[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Darin Fisher
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/48776

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Darin Fisher  wrote:

> I'm fixing the RegisteredEventListener one.-Darin
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
>
>>
>> Oh and a lot of warnings appeared recently. It is surprising how much
>> warnings slow down the build, probably due to stdout serialization.
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23039
>>
>> M-A
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
>> wrote:
>> > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21266
>> >
>> > This is a real problem, I just haven't looked into this one in
>> > particular. Sometimes I just feel like renaming the dll...
>> >
>> > M-A
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour 
>> wrote:
>> >> Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen
>> it
>> >> before)
>> >> 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not found
>> or
>> >> not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
>> >>
>> >> Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes
>> me
>> >> ~10-15 minutes.
>> >> -Mohamed
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <
>> b...@chromium.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
>> >>> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
>> >>> set it up in May.
>> >>>
>> >>> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Ben
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Darin Fisher
I'm fixing the RegisteredEventListener one.-Darin

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:

>
> Oh and a lot of warnings appeared recently. It is surprising how much
> warnings slow down the build, probably due to stdout serialization.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23039
>
> M-A
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
> wrote:
> > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21266
> >
> > This is a real problem, I just haven't looked into this one in
> > particular. Sometimes I just feel like renaming the dll...
> >
> > M-A
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour 
> wrote:
> >> Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen
> it
> >> before)
> >> 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not found
> or
> >> not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
> >>
> >> Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes
> me
> >> ~10-15 minutes.
> >> -Mohamed
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <
> b...@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
> >>> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
> >>> set it up in May.
> >>>
> >>> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
> >>>
> >>> -Ben
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel

A lot of the projects link half-of-the-world when not necessary. I'm
working on that right now.

M-A

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)  wrote:
> I would be surprised if it were just the addition of code. Bear in
> mind the May 7 minute figure includes all of WebKit, and I don't think
> that's doubled in size since then? So it seems like it must be
> something more related to the build system itself.
>
> I don't think it's incremental linking, since my build was a clean build.
>
> -Ben
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Nick Carter  wrote:
>> I'll volunteer to fix any build issues created as a result of sync.
>> Building the protobuf compiler (protoc.exe) emits a bunch of warnings -- the
>> bulk are signed/unsigned warnings.  I'll put together a change to suppress
>> those.
>>  - nick
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh and a lot of warnings appeared recently. It is surprising how much
>>> warnings slow down the build, probably due to stdout serialization.
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23039
>>>
>>> M-A
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
>>> wrote:
>>> > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21266
>>> >
>>> > This is a real problem, I just haven't looked into this one in
>>> > particular. Sometimes I just feel like renaming the dll...
>>> >
>>> > M-A
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen
>>> >> it
>>> >> before)
>>> >> 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not found
>>> >> or
>>> >> not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
>>> >>
>>> >> Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes
>>> >> me
>>> >> ~10-15 minutes.
>>> >> -Mohamed
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)
>>> >> 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
>>> >>> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
>>> >>> set it up in May.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Ben
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >>>
>>
>>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Peter Kasting
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Nick Carter  wrote:

> I'll volunteer to fix any build issues created as a result of sync.
> Building the protobuf compiler (protoc.exe) emits a bunch of warnings --
> the bulk are signed/unsigned warnings.  I'll put together a change to
> suppress those.
>

It would be nice if we could fix those instead of just suppressing them.

PK

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Ben Goodger (Google)

I would be surprised if it were just the addition of code. Bear in
mind the May 7 minute figure includes all of WebKit, and I don't think
that's doubled in size since then? So it seems like it must be
something more related to the build system itself.

I don't think it's incremental linking, since my build was a clean build.

-Ben

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Nick Carter  wrote:
> I'll volunteer to fix any build issues created as a result of sync.
> Building the protobuf compiler (protoc.exe) emits a bunch of warnings -- the
> bulk are signed/unsigned warnings.  I'll put together a change to suppress
> those.
>  - nick
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
> wrote:
>>
>> Oh and a lot of warnings appeared recently. It is surprising how much
>> warnings slow down the build, probably due to stdout serialization.
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23039
>>
>> M-A
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
>> wrote:
>> > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21266
>> >
>> > This is a real problem, I just haven't looked into this one in
>> > particular. Sometimes I just feel like renaming the dll...
>> >
>> > M-A
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour 
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen
>> >> it
>> >> before)
>> >> 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not found
>> >> or
>> >> not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
>> >>
>> >> Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes
>> >> me
>> >> ~10-15 minutes.
>> >> -Mohamed
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)
>> >> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
>> >>> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
>> >>> set it up in May.
>> >>>
>> >>> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Ben
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> >>
>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Nick Carter
I'll volunteer to fix any build issues created as a result of sync.
Building the protobuf compiler (protoc.exe) emits a bunch of warnings -- the
bulk are signed/unsigned warnings.  I'll put together a change to suppress
those.

 - nick

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:

>
> Oh and a lot of warnings appeared recently. It is surprising how much
> warnings slow down the build, probably due to stdout serialization.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23039
>
> M-A
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
> wrote:
> > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21266
> >
> > This is a real problem, I just haven't looked into this one in
> > particular. Sometimes I just feel like renaming the dll...
> >
> > M-A
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour 
> wrote:
> >> Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen
> it
> >> before)
> >> 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not found
> or
> >> not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
> >>
> >> Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes
> me
> >> ~10-15 minutes.
> >> -Mohamed
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <
> b...@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
> >>> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
> >>> set it up in May.
> >>>
> >>> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
> >>>
> >>> -Ben
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel

Oh and a lot of warnings appeared recently. It is surprising how much
warnings slow down the build, probably due to stdout serialization.

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23039

M-A

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel  wrote:
> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21266
>
> This is a real problem, I just haven't looked into this one in
> particular. Sometimes I just feel like renaming the dll...
>
> M-A
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
>> Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen it
>> before)
>> 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not found or
>> not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
>>
>> Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes me
>> ~10-15 minutes.
>> -Mohamed
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
>>> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
>>> set it up in May.
>>>
>>> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>>>
>>> -Ben
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=21266

This is a real problem, I just haven't looked into this one in
particular. Sometimes I just feel like renaming the dll...

M-A

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
> Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen it
> before)
> 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not found or
> not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
>
> Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes me
> ~10-15 minutes.
> -Mohamed
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) 
> wrote:
>>
>> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
>> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
>> set it up in May.
>>
>> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-25 Thread PhistucK
Perhaps the sync library?That was a large thing that was added recently...

☆PhistucK


On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:35, Lei Zhang  wrote:

>
> This is very recent. The Windows try server build times have gone way
> up this week. I thought it was just because of Incredibuild
> misbehaving on the try servers, but it looks like you're experiencing
> similar problems without IB.
>
> I think this is only affects Windows - the Mac and Linux trybot
> compile times haven't increased significantly.
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) 
> wrote:
> >
> > I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
> > minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
> > set it up in May.
> >
> > What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-24 Thread Lei Zhang

This is very recent. The Windows try server build times have gone way
up this week. I thought it was just because of Incredibuild
misbehaving on the try servers, but it looks like you're experiencing
similar problems without IB.

I think this is only affects Windows - the Mac and Linux trybot
compile times haven't increased significantly.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)  wrote:
>
> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
> set it up in May.
>
> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>
> -Ben
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-24 Thread Jeremy Orlow
Not sure, but it's possible shutting off precompiled headers is part of it.
In addition, I'm sure the code base has grown.  It'd be interesting to know
how many lines of code there are now vs. then.

Even if those are major contributors, I'd find it surprising if they were
enough to double the compile times, though.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) wrote:

>
> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
> set it up in May.
>
> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>
> -Ben
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Build time doubled since May - what gives?

2009-09-24 Thread Mohamed Mansour
Hey Ben, same here ... I see this additional message today (havn't seen it
before) 59>LINK : C:\Sandbox\Code\Chrome\src\chrome\Debug\chrome.dll not
found or not built by the last incremental link; performing full link

Changing one file used to take me 5 minutes to build. But now it takes me
~10-15 minutes.

-Mohamed


On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) wrote:

>
> I just ran a build here at home on my i7 workstation. It took 14
> minutes. This is the same system that would build in 7 minutes when I
> set it up in May.
>
> What gives? We need to figure this out ASAP.
>
> -Ben
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---