[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader added a comment. friendly ping Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader marked an inline comment as done. Kader added a comment. @lebedev.ri Thanks. I think do not have commit access. What should be my next step ? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader marked 2 inline comments as done. Kader added inline comments. Comment at: test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c:1 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify -Wpointer-integer-compare %s + lebedev.ri wrote: > I guess you want a run-line with no flag, this runline, and a run-line with > `-Wno-pointer-integer-compare` done Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader updated this revision to Diff 180143.
Kader added a comment.
remove typo
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
test/Misc/warning-flags.c
test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
Index: test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify
-DEXPECTWARNING %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify
-Wno-pointer-integer-compare %s
+
+#ifdef EXPECTWARNING
+// expected-warning@+6 {{comparison between pointer and integer ('int' and
'int *')}}
+#else
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+#endif
+
+int test_ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer(int integer, int *
pointer) {
+ return integer != pointer;
+}
Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c
===
--- test/Misc/warning-flags.c
+++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
-CHECK: Warnings without flags (75):
+CHECK: Warnings without flags (74):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst
CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens
-CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error<
"equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn<
- "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
+ "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">,
+ InGroup>;
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error<
"comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn<
Index: test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify -DEXPECTWARNING %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-pointer-integer-compare %s
+
+#ifdef EXPECTWARNING
+// expected-warning@+6 {{comparison between pointer and integer ('int' and 'int *')}}
+#else
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+#endif
+
+int test_ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer(int integer, int * pointer) {
+ return integer != pointer;
+}
Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c
===
--- test/Misc/warning-flags.c
+++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
-CHECK: Warnings without flags (75):
+CHECK: Warnings without flags (74):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst
CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens
-CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error<
"equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn<
- "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
+ "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">,
+ InGroup>;
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error<
"comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn<
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader updated this revision to Diff 180142.
Kader added a comment.
address comments
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
test/Misc/warning-flags.c
test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
Index: test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify
-DEXPECTWARNING -Wpointer-integer-compare %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify
-Wno-pointer-integer-compare %s
+
+#ifdef EXPECTWARNING
+// expected-warning@+6 {{comparison between pointer and integer ('int' and
'int *')}}
+#else
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+#endif
+
+int test_ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer(int integer, int *
pointer) {
+ return integer != pointer;
+}
Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c
===
--- test/Misc/warning-flags.c
+++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
-CHECK: Warnings without flags (75):
+CHECK: Warnings without flags (74):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst
CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens
-CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error<
"equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn<
- "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
+ "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">,
+ InGroup>;
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error<
"comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn<
Index: test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify -DEXPECTWARNING -Wpointer-integer-compare %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-pointer-integer-compare %s
+
+#ifdef EXPECTWARNING
+// expected-warning@+6 {{comparison between pointer and integer ('int' and 'int *')}}
+#else
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+#endif
+
+int test_ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer(int integer, int * pointer) {
+ return integer != pointer;
+}
Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c
===
--- test/Misc/warning-flags.c
+++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
-CHECK: Warnings without flags (75):
+CHECK: Warnings without flags (74):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst
CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens
-CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error<
"equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn<
- "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
+ "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">,
+ InGroup>;
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error<
"comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn<
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader updated this revision to Diff 180125.
Kader added a comment.
added missing test file
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
test/Misc/warning-flags.c
test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
Index: test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify
-Wpointer-integer-compare %s
+
+int test_ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer(int integer, int *
pointer) {
+ return integer != pointer; // expected-warning {{comparison between
pointer and integer ('int' and 'int *')}}
+}
Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c
===
--- test/Misc/warning-flags.c
+++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
-CHECK: Warnings without flags (75):
+CHECK: Warnings without flags (74):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst
CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens
-CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error<
"equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn<
- "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
+ "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">,
+ InGroup>;
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error<
"comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn<
Index: test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Sema/ext-typecheck-comparison-of-pointer-integer.c
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fsyntax-only -verify -Wpointer-integer-compare %s
+
+int test_ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer(int integer, int * pointer) {
+ return integer != pointer; // expected-warning {{comparison between pointer and integer ('int' and 'int *')}}
+}
Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c
===
--- test/Misc/warning-flags.c
+++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
-CHECK: Warnings without flags (75):
+CHECK: Warnings without flags (74):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst
CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens
-CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error<
"equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn<
- "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
+ "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">,
+ InGroup>;
def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error<
"comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">;
def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn<
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader added a comment. @lebedev.ri Thanks for the quick review ; > Perhaps there should be a test for this flag specifically? I am not really familiar with this part of the code base, but it seems that the warnings is already tested in both test/Sema/Compare.c and test/SemaCXX/compare.cpp. I have none the less added a new test file for c_lang. > Also, should "pointer-integer-compare" be in some group? I modeled my change on ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_function_pointers which doesn't belong to any group. Not sure if that's the right thing to do though. Also, this flag is only valid for C_lang and not for Cpp_lang. But right now the flag will be silently ignore when compiling cpp files. Is that an acceptable behavior ? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader updated this revision to Diff 180124. Kader added a comment. Added test case for C_lang Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241 Files: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td test/Misc/warning-flags.c Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c === --- test/Misc/warning-flags.c +++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0. -CHECK: Warnings without flags (75): +CHECK: Warnings without flags (74): CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens -CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td === --- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td +++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td @@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@ def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error< "equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn< - "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; + "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">, + InGroup>; def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error< "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn< Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c === --- test/Misc/warning-flags.c +++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0. -CHECK: Warnings without flags (75): +CHECK: Warnings without flags (74): CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens -CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td === --- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td +++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td @@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@ def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error< "equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn< - "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; + "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">, + InGroup>; def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error< "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn< ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D56241: expose a control flag for interger to pointer ext warning
Kader created this revision. Kader added a project: clang. Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits. While building openJDK11u, it seems that some of the code in the native core libraries make liberal use of integer to pointer comparisons. We currently have no flag to disabled this warning. This add such a flag. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241 Files: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td test/Misc/warning-flags.c Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c === --- test/Misc/warning-flags.c +++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0. -CHECK: Warnings without flags (75): +CHECK: Warnings without flags (74): CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens -CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td === --- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td +++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td @@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@ def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error< "equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn< - "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; + "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">, + InGroup>; def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error< "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn< Index: test/Misc/warning-flags.c === --- test/Misc/warning-flags.c +++ test/Misc/warning-flags.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0. -CHECK: Warnings without flags (75): +CHECK: Warnings without flags (74): CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers CHECK-NEXT: ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens -CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td === --- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td +++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td @@ -5875,7 +5875,8 @@ def err_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void : Error< "equality comparison between function pointer and void pointer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : ExtWarn< - "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; + "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">, + InGroup>; def err_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer : Error< "comparison between pointer and integer (%0 and %1)">; def ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers : ExtWarn< ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
