Hi Jim,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:11:30 -0600 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
I've uploaded a test distribution tarball of stability/4.8.0 [1].
This should contain everything that will go into 4.8.0.1 unless we
find a problem. If anyone would like to test it, it would be
appreciated. I also pushed the patches to the throw-away
tmp/stability/4.8.0 branch [2] in my github account.
You can see what's included by looking at NEWS [3] or NEWS.stability. [4]
[1] http://3e8.org/pub/chicken/stability-tmp/chicken-4.8.0-c4edbf1.tar.gz
[2] https://github.com/ursetto/chicken-core-stability/tree/tmp/stability/4.8.0
[3]
https://raw.github.com/ursetto/chicken-core-stability/tmp/stability/4.8.0/NEWS
[4]
https://raw.github.com/ursetto/chicken-core-stability/tmp/stability/4.8.0/NEWS.stability
I've tested your tarball on the following systems:
Operating system GCC Hardware platform
+---+--
Linux 4.7.2 x86
Linux 4.7.2 x86-64
FreeBSD 4.2.1 x86
Haiku 4.4.4 x86
Windows XP (mingw-msys) 4.5.2 x86
I run make install and make check. Everything seems to be ok on
those systems (except private repository test on Windows, which fails
due to environment configuration problems, IIRC -- shell and make
issues on that particular system).
As mentioned on IRC, I've also run salmonella on the full set of eggs to
compare the stability tarball to 4.8.0. The results are here:
http://parenteses.org/mario/misc/salmonella-diff-4.8.0-stability/ It
seems that there is no regression.
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
