Re: Re : [Chicken-users] csc -extend with user-preprocessor-pass
On 2/12/07, minh thu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, that's a silly silly bug. Here's a patch: > Well, silly silly question: What is the patch for ? Is it intended for those who use the latest tarball? I guess the one who use the svn (or darcs ?) version can just update ? The diff is taken from the current darcs/svn version, but should also fit the tarball. cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re : [Chicken-users] csc -extend with user-preprocessor-pass
2007/2/12, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 2/11/07, minh thu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying the -extend option of csc with the following : > > (user-preprocessor-pass > (lambda form > (display (car form)) > (newline) > '(display "...")) > > When compiling, the first top level form (of the being compiled file) > is not displayed. > Is it normal ? > No, that's a silly silly bug. Here's a patch: --- old-chicken/batch-driver.scm2007-02-12 08:03:19.223978592 +0100 +++ new-chicken/batch-driver.scm2007-02-12 08:03:19.326962936 +0100 @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ (let ([proc (user-preprocessor-pass)]) (when proc (when verbose (printf "User preprocessing pass...~%~!")) - (set! forms (cons (first forms) (map proc (cdr forms ) ) + (set! forms (map proc forms (print "source" '|1| forms) (begin-time) Sorry. Well, silly silly question: What is the patch for ? Is it intended for those who use the latest tarball? I guess the one who use the svn (or darcs ?) version can just update ? Thanks thu ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] csc -extend with user-preprocessor-pass
On 2/11/07, minh thu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm trying the -extend option of csc with the following : (user-preprocessor-pass (lambda form (display (car form)) (newline) '(display "...")) When compiling, the first top level form (of the being compiled file) is not displayed. Is it normal ? No, that's a silly silly bug. Here's a patch: --- old-chicken/batch-driver.scm2007-02-12 08:03:19.223978592 +0100 +++ new-chicken/batch-driver.scm2007-02-12 08:03:19.326962936 +0100 @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ (let ([proc (user-preprocessor-pass)]) (when proc (when verbose (printf "User preprocessing pass...~%~!")) - (set! forms (cons (first forms) (map proc (cdr forms ) ) + (set! forms (map proc forms (print "source" '|1| forms) (begin-time) Sorry. cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] csc -extend with user-preprocessor-pass
Hi, I'm trying the -extend option of csc with the following : (user-preprocessor-pass (lambda form (display (car form)) (newline) '(display "...")) When compiling, the first top level form (of the being compiled file) is not displayed. Is it normal ? Thanks, thu ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
