Re: [freenet-chat] 0.5 users

2007-05-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 00:33, you wrote:
> NOTE: I don't subscribe to this list. Any replies will have to be sent
> to me personally.
>
> I recently saw an IRC log where Toad claimed 0.5 had less than 300
> nodes. I just wanna comment that that's complete bullshit. I am
> personally connected to well over 1000 at the moment. 0.5 is still as
> healthy as it's always been IMO.

Sorry, this is just a result of 0.5's opennet sucking. A friend installed a 
node and it showed 230 or so peers after a few hours. Because of the 
old "assimilation" problem, it takes a while to get fully plugged in to the 
network.


pgpOiBgV5EHO8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-chat] 0.5 users

2007-05-08 Thread urza9814
NOTE: I don't subscribe to this list. Any replies will have to be sent
to me personally.

I recently saw an IRC log where Toad claimed 0.5 had less than 300
nodes. I just wanna comment that that's complete bullshit. I am
personally connected to well over 1000 at the moment. 0.5 is still as
healthy as it's always been IMO.

-- 

http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=57";>http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/blank.gif"/>
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]