Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
* Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news item. What should I use instead? It has been removed on Oct 4th with commit 6e10dfb17175faa307a2a7230cf705c987af85c5 I guess an alternative would be to use inexact-exact? Kind regards, Christian -- In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can surpass it. --- Lao Tzu ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
* Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? Are you mixing up files? Or using a chicken.h from a previous build? In my version there is no trace of double-number in chicken.h (nor the rest of the repo). -- In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can surpass it. --- Lao Tzu ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130304 15:11]: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? Are you mixing up files? Or using a chicken.h from a previous build? In my version there is no trace of double-number in chicken.h (nor the rest of the repo). Ah, but C_double_to_number is... sorry. -- In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can surpass it. --- Lao Tzu ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130304 15:13]: * Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130304 15:11]: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? Are you mixing up files? Or using a chicken.h from a previous build? In my version there is no trace of double-number in chicken.h (nor the rest of the repo). Ah, but C_double_to_number is... sorry. Which is used for integer64 foreign types in code generation (c-backend.scm). I am unconfused now and will stop mumbling. Sorry for the noise. -- In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can surpass it. --- Lao Tzu ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
Hi Jörg, Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news item. the ##sys# API is not even documented so I don't think it needs to be mentioned in the NEWS. In fact, AFIUI the point of identifiers having that prefix (and ##core#) is that those can be changed without considering backwards compatibility. Otherwise they could just be exported without the prefix. Moritz ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:32:52PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote: Hi Jörg, Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news item. the ##sys# API is not even documented so I don't think it needs to be mentioned in the NEWS. In fact, AFIUI the point of identifiers having that prefix (and ##core#) is that those can be changed without considering backwards compatibility. Otherwise they could just be exported without the prefix. +1; you mess with internals, you get burned :) Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
On Mar 4 2013, Peter Bex wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:32:52PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote: Hi Jörg, Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news item. the ##sys# API is not even documented so I don't think it needs to be mentioned in the NEWS. In fact, AFIUI the point of identifiers having that prefix (and ##core#) is that those can be changed without considering backwards compatibility. Otherwise they could just be exported without the prefix. +1; you mess with internals, you get burned :) Thanks for that hint, helpful enough. So how would I convert from a known-to-be integer to a fixnum? BTW: Another question, how would I use chicken without messing with the internals? Cheers, Peter ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
On Mar 4 2013, Christian Kellermann wrote: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? Are you mixing up files? Or using a chicken.h from a previous build? In my version there is no trace of double-number in chicken.h (nor the rest of the repo). In my version of chicken.h (untouched from git pull) there is at line 1305 #define C_a_double_to_num(ptr, n) C_double_to_number(C_flonum(ptr, n)) ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?
Thanks a lot, this one seems to do the job. On Mar 4 2013, Christian Kellermann wrote: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news item. What should I use instead? It has been removed on Oct 4th with commit 6e10dfb17175faa307a2a7230cf705c987af85c5 I guess an alternative would be to use inexact-exact? Kind regards, Christian ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
