[cia-drugs] Fwd: [SPY NEWS] Liquid terror: Training People To Act Like Subservient Slaves
__._,_.___ Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___ ---BeginMessage--- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/infowarsnews/message/1015 LIQUID TERROR: Training People To Act Like Subservient Slaves Message List LIQUID TERROR: Training People To Act Like Subservient SlavesTerrorists planned to mix liquids so why are they all being poured into airport bins? Steve Watson / Infowars.net | August 11 2006 The latest terror plot facade is nothing more than an exercise to assess how subservient the general population has become and a primer to making permanent the panicked and ridiculous freedom crushing security measures we are seeing being rushed into implementation at the moment. Whilst the government is saying there is no going back on these measures and that they will become permanent, the media is bleating about rushing in biometric retina scanners and Orwellian behaviour sensing technology. This is the only way they can do these things without backlash and protest, just have a major terror alert and rush them through. How is it that people can still deny that our governments are forwarding a big brother control agenda? ID cards, Biometric databases, retina scanners, face scanning cameras, behaviour sensing machines. The list goes on. It has been proven over and over that these measures will not help prevent terrorism, the government itself has even admitted this, so why do they relentlessly push them? The latest mind bending terror stupidity has every passenger at airports pouring their potentially explosive liquids into bins inside the airports. How stupid can things get? How far does it have to go before people start asking simple questions about what they are being made to do in the name of security? If these liquids are potentially explosive what the hell is the good in pouring them all into large bins inside overcrowded airports and mixing them all together? The Asheville Citizen Times interviewed a mother who was forced to pour away her baby's milk: "I have mixed feelings about all this," Leoni said as she waited to board a flight for Miami at Asheville Regional Airport. "On the one side, Im fine with the safety measures and the effects, but on the other hand, I had to pour out my babys milk this morning. They said I couldn't take it on board." And here she is pouring the potentially deadly milk into a vat of other potentially explosive dangerous liquids. The official counterterrorism statement told us that the plan involved mixing a sports drink with a gel-like substance to concoct explosives that could be ignited with an MP3 player or cell phone. The sports drink could be combined with a peroxide-based paste to form a potent explosive cocktail, counterterrorism officials said. If you believe the dodgy science that suggests that these liquids can be ignited by calling up your mom or whacking on a bit of Led Zeppelin on your MP3 player then they better clear the airports pretty smartish because those bins full liquids could go up any second. unless they are just bins full of baby milk and Dr Pepper that is. The Scientific American states: Furthermore, some chemicals can be mixed to create a toxic gas capable of killing people in an enclosed space such as an airplane. Great, marvelous, lets get mixing them in bins then! The XOPL blogger here is bang on the money and I couldn't put it any better: Sir, I'm going to have to take this bottle of water away from you since it might be a liquid explosive, and I'm going to have to mix it with all of these other bottles of possibly liquid explosive, and I'm going to have to dump them all in this trash can... together. Nevermind that the plot specifically mentions mixing chemicals and/or nitroglycerin... which explodes if handled too roughly. The only conclusion you can reach here is that airport security are not looking for terrorists because if they truly believed terrorists were attempting to board planes with liquids they wouldn't be mishandling the liquids in this way.
[cia-drugs] Fwd: [SPY NEWS] Bush's dubious terror alerts
__._,_.___ Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___ ---BeginMessage--- http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=17495 Bill Berkowitz WorkingForChange 08.19.04 Bush's dubious terror alerts Is administration's political agenda driving warnings of terrorism? WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration has discovered no evidence of imminent plans by terrorists to attack U.S. financial buildings, nearly two weeks after the government issued startling warnings about such possible threats, a White House official said. -- Associated Press, August 12, 2004. When the going gets tough, the tough get to issuing terrorist alerts, announcing high profile arrests, and raising the terrorism threat level. Since January 2002, according to JuliusBlog, an Internet web log, there have been at least fifteen incidents where Team Bush, responding to adverse news or dipping presidential poll numbers, turned either Attorney General John Ashcroft or Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge loose to ramp up talk of terrorism and terrorist attacks. The latest episode aired on August 1, shortly after the conclusion of the Democratic National Convention, when Secretary Ridge raised the Homeland Security Department's terrorist level to Code Orange -- high threat of terrorist attacks -- claiming that there was ample information about terrorists targeting the financial services sector in New York City, northern New Jersey and Washington, D.C. to warrant the action. In prepared remarks, Ridge told the press: ...reports indicate that al-Qaeda is targeting several specific buildings, including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank in the District of Columbia; Prudential Financial in Northern New Jersey; and Citigroup buildings and the New York Stock Exchange in New York. The rest of the country remained at Code Yellow -- significant risk of terrorist attacks. One week later, the New York Times reported that Pakistan had warned the United States that Al Qaeda has considered using tourist helicopters in terror attacks in New York City. Within hours reporters were on the scene interviewing heliport personnel and scaring the bejeezus out of tourists coming off their flights. In the run-up to the Republican Party Convention in New York City later this month, terrorist alerts are rolling out of the Dept. of Homeland Security faster than the grounds crew rolls out the Yankee Stadium tarp during a sudden summer shower. With each real or perceived threat, the American people are reminded of the president's belief that we live in the age of the permanent war against terrorism, a stance he spelled out in a November 2002 document titled Securing the Homeland, Strengthening the Nation. While outlining his budget priorities, Bush maintained that the threat of terrorism is an inescapable reality of life in the 21st century and a permanent condition to which America and the entire world must adjust. The president also said: Today's terrorists can strike at any place, at any time, and with a wide variety of weapons. The most urgent terrorist threat to America is the Al Qaeda network. We will prosecute our war with these terrorists until they are routed from the Earth. But we will not let our guard down after we defeat Al Qaeda. The terrorist threat to America takes many forms, has many places to hide, and is often invisible. We can never be sure that we have defeated all of our terrorist enemies, and therefore we can never again allow ourselves to become overconfident about the security of our homeland. Ramping up the Homeland Security Dept.'s threat level may result in greater vigilance amongst both law enforcement and the public, and it is conceivable that a terrorist attack may have been prevented. The cranking-up of the threat level, however, also drives the panic-mongers, most notably the 24/7 cable news networks: Terrorist Alert banners drape the screen, crawls get creepier, and terrorist experts are trucked out to provide wall-to-wall commentary. After several years of warnings, and no major terrorist incident, some are questioning the accuracy and timing of these alerts: Are they based on new information or old information? Is the information reliable? How great is the threat? Should we take for granted the administration's oft-heard mantra that Al Qaeda wants to disrupt the November elections? With the presidential election less than three months away, there are those with the temerity to question these warnings: Are there other stories -- the continued fighting in Iraq, the mounting death toll of U.S. service personnel, more Abu Ghraib revelations -- that
[cia-drugs] Fwd: Government Releases Detailed Information on 9/11 Crashes (delete if not a researcher)
__._,_.___ Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___ ---BeginMessage--- For what it's worth (not a 9-11 researcher? click "delete" - note: no further messages of this kind will follow). Of course, ALL information released by our government is The Uncensored Truth, especially five-year-old documents released only on demand.Government Releases DetailedInformation on 9/11 Crasheshttp://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htmComplete Air-Ground Transcripts of Hijacked9/11 Flight Recordings DeclassifiedNational Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 196Edited by Barbara EliasFor more information contact:Barbara Elias - 202/994-7000Posted - August 11, 2006(See also: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/sept11/index.html) Washington, DC - August 11, 2006 - The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) this week released full transcripts of the air traffic control recordings from the four flights hijacked on September 11, 2001, and meticulous Flight Path Studies for three of the flights, in response to a Freedom of Information request by the National Security Archive. The studies provide the most detailed technical information available to date related to the hijackings, and the transcripts of the aircraft-to-ground communications are the first complete government disclosure of each flight's air traffic control recordings. The documents are cited extensively in the 9/11 Commission Report to establish key facts and basic timelines for each hijacked flight. The NTSB Web site references the documents but does not provide copies, claiming "the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 are under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Safety Board provided requested technical assistance to the FBI, and any material generated by the NTSB is under the control of the FBI. The Safety Board does not plan to issue a report or open a public docket." The documents were released in their entirety to the National Security Archive and were received directly from the NTSB. The transcripts provide additional details to the information summarized in the 9/11 Commission Report. For example, the NTSB transcript differs slightly from the Commission's text of the warning that United Airlines Flight 93 received only minutes before the hijackers attacked. At 9:23am, the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) shows a text message to Flight 93 reading: "BEWARE OF ANY COCKPIT INTROUSION [sic]. TWO AIRCRAFT IN NY, HIT TRADE CNTER BUILDS [sic]." Five minutes later at 9:28am Flight 93 was sending the message "***(mayday)*** (hey get out of here) ***" as it was being hijacked. The Flight Path Studies reconstruct the routes of American Airlines Flight 11, American Airlines Flight 77 and United Airlines Flight 175. Complied from recorded radar data and information from the Flight Data Recorders, the studies' illustrations of radar ground tracks, maps and altitude profiles provide graphic guides to each hijacking and were used by the NTSB to determine the takeover points where the hijackers gained control of the planes. In addition to the Flight Path Studies and Air Traffic Control Recording transcripts, the NTSB released a February 2002 "Specialist's Factual Report of Investigation" on United Airlines Flight 93 based on the flight's recovered digital data recorder -- the only surviving recorder from the hijacked planes on 9/11. The report provides graphic analysis of the data recovered from Flight 93 and its subsequent crash in Shanksville, PA. According to the report, the flight recorder functioned normally. Documents Note: The following documents are in PDF format. You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view. Document 1: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 11," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnotes 23, 33] Document 2: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 77," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 53] Document 3: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-United Airlines 175," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 41] Document 4: NTSB report, "Specialist's Factual Report of Investigation-Digital Flight Data Recorder" for United Airlines Flight 93, Feb. 15, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnotes 70, 71] Document 5: NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-American Airlines Flight 11, Dec. 21, 2001 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 24] Document 6: NTSB
[cia-drugs] With the Lieberman Defeat, Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2006/lieberman_dlc_down.html With the Lieberman Defeat,Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed by Nancy Spannaus The defeat of the leading Republican Bush-lover in the Democratic Party, Joe Lieberman, in the Senate Democratic primary in Connecticut on Aug. 8, has thrown a huge monkeywrench into the efforts of the Felix Rohatyn-funded Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) to stage a comeback in the runup to the November Congressional elections. The field is now wide open for the Democrats to turn to Lyndon LaRouche's leadership, especially as LaRouche has been the spearhead of the anti-Lieberman drive. Any other course is going to lead, quite predictably, to a smashing Democratic defeat in November. LaRouche representatives in Washington, D.C. are already receiving congratulations on the Lieberman defeat, much as they did when leading Republican thug Tom DeLay of Texas was knocked out of politics. The real question is: Do the Democrats have the guts to follow up? Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.), one of the many leading Democrats who had endorsed Lieberman prior to the primary, responded to the election result with his most feisty comments in months. According to the Aug. 10 Boston Globe, Reid said: "But the perception was that he was too close to George Bush, and this election was, in many respects, a referendum on the President more than anything else. The results bode well for Democratic victories in November and our efforts to take the country in a new direction." Reid said polls show Democrats winning Republican-held Senate seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana, Missouri, and Rhode Island. "A lot of time has gone by and the numbers haven't changed. In actuality, Ohio has gotten better. Montana has gotten better. And now we have three other seats we are looking at. We were only looking also at Tennessee and Arizona. Now we've added Virginia to the mix." Reid said. Out of the eight Republican seats Reid mentioned, the Democrats need to win six, in order to take control of the Senate. The Lieberman Stink Lieberman's loss is a direct reflection of the fact that the Connecticut electorate saw him as the "kissing cousin" of George W. Bush. Like the majority of the nation, Connecticut voters are in revulsion against the brutal, no-win war in Iraq, and the complete lack of action by the current Administration and Congress on the accelerating economic and financial collapse. Challenger Ned Lamont's anti-war campaign was a plus for him, but Lieberman's negatives far outweighed them. Washington sources tell EIR that when Lieberman began to threaten the party that he would campaign as an Independent if he lost the primary, he pushed many over the edge, against him. Lieberman comes by his thug-like behavior naturally. As LaRouche's EIR exposed in a series of mass-run offprints back in August 2002, Lieberman got his start in the Senate with the full backing of some of the most notorious right-wing fascist circles on the planet, including avowed Carlist William F. Buckley. Buckley not only waged a propaganda campaign against Lieberman's opponent, Lowell Weicker, in the Senate race of 1988, but bailed Lieberman out financially by steering him to the Cuban exile community in Miami. Lieberman maintained the close connections with the Cuban right wing, at least up through the 2000 Presidential election, when he was known as "Gore's Man in Little Havana." (See "Fascist William Buckley Put Joe Lieberman in the Senate," EIR, July 26, 2002.) Then there are Lieberman's mob connections, starting with Michael Steinhardt, the chairman and bankroller of the DLC when it was launched out of Pam Harriman's "Democrats for the 80s" late in that decade. Steinhardt, the son of the leading jewel fence for the Meyer Lansky syndicate, ran one of the filthiest hedge funds on Wall Street during the 1980s and 1990s. After he shut down his hedge fund in the wake of his company being involved in a scam over Treasury bonds, Steinhardt emerged as a major player in the Edgar Bronfman-founded Mega Group. Steinhardt, who now funds the neo-con New York Sun newspaper, has continued to be close to Lieberman. The two collaborated in the infamous September 1998 effort to carry out a coup d'état against the Clinton Administration, by trying to get President Clinton to resign in the wake of the Monica Lewinsky affair. Indeed, Lieberman is known in some Washington political circles as the "Senator from
[cia-drugs] Stone's Stupendous Masterpiece Raises Disturbing Questions
Once bitten, twice shy, Stone - no stranger to controversy or conspiracy - has not made a JFK-style expose of the 9-11 Commission. At first blush, grassy knollers may be disappointed, as Stone seems to steer clear of speculation about what "really" happened September 11th. http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/poliwood/poliwoodmain.php Aug. 11, 2006 Stones Stupendous Masterpiece Raises Disturbing Questions By Ed Rampell Oliver Stones World Trade Center is among the greatest disaster movies ever shot, although its much more than a special effects spectacle. This colossal masterpiece returns the director of Kennedy assassination/ Vietnam/Central America classics to Hollywoods front ranks and the frontlines of films about touchy subjects that raise troubling questions, with what appears to be a knowing nod to 9/11 conspiracy theories. Based on actual accounts, WTC opens with just another day, as unsuspecting commuters rise and head towards Manhattan. Nicolas Cage and Michael Pena portray Sergeant John McLoughlin and rookie Will Jimeno (based on real Port Authority Police Department officers). Suddenly, a jets shadow zooms across a high rise; booms are heard. A veteran of 1993s WTC bombing, McLoughlin leads a PADP detachment from midtowns Bus Terminal to downtowns disaster site.En route, a second plane strikes the South Tower. The sarge mutters that after the blind sheiks assault, authorities became "prepared for everything, but not this, not for something this size. Theres no plan" for aerial surprise attacks. Arriving at the WTC, amidst mass carnage and confusion, the policemen see someone falling from the towering inferno. Nevertheless, the men-in-blue press on to the concourse, where McLoughlin asks for volunteers to rescue people stranded above. "I got it, sarge," says the rookie. As Jimeno, McLoughlin and others enter hells gates, viewers who know what will literally befall the first responders unaware of the impending apocalypse cant help but be moved. At the screening I attended, two women brought tissue boxes and offered Kleenexes to audience members - it was here this Native New Yorker needed eye wipe number one. Its the first of many Kleenex moments: as the Twin Towers collapse, Jimeno and McLoughlin are trapped by rubble. Pinned down, they fight for their lives, and Stone opens up the action to their flashbacks and those left behind. Like many disaster flicks, personal stories unfold. Coping with the unraveling Armageddon, the cops families are brave in their own ways. At a March 18 L.A. demo protesting the Iraq invasions third anniversary, I asked Maria Bello if she was in any upcoming socially conscious films. She replied, "I dont ever plan to do a film with a message. I just happen to do films that move me, and if they happen to have a message for someone, thats fantastic as well. Im currently in Oliver Stones new film about 9/11." As McLoughlin and Jimenos wives, Bello and Maggie Gyllenhaals performances are eloquent rebukes to Squeaky Fromme-like "pundits" who mock 9/11 widows. But WTC is no tearjerker - or gung-ho flag waver. This homage to ordinary peoples extraordinary courage could have ended with Bushs bullhorn speech atop Ground Zeros remains. But Stone (who, unlike Bush, volunteered for Vietnam) knows that with turmoil in Afghanistan, Iraq and much of the Middle East, the presidential bravado rings hollow today. Instead, the wise director of the 1980s Vietnam and Central America dramas Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July and Salvador ends WTC on a note of hope and solidarity, as Cage says: "9/11 showed us what humans are capable of, the evil, yeah sure, but it also brought out a goodness we forgot could exist. People taking care of each other, for no other reason than it was the right thing to do. Its important for us to talk about that good, to remember, because I saw a lot of it that day."In Stones oeuvre, WTC may be closest to his other Lower Manhattan movie, 1987s Wall Street, starring Charlie Sheen, who goes-for-broker when bullish Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas) pronounces: "Greed is good." Charlie plays the son of blue collar worker Martin Sheen (his offscreen father and activist). Stone, the son of a Wall Streeter, extols the proletariats virtues in Wall Street and WTC, where plebians, not patricians, are working class heroes. 9/11 conspiracy theorists would naturally cast the first Stone to direct a September 11th feature. After all, he helmed 1991s JFK, wherein Stone leaves no stone unturned in debunking the Warren Commission/lone gunman/"magic bullet" Kennedy assassination narrative. Similarly, todays cabal-minded doubt the official version of September 11th in documentaries such as Michael Moores Fahrenheit 9/11, 911 in Plane Site and Confronting the Evidence. Among critics bone-chilling allegations is that the Pentagons 16 foot hole reportedly caused by Flight 77 is too small for
[cia-drugs] Uncle Sam a Liar George Bush Says NOPE BABY !!
NOW COME ON YOU KNOW MO BETTERMy Buddy W would never Prevaricate They all be fine up standing WALKING EAGLE TYPESUncle Sam a LIAR ohhh PULASE To: Cia-drugs@yahoogroups.comFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:03:02 EDTSubject: [cia-drugs] Fwd: Government Releases Detailed Information on 9/11 Crashes (delete if not a researcher)To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]From: Brian Bogart [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Government Releases Detailed Information on 9/11 Crashes (delete if not a researcher)Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:10:15 -0700 For what it's worth (not a 9-11 researcher? click "delete" - note: no further messages of this kind will follow).Of course, ALL information released by our government is The Uncensored Truth, especially five-year-old documents released only on demand. Government Releases Detailed Information on 9/11 Crasheshttp://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htmComplete Air-Ground Transcripts of Hijacked 9/11 Flight Recordings DeclassifiedNational Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 196Edited by Barbara EliasFor more information contact: Barbara Elias - 202/994-7000Posted - August 11, 2006(See also:http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/sept11/index.html) Washington, DC - August 11, 2006 - The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) this week released full transcripts of the air traffic control recordings from the four flights hijacked on September 11, 2001, and meticulous Flight Path Studies for three of the flights, in response to a Freedom of Information request by the National Security Archive. The studies provide the most detailed technical information available to date related to the hijackings, and the transcripts of the aircraft-to-ground communications are the first complete government disclosure of each flight's air traffic control recordings. The documents are cited extensively in the 9/11 Commission Report to establish key facts and basic timelines for each hijacked flight. The NTSB Web site references the documents but does not provide copies, claiming "the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 are under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Safety Board provided requested technical assistance to the FBI, and any material generated by the NTSB is under the control of the FBI. The Safety Board does not plan to issue a report or open a public docket." The documents were released in their entirety to the National Security Archive and were received directly from the NTSB. The transcripts provide additional details to the information summarized in the 9/11 Commission Report. For example, the NTSB transcript differs slightly from the Commission's text of the warning that United Airlines Flight 93 received only minutes before the hijackers attacked. At 9:23am, the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) shows a text message to Flight 93 reading: "BEWARE OF ANY COCKPIT INTROUSION [sic]. TWO AIRCRAFT IN NY, HIT TRADE CNTER BUILDS [sic]." Five minutes later at 9:28am Flight 93 was sending the message "***(mayday)*** (hey get out of here) ***" as it was being hijacked. The Flight Path Studies reconstruct the routes of American Airlines Flight 11, American Airlines Flight 77 and United Airlines Flight 175. Complied from recorded radar data and information from the Flight Data Recorders, the studies' illustrations of radar ground tracks, maps and altitude profiles provide graphic guides to each hijacking and were used by the NTSB to determine the takeover points where the hijackers gained control of the planes. In addition to the Flight Path Studies and Air Traffic Control Recording transcripts, the NTSB released a February 2002 "Specialist's Factual Report of Investigation" on United Airlines Flight 93 based on the flight's recovered digital data recorder -- the only surviving recorder from the hijacked planes on 9/11. The report provides graphic analysis of the data recovered from Flight 93 and its subsequent crash in Shanksville, PA. According to the report, the flight recorder functioned normally. DocumentsNote: The following documents are in PDF format.You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view. Document 1: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 11," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnotes 23, 33] Document 2: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines Flight 77," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 53] Document 3: NTSB report, "Flight Path Study-United Airlines 175," Feb. 19, 2002 [Chapter 1, The 9/11 Commission Report, "We Have Some Planes." Footnote 41] Document 4: NTSB report, "Specialist's Factual Report of Investigation-Digital Flight Data Recorder" for United Airlines Flight 93, Feb. 15, 2002
