Re: [Chicken-users] Updated crypt.egg
Am 03.10.2005, 20:45 Uhr, schrieb Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Do we have a situation like sqlite; Dr Hipp supports sqlite 2 & sqlite 3? The author of Cryptlib doesn't seem to support anything but the current version. Maybe just renaming the egg crypt3.egg would be sufficient. [...] Hello, I think replacing the original version should be ok -- I wouldn't even know where to get a copy of the old cryptlib version, as I only saw download links to the recent version on its homepage. cu, Thomas ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Updated crypt.egg
Do we have a situation like sqlite; Dr Hipp supports sqlite 2 & sqlite 3? The author of Cryptlib doesn't seem to support anything but the current version. Maybe just renaming the egg crypt3.egg would be sufficient. Best Wishes, Kon On Oct 3, 2005, at 12:17 PM, felix winkelmann wrote: On 9/30/05, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Attached is an updated crypt.egg for cryptlib 3.2.2 Should be renamed to something like crypt3.2.2.egg Use at your own risk. It compiles & links but a test suite is a To Do. Hey, thanks, Kon! Should I replace the official version with this one? (Question directed to Thomas and Kon) cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Updated crypt.egg
On 9/30/05, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is an updated crypt.egg for cryptlib 3.2.2 > > Should be renamed to something like crypt3.2.2.egg > > Use at your own risk. It compiles & links but a test suite is a To Do. > Hey, thanks, Kon! Should I replace the official version with this one? (Question directed to Thomas and Kon) cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users