions
President, ACT and Region ColdFusion Users Group
PO Box 2247
Queanbeyan, NSW, 2620
AUSTRALIA

http://www.coldgen.com/
http://www.actcfug.com/

Tel: +61-2-6284-2727
Mob: +61-0432-897-437

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN Messenger Live: Desktop General

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---