[PATCH] D39834: [clang] -foptimization-record-file= should imply -fsave-optimization-record

2017-12-19 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rC321090: [clang] -foptimization-record-file= should imply 
-fsave-optimization-record (authored by JDevlieghere, committed by ).

Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834

Files:
  lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
  test/Driver/opt-record.c


Index: test/Driver/opt-record.c
===
--- test/Driver/opt-record.c
+++ test/Driver/opt-record.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc 
-nocudalib %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O 
-check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc -nocudalib 
%s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O -check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -fsave-optimization-record 
-foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | 
FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt 
-fno-save-optimization-record %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s 
--check-prefix=CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE
 
 // CHECK: "-cc1"
 // CHECK: "-opt-record-file" "FOO.opt.yaml"
@@ -20,3 +22,4 @@
 // CHECK-EQ: "-cc1"
 // CHECK-EQ: "-opt-record-file" "BAR.txt"
 
+// CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE-NOT: "-fno-save-optimization-record"
Index: lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
===
--- lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
+++ lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
@@ -4389,6 +4389,7 @@
 CmdArgs.push_back("-fapple-pragma-pack");
 
   if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsave_optimization_record,
+   options::OPT_foptimization_record_file_EQ,
options::OPT_fno_save_optimization_record, false)) {
 CmdArgs.push_back("-opt-record-file");
 


Index: test/Driver/opt-record.c
===
--- test/Driver/opt-record.c
+++ test/Driver/opt-record.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc -nocudalib %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O -check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc -nocudalib %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O -check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt -fno-save-optimization-record %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE
 
 // CHECK: "-cc1"
 // CHECK: "-opt-record-file" "FOO.opt.yaml"
@@ -20,3 +22,4 @@
 // CHECK-EQ: "-cc1"
 // CHECK-EQ: "-opt-record-file" "BAR.txt"
 
+// CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE-NOT: "-fno-save-optimization-record"
Index: lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
===
--- lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
+++ lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
@@ -4389,6 +4389,7 @@
 CmdArgs.push_back("-fapple-pragma-pack");
 
   if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsave_optimization_record,
+   options::OPT_foptimization_record_file_EQ,
options::OPT_fno_save_optimization_record, false)) {
 CmdArgs.push_back("-opt-record-file");
 
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D39834: [clang] -foptimization-record-file= should imply -fsave-optimization-record

2017-12-19 Thread Dmitry Venikov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
Quolyk added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834#959500, @JDevlieghere wrote:

> Thanks Dmitry, this LGTM!
>
> PS: Let me know if you don't have commit access and want me to commit it for 
> you.


I don't have commit access, please commit. Thanks for code review.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D39834: [clang] -foptimization-record-file= should imply -fsave-optimization-record

2017-12-19 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via cfe-commits
JDevlieghere accepted this revision.
JDevlieghere added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Thanks Dmitry, this LGTM!

PS: Let me know if you don't have commit access and want me to commit it for 
you.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D39834: [clang] -foptimization-record-file= should imply -fsave-optimization-record

2017-11-22 Thread Dmitry Venikov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
Quolyk updated this revision to Diff 123914.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834

Files:
  lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
  test/Driver/opt-record.c


Index: test/Driver/opt-record.c
===
--- test/Driver/opt-record.c
+++ test/Driver/opt-record.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc 
-nocudalib %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O 
-check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc -nocudalib 
%s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O -check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -fsave-optimization-record 
-foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | 
FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt 
-fno-save-optimization-record %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s 
--check-prefix=CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE
 
 // CHECK: "-cc1"
 // CHECK: "-opt-record-file" "FOO.opt.yaml"
@@ -20,3 +22,4 @@
 // CHECK-EQ: "-cc1"
 // CHECK-EQ: "-opt-record-file" "BAR.txt"
 
+// CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE-NOT: "-fno-save-optimization-record"
Index: lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
===
--- lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
+++ lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
@@ -4342,6 +4342,7 @@
 CmdArgs.push_back("-fapple-pragma-pack");
 
   if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsave_optimization_record,
+   options::OPT_foptimization_record_file_EQ,
options::OPT_fno_save_optimization_record, false)) {
 CmdArgs.push_back("-opt-record-file");
 


Index: test/Driver/opt-record.c
===
--- test/Driver/opt-record.c
+++ test/Driver/opt-record.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc -nocudalib %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O -check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -fsave-optimization-record -x cuda -nocudainc -nocudalib %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-NO-O -check-prefix=CHECK-CUDA-DEV
 // RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-EQ
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -o FOO -foptimization-record-file=BAR.txt -fno-save-optimization-record %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE
 
 // CHECK: "-cc1"
 // CHECK: "-opt-record-file" "FOO.opt.yaml"
@@ -20,3 +22,4 @@
 // CHECK-EQ: "-cc1"
 // CHECK-EQ: "-opt-record-file" "BAR.txt"
 
+// CHECK-FOPT-DISABLE-NOT: "-fno-save-optimization-record"
Index: lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
===
--- lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
+++ lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
@@ -4342,6 +4342,7 @@
 CmdArgs.push_back("-fapple-pragma-pack");
 
   if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsave_optimization_record,
+   options::OPT_foptimization_record_file_EQ,
options::OPT_fno_save_optimization_record, false)) {
 CmdArgs.push_back("-opt-record-file");
 
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D39834: [clang] -foptimization-record-file= should imply -fsave-optimization-record

2017-11-20 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via cfe-commits
JDevlieghere added a comment.

I think you can achieve the same result with less code by checking for the 
flag's presence higher up, where currently `OPT_fsave_optimization_record` is 
handled (Clang.cpp:4329). Something like:

  if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsave_optimization_record,
   options::OPT_fno_save_optimization_record, false) || 
  Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_foptimization_record_file_EQ, 
   options::OPT_fno_save_optimization_record, false)) {

The test looks good to me.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D39834: [clang] -foptimization-record-file= should imply -fsave-optimization-record

2017-11-20 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via cfe-commits
JDevlieghere added a comment.

This also ensures that if `fno_save_optimization_record` is specified, you 
don't overwrite it by setting the file. This is definitely something you'd want 
to add to your test case.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits