[cia-drugs] Fwd: don't breath

[Kris Millegan]

 


 


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:19 am
Subject: Fwd: don't breath















Then,?once?our?immune resistance has 
been?weakened,?unruly Left Coasters?start?dying 
from?"bird flu."


?





  

  


  
Sent: 3/13/2008 10:32:04 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subj: 
  don't breath


  
?
Plan to Spray Toxic 
  Biological Chemicals Over San Francisco Announced By Rami Nagel 11 Mar 2008 
  People of the world, the US Government is planning to poison more than two 
  million people, in California, using an untested biological "pesticide" this 
  summer. The chemical to be sprayed is classified by the EPA as a "pesticide" 
  and the plan is to douse cities with this chemical designed to stick on 
  everything for 90 days or longer. This application is not a one time event, 
  but will continue every 1-3 months for as long as five 
  years. 

  

  


  Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser. 









It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance.

 

[cia-drugs] "Royal" ClintonBush Colonist Apologists for past 7 Years of Bush Kingdom?

[Europeangenocideiii]

- Any amount of Financial Analysis would tell you that
Bushopperated as though or believed he was running a Kingdom
instead of a Constitutional Democracy.  Clinton is as gullable as a
Fried Brain Kiddie Porn Artist.

- Read What's in a "New York Minute?" Part 1 & Part 2

http://gknot.net/dfusz/files/NewYorkMinute.pdf

http://gknot.net/dfusz/files/NYMinutePart2.pdf

- NOT A DIPLOMAT.
Clinton BAD Campaign Tactic talking about NON ISSUES = OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE & GENOCIDE.

- Clinton less than 6 degrees of separation from Spitzer Bordello
Keywords, 11-9-2001, Anti Semitic, Bordello, ClintonBush, FELONY, Fraud,
GOP, Narcotics, Rail, Real Estate, Secret Service, Stalking, Toll Roads

Connect the missing pieces of the Clinton PI-MP Puzzle.

- Clinton Mafioso Terrorist Tactics
- Clinton PI-MP Reputation with Secret Service, Royal Ponzi Scheme,
Bordello-Sex Pissing Contest
- IDENTIFIED Russian Real Estate Mafia Bordellos
- IDENTIFIED City & County Real Estate Bordellos in ALL 50 States linked
to Rail & Toll Road Projects
- IDENTIFIED Anti Semitic Narcotics Stalking Terrorists with SAME
Tactics as GOP & ClintonBush, Hindi Pakistani impersonating
Scientologist Greenpeace Activists & Irish Extremists.

NOT TOO FAR FROM

- Spitzer Bordello Pissing Contest, What couldn't Spitzer do with his
wife & WHY spend as much for sex as a Narcotics Trafficker does for
Narcotics?

What Pattern of the macho Clinton pissing contest didn't Spitzer follow?
What tactic isn't Mrs. Clinton copying? Is anything the GOP &
ClintonBush does that's NOT a FELONY?

GOOD NEWS
FACT, Westerners (Hindi Pakistani) are criminals at birth & there's no
reason to compete with these criminals!

If you have any questions about this statement please visit the
Childhood
Without War Website with an Opera.com browser.

ChilhdoodWithoutWar.net

BAD NEWS
THERE'S MUCH WORK TO DO!

COMPLACENCY IS NOT AN OPTION FOR YOUTH LEADERSHIP & YOUTH FUTURE
ADVOCACY!

YOUTH NEED LEADERSHIP NOW.  Please contact your Government Ministries &
send this inforamtkion to them Loud & Clear!

Don't allow Non Native Indigenous Ancestral to try to steal your
ANCESTRY
from you!
ALL WAR PLANS ARE AUTOMATIC SIGNALS from Western Countries = Westerners
are
without any other intention.

GOOD NEWS
Westerners don't rule the World! Europeans Never Ruled Earth!  WORLD
PEACE
IS POSSIBLE!

Please work with A Well Earth to build your Volunteer Organization into
a
PAID & STAFFED Organization.

NOW IS THE TIME! There are many projects to begin.
Volunteer today at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[cia-drugs] Wiretapping(1)AppolloAliance(2)InstutiteforPub. Accuracy(3)ACLU(4)

[Quechick Barnyard]

 
  Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:01:05 -0700 (PDT) 
From:Politics Video Elections White House Congress U.S. Government World 
Supreme Court Press Releases Search:   All News Yahoo! News Only News Photos 
Video/Audio  Advanced 
House closes its doors for spying bill By PAMELA HESS, Associated Press Writer 
30 minutes ago
 
WASHINGTON - The House held a closed session Thursday for the first time in 25 
years to discuss a hotly contested surveillance bill. 
Republicans requested privacy for what they termed "an honest debate" on the 
new Democratic eavesdropping measure that is opposed by the White House and 
most Republicans in Congress.
Lawmakers were forbidden to disclose what was said during the hour-long 
session. The extent to which minds were changed, if at all, should be more 
clear Friday, when the House was expected to openly debate and then vote on the 
bill.
Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas said she didn't believe anyone 
changed positions but that the session was useful because no one would be able 
to complain on Friday that their views had not been heard.
"We couldn't have gone more of an extra mile to make sure we're doing the best 
for national security," she told The Associated Press.
Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, the top Republican on the House Intelligence 
Committee, said in an interview that he read aloud the titles — but not details 
— of intelligence reports "that shows the nature of the global threat and how 
dynamic the situation is, and how fluid."
Hoekstra said the House discussed the procedures intelligence agencies use to 
protect the identities of innocent Americans whose calls and e-mails are 
incidentally intercepted in wiretaps.
Hoekstra said three Democrats spoke as did eight or nine Republicans.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said "there was nothing new, nothing that wasn't 
public, nothing that can't and shouldn't be debated on the floor tomorrow in 
open session."
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said he heard nothing new that would 
change his mind about the bill.
"Tomorrow, I will urge members on both sides of the aisle to vote for this 
legislation," Hoyer said.
The last such session in the House was in 1983 on U.S. support for paramilitary 
operations in Nicaragua. Only five closed sessions have taken place in the 
House since 1825.
Four members declined to sign the confidentiality oath required to participate 
in the closed session, House staff members said.
Many Democrats initially objected, calling it a political ploy by Republicans 
to delay a vote on the bill. House leaders did in fact push off the scheduled 
vote until Friday, just before taking a two-week recess. If it passes, the bill 
would need Senate approval before going to the president.
President Bush has vowed to veto it, saying it would undermine the nation's 
security.
Bush opposes it in part because it doesn't provide full, retroactive legal 
protection to telecommunications companies that helped the government eavesdrop 
on their customers without court permission after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist 
attacks.
About 40 lawsuits have been filed against telecommunications companies by 
people and organizations alleging they violated wiretapping and privacy laws. 
The lawsuits have been combined and are pending before a single federal judge 
in California.
The Democrats' measure would encourage the judge to review in private the 
secret government documents underpinning the program in order to decide whether 
the companies acted lawfully. If they did, the lawsuits would be dismissed. 
The administration has prevented those documents from being revealed, even to a 
judge, by invoking the state secrets privilege. That puts the companies in a 
bind because they cannot use the documents to defend themselves in court. 
It wasn't clear what information would be presented in the closed session. Just 
a fraction of Congress has been allowed to read secret documents underpinning 
the surveillance program, and those who have arrived at varying conclusions. 
The Senate Intelligence Committee, after seeing classified material, said the 
companies acted on the good-faith belief that the wiretaps they allowed were 
lawful. Democrats on the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees were 
unconvinced after being presented with the same material. 
The surveillance law is intended to help in the pursuit of suspected terrorists 
by making it easier to eavesdrop on foreign phone calls and e-mails that pass 
through the United States. A temporary law expired Feb. 16 before Congress was 
able to produce a replacement bill. Bush opposed an extension of the temporary 
law as a tactic to pressure Congress into accepting the Senate version of the 
surveillance legislation. The Senate's bill provides retroactive legal immunity 
for the telecommunications companies. 
Bush said lawsuits against telecom companies would lead to the disclosure of 
state secrets. Further, he said lawsuits would undermine the willingn

[cia-drugs] Who's Afraid of "Rate My Cop"?

[Vigilius Haufniensis]

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2008/03/whos-afraid-of-rate-my-cop.html


   Wednesday, March 12, 2008


 Who's Afraid of "Rate My Cop"?

Each week, if not every day, brings in its train another illustration of 
the fact that those who scrutinize us cannot abide reciprocal scrutiny. 
Witness the apparent demise of the "Rate My Cop" website.



Carly Kullman, a one-time police cadet, explains that Rate My Cop was to 
be a national database of police officers and agencies. Users would be 
able "to browse through their own local police department and see how 
their local police force stacks up" when compared to other agencies 
across the country. The site would deal only in publicly available 
information about agencies and individual officers. Each officer would 
be rated on the basis of three criteria: authority, fairness, and 
satisfaction.



Rebecca Costell, a creator of Rate My Cop, said that the objective was 
to combat an emerging stereotype of police as abusive, violence-prone 
revenue hogs: "Our website's purpose is to break that stereotype that 
people have that cops are all bad by having officers become responsible 
for their actions."



Of course, stereotypes don't materialize spontaneously, and the image 
Costell describes has been abundantly validated over the past couple of 
years with the emergence of YouTube and other forms of cyber-samizdat 
. The near-ubiquity of cell 
phones and other digital recording devices has made it possible to 
record episodes of police misconduct, and video sharing sites have made 
those recordings available to anybody with a high-speed internet connection.



Rate My Cop's very practical and commendable contribution to the 
necessary -- and overdue -- public conversation about police misconduct 
is to provide an incentive for internal police reform: The site would 
help burnish the reputations of genuinely professional, service-oriented 
departments and officers, while goading others to clean up their act.


Additionally, as Kullman points out 
 
in reviewing the site, "People who are potentially moving to another 
city might use Rate My Cop to check out the police force in the area 
that they are moving to, allowing them to see how the police perform"



In these ways, Rate My Cop would have applied the logic of the free 
market to the practice of law enforcement. The problem here, of course, 
is that our current approach to law enforcement is entirely statist, 
which means that it's designed in a manner intended to insulate it from 
market discipline.



In unadorned terms, the last thing police want is to be accountable to 
the communities they're supposed to be serving. Accordingly, police 
unions immediately began to shriek and keen 
 that Rate My Cop posed 
a threat to ...



... wait for it ...


... wait for it ...


... that's right: "Officer safety."


I've said it before: "officer safety," not protection of the law-abiding 
public, is the highest priority of every police department 
, 
and every effort to reform police conduct or hold police publicly 
accountable is condemned as a threat to the same by the professional 
whiners who represent police unions 
.



In this case, there was a legitimate threat, since Rate My Cop did 
imperil the job safety 
 of bad, 
indifferent, or corrupt police officers. Of course, it also offered a 
way to reward and promote the conscientious, heroic officers we are 
constantly assured constitute the vast majority of police.



Apparently, it was that positive stereotype -- which is still the 
preponderant image in most media and entertainment depictions of police 
-- that would have suffered, or perished, because of Rate My Cop. So the 
"law enforcement community," as an appendage of the Leviathan State, did 
what such people always do when threatened with accountability: They 
used the threat of legislation and criminal sanctions to compel Rate My 
Cop's creators to shut down the site 
.


Interestingly, the first recorded objections to Rate My Cop come from a 
familiar source: Utah state senator Chris Buttars, sponsor of SB260, a 
measure intended to suppress reports of police misconduct. As Salt Lake 
City CBS affiliate KUTV reported on February 12: "A main concern of 
SB260 supporters is with the buisness `rate-my-cop,' which is a national 
company that has made requests for misconduct reports on every officer 
in every agency in the area. Buttars believes that `rate-my-cop' will 
put the information into a data base and sell it to defense attorneys."



Buttars, like other petit-authorit