[cia-drugs] Foreign policy and the Power Elite-reposted from April 5, 2005

2007-02-19 Thread Arlene Johnson
This is just as appropriate today as it was in 2005, maybe more so.

Peace,

Arlene Johnson
Publisher/Author
http://www.truedemocracy.net
To access my work, click on the icon that says Magazine.
Password for 2006 editions: message

Foreign Policy and the Power Elite

Scott Ritsema

 April 4 2005

 

Any objective observer can see the wisdom of the Founding Fathers’ foreign 
policy philosophy of non-interventionism: friendly trade relationships with all 
nations, but pre-emptive war and alliances with none. It was a philosophy that 
kept us safe and prosperous until 1898, when we began to turn from its wisdom, 
as we declared war on Spain. The 20th century witnessed further ill-advised 
departures from the foreign policy philosophy of our Founding Fathers. Today, 
aside from a few scattered patriots, Washington can essentially be divided into 
two camps, internationalists and neo-conservative 
internationalist/interventionists, neither of which is truly American, and both 
of which, controlled by the same power elite, lead to the same ends: world 
government.

The first camp, mostly comprised of Democrat internationalists, genuinely seeks 
submergence of the US into a UN-controlled world government in which the EU and 
an increasingly socialist US hold the seats of power. Their philosophy aligns 
with that of the Europeans; they believe in “democratic socialism” (two very 
un-American words) and the end of national sovereignty. The political values of 
this camp do not reflect, in the least, the political philosophy of the 
Founding Fathers.

This socialist internationalist philosophy can most clearly trace its roots to 
the scheming of Edward M. House (or “Colonel House”), who was a close advisor 
to Woodrow Wilson, and was even described by Wilson as his “independent self.” 
The philosophy of House was a far cry from that of our Founding Fathers. In 
fact, he argued that the Constitution was a product of out-dated 18th century 
philosophy, and it needed to be scrapped. His solution was socialist world 
government. In his own words, what he sought was “socialism as dreamed of by 
Karl Marx.”

Additionally, he was the primary advocate for the League of Nations and became 
the principle founder of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 after the 
Senate’s refusal to agree to U.S. membership in the League. The Council on 
Foreign Relations, then, became the brains behind the New Deal and the United 
Nations, and is described by many as the ruling establishment even to this day. 
It is not difficult to see how this philosophy has been leading us into the 
“new world order” (their own phrase) that these internationalists have dreamed 
of for the last century, as the United Nations has grown in power over the 
decades.

The second camp, mostly comprised of Republican neo-conservatives, seeks to 
cooperate with and empower the UN, but has as its main goal a virtual “Pax 
Americana” and the “greatness of the state”, brought about through endless 
pre-emptive war. As detailed extensively by Ron Paul in his excellent speech, 
Neo-Conned, these self-proclaimed neo-conservatives are not conservative and 
there is nothing new about the disgraceful philosophy to which they adhere. 
Their philosophy of endless war and big government really finds its roots in 
Machiavelli’s obsession with the “greatness of the state” along with Trotsky’s 
belief in “permanent revolution.” It is well documented and undeniable that 
neo-conservatism is not compatible with the non-interventionism, limited 
government, and constitutionalism held to by our Founding Fathers. Individual 
liberty is not even on their radar, much less is it the priority of 
neo-conservatives.

Interestingly enough, most of the prominent neo-conservatives are also part of 
the CFR power elite. Clearly, the philosophy of the neo-cons does not detract 
from the move toward world government in the least; rather, neo-conservatism 
hastens its coming in an obvious way, as well as a round-about way. It does so, 
first, because neo-cons continually legitimize the UN, seeking to “give teeth” 
to the world body, and back its resolutions with military force. This pro-UN 
stance is much neglected by good Americans who desire to see Republicans as 
defenders of American sovereignty. Yet it is clearly obvious that these 
neo-cons are not anti-UN. They seek to fight wars to uphold its resolutions and 
they seek to cooperate with the UN whenever possible.

Secondly, neo-conservatives aid in the empowerment of the world government by 
energizing the left wing through their torturous disregard for life and human 
dignity. By doing this, the neo-cons not only give America a bad name, but also 
spur world-wide left-wingers to unite and beg for a new world order to stop the 
American “fascists.” This is demonstrated clearly in the fact that France and 
Germany now see themselves and the whole of the EU as a counterbalance to the 
US. They seek to have the seat of power of the 

[cia-drugs] Jim Marrs Concise History of Secret Societies/audio

2007-02-19 Thread calgirlsddd85021
http://ia310909.us.archive.org/2/items/VariousVariousResearchersontheNew
WorldOrderwwwgeocitiescomariainvictus/Jim_Marrs__Concise_History_of_Secr
et_Societies.mp3



Re: [cia-drugs] Re: Fwd: [SPY NEWS] 9/11 questions still smoldering

2007-02-19 Thread Gritzle70
Notice the brief mention about flight AA77; later on
there is also brief mention of controlled demolition. 

The rest of the lengthy article is a list of all the
experts or well known people who have stated that
the government is complicit.  We are to assume that
they have so stated this based on the assumptions that
Boeings were hijacked and the WTC was destroyed by CD.

No wonder the perps are laughing and slapping each
other on the backs about the success of their messy
911 psyops.  

Since even the 911 truthlings fell for this rather
crude psyops, imagine how sophisticated the new ops
will be.

--- muckblit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would have been illegal for AA77 out of Dulles
 9/11/2001 to land
 without radio or altitude transponder, unless it had
 a fighter escort.
 There is an instance of dereliction of duty that
 will live in infamy,
 in the pedophile database.
 
 Therefore an FAA flight controller could not have
 abandoned that dot
 on his or her screen. To abandon AA77 without
 Presidential orders, not
 vice-presidential weasel words, would have been
 unthinkable for the
 responsible FAA flight controller. And the same
 screen was available
 to FAA flight controllers at Andrews AFB, whose
 Potomac Valley FAA
 TRACON screens look the same as those at Dulles,
 BWI, and National
 airports, because they are the same. FAA Andrews AFB
 Potomac Valley
 TRACON flight controllers are on record in
 mainstream news as having
 taken over all FAA flight control at National when
 the tower at
 National went out years before 911. Flight
 controllers at Andrews are
 fully FAA flight controllers and looking at the same
 representation of
 the same data package distributed by the same
 network to all FAA
 flight controllers in the FAA's Potomac Valley
 TRACON. You might have
 heard different, but Andrews AFB is FAA flight
 control, no disconnect,
 literally, no disconnect to connect by way of NORAD
 or special
 invitation from Dick Cheney.
 
 Ironically, the guts of the Potomac Valley TRACON
 are currently housed
 at the old Electronic Warfare Center at Vint Hill,
 Virginia(near
 Gainesville on the map), which in a further test of
 your gullibility
 is not even near ANY airport. The radars assembled
 feeding into that
 network are scattered over an area including all of
 those
 airports(Dulles, BWI, National, Andrews), and MANY
 other radar sites
 miles beyond those airports. A vast array of radars
 feed into the
 Potomac Valley TRACON, which then relays the same
 digital data package
 to FAA flight controllers at Andrews AFB, Dulles,
 National, and BWI.
 Forget NORAD, learn TRACON.
 
 It was unthinkable, if you remember that word from
 the
 neuro-linguistic neutralization of that same word by
 the high flying
 shootdown unthinkable non sequitur, unthinkable,
 not to mention
 highly illegal and certain to instantly get a flight
 controller fired,
 which would then be the least of his worries in
 eternal infamy among
 flight controllers and pilots, unthinkable for the
 Dulles flight
 controller to abandon AA77, knowing that it would be
 illegal for AA77
 to land on a 10,000 foot runway, or anywhere but a
 10,000 foot runway,
 unless it had a fighter escort. The Dulles flight
 controller
 abandoning AA77 was what was unthinkable, not
 following standard
 operating procedure and giving AA77 a fighter escort
 because it was
 required to land immediately(but only if it had a
 fighter escort).
 Both the flight controller and the AA77 pilot would
 lose their jobs,
 at a bare minimum of unthinkable consequences, if
 the Dulles flight
 controller abandoned the pilot to an impossible
 requirement to land
 immediately combined with the illegality of landing
 without a fighter
 escort.
 
 That's a given. Then you had Porter Goss having
 breakfast in DC with
 General Mahmud Ahmed, commander of 911 mastermind
 KSM and 911 moneyman
 Omar. What did the 911 Commission say Porter ate for
 breakfast?
 
 The notion of a high-G...fighter style
 maneuver...270 degree
 turn...high speed stall by  AA77 at the Pentagon
 9/11/2001 began with
 Harry Gold, a civilian contractor at the Pentagon
 who spoke on local
 TV, EyeWitness News, channel 9 CBS affiliate,
 anchored by Mike Buck
 Buchanan and Andrea (?). Harry Gold did not say that
 he saw see any
 turn, not a hint of a beginning of any turn, but he
 was
 mis-understood, perhaps deliberately. Details
 follow, but first...
 
 The notion of a small plane hitting the Pentagon
 began with USAF
 propaganda officer Lt Col Art Holbo on the same
 local TV news show.
 After the FBI had confiscated local area security
 videos that would
 have resolved the 911 Pentagon Magic Bullet issue,
 notably the
 Sheraton Hotel and Citgo gas station videos, the
 government's Magic
 Bullet propaganda was bolstered by the Pentagon
 security camera
 forgery, which did not show any plane. All it showed
 clearly was many
 artifacts of forgery, which you can easily find on
 the internet.
 
 Holbo was heard 

[cia-drugs] RE: [Armageddon-or-NewAge] Is Saddam MABUS?

2007-02-19 Thread George Baaden



 This battle between the Sunnis and the Shiites started after the Death 
of Muhammed and in the Medina and Mecca Area. The Sunnis say the leadership 
of Islam should be choosen by the People and the Shiites say it should be by 
Muhammed's Blood line.

  Over time, the Sunnis gained in Numbers, and they Killed EACH of the 
Shiite top Leader. The Sunnis killed up to the next 11 Shiites in bloodline 
for the leadership of Islam.

 By the 860's, there was a 12th Leader of the Muhammed Bloodline to take 
the leadership of Islam. The Sunnis also wanted to kill him. BUT, God hid 
him from the people, the process is called the Occultation, (see below 
link). This 12th Iman has been ALIVE all of these years since the 860's, 
living amoung us and etc. and etc. and etc.!!!

 After this, the Sunnis outnumbered the Shiites and drove them East, 
towards Baghdad and Iran, where today is where the Shiites live and etc.!!!

 This 12th Iman, is the Magi that the Shiites are waiting for. Some say 
he showed up in the 1800's. That there was some Muslim Shiite claiming to be 
him and etc.!!! (See below link).

 The Shiites say that those Imans that you see in Iran wearing the Black 
Turbins and etc., supposedly they are the True Descendents of Muhammed.

 Interesting, the Jordanian Ruling family also claim to be the 
descendents of Muhammed, even though they are Sunnis, but they don't claim 
to be the leaders of Islam!!!

 In Judaism, I think they also claim that there is suppose to be a 
person living on this Earth for over 2000 years and etc. that God is waiting 
to bring about at the Right Time!!!

 If anybody knows about this, can you write something about it, 
Thanks!!!

 Excellent Link about the Shiites 12th Iman, the future Mahdi:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_al-Mahdi



   George






From: John Bacon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Armageddon-or-NewAge] Is Saddam MABUS?
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:04:48 -

This Comet McNaught is a warning. What with the death of Saddam
(MABUS)? and the unexpected appearance of a comet. Portend that
something is in the air. These two events Harold the coming of the
Third Anti Christ. And the countdown to Armageddon. I spent a lot of
time thinking over this and it seems to me that the Anti Christ (3rd)
will emerge in Iran. And we have a world wide insurgency of Islamic
terror so to soften up the world for the Take over of the Revised
Persian Empire. The 'Moderate' Arab States are scared of the Persians
(because they're Non Arabs) And the trouble in The Palestine with
Syria and Hezbollah Both clients of Iran. The struggle now is for the
control of Lebanon with Hamass being funded by Arabs and Hezbollah by
Iran. Iran wants to extend it's influence to the Mediterranean sea to
the Turkish border down to Egypt to include the Sudan and maybe
further, East to the Pakistani border. And maybe just maybe include
Pakistan.  Also to include the entire Saudi Arabian peninsula. And
all other Gulf States And of course kick out all foreign influence.
Not just the United States. The fear is that the 12th. Magti will
indeed come and lead the Moslems to take over the world. However the
key to understand this is to be found in the Book of Revelations.
What I'm proposing here is that the 12th. Magti is in fact a robotic
figure It talks about a Human form given the power to move as a
Human. Weather you believe in such things is up to you but is it any
accident that there have been massive UFO sighting over Iran as of
late? Particularly over their Nuclear program? I'm wondering just
what's going on?








Re: [cia-drugs] Re: Fwd: [SPY NEWS] 9/11 questions still smoldering

2007-02-19 Thread Gritzle70
Very interesting.  You edited out the entire my part
of my post about where I stated that no planes hit the
WTC.  Indeed, no planes were used during the entire
911 psyops.

The media inserted CGI's (computer graphic images)into
the footage of the 2nd hit.  So the media was not only
complicit, but an accessory to mass murder.

You also edited out my part about how the WTC was
destroyed by an exotic weapon -- a directed energy
beam weapon -- probably an EM type.  It turned the WTC
to dust so there was no collapse; the dust debris blew
away with the wind.

After you edited out the major part of my post, you
left the remaining in tact so that what my message
says makes no sense.

I sent the message directly to you but you forwarded
it to CIA-drugs.

Just goes to show me that you are on the perps' side
as well.

You should stick to reporting on drugs where you do
some good work and leave the 911 psyops alone;  isn't
it off topic?


--- Gritzle70 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Notice the brief mention about flight AA77; later on
 there is also brief mention of controlled
 demolition. 
 
 The rest of the lengthy article is a list of all the
 experts or well known people who have stated that
 the government is complicit.  We are to assume that
 they have so stated this based on the assumptions
 that
 Boeings were hijacked and the WTC was destroyed by
 CD.
 
 No wonder the perps are laughing and slapping each
 other on the backs about the success of their messy
 911 psyops.  
 
 Since even the 911 truthlings fell for this rather
 crude psyops, imagine how sophisticated the new ops
 will be.
 
 --- muckblit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It would have been illegal for AA77 out of Dulles
  9/11/2001 to land
  without radio or altitude transponder, unless it
 had
  a fighter escort.
  There is an instance of dereliction of duty that
  will live in infamy,
  in the pedophile database.
  
  Therefore an FAA flight controller could not have
  abandoned that dot
  on his or her screen. To abandon AA77 without
  Presidential orders, not
  vice-presidential weasel words, would have been
  unthinkable for the
  responsible FAA flight controller. And the same
  screen was available
  to FAA flight controllers at Andrews AFB, whose
  Potomac Valley FAA
  TRACON screens look the same as those at Dulles,
  BWI, and National
  airports, because they are the same. FAA Andrews
 AFB
  Potomac Valley
  TRACON flight controllers are on record in
  mainstream news as having
  taken over all FAA flight control at National when
  the tower at
  National went out years before 911. Flight
  controllers at Andrews are
  fully FAA flight controllers and looking at the
 same
  representation of
  the same data package distributed by the same
  network to all FAA
  flight controllers in the FAA's Potomac Valley
  TRACON. You might have
  heard different, but Andrews AFB is FAA flight
  control, no disconnect,
  literally, no disconnect to connect by way of
 NORAD
  or special
  invitation from Dick Cheney.
  
  Ironically, the guts of the Potomac Valley TRACON
  are currently housed
  at the old Electronic Warfare Center at Vint Hill,
  Virginia(near
  Gainesville on the map), which in a further test
 of
  your gullibility
  is not even near ANY airport. The radars assembled
  feeding into that
  network are scattered over an area including all
 of
  those
  airports(Dulles, BWI, National, Andrews), and MANY
  other radar sites
  miles beyond those airports. A vast array of
 radars
  feed into the
  Potomac Valley TRACON, which then relays the same
  digital data package
  to FAA flight controllers at Andrews AFB, Dulles,
  National, and BWI.
  Forget NORAD, learn TRACON.
  
  It was unthinkable, if you remember that word
 from
  the
  neuro-linguistic neutralization of that same word
 by
  the high flying
  shootdown unthinkable non sequitur,
 unthinkable,
  not to mention
  highly illegal and certain to instantly get a
 flight
  controller fired,
  which would then be the least of his worries in
  eternal infamy among
  flight controllers and pilots, unthinkable for
 the
  Dulles flight
  controller to abandon AA77, knowing that it would
 be
  illegal for AA77
  to land on a 10,000 foot runway, or anywhere but a
  10,000 foot runway,
  unless it had a fighter escort. The Dulles flight
  controller
  abandoning AA77 was what was unthinkable, not
  following standard
  operating procedure and giving AA77 a fighter
 escort
  because it was
  required to land immediately(but only if it had a
  fighter escort).
  Both the flight controller and the AA77 pilot
 would
  lose their jobs,
  at a bare minimum of unthinkable consequences,
 if
  the Dulles flight
  controller abandoned the pilot to an impossible
  requirement to land
  immediately combined with the illegality of
 landing
  without a fighter
  escort.
  
  That's a given. Then you had Porter Goss having
  breakfast in DC with
  General Mahmud Ahmed, commander of 911 mastermind
  KSM and 911 

[cia-drugs] Foreign policy the Power Elite- OIL WARS NO SECRET

2007-02-19 Thread judson witham
WE NEED A NATIONAL ACTION PLAN AND
  NATIONAL POSSE UP /  TO BETTER ORGANISE
   
  OIL WARS NO SECRET
  The Reality  BushCo and Carlyle Whores
   
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaGCJmCAJ40
   
  The LIES JUST KEEP COMING from DC
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaGCJmCAJ40
   
  Well Paying To Take Over American Political Power takes loads of CASH.  Like 
the Clintons used Madison Cash, Bush and Carlyle, Enron and even the Missing 
C-130s TONS of Brand New Hundred Dollar Bills, Bush's Way Forward is a MONEY 
CON of unprecedented proportion.  Everyone who has a brain KNOWS the Lie 
Factory covered by Mother Jones was as accurate an account as the REALITY seems 
to have panned out. Mr. Pizzo fails to see the CASH missing from Texas Banks 
and SLs and those in California, New Mexico, Arizona, Florida, Missouri, Penn 
HELL going back to Penn Square and The Continental Lootings and the BCCI mess, 
its takes MONEY to run SECRET GUVMINTS.
  Cathryn Fitts and William Black from UT and JUDSON WITHAM from Houston Texas 
along with folks like Martin Mayer etc., et al in FACT KNOW that All The 
Missing Loot is being used to PROMOTE, INFLUENCE and BUY FAVORS from all sorts 
of folks Mostly in the Congress and Senate - AND THE BAND PLAYS ON
   
  Judson Witham

While we're all being DISTRACTED they are Looting the Nation


The Globalists are Coming
  The New World Order Is Taking Over
   
  WAKE THE  F  UP

  Here's WHY you all are being distracted with Iraq and Iran
   
  GLOBAL TAKE OVER by the FILTHY SMUCKS

   
  - Original Message -   From: spiker
  Subject: VIDEO CLIP: LOU DOBBS PUTS A BIG FAT SMELLY FISH RIGHT UP ON THE 
TABLE FOR EVERYONE TO LOOK AT - THE NEW WORLD ORDER

  

CNN/DOBBS: W FULFILLS HIS DAD'S DREAM OF A NEW WORLD ORDER
http://www.youtube. com:80/watch? v=XdxI0zClV_ Y

Video Description

IN THIS VIDEO CLIP LOU DOBBS PUTS THE BIG FAT SMELLY FISH RIGHT UP ON THE TABLE 
FOR EVERYONE TO LOOK AT - THE NEW WORLD ORDER.

IN THIS CLIP YOU WILL SEE:

1. THE 1991 VIDEO OF DADDY bUSH ANNOUNCING THE NEW WORLD ORDER !!

2. LOU DOBBS CALLING THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION A PART OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER !!

3. DOBBS SAYING THAT W IS FULFILLING DADDY'S DREAM OF A NEW WORLD ORDER !!

4. THE NEW PROGRAM GOING INTO EFFECT TO BRING ALL OF THE AMERICAS INTO ONE 
UNION CALLED THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS. I GUESS THEY 
WILL MERGE WITH HUGO CHAVEZ'S TRADE AGREEMENT IN SOUTH AMERICA.

5. LOU DOBBS SAYING, IT'S A NEW WORLD ORDER THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE !!

6. IT'S THE SURRENDER OF THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE UNITED STATES !!

7. IT'S A STEALTH AGENDA BY THE PRIVATE CORPORATE ELITE !!

8. LOU DOBBS SAYS, ITS A STRAIGHT FORWARD ASSAULT BY THE ELITIST !!

THE NEW WORLD ORDER HAS NOW BEEN ANNOUNCED BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND EVEN 
SAYS THAT IT WAS AN AGENDA ANNOUNCED BY DADDY BUSH BACK IN 1991 !!

NOW IT'S TIME TO DO SOMETHING !! 





 
-
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people 
who know.