[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-03-25 Thread Longsheng Mou via cfe-commits

https://github.com/CoTinker edited 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-03-25 Thread Eli Friedman via cfe-commits

efriedma-quic wrote:

If you implement #86075 like I suggested, the inconsistency here also goes 
away, I think: if va_arg queries classifyArgumentType, you get the same result 
as argument lowering, so clang becomes self-consistent.  (Whether that's 
gcc-compatible is a different question...)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-07-12 Thread Longsheng Mou via cfe-commits

CoTinker wrote:

Inconsistency here is inevitable.
Such struct `SuperEmpty { struct{ int a[0];} b;}` in c++ mode can not be 
ignored in i386 for that c++ fields are never empty, and its TypeInfo.Width = 
TypeInfo.Align = 0.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/594989918bf9e178f3b7c5e200d700d0574f15ec/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp#L1070-L1091

And Indirect is false, so that DirectSize = DirectAlign = 0, which leads to 
error.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/594989918bf9e178f3b7c5e200d700d0574f15ec/clang/lib/CodeGen/ABIInfoImpl.cpp#L205-L230

How do I fix this? Change the classifyArgumentType or the EmiVAArg? 
@efriedma-quic 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-07-15 Thread Eli Friedman via cfe-commits

efriedma-quic wrote:

There are two ways we could analyze, this, I think:

- EmitVAArg is doing something which disagrees with the classification done by 
classifyArgumentType, so that's a bug in EmitVAArg.
- classifyArgumentType is returning a malformed value; EmitVAArg should assert 
that it never sees such a value, and classifyArgumentType should be changed to 
return something else in that case.

What exactly is classifyArgumentType returning here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-07-29 Thread Longsheng Mou via cfe-commits

https://github.com/CoTinker updated 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388

>From 54f75d7068d0acf336d6d1e61bcf800ff52cc310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Longsheng Mou 
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:53:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [X86_32] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg.

struct SuperEmpty { struct{ int a[0];} b;};
Such 0 sized structs in c++ mode can not be ignored in i386 for
that c++ fields are never empty.But when EmitVAArg, its size is
0, so that va_list not increase.Maybe we can ignore this kind of
arguments.
---
 clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp  |  4 
 clang/test/CodeGenCXX/regparm.cpp  |  2 +-
 clang/test/CodeGenCXX/x86_32-vaarg.cpp | 22 ++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp 
b/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
index 16d52bee3490b..26ff4e4ac0a3b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/X86.cpp
@@ -795,6 +795,10 @@ ABIArgInfo X86_32ABIInfo::classifyArgumentType(QualType 
Ty, CCState &State,
 if (!IsWin32StructABI && isEmptyRecord(getContext(), Ty, true))
   return ABIArgInfo::getIgnore();
 
+// Ignore 0 sized structs.
+if (TI.Width == 0)
+  return ABIArgInfo::getIgnore();
+
 llvm::LLVMContext &LLVMContext = getVMContext();
 llvm::IntegerType *Int32 = llvm::Type::getInt32Ty(LLVMContext);
 bool NeedsPadding = false;
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/regparm.cpp 
b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/regparm.cpp
index 1fd471c2d0727..b9735485db8de 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/regparm.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/regparm.cpp
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct S3 {
   } a;
 };
 __attribute((regparm(2))) void foo4(S3 a, int b);
-// CHECK: declare void @_Z4foo42S3i(ptr noundef byval(%struct.S3) align 4, i32 
inreg noundef)
+// CHECK: declare void @_Z4foo42S3i(i32 inreg noundef)
 void bar3(S3 a, int b) {
   foo4(a, b);
 }
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/x86_32-vaarg.cpp 
b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/x86_32-vaarg.cpp
index a3f2791484362..90665652a0286 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/x86_32-vaarg.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/x86_32-vaarg.cpp
@@ -18,3 +18,25 @@ empty empty_record_test(int z, ...) {
   __builtin_va_start(list, z);
   return __builtin_va_arg(list, empty);
 }
+
+typedef struct {
+  struct {
+int a[0];
+  } b;
+} SortOfEmpty;
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: @_Z18test_sort_of_emptyiz(
+// CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+// CHECK-NEXT:[[RESULT_PTR:%.*]] = alloca ptr, align 4
+// CHECK-NEXT:[[Z_ADDR:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+// CHECK-NEXT:[[LIST:%.*]] = alloca ptr, align 4
+// CHECK-NEXT:store ptr [[AGG_RESULT:%.*]], ptr [[RESULT_PTR]], align 4
+// CHECK-NEXT:store i32 [[Z:%.*]], ptr [[Z_ADDR]], align 4
+// CHECK-NEXT:call void @llvm.va_start.p0(ptr [[LIST]])
+// CHECK-NEXT:ret void
+//
+SortOfEmpty test_sort_of_empty(int z, ...) {
+  __builtin_va_list list;
+  __builtin_va_start(list, z);
+  return __builtin_va_arg(list, SortOfEmpty);
+}

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-07-29 Thread Longsheng Mou via cfe-commits

https://github.com/CoTinker edited 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-07-30 Thread Longsheng Mou via cfe-commits

CoTinker wrote:

Could you please take time to review it, thank you. @efriedma-quic 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-07-31 Thread Eli Friedman via cfe-commits

https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.

LGTM

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-08-01 Thread Longsheng Mou via cfe-commits

https://github.com/CoTinker closed 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-08-02 Thread Rose Silicon via cfe-commits

RSilicon wrote:

Should this be backported to 19.x?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [X86_32][C++] fix 0 sized struct case in vaarg. (PR #86388)

2024-08-02 Thread Longsheng Mou via cfe-commits

CoTinker wrote:

I don't know, but maybe Eli can give you an answer.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits