openssl: 2.2.4 release
Hello, I've released openssl 2.2.4 to resolve an issue in the `file-cipher` and `file-digest` procedures returning incorrect results for file sizes that are not an exact multiple of 4096. I have to thank elflng for finding the issue and megane with root cause analysis. As a result of this, the `cipher-context-update!` and `digest-context-update!` procedures have been amended to accept an optional `effective-length` argument to read in less than the full blob. If anyone else is using or considers using the `file-cipher` and `file-digest` procedures, I strongly urge them to update to avoid inconsistencies. Vasilij signature.asc Description: PGP signature
New eggs: srfi-203 and srfi-216 (SICP)
Hello, Someone on the IRC channel pointed out that there is no obvious egg to use for solving SICP exercises as the sicp egg is C4-only and no alternatives exist. I chose to port SRFI-203 and SRFI-216 which provide the picture language and other SICP prerequisites. Both eggs have been tested successfully with `test-new-egg`. I plan to set up a C5 page for the sicp egg pointing to the two SRFIs instead. https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-203/srfi-203.release-info https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-216/srfi-216.release-info Vasilij signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: New eggs: srfi-203 and srfi-216 (SICP)
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:06:58 +0200 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > Someone on the IRC channel pointed out that there is no obvious egg to > use for solving SICP exercises as the sicp egg is C4-only and no > alternatives exist. I chose to port SRFI-203 and SRFI-216 which provide > the picture language and other SICP prerequisites. > > Both eggs have been tested successfully with `test-new-egg`. I plan to > set up a C5 page for the sicp egg pointing to the two SRFIs instead. > > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-203/srfi-203.release-info > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-216/srfi-216.release-info Thanks, Vasilij. Your eggs have been added to the coop. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario
