Does that mean there is a bug in libcxx that should be documented somewhere?
-- adrian
> On Mar 2, 2017, at 3:18 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> Author: ericwf
> Date: Thu Mar 2 17:18:40 2017
> New Revision: 296840
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=296840=rev
> Log:
> Work around test failure on 32 bit OS X
>
> Modified:
>
> libcxx/trunk/test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_replace/size_size_T_size_size.pass.cpp
>
> Modified:
> libcxx/trunk/test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_replace/size_size_T_size_size.pass.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_replace/size_size_T_size_size.pass.cpp?rev=296840=296839=296840=diff
> ==
> ---
> libcxx/trunk/test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_replace/size_size_T_size_size.pass.cpp
> (original)
> +++
> libcxx/trunk/test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_replace/size_size_T_size_size.pass.cpp
> Thu Mar 2 17:18:40 2017
> @@ -29,16 +29,22 @@ test(S s, typename S::size_type pos1, ty
> SV sv, typename S::size_type pos2, typename S::size_type n2,
> S expected)
> {
> +typedef typename S::size_type SizeT;
> static_assert((!std::is_same::value), "");
> -const typename S::size_type old_size = s.size();
> +
> +// String and string_view may not always share the same size type,
> +// but both types should have the same size (ex. int vs long)
> +static_assert(sizeof(SizeT) == sizeof(typename SV::size_type), "");
> +
> +const SizeT old_size = s.size();
> S s0 = s;
> if (pos1 <= old_size && pos2 <= sv.size())
> {
> s.replace(pos1, n1, sv, pos2, n2);
> LIBCPP_ASSERT(s.__invariants());
> assert(s == expected);
> -typename S::size_type xlen = std::min(n1, old_size - pos1);
> -typename S::size_type rlen = std::min(n2, sv.size() - pos2);
> +SizeT xlen = std::min(n1, old_size - pos1);
> +SizeT rlen = std::min(n2, sv.size() - pos2);
> assert(s.size() == old_size - xlen + rlen);
> }
> #ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
> @@ -64,16 +70,17 @@ test_npos(S s, typename S::size_type pos
> SV sv, typename S::size_type pos2,
> S expected)
> {
> +typedef typename S::size_type SizeT;
> static_assert((!std::is_same::value), "");
> -const typename S::size_type old_size = s.size();
> +const SizeT old_size = s.size();
> S s0 = s;
> if (pos1 <= old_size && pos2 <= sv.size())
> {
> s.replace(pos1, n1, sv, pos2);
> LIBCPP_ASSERT(s.__invariants());
> assert(s == expected);
> -typename S::size_type xlen = std::min(n1, old_size - pos1);
> -typename S::size_type rlen = std::min(S::npos, sv.size() - pos2);
> +SizeT xlen = std::min(n1, old_size - pos1);
> +SizeT rlen = std::min(S::npos, sv.size() - pos2);
> assert(s.size() == old_size - xlen + rlen);
> }
> #ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
>
>
> ___
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits