[chromium-dev] Re: 2 Questions about Npapi (and flash in particular)
i have none. if i could do it on my machine i would debug it and (fopefully) find the root cause my intention in posting it here is that maybe the person who wrote NPAPI will say oh, this makes sense or maybe this thread will die .. anyways, the address space issue seems to make sense in a way, but then again, i never wrote anything with flash or anything like it, so i don't know how they handle the Address space issues (they really have only one process for the plugin) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: 2 Questions about Npapi (and flash in particular)
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:17 PM, nakroyoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote: This is mostly related to problems people have in the help forum 1- you fork a process for npapi plugins, but many people report that if they have a bookmark folder with loads of flash content, they get an 'Aw Snap' or the lucky ones get OUt of Script memory Got any actual repro cases? :) That would be very helpful. :DG --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: 2 Questions about Npapi (and flash in particular)
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:17 PM, nakroyoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote: This is mostly related to problems people have in the help forum 1- you fork a process for npapi plugins, but many people report that if they have a bookmark folder with loads of flash content, they get an 'Aw Snap' or the lucky ones get OUt of Script memory Sounds like a race. If someone would submit the list of bookmarks in such a folder I bet John could reproduce it. this only happens if they do it fast, my question is are you running out of Address space (this mostly happens for 64bit vista but also 32XP and vista) 1) Address space is per-process. 2) We use a single process for all Flash content, so it should be comparable to the way it works in a single-process browser. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: 2 Questions about Npapi (and flash in particular)
Evan thanx, but the 2nd part of the --safe-plugins, i know it works on dev, and it does seem to create the plugininside the sandbox, so is this a good solution security wise to suggest to people ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: 2 Questions about Npapi (and flash in particular)
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, yoav zilberbergyoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote: Evan thanx, but the 2nd part of the --safe-plugins, i know it works on dev, and it does seem to create the plugin inside the sandbox, so is this a good solution security wise to suggest to people ? I don't know this flag, but one reason we don't do plugin sandboxing is that it disables security updates for plugins. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
