[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)
phoebewang wrote: Thanks @KanRobert ! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)
https://github.com/phoebewang closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)
phoebewang wrote: > > > Why not return `i32` for 64-bit mask in 32-bit mode? > > > > > > You mean in two `i32` registers? The problem is the inline asm constraint > > has 1:1 map with physical register except corner cases. And represent a `k` > > constraint into two GPR registers is inefficient. > > Is it represented by i64 x 1 in 32-bit mode after this patch? Yes. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)
KanRobert wrote: > > Why not return `i32` for 64-bit mask in 32-bit mode? > > You mean in two `i32` registers? The problem is the inline asm constraint has > 1:1 map with physical register except corner cases. And represent a `k` > constraint into two GPR registers is inefficient. Is it represented by i64 x 1 in 32-bit mode after this patch? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)
KanRobert wrote: Why not return `i32` for 64-bit mask in 32-bit mode? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)
https://github.com/RKSimon commented: Should we add test coverage for the gpr <-> mask transfers? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)
https://github.com/phoebewang edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits