Re: POR-15 vs powdercoating was Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor Mounts

2005-03-01 Thread Ryan Langstraat



Kyle,
Not to but in on your emails but the place I went 
to today said that I could have the frame blasted, powerdercoated and misc 
pieces done too for $300-$400.  I hope that comes to be true because I am 
counting on it!
 
Ryan


Re: POR-15 vs powdercoating was Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor Mounts

2005-03-01 Thread kbennett



is that a common price for all that you had done. I 
thought it would of been a LOT more than that. I've heard friends tell me stuff 
like 8 or 9 hundred for the frame alone.
 
Thanks
Kyle

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Michael Pell 
  To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:27 
  PM
  Subject: POR-15 vs powdercoating was Re: 
  [Chevelle-list] Motor Mounts
  To finish the frame and other parts, you should also consider 
  powder coating. I had my frame, rear end housing, and 60 some odd pieces 
  powdercoated for $300.  Sandblasting for all if it was $75. All in 
  all, pretty inexpensive, and the results are awesome. 
  I've POR-15ed a lot of stuff, and I much prefer the powdercoating. 
  Dittos on getting the frame mounts off.  I had the body off, so that 
  made it much simpler to get to everything.  Just take your time, and 
  prepare to be a contortionist for a little while.  :-) 
  Mike 
  bhardin1 wrote: 
  

I know the feeling about doing it right Ryan. 
We only want to do the job once and we want to get it right. It seems I 
always run in to problems and end up redoing something here and there. I 
have to learn from my mistakes. As far as getting the frame mounts off the frame. It is a tight 
squeeze to get them off. But you can do it. I did it, so I know you can. It 
was actually harder to put them back on then it was to get them off. 
Everything is harder to back together then it is to tear apart. Have you 
found your new frame mounts yet? That was a trick too. I had to get my frame 
mounts from a buddy of mine that had an extra set. Good luck on finding 
yours. When I compared the 350 or 454 mounts to the 307 mounts, the 307 
mounts were a lot taller. Are you going to do a frame off restoration? That's a big job. Once 
you tear it down that far it won't have any problem getting your frame 
mounts off and on. I have 
never done a frame off restoration and I have never chemical dipped a frame. 
But I have used POR15. I like POR15 OK on some small things. Battery trays, 
etc. I brushed my frame with POR15 but after looking back I probably should 
of sprayed it on. I think it has a think look to it and I don't like it as 
much. Also you have to get anything you paint real clean before you use 
POR15 or it won't stick. It will peal right off after it dries. That's why I 
like to use POR15 on small things that can be cleaned real good. If you can 
chemical strip your frame and spray on POR 15 you should look real good and 
it should stick real good too. Good luck Ryan,It 
sounds like you have a big project on your hands.Take your time and it will turn out real 
nice. Keep on 
Chevelleing! Brent 
HardinWichita Area Chevelle 
Owners  

  - Original Message -
  From: 
  Ryan 
  Langstraat
  To: The Chevelle Mailing 
  List
  Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 8:22 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor 
  Mounts Brent Thank you for your 
  info.  I have come to the conclusion that they will have to be 
  changed.  I was wondering what was the best way to get those off of 
  the frame.  It looks to be difficult.  Also, I was wondering if 
  you or anybody out there has chemical dipped their frame?  I was 
  considering just sandblasting it but I need to do some research on 
  both.  I have read that many people recomend using POR-15 on the 
  cleaned frame.  Have you or anybody used it?  Do you recomend 
  it?  Anyway, thank you for your help and sorry for so many questions 
  but this is my first resto and I want to do it 
  right. Thanks 
  againRyan
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release Date: 2/28/2005
  --   I would rather live my life as if there is a God,   
  and die to find out there isn't, Than live my   life as if there 
  isn't, And die to find out there is. 
    Check out my webpage at http://www.ProStreetCar.com   
  TREMEC Distributor at http://www.5speedTransmissions.com 
    Team Chevelle member #1778 (Gold),  ACES member #1377 
    Hoosier State Chevelle Assoc (www.IndianaChevelles.com) #6 
    
  
  

  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 
  266.5.2 - Release Date: 2/28/2005


Re: POR-15 vs powdercoating was Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor Mounts

2005-03-01 Thread Ryan Langstraat



Mike,
I went to a local place today that does the 
blasting and powder coating of frames etc... I would have to agree with you that 
the powder coat is much nicer.  Not to mention, all that work with those 
results is well worth paying $300 and not having to do it yourself.  Thanks 
again for the reply and as always any advice is always welcome!! 
 
Thanks
Ryan


POR-15 vs powdercoating was Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor Mounts

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Pell



To finish the frame and other parts, you should also consider powder coating.
I had my frame, rear end housing, and 60 some odd pieces powdercoated
for $300.  Sandblasting for all if it was $75.
All in all, pretty inexpensive, and the results are awesome.
I've POR-15ed a lot of stuff, and I much prefer the powdercoating.
Dittos on getting the frame mounts off.  I had the body off, so
that made it much simpler to get to everything.  Just take your time,
and prepare to be a contortionist for a little while.  :-)
Mike
bhardin1 wrote:

I
know the feeling about doing it right Ryan. We only want to do the job
once and we want to get it right. It seems I always run in to problems
and end up redoing something here and there. I have to learn from my mistakes. As
far as getting the frame mounts off the frame. It is a tight squeeze to
get them off. But you can do it. I did it, so I know you can. It was actually
harder to put them back on then it was to get them off. Everything is harder
to back together then it is to tear apart. Have you found your new frame
mounts yet? That was a trick too. I had to get my frame mounts from a buddy
of mine that had an extra set. Good luck on finding yours. When I compared
the 350 or 454 mounts to the 307 mounts, the 307 mounts were a lot taller. Are
you going to do a frame off restoration? That's a big job. Once you tear
it down that far it won't have any problem getting your frame mounts off
and on. I have never
done a frame off restoration and I have never chemical dipped a frame.
But I have used POR15. I like POR15 OK on some small things. Battery trays,
etc. I brushed my frame with POR15 but after looking back I probably should
of sprayed it on. I think it has a think look to it and I don't like it
as much. Also you have to get anything you paint real clean before you
use POR15 or it won't stick. It will peal right off after it dries. That's
why I like to use POR15 on small things that can be cleaned real good.
If you can chemical strip your frame and spray on POR 15 you should look
real good and it should stick real good too. Good
luck Ryan,It sounds like
you have a big project on your hands.Take
your time and it will turn out real nice. Keep
on Chevelleing! Brent
HardinWichita Area Chevelle
Owners 

- Original Message -

From:
Ryan
Langstraat

To: The
Chevelle Mailing List

Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 8:22
PM

Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor
Mounts
 Brent Thank you for your info. 
I have come to the conclusion that they will have to be changed. 
I was wondering what was the best way to get those off of the frame. 
It looks to be difficult.  Also, I was wondering if you or anybody
out there has chemical dipped their frame?  I was considering just
sandblasting it but I need to do some research on both.  I have read
that many people recomend using POR-15 on the cleaned frame.  Have
you or anybody used it?  Do you recomend it?  Anyway, thank you
for your help and sorry for so many questions but this is my first resto
and I want to do it right. Thanks
againRyan



Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release Date: 2/28/2005


--
  I would rather live my life as if there is a God,
  and die to find out there isn't, Than live my
  life as if there isn't, And die to find out there is.
  Check out my webpage at http://www.ProStreetCar.com
  TREMEC Distributor at http://www.5speedTransmissions.com
  Team Chevelle member #1778 (Gold),  ACES member #1377
  Hoosier State Chevelle Assoc (www.IndianaChevelles.com) #6
 



Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release Date: 2/28/2005


Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor Mounts

2005-03-01 Thread bhardin1



I know the feeling about doing it right Ryan. We 
only want to do the job once and we want to get it right. It seems I always run 
in to problems and end up redoing something here and there. I have to learn from 
my mistakes. 
 
As far as getting the frame mounts off the frame. 
It is a tight squeeze to get them off. But you can do it. I did it, so I 
know you can. It was actually harder to put them back on then it was to get them 
off. Everything is harder to back together then it is to tear apart. Have you 
found your new frame mounts yet? That was a trick too. I had to get my 
frame mounts from a buddy of mine that had an extra set. Good luck on 
finding yours. When I compared the 350 or 454 mounts to the 307 mounts, the 307 
mounts were a lot taller.
 
Are you going to do a frame off restoration? That's 
a big job. Once you tear it down that far it won't have any problem getting 
your frame mounts off and on. 
 
I have never done a frame off restoration and I 
have never chemical dipped a frame. But I have used POR15. I like POR15 OK on 
some small things. Battery trays, etc. I brushed my frame with POR15 but 
after looking back I probably should of sprayed it on. I think it has a 
think look to it and I don't like it as much. Also you have to get anything 
you paint real clean before you use POR15 or it won't stick. It will peal 
right off after it dries. That's why I like to use POR15 on small things that 
can be cleaned real good. If you can chemical strip your frame and spray on POR 
15 you should look real good and it should stick real good too. 
 
Good luck Ryan,
It sounds like you have a big project on your 
hands. 
Take your time and it will turn out real nice. 

 
Keep on Chevelleing!
 
Brent Hardin
Wichita Area Chevelle Owners
 
 
 
 
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ryan 
  Langstraat 
  To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 8:22 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Motor 
  Mounts
  
  Brent Thank you for your info.  I have come 
  to the conclusion that they will have to be changed.  I was wondering 
  what was the best way to get those off of the frame.  It looks to be 
  difficult.  Also, I was wondering if you or anybody out there has 
  chemical dipped their frame?  I was considering just sandblasting it but 
  I need to do some research on both.  I have read that many people 
  recomend using POR-15 on the cleaned frame.  Have you or anybody used 
  it?  Do you recomend it?  Anyway, thank you for your help and sorry 
  for so many questions but this is my first resto and I want to do it 
  right.  
   
  Thanks again
  Ryan


RE: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

2005-03-01 Thread Dan Mascheck
You might want to check Penske Shocks...They are impressive, but I'm afraid
they are more toward racing then cruising...I could be wrong! Their sight
is: http://www.penskeshocks.com/home.htm

Dan

-Original Message-
From: André-Tigergutt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 1:01 PM
To: 'The Chevelle Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

Hey Guys,

The Koni factory got back to me and they told me. Guess what??? 

To contact the italian agent :o(

that normally means no answer or an answer after a lng time with
some stupid prices.
I guess I'll go for bilstein or koni nort america, as you are much
better on customer service "over there" than here in spaghettiland.

Have Fun!
André - Tigergutt



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Mascheck
Sent: 28. februar 2005 13:16
To: 'The Chevelle Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins


Sorry Clint..I must have read someone else's post besides yours!!

  Dan

-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 4:00 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

I don't know where you inferred in any of my posts that implied QA1's
were better or even equal to Konis or Bilsteins. If all you're
interested in is a better ride,I would stay with the present coil
springs. If you have the funds and want the best ride,install an air
ride system. I've used some of Coil Spring Specialties custom coil
springs on other cars and like them. Sounds like you didn't read much of
my previous post,Dan. True coilovers are much more than just saving
space. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El Camino ProTourer 2001 H-D
FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Mascheck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Clint,

  You talk about the Bilsteins, but then give the impression Konis and
QA1's are slightly better. If I was you...and I wanted a better ride for
my 72 Chevelle...Which would you choose? Second what do you gain with
Coil overs,  other than space?

Do you have any brand of spring you prefer?

   Dan

-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 3:56 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

The average damper is shot after about 15K miles,if that. The high-end
stuff will last over 100K before needing rebuilding. The cheaper stuff
is non-rebuildable. The high-end  stuff can be taken apart and revalved
for different compression & rebound dampening rates or have external
adjustment such as knobs,etc. With the cheaper stuff,what you get,,,is
what you get. Would Bilsteins or Konis make your car ride stiffer? Yes
or they can make it ride a lot better,depending on the dampening rates.
The coilovers on my El Camino are what's known as single-adjustable.
What that means is that when you turn one of the knobs to adjust the
compression dampening,you're also adjusting the rebound dampening also.
Better than a fixed rate but still not as good as a double adjustable
shock which allows you to adjust rebound & compression rates,separately.
Starting to sound like this stuff could get pretty complicated and
expensive? Yes,it can. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El Camino
ProTourer 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Studly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Ok, I'll bite here -- what makes a shock good or bad?  It's one area I
feel very uninformed about.

I guess more directly, what would I feel differently from the driver's
seat if I swap out my cheapy parts store shocks for Koni or Bilsteins?
I have Hotchkis springs all the way.  While I love the performance, the
ride is a little on the stiff side.  Would Bilstein/Koni's make the ride
even stiffer?

-Dave



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clint Hooper
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 7:19 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

I don't know anyone running them on an A-Body. Bilstein and Koni are
comparable with QA1's being maybe a notch below. Penske's are probably
better than any of the above. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El
Camino ProTourer 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Mascheck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks Clint...pretty impressive web sight...I'll look at it in the
morning!! Do you know anyone running them on a Chevelle? Are they that
much better than QA1 or KONI?

   Dan Mascheck

-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.bilstein.com/
Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Ori

[Chevelle-list] Shocks

2005-03-01 Thread brian hollingshead
  I am looking for rear shocks and springs for my '71 malibu, and I was 
wondering if anyone had any suggestions or comments about what brand and 
types to buy. What types are good but are still reasonably priced. Any 
suggestions are much appriciated. Thanks in advance.

  Brian Hollingshead



Re: [Chevelle-list] Air Gap Intake

2005-03-01 Thread Copocloner



hey tom  not sure about the intake I never stray from the stock, 
the cooler the air coming in is always better, for the open road use, you need 
to run lean for long drive,and rich when you race,that's the golden rule, if you 
want the best of both world like so many of us do, the tune is the most 
important part, they sell those  tuner just install the sensor in the 
exhaust,  it take all the guess work out of mixture setting to conditions 
at hand, cost around 80 bucks, and will save your gas and keep your engine at 
peak performance year around, you can spend more on these devices, but I 
still like to get under the hood, and turn the screws, go with a high volume 
pump. as for the finish you speak of never heard of it, but if apply my 
professional, you cant go to wrong.  rick


RE: [Chevelle-list] Air Gap Intake

2005-03-01 Thread Dave Studly








Sucking in cool air is not
counter-productive.  Cooler air = denser air.  Denser air = more
oxygen per unit of volume.  More oxygen means you can add more fuel and
make a bigger bang in the combustion chamber, yielding more power.  While
you are right to an extent that the air might pick up some temperature in the
manifold, (thus making it less dense), it’s still better off than
starting with hot air and making it even hotter.  It’s the same
principle with using an intercooler on a turbocharged or supercharged engine –
cool off the air entering the engine.

 

As for the oil pump, definitely do not use
a high volume pump on a stock pan.  You can find all sorts of horror
stories of people sucking the oil pan dry at higher RPMs.  Match a
high-volume pump with a high volume pan.  With that said, I believe you
could a run a higher pressure than stock, but I’m not sure what the
advantages are.  The only drawback with high volume oil pans are the extra
cost of oil during an oil change, and ground clearance.  I personally
would not want a pan that hangs lower than the crossmember on a street driven
vehicle.  I run a stock pump (Melling M55, I think) and stock pan on my
car and drag race it regularly.  I usually shift at 5700 RPM and have not
had an oil related failure in the 15 years I’ve been racing.  The
stock Chevy oiling system is pretty good.  The rule of thumb is typically
10 psi of oil pressure for every 1000 RPM, although I’ve never seen 50+
psi on my pressure gauge (warm) .  It’s usually around 40-45 at
speed, low 20s at idle.  I run 10W-30 oil.

 

I have a non-air-gap RPM.  I live in northern
Ohio and
never had problems starting my car in cold weather, ie – in the 30s.  It
might take a minute or two of fast-idle before it would idle with no choke, but
it was never hard to start.   As for the air-gap versus non-air-gap,
I don’t think there is a huge difference in performance.  I seem to
remember reading an engine buildup recently where they tested them and the
difference was nil (less than 10 horsepower), but I’ll defer to others on
that, as I can’t remember the source.

 

-Dave

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Tomlinson
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005
11:06 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: [Chevelle-list] Air Gap
Intake



 



When I bought my '66 Elky, it came with a
rebuilt 350 that was not quite completed. The engine is from a '70 Camaro, 4
bolt main, bored out to 355ci, high compression (10:1?), 2.02 heads, and
roller rockers. The cam is the one used in the Edelbrock RPM performance
package (can't remember the specs), and the intake (not installed yet) is the
Edelbrock RPM. Basically, the engine is very similar to the Edelbrock 420HP
engine built with the RPM package.





 





Now for the questions.





 





1) Should I consider the RPM air gap
instead of the non-air gap? I would like to get all the performance I can, but
I still want it streetable. I've heard that the air gap can be difficult to
start, especially in cold weather. I live in NY and won't drive it in the
winter, but it will see cool weather in the spring and fall. I am also
considering a cowl induction system, and it seems like sucking in cool air just
to have it hit a hot manifold is counter productive. Does anyone have
experience with the PermaStar finish?





 





2) The oil pan appears stock. I'm not
sure what oil pump is in the engine. Should an engine like this use something
better than the stock oil pump and pan? It would be easy to change now since
the engine is already on the stand.





 





Thanks for your advice.





 





Tom Tomlinson










RE: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

2005-03-01 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9-Tigergutt?=
Hey Guys,

The Koni factory got back to me and they told me. Guess what??? 

To contact the italian agent :o(

that normally means no answer or an answer after a lng time with
some stupid prices.
I guess I'll go for bilstein or koni nort america, as you are much
better on customer service "over there" than here in spaghettiland.

Have Fun!
André - Tigergutt



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Mascheck
Sent: 28. februar 2005 13:16
To: 'The Chevelle Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins


Sorry Clint..I must have read someone else's post besides yours!!

  Dan

-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 4:00 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

I don't know where you inferred in any of my posts that implied QA1's
were better or even equal to Konis or Bilsteins. If all you're
interested in is a better ride,I would stay with the present coil
springs. If you have the funds and want the best ride,install an air
ride system. I've used some of Coil Spring Specialties custom coil
springs on other cars and like them. Sounds like you didn't read much of
my previous post,Dan. True coilovers are much more than just saving
space. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El Camino ProTourer 2001 H-D
FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Mascheck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Clint,

  You talk about the Bilsteins, but then give the impression Konis and
QA1's are slightly better. If I was you...and I wanted a better ride for
my 72 Chevelle...Which would you choose? Second what do you gain with
Coil overs,  other than space?

Do you have any brand of spring you prefer?

   Dan

-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 3:56 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

The average damper is shot after about 15K miles,if that. The high-end
stuff will last over 100K before needing rebuilding. The cheaper stuff
is non-rebuildable. The high-end  stuff can be taken apart and revalved
for different compression & rebound dampening rates or have external
adjustment such as knobs,etc. With the cheaper stuff,what you get,,,is
what you get. Would Bilsteins or Konis make your car ride stiffer? Yes
or they can make it ride a lot better,depending on the dampening rates.
The coilovers on my El Camino are what's known as single-adjustable.
What that means is that when you turn one of the knobs to adjust the
compression dampening,you're also adjusting the rebound dampening also.
Better than a fixed rate but still not as good as a double adjustable
shock which allows you to adjust rebound & compression rates,separately.
Starting to sound like this stuff could get pretty complicated and
expensive? Yes,it can. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El Camino
ProTourer 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Studly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Ok, I'll bite here -- what makes a shock good or bad?  It's one area I
feel very uninformed about.

I guess more directly, what would I feel differently from the driver's
seat if I swap out my cheapy parts store shocks for Koni or Bilsteins?
I have Hotchkis springs all the way.  While I love the performance, the
ride is a little on the stiff side.  Would Bilstein/Koni's make the ride
even stiffer?

-Dave



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clint Hooper
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 7:19 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bilsteins

I don't know anyone running them on an A-Body. Bilstein and Koni are
comparable with QA1's being maybe a notch below. Penske's are probably
better than any of the above. Clint Hooper H&H Custom,owner 1969 El
Camino ProTourer 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Mascheck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks Clint...pretty impressive web sight...I'll look at it in the
morning!! Do you know anyone running them on a Chevelle? Are they that
much better than QA1 or KONI?

   Dan Mascheck

-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.bilstein.com/
Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Mascheck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Can you find them locally? I do have a German cousin living in
Shwedt...???

-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

ZR-1 Corvettes came standard with Bilsteins,Dan. It's hard to find a
better shock than a Bilstein, Koni,or Penske. Clint Hooper H&H
Custom,owner 1969 El Camino ProTourer

Re: [Chevelle-list] Chevelle sighting

2005-03-01 Thread Dave Corgill


At 10:11 AM 3/1/2005, you wrote:
>
>Has anybody on the list ever had your car featured in a movie? 
How do you 
>get to do that?
>
>Steve
 Yep, "Storming Home" with gil Jared (SP) & jefery
lewis (SP) had my
Wife's 1971 Camaro (blown) & my 1974 (blown) pickup, My job was to
grab
the phone & pick it up, it took 10 hrs of (cut) & try again to
make what
was 3 mins in the movie. They wanted to use my Wife's Camaro in the
race
but She said only she would drive it they poo-poo'ed that idea. After
all
can't have a women driving a blown Camaro can we :( But they have good
eats
on a shoot.
 



RE: [Chevelle-list] Chevelle sighting

2005-03-01 Thread Dave Studly
Not in a movie, but in the mid 90s, my car was in an Eaton brochure for
their aftermarket posi units.  Some woman working for a graphic design
company hired by Eaton saw a picture of my car on a personal website I used
to have when I was in college.  They contacted me and I gave them permission
to use the image.  I was pretty proud of it at the time.. :-) 

Unfortunately, I have no idea what I did with my 2-3 copies of the brochure.
I'm certain I didn't throw them out, but I have no idea where they are at.
:-(

In years past on this list, I know there were discussions about letting your
car be used in a movie.  I don't remember the details, but there were lots
of legal considerations -- who is going to drive the car, who is liable for
any potential damage, etc.  It sounded like a lot of hassle for someone who
doesn't deal with that stuff on a regular basis.

-Dave


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:12 AM
To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Subject: [Chevelle-list] Chevelle sighting

I just bought a used movie from Blockbuster called "Surviving Christmas"
(mostly to watch Christina Applegate).  I was surprised to find that her dad
purchases a beautiful red 70 SS Chevelle.  I think there were 454 markings
on the fender, it had black stripes, cowl induction, and red interior.
Unfortunately, you only get to see the car in two or three scenes.  Either
way, It is a much nicer car than the butchered one in the crummy movie
"Speed Demon".  

Has anybody on the list ever had your car featured in a movie?  How do you
get to do that?

Steve






RE: [Chevelle-list] Chevelle sighting

2005-03-01 Thread Fruhauf Kerry A SSgt 3 CS/CCO

If I remember correct, we covered this area about a year ago.  Again, if I
remember correct, the general consensus was it's a bad idea.  Primarily
because you have to sign a release waiver for your car regarding any
possible damages, and what-not.  I'm sure some one has experience in this.
I'm waiting to see Herb's car in a movie!  It's definitely capable of
hitting the big screen.  

SARGE

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 7:12 AM
To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Subject: [Chevelle-list] Chevelle sighting

I just bought a used movie from Blockbuster called "Surviving Christmas"
(mostly to watch Christina Applegate).  I was surprised to find that her dad
purchases a beautiful red 70 SS Chevelle.  I think there were 454 markings
on the fender, it had black stripes, cowl induction, and red interior.
Unfortunately, you only get to see the car in two or three scenes.  Either
way, It is a much nicer car than the butchered one in the crummy movie
"Speed Demon".  

Has anybody on the list ever had your car featured in a movie?  How do you
get to do that?

Steve




[Chevelle-list] Chevelle sighting

2005-03-01 Thread steve502
I just bought a used movie from Blockbuster called "Surviving Christmas" 
(mostly to watch Christina Applegate).  I was surprised to find that her dad 
purchases a beautiful red 70 SS Chevelle.  I think there were 454 markings on 
the fender, it had black stripes, cowl induction, and red interior.  
Unfortunately, you only get to see the car in two or three scenes.  Either way, 
It is a much nicer car than the butchered one in the crummy movie "Speed 
Demon".  

Has anybody on the list ever had your car featured in a movie?  How do you get 
to do that?

Steve