[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)

2024-01-16 Thread Phoebe Wang via cfe-commits

phoebewang wrote:

Thanks @KanRobert !

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)

2024-01-16 Thread Phoebe Wang via cfe-commits

https://github.com/phoebewang closed 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)

2024-01-14 Thread Phoebe Wang via cfe-commits

phoebewang wrote:

> > > Why not return `i32` for 64-bit mask in 32-bit mode?
> > 
> > 
> > You mean in two `i32` registers? The problem is the inline asm constraint 
> > has 1:1 map with physical register except corner cases. And represent a `k` 
> > constraint into two GPR registers is inefficient.
> 
> Is it represented by i64 x 1 in 32-bit mode after this patch?

Yes.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)

2024-01-14 Thread Shengchen Kan via cfe-commits

KanRobert wrote:

> > Why not return `i32` for 64-bit mask in 32-bit mode?
> 
> You mean in two `i32` registers? The problem is the inline asm constraint has 
> 1:1 map with physical register except corner cases. And represent a `k` 
> constraint into two GPR registers is inefficient.

Is it represented by i64 x 1 in 32-bit mode after this patch?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)

2024-01-14 Thread Shengchen Kan via cfe-commits

KanRobert wrote:

Why not return `i32` for 64-bit mask in 32-bit mode?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)

2024-01-12 Thread Simon Pilgrim via cfe-commits

https://github.com/RKSimon commented:

Should we add test coverage for the gpr <-> mask transfers?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[llvm] [clang] [X86] Use vXi1 for `k` constraint in inline asm (PR #77733)

2024-01-10 Thread Phoebe Wang via cfe-commits

https://github.com/phoebewang edited 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits