[Chicken-users] 4.8.0.5 "compiled ... on" message not quite correct
When I compiled 4.8.0.5 from the tar this morning I get a curious message on starting csi: > csi CHICKEN (c) 2008-2013, The Chicken Team (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann Version 4.8.0.5 (stability/4.8.0) (rev 5bd53ac) linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ] compiled 2013-10-03 on aeryn.xorinia.dim (Darwin)< Not true :) -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to be in the majority... ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] 4.8.0.5 "compiled ... on" message not quite correct
Hi Matt, On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:57:26 -0700 Matt Welland wrote: > When I compiled 4.8.0.5 from the tar this morning I get a curious > message on starting csi: > >> csi > > CHICKEN > (c) 2008-2013, The Chicken Team > (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann > Version 4.8.0.5 (stability/4.8.0) (rev 5bd53ac) > linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ] > compiled 2013-10-03 on aeryn.xorinia.dim (Darwin) < Not true :) That's where the Scheme->C compilation took place. When you built the code from the release tarball, you actually only compiled the C code. Yes, the banner is a bit misleading. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] 4.8.0.5 "compiled ... on" message not quite correct
There was some noise on the list a few months ago in re changing the compilation message to reflect where the .c to .o compile occurred. Not sure if it went anywhere. I don't really care either way, it is basically cosmetic IMO. > On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:02, Mario Domenech Goulart > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > >> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:57:26 -0700 Matt Welland wrote: >> >> When I compiled 4.8.0.5 from the tar this morning I get a curious >> message on starting csi: >> >>> csi >> >> CHICKEN >> (c) 2008-2013, The Chicken Team >> (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann >> Version 4.8.0.5 (stability/4.8.0) (rev 5bd53ac) >> linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ] >> compiled 2013-10-03 on aeryn.xorinia.dim (Darwin) < Not true :) > > That's where the Scheme->C compilation took place. When you built the > code from the release tarball, you actually only compiled the C code. > > Yes, the banner is a bit misleading. > > Best wishes. > Mario > -- > http://parenteses.org/mario > > ___ > Chicken-users mailing list > Chicken-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] 4.8.0.5 "compiled ... on" message not quite correct
Matt, Easiest way to fix this in the tarball is, prior to `make`: echo "#define C_BUILD_TAG \"compiled $(date +%Y-%m-%d) on $(hostname)\"" > buildtag.h or echo '#define C_BUILD_TAG ""' > buildtag.h or whatever you want in that line. You can't currently remove or truncate that file to get an empty buildtag; you have to define C_BUILD_TAG to "". The code could be updated to accept a missing build tag (and/or to remove the resulting blank line); I can provide a patch if you like. Jim On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote: > There was some noise on the list a few months ago in re changing the > compilation message to reflect where the .c to .o compile occurred. Not sure > if it went anywhere. > > I don't really care either way, it is basically cosmetic IMO. > >> On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:02, Mario Domenech Goulart >> wrote: >> >> Hi Matt, >> >>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:57:26 -0700 Matt Welland wrote: >>> >>> When I compiled 4.8.0.5 from the tar this morning I get a curious >>> message on starting csi: >>> csi >>> >>> CHICKEN >>> (c) 2008-2013, The Chicken Team >>> (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann >>> Version 4.8.0.5 (stability/4.8.0) (rev 5bd53ac) >>> linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ] >>> compiled 2013-10-03 on aeryn.xorinia.dim (Darwin) < Not true :) >> >> That's where the Scheme->C compilation took place. When you built the >> code from the release tarball, you actually only compiled the C code. >> >> Yes, the banner is a bit misleading. >> >> Best wishes. >> Mario >> -- >> http://parenteses.org/mario >> >> ___ >> Chicken-users mailing list >> Chicken-users@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] 4.8.0.5 "compiled ... on" message not quite correct
I've changed the build process for stability so that release tarballs have their build tag made more generic and more accurate. This was the easiest workaround, I hope the wording is ok. There's no provision in the build for recording C compilation, just Scheme->C compilation. However, you can override the build tag manually as described below if you'd like to record your C compile environment. Jim CHICKEN (c) 2008-2013, The Chicken Team (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann Version 4.8.0.5 (stability/4.8.0) (rev 5bd53ac) macosx-unix-clang-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ] bootstrapped 2013-10-31 On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:36 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote: > Matt, > > Easiest way to fix this in the tarball is, prior to `make`: > > echo "#define C_BUILD_TAG \"compiled $(date +%Y-%m-%d) on $(hostname)\"" > > buildtag.h > > or > > echo '#define C_BUILD_TAG ""' > buildtag.h > > or whatever you want in that line. > > You can't currently remove or truncate that file to get an empty buildtag; > you have to define C_BUILD_TAG to "". The code could be updated to accept a > missing build tag (and/or to remove the resulting blank line); I can provide > a patch if you like. > > Jim > > On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote: > >> There was some noise on the list a few months ago in re changing the >> compilation message to reflect where the .c to .o compile occurred. Not sure >> if it went anywhere. >> >> I don't really care either way, it is basically cosmetic IMO. >> >>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:02, Mario Domenech Goulart >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matt, >>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:57:26 -0700 Matt Welland wrote: When I compiled 4.8.0.5 from the tar this morning I get a curious message on starting csi: > csi CHICKEN (c) 2008-2013, The Chicken Team (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann Version 4.8.0.5 (stability/4.8.0) (rev 5bd53ac) linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ] compiled 2013-10-03 on aeryn.xorinia.dim (Darwin) < Not true :) >>> >>> That's where the Scheme->C compilation took place. When you built the >>> code from the release tarball, you actually only compiled the C code. >>> >>> Yes, the banner is a bit misleading. >>> >>> Best wishes. >>> Mario >>> -- >>> http://parenteses.org/mario >>> >>> ___ >>> Chicken-users mailing list >>> Chicken-users@nongnu.org >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
