Re: [Chicken-users] JQuery in Chickadee

2012-12-11 Thread Matt Gushee
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'll look at it, it probably makes sense to use a local copy for the
 default config.

 What it should really do is fall back to the local copy if the internet
 copy is inaccessible.  This is not difficult but there is an internal issue
 currently preventing it.


Sounds good to me! Thank you.

--
Matt Gushee
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


Re: [Chicken-users] JQuery in Chickadee

2012-12-10 Thread .alyn.post.
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 11:24:54AM -0700, Matt Gushee wrote:
Last night I got a shock when I tried to use Chickadee (as I often do
these days). The Contents section was at the bottom of the page,
expanded, instead of collapsed at the top; the TOC section wouldn't
expand, and incremental search wasn't working. It was rather mystifing,
since I knew I hadn't installed or uninstalled any eggs for at least a
couple of weeks, nor altered my Chicken configuration in any way.
Eventually I got around to examine the Chickadee config file, where i
discovered that Chickadee uses JQuery, accessed by default over the
internet. Then I remembered that I had cleared my browser cache a day or
two before ... and since I was working offline, that must be the problem.
And indeed, I happened to have a copy of the JQuery library on my system,
so I copied it into the Chickadee tree and edited the configuration to
point to the local copy. Problem solved!
But I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to simply bundle JQuery with
Chickadee in the first place--after all, I would think that offline usage
is one of the major reasons for having Chickadee in the first place, and
people do need to clear their caches now and then for a variety of
reasons. I can't see any non-trivial disadvantages to bundling the
library, unless there is a licensing conflict.
What says the community?

I'm not currently using this feature, but I work offline a fair bit,
so the idea gets a +1 from me.

-Alan
-- 
my personal website: http://c0redump.org/

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


Re: [Chicken-users] JQuery in Chickadee

2012-12-10 Thread Jim Ursetto
I'll look at it, it probably makes sense to use a local copy for the default 
config.

What it should really do is fall back to the local copy if the internet copy is 
inaccessible.  This is not difficult but there is an internal issue currently 
preventing it.

Jim

On Dec 9, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Matt Gushee wrote:

 Last night I got a shock when I tried to use Chickadee (as I often do these 
 days). The Contents section was at the bottom of the page, expanded, 
 instead of collapsed at the top; the TOC section wouldn't expand, and 
 incremental search wasn't working. It was rather mystifing, since I knew I 
 hadn't installed or uninstalled any eggs for at least a couple of weeks, nor 
 altered my Chicken configuration in any way.
 
 Eventually I got around to examine the Chickadee config file, where i 
 discovered that Chickadee uses JQuery, accessed by default over the internet. 
 Then I remembered that I had cleared my browser cache a day or two before ... 
 and since I was working offline, that must be the problem. And indeed, I 
 happened to have a copy of the JQuery library on my system, so I copied it 
 into the Chickadee tree and edited the configuration to point to the local 
 copy. Problem solved!
 
 But I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to simply bundle JQuery with 
 Chickadee in the first place--after all, I would think that offline usage is 
 one of the major reasons for having Chickadee in the first place, and people 
 do need to clear their caches now and then for a variety of reasons. I can't 
 see any non-trivial disadvantages to bundling the library, unless there is a 
 licensing conflict.
 
 What says the community?
 ___
 Chicken-users mailing list
 Chicken-users@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


Re: [Chicken-users] JQuery in Chickadee

2012-12-10 Thread Jim Ursetto
Okay, chickadee 0.10.2 uses local jquery for the default config.
Jim

On Dec 10, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:

 I'll look at it, it probably makes sense to use a local copy for the default 
 config.
 
 What it should really do is fall back to the local copy if the internet copy 
 is inaccessible.  This is not difficult but there is an internal issue 
 currently preventing it.
 
 Jim
 
 On Dec 9, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Matt Gushee wrote:
 
 Last night I got a shock when I tried to use Chickadee (as I often do these 
 days). The Contents section was at the bottom of the page, expanded, 
 instead of collapsed at the top; the TOC section wouldn't expand, and 
 incremental search wasn't working. It was rather mystifing, since I knew I 
 hadn't installed or uninstalled any eggs for at least a couple of weeks, nor 
 altered my Chicken configuration in any way.
 
 Eventually I got around to examine the Chickadee config file, where i 
 discovered that Chickadee uses JQuery, accessed by default over the 
 internet. Then I remembered that I had cleared my browser cache a day or two 
 before ... and since I was working offline, that must be the problem. And 
 indeed, I happened to have a copy of the JQuery library on my system, so I 
 copied it into the Chickadee tree and edited the configuration to point to 
 the local copy. Problem solved!
 
 But I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to simply bundle JQuery with 
 Chickadee in the first place--after all, I would think that offline usage is 
 one of the major reasons for having Chickadee in the first place, and people 
 do need to clear their caches now and then for a variety of reasons. I can't 
 see any non-trivial disadvantages to bundling the library, unless there is a 
 licensing conflict.
 
 What says the community?
 ___
 Chicken-users mailing list
 Chicken-users@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
 


___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users