[PATCH] D151696: [X86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-05 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

Thank so much on all your comments/review to make this happen. Cheers~!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [X86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-05 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG7717c0071d7c: [X86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add 
getCPUDispatchMangling (authored by FreddyYe).

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev

[PATCH] D151696: [X86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-05 Thread Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via cfe-commits
RKSimon accepted this revision.
RKSimon added a comment.

LGTM - cheers


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-04 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe updated this revision to Diff 537065.
FreddyYe marked 2 inline comments as done.
FreddyYe added a comment.

Add comments about Mangling and OnlyForCPUDispatchSpecific,
and remove the supporting more/new CPU names for cpu_specific/dispatch feature.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o

[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-04 Thread Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via cfe-commits
RKSimon added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-cpus.c:40
 ATTR(cpu_specific(knm)) void CPU(void){}
+ATTR(cpu_specific(cascadelake)) void CPU(void){}
+ATTR(cpu_specific(cooperlake)) void CPU(void){}

FreddyYe wrote:
> In this patch, I additionally supported some intel new CPU's _cpu_specific 
> feature by creating a new mangling or copy some old ones (which means 
> aliasing certain cpu). Maybe I should do this in a following patch?
Yes please, that would great.



Comment at: llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp:378
+  { {"core_3rd_gen_avx"}, CK_IvyBridge, FEATURE_AVX, FeaturesIvyBridge, 'S', 
true },
+  { {"core-avx-i"}, CK_IvyBridge, FEATURE_AVX, FeaturesIvyBridge, '\0', false 
},
   // Haswell microarchitecture based processors.

FreddyYe wrote:
> RKSimon wrote:
> > I'm still not clear on what determines the mangling mode and cpu dispatch 
> > flag for cpu targets are supposedly the same? For example, none of these 
> > ivybridge equivalent configs have the same values.
> I assign them by following orders:
> 1. Copy the mangling from the original CPU_SPEICIFC MACRO.
> 2. If there's no way to copy, assign to '\0' by default, which means doesn't 
> support __cpu_specific/dispatch feature.
> 3. If cpu name contain ''-', assign the mangling as '\0', too. Because '-' 
> cannot be correctly identified in _cpu_specific/dispatch().
> 4. set OnlyForCPUDispatch flag as `true` if this cpu name was not listed 
> here, which means it doesn't support -march, -mtune and so on. This flag 
> makes this cpu name only support __cpu_dispatch/specific feature. E.g. 
> core_3rd_gen_avx, core_4rd_gen_avx., ... And normally, these names are very 
> old. So supporting them with -march=, -mtune= is not easy for now. And notice 
> that new cpu names shouldn't set this flag as `true` since they should both 
> support -march= and __cpu_specific/dispatch feature by default.
> 
OK - please can you add that to a comment above line 311 for future reference?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-03 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe marked an inline comment as done.
FreddyYe added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-cpus.c:40
 ATTR(cpu_specific(knm)) void CPU(void){}
+ATTR(cpu_specific(cascadelake)) void CPU(void){}
+ATTR(cpu_specific(cooperlake)) void CPU(void){}

In this patch, I additionally supported some intel new CPU's _cpu_specific 
feature by creating a new mangling or copy some old ones (which means aliasing 
certain cpu). Maybe I should do this in a following patch?



Comment at: llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp:378
+  { {"core_3rd_gen_avx"}, CK_IvyBridge, FEATURE_AVX, FeaturesIvyBridge, 'S', 
true },
+  { {"core-avx-i"}, CK_IvyBridge, FEATURE_AVX, FeaturesIvyBridge, '\0', false 
},
   // Haswell microarchitecture based processors.

RKSimon wrote:
> I'm still not clear on what determines the mangling mode and cpu dispatch 
> flag for cpu targets are supposedly the same? For example, none of these 
> ivybridge equivalent configs have the same values.
I assign them by following orders:
1. Copy the mangling from the original CPU_SPEICIFC MACRO.
2. If there's no way to copy, assign to '\0' by default, which means doesn't 
support __cpu_specific/dispatch feature.
3. If cpu name contain ''-', assign the mangling as '\0', too. Because '-' 
cannot be correctly identified in _cpu_specific/dispatch().
4. set OnlyForCPUDispatch flag as `true` if this cpu name was not listed here, 
which means it doesn't support -march, -mtune and so on. This flag makes this 
cpu name only support __cpu_dispatch/specific feature. E.g. core_3rd_gen_avx, 
core_4rd_gen_avx., ... And normally, these names are very old. So supporting 
them with -march=, -mtune= is not easy for now. And notice that new cpu names 
shouldn't set this flag as `true` since they should both support -march= and 
__cpu_specific/dispatch feature by default.



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-03 Thread Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via cfe-commits
RKSimon added inline comments.



Comment at: llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp:378
+  { {"core_3rd_gen_avx"}, CK_IvyBridge, FEATURE_AVX, FeaturesIvyBridge, 'S', 
true },
+  { {"core-avx-i"}, CK_IvyBridge, FEATURE_AVX, FeaturesIvyBridge, '\0', false 
},
   // Haswell microarchitecture based processors.

I'm still not clear on what determines the mangling mode and cpu dispatch flag 
for cpu targets are supposedly the same? For example, none of these ivybridge 
equivalent configs have the same values.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-03 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

gentle ping. If no objections, I'll merge this tomorrow.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-07-02 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe updated this revision to Diff 536645.
FreddyYe marked an inline comment as done.
FreddyYe added a comment.

Rebase, especially for D151696 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-cpus.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-un

[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-30 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe marked an inline comment as done.
FreddyYe added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:47
 // LINUX: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

RKSimon wrote:
> FreddyYe wrote:
> > RKSimon wrote:
> > > FreddyYe wrote:
> > > > This value change is because the feature list of ivybridge described in 
> > > > X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "pclmul".
> > > Pull out an ivybridge fix into its own patch?
> > Emmm. Seems like a good idea. How about I change these two CPU's old 
> > feature list only? Since the successors of them will also have this issue, 
> > but no tests influenced.
> Sure, a single patch with multiple cpus' fixups is fine
Done in https://reviews.llvm.org/D154209


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-30 Thread Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via cfe-commits
RKSimon added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:47
 // LINUX: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

FreddyYe wrote:
> RKSimon wrote:
> > FreddyYe wrote:
> > > This value change is because the feature list of ivybridge described in 
> > > X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "pclmul".
> > Pull out an ivybridge fix into its own patch?
> Emmm. Seems like a good idea. How about I change these two CPU's old feature 
> list only? Since the successors of them will also have this issue, but no 
> tests influenced.
Sure, a single patch with multiple cpus' fixups is fine


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-30 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:47
 // LINUX: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

RKSimon wrote:
> FreddyYe wrote:
> > This value change is because the feature list of ivybridge described in 
> > X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "pclmul".
> Pull out an ivybridge fix into its own patch?
Emmm. Seems like a good idea. How about I change these two CPU's old feature 
list only? Since the successors of them will also have this issue, but no tests 
influenced.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-30 Thread Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via cfe-commits
RKSimon added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:47
 // LINUX: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

FreddyYe wrote:
> This value change is because the feature list of ivybridge described in 
> X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "pclmul".
Pull out an ivybridge fix into its own patch?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-29 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe updated this revision to Diff 536118.
FreddyYe added a comment.

changes according to the new RULE3, pls review again.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-cpus.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_sse4_1 2>&1 | FileCheck 

[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-29 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe updated this revision to Diff 536116.
FreddyYe added a comment.

Rebase for D154181 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-cpus.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_sse4_1 2>&1 | FileCheck 

[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-29 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

> Yes, it looks like it would be best to split off and commit some of the fixes 
> (cmov / the isa changes causing the attr-cpuspecific.c diffs etc.) first, 
> before this refactor patch.

Done in https://reviews.llvm.org/D154181


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-29 Thread Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via cfe-commits
RKSimon added a comment.

In D151696#4458751 , @FreddyYe wrote:

> In D151696#4458443 , @pengfei wrote:
>
>> It looks to me the failed unit tests might be related to this patch, please 
>> take a look.
>
> This is due to FeatureCMOV adding. Should I split into another review?

Yes, it looks like it would be best to split off and commit some of the fixes 
(cmov / the isa changes causing the attr-cpuspecific.c diffs etc.) first, 
before this refactor patch.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-29 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

In D151696#4458435 , @pengfei wrote:

> I have some concerns for RULE 3, especially `core_aes_pclmulqdq -> westmere` 
> and `atom_sse4_2_movbe -> silvermont`.
> Sometimes, we have minor feature differences in the same generation targets. 
> I guess that's why we use `arch_feature` naming like core_2_duo_ssse3. 
> Merging them into the same generation or the next generation might corrup the 
> intention here. But I'm not expert in CPUDispatch, and I don't see any 
> existing tests for them, so I won't block the patch since it's an improvement 
> in general.
> Please wait a few days for other reviewers' opinions.

You are right. For historical reasons, I can't find which product each cpu name 
string points to actually. From the old feature list in X86TargetParser.def, 
these three cpu names even share a same feature list:

  atom_sse4_2
  core_i7_sse4_2
  core_aes_pclmulqdq

"core_5th_gen_avx_tsx"  is also same as "broadwell". So I have a new proposal 
for RULE3, which can be considered to be more conservative:

  pentium_4_sse3 -> prescott (FeatureSSE3)
  First introduce FeatureSSE4_1 like prescott
  core_2_duo_ssse3 -> core2 (FeatureSSSE3)
  First introduce FeatureSSE4_1 like core2
  core_2_duo_sse4_1 -> penryn (FeatureSSE4_1)
  First introduce FeatureSSE4_1 like penryn
  atom_sse4_2 -> nehalem (FeatureSSE4_2)
  First introduce FeatureSSE4_2 like nehalem
  core_i7_sse4_2 -> nehalem (FeatureSSE4_2)
  First introduce FeatureSSE4_2 like nehalem
  core_aes_pclmulqdq -> nehalem (FeatureSSE4_2)
  First introduce FeatureSSE4_2 like nehalem
  core_5th_gen_avx_tsx -> broadwell 
  Same feature list as broadwell

Meanwhile, the fact above won't affect code changes in X86.td. I'll still 
define these new cpu names with the TUNE_NAME info in original source.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-29 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe marked an inline comment as done.
FreddyYe added a comment.

In D151696#4458443 , @pengfei wrote:

> It looks to me the failed unit tests might be related to this patch, please 
> take a look.

This is due to FeatureCMOV adding. Should I split into another review?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-29 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe marked an inline comment as done.
FreddyYe added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:56
 // WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

pengfei wrote:
> FreddyYe wrote:
> > This value change is because the feature list of knl described in 
> > X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "bmi2" and "aes".
> The comment is for TwoVersions?
Yes. Sorry for wrong point.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-28 Thread Phoebe Wang via Phabricator via cfe-commits
pengfei added a comment.

It looks to me the failed unit tests might be related to this patch, please 
take a look.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-28 Thread Phoebe Wang via Phabricator via cfe-commits
pengfei accepted this revision.
pengfei added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

I have some concerns for RULE 3, especially `core_aes_pclmulqdq -> westmere` 
and `atom_sse4_2_movbe -> silvermont`.
Sometimes, we have minor feature differences in the same generation targets. I 
guess that's why we use `arch_feature` naming like core_2_duo_ssse3. Merging 
them into the same generation or the next generation might corrup the intention 
here. But I'm not expert in CPUDispatch, and I don't see any existing tests for 
them, so I won't block the patch since it's an improvement in general.
Please wait a few days for other reviewers' opinions.




Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:56
 // WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

FreddyYe wrote:
> This value change is because the feature list of knl described in 
> X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "bmi2" and "aes".
The comment is for TwoVersions?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-28 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

gentle ping


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-28 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

Notice that these two changes are both expected since a more complete feature 
list won't influence the _cpu_dispatch/specific multiversion to not work.




Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:47
 // LINUX: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// LINUX: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

This value change is because the feature list of ivybridge described in 
X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "pclmul".



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:56
 // WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_INIT:.+]] = load i32, ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, 
i32, i32, [1 x i32] }, ptr @__cpu_model, i32 0, i32 3, i32 0), align 4
-// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 1023
-// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 1023
+// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_JOIN:.+]] = and i32 %[[FEAT_INIT]], 525311
+// WINDOWS: %[[FEAT_CHECK:.+]] = icmp eq i32 %[[FEAT_JOIN]], 525311

This value change is because the feature list of knl described in 
X86TargetParser.def before missed feature "bmi2" and "aes".


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-28 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe updated this revision to Diff 535277.
FreddyYe added a comment.

1. Fixed copy errors of some CPU's manglings
2. Updated resolver function checkers due to more complete feature list changes.
3. Added more cpu checks in attr-cpuspecific-cpus.c


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-cpus.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO

[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-27 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

In D151696#4448680 , @FreddyYe wrote:

> In D151696#4448573 , @erichkeane 
> wrote:
>
>> I think this is OK, I have a slight fear we're losing a bit of the 'tune' 
>> functionality, but it is not impossible that we've never really cared about 
>> that.  One concern I have is that the list was used for the resolver 
>> function, but I don't see any test changes for that?  Are we properly 
>> filtering out the features list somehow?
>
> Yes! Now there are no tests yet testing the resolver function influenced by 
> the feature list. I'll add another pre-commit test to show this.

Added checks in https://reviews.llvm.org/D152989. pls help review. About the 
"-tune-cpu", I think it's ok to use the same name as the one that users 
specified in _cpu_specific(), after I supported those missing names in X86.td 
so that optimizer can now recognize them.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-26 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

In D151696#4448573 , @erichkeane 
wrote:

> I think this is OK, I have a slight fear we're losing a bit of the 'tune' 
> functionality, but it is not impossible that we've never really cared about 
> that.  One concern I have is that the list was used for the resolver 
> function, but I don't see any test changes for that?  Are we properly 
> filtering out the features list somehow?

Yes! Now there are no tests yet testing the resolver function influenced by the 
feature list. I'll add another pre-commit test to show this.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-26 Thread Erich Keane via Phabricator via cfe-commits
erichkeane added a comment.

I think this is OK, I have a slight fear we're losing a bit of the 'tune' 
functionality, but it is not impossible that we've never really cared about 
that.  One concern I have is that the list was used for the resolver function, 
but I don't see any test changes for that?  Are we properly filtering out the 
features list somehow?




Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:2272
   // favor this processor.
-  TuneCPU = getTarget().getCPUSpecificTuneName(
-  SD->getCPUName(GD.getMultiVersionIndex())->getName());
+  TuneCPU = SD->getCPUName(GD.getMultiVersionIndex())->getName();
 }

So my understanding here is that our intent was that the 'tune' cpu and the 
'selected' cpu were not necessarily the same (either not the same name, OR not 
the same CPU!), right?  Is that being lost here?  


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-26 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added a comment.

gentle ping _cpu_dispatch/specific feature owner @erichkeane. Any comments?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-21 Thread Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via cfe-commits
RKSimon added a comment.

Please can you cleanup the summary, as it isn't very easy to understand at the 
moment. Possibly split into a series of bullet points describing the changes?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-21 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe updated this revision to Diff 533161.
FreddyYe added a comment.

debug typo.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_sse4_1 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x

[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-21 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe updated this revision to Diff 533155.
FreddyYe added a comment.

Add missing FeatureCMOV in X8TargetParser.cpp


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

Files:
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
  clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific-avx-abi.c
  clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def
  llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td
  llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll

Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
===
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll
@@ -6,16 +6,24 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i586 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_mmx 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=i686 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentiumpro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_pro 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_ii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium3m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium-m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium4m 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=yonah 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=prescott 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=pentium_4_sse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=lakemont 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=raptorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown -mcpu=meteorlake 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
@@ -26,26 +34,39 @@
 
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=nocona 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core2 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_ssse3 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=penryn 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=core_2_duo_sse4_1 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR --allow-empty
 ; RUN

[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-20 Thread Freddy, Ye via Phabricator via cfe-commits
FreddyYe added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:342
 
-// CHECK: attributes #[[S]] = 
{{.*}}"target-features"="+avx,+cmov,+crc32,+cx8,+f16c,+mmx,+popcnt,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+ssse3,+x87,+xsave"
 // CHECK-SAME: "tune-cpu"="ivybridge"

pengfei wrote:
> Why `cmov` disappearing? This feature is supported by most recent targets. 
> Same below.
Good catch. Seems like frontend codes missed CMOV from the very beginning, 
while X86.td doesn't have this issue. Will update.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D151696: [x86] Remove CPU_SPECIFIC* MACROs and add getCPUDispatchMangling

2023-06-20 Thread Phoebe Wang via Phabricator via cfe-commits
pengfei added inline comments.



Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/attr-cpuspecific.c:342
 
-// CHECK: attributes #[[S]] = 
{{.*}}"target-features"="+avx,+cmov,+crc32,+cx8,+f16c,+mmx,+popcnt,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+ssse3,+x87,+xsave"
 // CHECK-SAME: "tune-cpu"="ivybridge"

Why `cmov` disappearing? This feature is supported by most recent targets. Same 
below.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits