Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote: It appears that the following pattern no longer works with matchable 3.0 (Chicken 4.6.5): Sorry about that, stupid copypaste error, fixed now. -- Alex ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Felix
fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote:
Talking about matchable: I always wondered whether this should
work:
(match '(...)
(('...) 'yep))
This is:
(match (quote ...)
((quote ...) 'yep))
so the pattern is trying to match a list and bind the result to
the quote identifier. The problem is the pattern language is
ambiguous - does (quote X) get precedence or does (X ...) ?
Currently it's the latter because of the way matchable checks
for ellipsis in match-one and everything else in match-two.
--
Alex
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records
Thanks for restoring my sanity ;-) This was breaking a substantial amount of code I am working on. -Ivan Alex Shinn alexsh...@gmail.com writes: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote: It appears that the following pattern no longer works with matchable 3.0 (Chicken 4.6.5): Sorry about that, stupid copypaste error, fixed now. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] matchable 3.0 and SRFI-9 records
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote: It appears that the following pattern no longer works with matchable 3.0 (Chicken 4.6.5): [...] (match-let ((($ test x y z) (make-test 'a 1 two))) (print x y z)) Error: (match) no matching pattern [...] Does this mean that SRFI-9 record matching is no longer supported? It should work - the code for record matching is essentially the same. I'll look into it. -- Alex ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
