The current infrastructure for vector names generation works only for
function definition. Ideally we should implement it also for function
definition provided by external libraries
Right, we need to fix that to support #pragma omp declare simd on function
declaration as well to enable multiple module compilation via .h files for simd
functions.
Thanks,
Xinmin
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Petrogalli via Phabricator [mailto:revi...@reviews.llvm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 6:13 AM
To: francesco.petroga...@arm.com; a.bat...@hotmail.com; cber...@us.ibm.com;
acja...@us.ibm.com; hahnf...@itc.rwth-aachen.de
Cc: Tian, Xinmin ; florian.h...@arm.com;
roger.ferreriba...@arm.com; amara.emer...@arm.com; renato.go...@linaro.org;
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Subject: [PATCH] D30739: [OpenMP] "declare simd" for AArch64 Advanced SIMD.
fpetrogalli added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30739#706292, @Hahnfeld wrote:
> In principal looks good to me although I'm not really familiar with this
> part. Does that work for you if you have the `declare simd` in a header file
> and the implementation in another file? On x86_64 I currently get:
The current infrastructure for vector names generation works only for function
definition. Ideally we should implement it also for function definition
provided by external libraries.
> remark: loop not vectorized: call instruction cannot be vectorized
>
>
> But that seems to be a general problem inside LLVM's LoopVectorize pass...
AFAIK, none of the machinery required in LLVM to expose the mangled names in
the vectorizer is present in trunk. There is a patch for x86 under review that
does that: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22792
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits