[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL305272: clang-format: add option to merge empty function
body (authored by Typz).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447?vs=100420=102294#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
Files:
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Format/Format.h
cfe/trunk/lib/Format/Format.cpp
cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Index: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Format/Format.h
===
--- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Format/Format.h
+++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Format/Format.h
@@ -688,6 +688,18 @@
bool BeforeElse;
/// \brief Indent the wrapped braces themselves.
bool IndentBraces;
+/// \brief If ``false``, empty function body can be put on a single line.
+/// This option is used only if the opening brace of the function has
+/// already been wrapped, i.e. the `AfterFunction` brace wrapping mode is
+/// set, and the function could/should not be put on a single line (as per
+/// `AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine` and constructor formatting options).
+/// \code
+/// int f() vs. inf f()
+/// {} {
+/// }
+/// \endcode
+///
+bool SplitEmptyFunctionBody;
};
/// \brief Control of individual brace wrapping cases.
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
===
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
@@ -186,6 +186,12 @@
? 0
: Limit - TheLine->Last->TotalLength;
+if (TheLine->Last->is(TT_FunctionLBrace) &&
+TheLine->First == TheLine->Last &&
+!Style.BraceWrapping.SplitEmptyFunctionBody &&
+I[1]->First->is(tok::r_brace))
+ return tryMergeSimpleBlock(I, E, Limit);
+
// FIXME: TheLine->Level != 0 might or might not be the right check to do.
// If necessary, change to something smarter.
bool MergeShortFunctions =
@@ -215,7 +221,10 @@
Limit -= 2;
unsigned MergedLines = 0;
- if (MergeShortFunctions) {
+ if (MergeShortFunctions ||
+ (Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine >= FormatStyle::SFS_Empty &&
+ I[1]->First == I[1]->Last && I + 2 != E &&
+ I[2]->First->is(tok::r_brace))) {
MergedLines = tryMergeSimpleBlock(I + 1, E, Limit);
// If we managed to merge the block, count the function header, which is
// on a separate line.
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Format/Format.cpp
===
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Format/Format.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Format/Format.cpp
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@
IO.mapOptional("BeforeCatch", Wrapping.BeforeCatch);
IO.mapOptional("BeforeElse", Wrapping.BeforeElse);
IO.mapOptional("IndentBraces", Wrapping.IndentBraces);
+IO.mapOptional("SplitEmptyFunctionBody", Wrapping.SplitEmptyFunctionBody);
}
};
@@ -485,7 +486,7 @@
return Style;
FormatStyle Expanded = Style;
Expanded.BraceWrapping = {false, false, false, false, false, false,
-false, false, false, false, false};
+false, false, false, false, false, true};
switch (Style.BreakBeforeBraces) {
case FormatStyle::BS_Linux:
Expanded.BraceWrapping.AfterClass = true;
@@ -498,6 +499,7 @@
Expanded.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
Expanded.BraceWrapping.AfterStruct = true;
Expanded.BraceWrapping.AfterUnion = true;
+Expanded.BraceWrapping.SplitEmptyFunctionBody = false;
break;
case FormatStyle::BS_Stroustrup:
Expanded.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
@@ -517,7 +519,7 @@
break;
case FormatStyle::BS_GNU:
Expanded.BraceWrapping = {true, true, true, true, true, true,
- true, true, true, true, true};
+ true, true, true, true, true, true};
break;
case FormatStyle::BS_WebKit:
Expanded.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
@@ -554,7 +556,7 @@
LLVMStyle.BreakBeforeTernaryOperators = true;
LLVMStyle.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Attach;
LLVMStyle.BraceWrapping = {false, false, false, false, false, false,
- false, false, false, false, false};
+ false, false, false, false, false, true};
LLVMStyle.BreakAfterJavaFieldAnnotations = false;
LLVMStyle.BreakConstructorInitializers = FormatStyle::BCIS_BeforeColon;
LLVMStyle.BreakBeforeInheritanceComma = false;
Index: cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===
--- cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -6239,6 +6239,35 @@
getLLVMStyleWithColumns(23));
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
djasper accepted this revision. djasper added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Looks good. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
Typz added a comment. ping? https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
Typz added a comment. ping https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
Typz updated this revision to Diff 100420.
Typz marked 2 inline comments as done.
Typz added a comment.
fix indent & rename option to SplitEmptyFunctionBody
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
Files:
include/clang/Format/Format.h
lib/Format/Format.cpp
lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Index: unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===
--- unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -6006,6 +6006,35 @@
getLLVMStyleWithColumns(23));
}
+TEST_F(FormatTest, PullEmptyFunctionDefinitionsIntoSingleLine) {
+ FormatStyle MergeEmptyOnly = getLLVMStyle();
+ MergeEmptyOnly.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Empty;
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {\n"
+ "return 42;\n"
+ " }\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+
+ // Also verify behavior when BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true
+ MergeEmptyOnly.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ MergeEmptyOnly.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+}
+
TEST_F(FormatTest, PullInlineFunctionDefinitionsIntoSingleLine) {
FormatStyle MergeInlineOnly = getLLVMStyle();
MergeInlineOnly.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Inline;
@@ -6017,6 +6046,101 @@
" return 42;\n"
"}",
MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // SFS_Inline implies SFS_Empty
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // Also verify behavior when BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true
+ MergeInlineOnly.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ MergeInlineOnly.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() { return 42; }\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // SFS_Inline implies SFS_Empty
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+}
+
+TEST_F(FormatTest, SplitEmptyFunctionBody) {
+ FormatStyle Style = getLLVMStyle();
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_None;
+ Style.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ Style.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ Style.BraceWrapping.SplitEmptyFunctionBody = false;
+ Style.ColumnLimit = 40;
+
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " // some comment\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Empty;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 0;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Inline;
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int f() { return 0; }\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int aa(int bb)\n"
+ " {}\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int aa(int bb)\n"
+ " {\n"
+ "return 0;\n"
+ " }\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_All;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f() { return 0; }", Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 0;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
}
TEST_F(FormatTest, UnderstandContextOfRecordTypeKeywords) {
@@ -8715,6 +8839,7 @@
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
djasper added inline comments.
Comment at: include/clang/Format/Format.h:644
+/// This option is used only if the opening brace of the function has
+/// already
+/// been wrapped, i.e. the `AfterFunction` brace wrapping mode is set, and
Reflow the comment.
Comment at: include/clang/Format/Format.h:654
+///
+bool AllowEmptyFunctionBody;
/// \brief Wrap before ``catch``.
I think the name probably isn't very intuitive. Maybe invert it and call it
"SplitEmptyFunctionBody"?
Comment at: unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:6092
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
indent. Here and elsewhere.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
Typz updated this revision to Diff 100412.
Typz added a comment.
move option to BraceWrapping
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
Files:
include/clang/Format/Format.h
lib/Format/Format.cpp
lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Index: unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===
--- unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -6006,6 +6006,36 @@
getLLVMStyleWithColumns(23));
}
+TEST_F(FormatTest, PullEmptyFunctionDefinitionsIntoSingleLine) {
+ FormatStyle MergeEmptyOnly = getLLVMStyle();
+ MergeEmptyOnly.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Empty;
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {\n"
+ "return 42;\n"
+ " }\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+
+ // Also verify behavior when BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true
+ MergeEmptyOnly.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ MergeEmptyOnly.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+}
+
TEST_F(FormatTest, PullInlineFunctionDefinitionsIntoSingleLine) {
FormatStyle MergeInlineOnly = getLLVMStyle();
MergeInlineOnly.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Inline;
@@ -6017,6 +6047,104 @@
" return 42;\n"
"}",
MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // SFS_Inline implies SFS_Empty
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // Also verify behavior when BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true
+ MergeInlineOnly.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ MergeInlineOnly.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() { return 42; }\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // SFS_Inline implies SFS_Empty
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+}
+
+TEST_F(FormatTest, AllowEmptyFunctionBody) {
+ FormatStyle Style = getLLVMStyle();
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_None;
+ Style.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ Style.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ Style.BraceWrapping.AllowEmptyFunctionBody = true;
+ Style.ColumnLimit = 40;
+
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " // some comment\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Empty;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 0;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Inline;
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int f() { return 0; }\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int aa(int bb)\n"
+ " {}\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int aa(int bb)\n"
+ " {\n"
+ "return 0;\n"
+ " }\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_All;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f() { return 0; }",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 0;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
}
TEST_F(FormatTest, UnderstandContextOfRecordTypeKeywords) {
@@ -8712,6 +8840,7 @@
CHECK_PARSE_NESTED_BOOL(BraceWrapping, AfterObjCDeclaration);
CHECK_PARSE_NESTED_BOOL(BraceWrapping, AfterStruct);
CHECK_PARSE_NESTED_BOOL(BraceWrapping, AfterUnion);
+ CHECK_PARSE_NESTED_BOOL(BraceWrapping,
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
djasper added a comment. Lets try this the other way around. I am not ok with introducing an additional top-level option for this. It simply isn't important enough. So find a way for the existing style flags to support what you need and not regress existing users. If that can't be done, I am also ok with adding another value into BraceWrapping (which you suggested at some point, I think). https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
Typz added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447#765610, @djasper wrote:
> I think it's just wrong that WebKit inherits this. The style guide explicitly
> says that this is wrong:
>
> MyOtherClass::MyOtherClass() : MySuperClass() {}
I think this exemple applies to constructors only.
Looking at webkit code, there are many shortl functions which are indeed
formatted on a single line (at least 22097 occurences, actually)
> So I still think we can make this work with the existing options without
> regressing a behavior that anyone is relying on.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
djasper added a comment.
I think it's just wrong that WebKit inherits this. The style guide explicitly
says that this is wrong:
MyOtherClass::MyOtherClass() : MySuperClass() {}
So I still think we can make this work with the existing options without
regressing a behavior that anyone is relying on.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
Typz updated this revision to Diff 100393.
Typz added a comment.
update mozilla style to use empty function blocks
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
Files:
include/clang/Format/Format.h
lib/Format/Format.cpp
lib/Format/UnwrappedLineFormatter.cpp
unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Index: unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===
--- unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -6006,6 +6006,36 @@
getLLVMStyleWithColumns(23));
}
+TEST_F(FormatTest, PullEmptyFunctionDefinitionsIntoSingleLine) {
+ FormatStyle MergeEmptyOnly = getLLVMStyle();
+ MergeEmptyOnly.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Empty;
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {\n"
+ "return 42;\n"
+ " }\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+
+ // Also verify behavior when BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true
+ MergeEmptyOnly.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ MergeEmptyOnly.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeEmptyOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeEmptyOnly);
+}
+
TEST_F(FormatTest, PullInlineFunctionDefinitionsIntoSingleLine) {
FormatStyle MergeInlineOnly = getLLVMStyle();
MergeInlineOnly.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Inline;
@@ -6017,6 +6047,104 @@
" return 42;\n"
"}",
MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // SFS_Inline implies SFS_Empty
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // Also verify behavior when BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true
+ MergeInlineOnly.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ MergeInlineOnly.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() { return 42; }\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+
+ // SFS_Inline implies SFS_Empty
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", MergeInlineOnly);
+ verifyFormat("class C {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};",
+ MergeInlineOnly);
+}
+
+TEST_F(FormatTest, AllowEmptyFunctionBodyOnASingleLine) {
+ FormatStyle Style = getLLVMStyle();
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_None;
+ Style.AllowEmptyFunctionBodyOnASingleLine = true;
+ Style.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Custom;
+ Style.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;
+ Style.ColumnLimit = 40;
+
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 42;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " // some comment\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Empty;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}", Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f()\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 0;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_Inline;
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int f() {}\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int f() { return 0; }\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int aa(int bb)\n"
+ " {}\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("class Foo {\n"
+ " int aa(int bb)\n"
+ " {\n"
+ "return 0;\n"
+ " }\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_All;
+ verifyFormat("int f() {}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int f() { return 0; }",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{}",
+ Style);
+ verifyFormat("int aa(int bb)\n"
+ "{\n"
+ " return 0;\n"
+ "}",
+ Style);
}
TEST_F(FormatTest, UnderstandContextOfRecordTypeKeywords) {
@@ -8670,6 +8798,7 @@
CHECK_PARSE_BOOL(AlignConsecutiveAssignments);
CHECK_PARSE_BOOL(AlignConsecutiveDeclarations);
CHECK_PARSE_BOOL(AllowAllParametersOfDeclarationOnNextLine);
+
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
Typz added a comment. Webkit inherits AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_All from LLVM style, so merging the options would introduce these explicitely-forbidden empty blocks. But the empty blocks should actually be used in code following Mozilla or Qt style. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[PATCH] D33447: clang-format: add option to merge empty function body
djasper added a comment. I don't understand. WebKit style would not set AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine and so the behavior there wouldn't change, I presume? https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
