Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add `module-environments' feature
Felix writes: > Signed off and pushed. I fear we will end up with many arbitrary feature > identifiers at some stage, though. Perhaps we should find a method to > distinguish "system" features like this and avoid collisions with user- > defined features? Any ideas? Perhaps a `chicken-', 'core-' or maybe even a `sys##' prefix would do the trick? I wouldn't introduce a new namespace just for that I think. Moritz ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add `module-environments' feature
From: Moritz Heidkamp Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add `module-environments' feature Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:57:42 +0100 > Hello Chickenauts, > > the attached patch merely adds a `module-environments' feature which > indicates the availability of the new `module-environment' > function. This feature would be very nice to have for the new > environments egg implementation in order to be able to cond-expand to > the old implementation for earlier Chicken versions. I somebody agrees! Signed off and pushed. I fear we will end up with many arbitrary feature identifiers at some stage, though. Perhaps we should find a method to distinguish "system" features like this and avoid collisions with user- defined features? Any ideas? cheers, felix ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add `module-environments' feature
Moritz Heidkamp writes: > [...] I somebody agrees! ^ hope ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add `module-environments' feature
Hello Chickenauts, the attached patch merely adds a `module-environments' feature which indicates the availability of the new `module-environment' function. This feature would be very nice to have for the new environments egg implementation in order to be able to cond-expand to the old implementation for earlier Chicken versions. I somebody agrees! Moritz >From 4f326e219248d4de807381af9df9edad6daedf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Moritz Heidkamp Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 20:37:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] register `module-environments' feature to indicate availability of the `module-environment' function --- modules.scm |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules.scm b/modules.scm index f248890..8b048a3 100644 --- a/modules.scm +++ b/modules.scm @@ -882,6 +882,8 @@ (##sys#register-module-alias 'r5rs 'scheme) +(register-feature! 'module-environments) + (define (module-environment mname #!optional (ename mname)) (let* ((mod (##sys#find-module/import-library mname 'module-environment)) (saved (module-saved-environments mod))) -- 1.7.9 ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
