Re: [Chicken-users] string-split-fields
On 3/25/06, Sunnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following expressions: (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz foo #:infix) (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz foo #:suffix) (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz #:infix) all return the same, while (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz #:suffix) dies with an error, which I guess makes sense. Would you please consider updating the #!:infix variant so that (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz foo #:infix) returns an extra at the end of the list, to distinguish it from (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz #:infix) Try this patch (for regex-comon.scm): 57c57 (reverse ms) --- (reverse (cons ms)) cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] string-split-fields
The following expressions: (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz foo #:infix) (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz foo #:suffix) (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz #:infix) all return the same, while (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz #:suffix) dies with an error, which I guess makes sense. Would you please consider updating the #!:infix variant so that (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz foo #:infix) returns an extra at the end of the list, to distinguish it from (string-split-fields foo foobarfooquuxfoo foo baz #:infix) Sunnan PS My tinyclos/syntax-case problem that I reported earlier remains unsolved. I'll download darcs chicken and see if it' still there. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
