Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI))
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Shawn Rutledge wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fortunately, Chicken Literary and his friends visited the fox, Henry Baker, who reminded them that their stacks are GC'd frequently. All was well again in Chicken Literary Land! But when he added that function-calls never return, Chicken Literary and friends lapsed into an existential stupor. And Henry the Fox ate them. You handled the continuation very well, congratulations. Not a very happy ending though. After (eat ...) I suppose the return value is undefined, isn't it... nah, its not undefined. there is no return value, remember? and the continuation is clearly 'eat -> burp -> digest' -elf ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI))
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fortunately, Chicken Literary and his friends visited the fox, Henry > Baker, who reminded them that their stacks are GC'd frequently. All > was well again in Chicken Literary Land! > > But when he added that function-calls never return, Chicken Literary > and friends lapsed into an existential stupor. And Henry the Fox ate > them. You handled the continuation very well, congratulations. Not a very happy ending though. After (eat ...) I suppose the return value is undefined, isn't it... ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI))
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chicken Literary is all in a panic that the stacks are falling. lol! Fortunately, Chicken Literary and his friends visited the fox, Henry Baker, who reminded them that their stacks are GC'd frequently. All was well again in Chicken Literary Land! But when he added that function-calls never return, Chicken Literary and friends lapsed into an existential stupor. And Henry the Fox ate them. G ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI))
Chicken Literary is all in a panic that the stacks are falling. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI))
On Sun, 1 Mar 2008, Graham Fawcett wrote: On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: heh, thats the longest response ive ever gotten to a random selection from the tao of programming. cool :) Yes. Beautiful work there, John. Graham Nice, nice, very nice, Nice, nice, very nice, Nice, nice, very nice, So many different hackers in the same device. -- "The Book of Bokonon" for Unix (work in progress ;-) Hehehe... The Fourteenth Book of Bokonon for Unix, or What Can A Thoughtful Man Hope For Computing on Earth, Given The Experience Of The Past Nine Decades? - Almost nothing. -elf see the elf? see the cradle? ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
