Re: Not compiling statically
On Feb 22, 2023, at 4:20 AM, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > >> Hi everyone. Sorry if this is an obvious question, but can I *not* compile >> an extension statically? > > I think this may require a csc option (to override the > default setting). I can look into this, but currently it > is not supported. Thanks Felix, I wouldn’t really worry about it. It is just making CI take longer than expected, but that is not a big deal. Jim
Re: Not compiling statically
> Hi everyone. Sorry if this is an obvious question, but can I *not* compile an > extension statically? > > In other words, I’m trying to build chickadee, and I believe it's taking > around twice as long as expected because it is building every egg dependency > dynamically and then again statically. > > Is it possible to not do this? This seems to be controlled by > `default-extension-linkage` and by each individual extension with the > `linkage` property, but there doesn’t seem to be a way to control this at > runtime or build a whole set of dependencies dynamically only. I think this may require a csc option (to override the default setting). I can look into this, but currently it is not supported. felix
Not compiling statically
Hi everyone. Sorry if this is an obvious question, but can I *not* compile an extension statically? In other words, I’m trying to build chickadee, and I believe it's taking around twice as long as expected because it is building every egg dependency dynamically and then again statically. Is it possible to not do this? This seems to be controlled by `default-extension-linkage` and by each individual extension with the `linkage` property, but there doesn’t seem to be a way to control this at runtime or build a whole set of dependencies dynamically only. Jim
