Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor

2006-12-11 Thread Richard Lewis
On Monday 11 December 2006 11:41, Arto Bendiken wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > felix winkelmann wrote:
> > > Anyway, I'm slowly approaching the point where I can't handle
> > > all feature requests and bug reports and I feel we need a bugtracking
> > > system...
> > >
> > > HINT! HINT!
> >
> > These are the conundrums of open source growth.  I don't know what the
> > answer is here; I haven't passed through this project stage before.  A
> > lot of open source projects have $ attached to them somehow.  Like a
> > university researcher for instance.  Lacking $, there's a
> > corresponding lack of resources for taking on certain things.  Unless
> > people volunteer.
>
>
> As far bug trackers go, I don't know how many people on this list are
> familiar with Trac (http://trac.edgewall.org/)? It's a minimalistic,
> KISS-style issue tracking and project management system for software
> development, with superb Subversion integration (and Darcs support,
> too, though I haven't used that myself).
>
> I have plenty of server resources to spare, and a personal interest in
> all this. Trac could run on a sub-domain such as
> trac.call-with-current-continuation.org, and I could give SSH access
> to the system for the people who need it (Felix, Alejandro, et al). I
> would naturally work with Alejandro to get the SVN (or Darcs)
> repository integrated and ensure everyone could use their existing SVN
> accounts to login to the Trac system without having to re-register.
>
Google's new Code Hosting (http://code.google.com/hosting/) system provides 
users with a Subversion repository and Trac issue management. I've used it 
for my pet project and it seems to work quite well.

Cheers,
Richard
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Richard Lewis
Sonic Arts Research Archive
http://www.sara.uea.ac.uk/
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1)

2006-12-08 Thread Richard Lewis
On Friday 08 December 2006 16:38, Ivan Raikov wrote:
>   It turned out that it is quite painless to make Debian packages for
> Chicken 2.41 based on the 2.3 build scripts. If anyone is interested,
> I have built Chicken packages for Debian stable and placed them at the
> following repository:
>
>   deb http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/mrci/debian  stable main
>   deb-src http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/mrci/debian stable main
>
Yay! Thanks very much. It has installed without problems on Debian "unstable". 
Now I can install more eggs!

Cheers,
Richard
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Richard Lewis
Sonic Arts Research Archive
http://www.sara.uea.ac.uk/
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


Re: [Chicken-users] New user; egg problems

2006-12-07 Thread Richard Lewis
Thanks for your replies regarding this.

I've just managed to install easyffi by removing the -G option from 
easyffi.setup.

But it looks like I'll have to have a go at self-compilation. Being a Debian 
user I'm extremely unused to this sort of thing. Wish me luck ;-)

On Thursday 07 December 2006 18:15, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hello Ivan,
>
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:04:57 -0500 Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think even the most simple kind of Chicken/egg versioning would
> > go a long way.  For example, I can build easyffi and use it in Chicken
> > 2.3 if I simply remove the -G option. So if chicken-setup supported
> > different build commands for different versions of Chicken, this would
> > make packaging Chicken code a whole lot easier. In my case, I want to
> > provide my software as Debian packages, and so I am stuck with
> > whatever version of Chicken is available in the current Debian stable
> > release.
>
> Would it be difficult to make Debian a little more up-to-date
> regarding to Chicken?  2.3 is quite old.
>
> Or maybe we should have an "unofficial" Chicken build for Debian and
> its derivatives ([K,X]Ubuntu, Knoppix etc).  I don't know about dpkg
> packaging and compatibility among distributions .deb packages, so I
> have no idea if it's feasible, easy or even worth.
>
I would certainly use a Chicken Debian repository if someone were to make one.

Cheers,
Richard
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Richard Lewis
Sonic Arts Research Archive
http://www.sara.uea.ac.uk/
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


[Chicken-users] New user; egg problems

2006-12-07 Thread Richard Lewis
Hello CHICKEN users,

I'm new both to chicken scheme and, in fact, to scheme itself. I was attracted 
to chicken as soon as I saw that it had a very simple module management 
system.

I have experienced a few problems with installing some of the eggs though. It 
seems that two important eggs (i.e. ones with quite a few dependents) won't 
install correctly: easyffi and base64.

aquila:/home/richard# chicken-setup easyffi
  /usr/bin/csc -feature compiling-extension -s -O2 -d0 easyffi.scm -G
csc: invalid option `-G'
make: Failed to make easyffi.so: shell invocation failed with non-zero return 
status
Error: shell invocation failed with non-zero return status
"/usr/bin/csc -feature compiling-extension -s -O2 -d0 easyffi.scm -G"
64

and

aquila:/home/richard# chicken-setup base64
  /usr/bin/csc -feature compiling-extension -s -O2 -d1 
base64.scm -emit-exports base64.exports
csc: invalid option `-emit-exports'
Error: shell invocation failed with non-zero return status
"/usr/bin/csc -feature compiling-extension -s -O2 -d1 
base64.scm -emit-exports ...
64

My system is Debian "unstable" with chicken 2.3

I hope its just something really simple!

Also, I notice that it leaves the egg file and an associated directory in the 
directory where I run chicken-setup. Is it alright to delete these 
afterwards?

(BTW, my jabber id predates not only my decision to try chicken scheme but 
also my awareness of its existence!)

Cheers,
Richard
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Richard Lewis
Sonic Arts Research Archive
http://www.sara.uea.ac.uk/
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users