Re: [Chicken-users] Bugs in documentation and Mac OS X 10.6.8 executable generation broken
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > Hi Watson, > > On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:52:06 -0600 Watson Ladd wrote: > >> csi has it for making scripts run. This could simply be a case of me >> assuming that the interpreter and compiler took similar options, which >> is likely. So now i see what happens: csc takes the -ss switch and >> interprets it as -s, which causes the result. >> >> So what is the correct way to compile an SRFI-22 compliant script to >> an executable? > > I'm not sure I understand your question. Usually it's just a matter of > > $ csc your-program.scm > > A binary executable file called `your-program' will be generated. So that works: I get an executable. But the executable does nothing but take up time when run. I've got a SRFI-22 compliant script: that is I want the executable to evaluate (main argslist) where argslist is a list containing strings corresponding to the entries of the argv vector. The interpreter has a flag for this: the compiler doesn't seem to. Do I need to put in a toplevel expression, and if so, which one? Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions: I'm reasonably experienced with scheme, but recently needed to turn some scheme into something that can run on systems with only a C compiler. > > > Best wishes. > Mario > -- > http://parenteses.org/mario Sincerely, Watson Ladd -- "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Bugs in documentation and Mac OS X 10.6.8 executable generation broken
csi has it for making scripts run. This could simply be a case of me assuming that the interpreter and compiler took similar options, which is likely. So now i see what happens: csc takes the -ss switch and interprets it as -s, which causes the result. So what is the correct way to compile an SRFI-22 compliant script to an executable? Sincerely, Watson Ladd On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Christian Kellermann wrote: > Hello Watson, > > * Watson Ladd [111205 11:32]: > >> man csc suggests sending bug reports to chicken-janit...@nongnu.org. I >> did so, and received a message back indicating it was bounced as I was >> not a subscriber. i > >> csc has no comprehensive listing of options. And >> lastly, the bug that started this entire exercise, on Mac OS X csc -ss >> generates a Mach O bundle, not an executable. > > csc -h produces this list for me, a detailed description might be > found in the manual or on the online copy: http://api.call-cc.org/doc/csc > > From your description I am not able to guess what you want to do. > > To generate a "normal" executable with chicken from a scheme file > called "foo.scm" one would call csc like this: > > $ csc foo.scm > > to generate a binary "foo". > > The -s switch is used to generate shared objects, usually used when > compiling modules as extensions. See > http://api.call-cc.org/doc/chicken/eggs for details on those. > > I am not sure where you got the "-ss" switch from, where did you > find that and what did you intend to do? > > Kind regards, > > Christian > > -- > Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will > gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let > movement go on, and the condition of rest will gradually arise. > -- Lao Tse. -- "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] Bugs in documentation and Mac OS X 10.6.8 executable generation broken
Dear Chicken Users, man csc suggests sending bug reports to chicken-janit...@nongnu.org. I did so, and received a message back indicating it was bounced as I was not a subscriber. csc has no comprehensive listing of options. And lastly, the bug that started this entire exercise, on Mac OS X csc -ss generates a Mach O bundle, not an executable. Sincerely, Watson Ladd ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
