[cia-drugs] Experts Say Professor Wrong on World Trade Center Theory

2006-09-10 Thread Vigilius Haufniensis





http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148sid=480956


Experts Say Professor 
Wrong on World Trade Center Theory
September 9th, 2006 @ 9:10pm
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) -- A Utah professor's theory that the World Trade Center 
was brought down by explosives is nonsense, experts say. 
Physicist Steven Jones, co-chairman of a group called Scholars for 9/11 
Truth, has been placed on paid leave by Brigham Young University while the 
Mormon church-owned school investigates the "increasingly speculative and 
accusatory nature" of his claims. 
Jones questions official findings that explosive jet fuel from hijacked 
airplanes turned steel floor supports rubbery and brought down the World Trade 
Center, suggesting hidden explosives imploded the skyscrapers. 
"Number one, why would you bother with the planes if you could bring down the 
buildings with bombs?" said William Connolly, director of New Jersey's Division 
of Codes and Standards and an advocate for strengthening buildings against 
terrorist attacks. 
"Second, that whole theory is just utterly inconsistent with the evidence," 
Connolly told the Deseret Morning News of Salt Lake City. 
"This happened in plain view. The National Institute of Standards and 
Technology had very detailed pictures analyzing it in a very detailed way. We 
know exactly what happened and exactly why they fell, and it has nothing to do 
with bombs," he said. 
Leslie Robertson, chief architectural engineer of the World Trade Center, 
said Jones' theory was "utterly ridiculous." 
Connolly and Robertson were featured on the recent PBS program "Nova: 
Building at Ground Zero," which examined why the buildings failed in a 
minute-by-minute re-creation. 
Jones, a physicist at BYU since 1985, remained in seclusion on Saturday, 
refusing interviews. 
In a CD recording of one of his lectures, obtained by The Associated Press, 
Jones said a "puff of smoke" that issued from under the impact zone of one of 
the towers as it gave way was evidence of an explosive charge. He discounted the 
chance the smoke was blown out by air pressure as the tower started collapsing. 
Jones showed side-by-side images of the collapsing World Trade Center towers 
and other buildings deliberately brought down by implosives, saying there was no 
difference in they way they fell. He gave the lecture Feb. 1 at Utah Valley 
State College. 
For years Jones has been working on cold fusion, claiming he's gotten the 
elusive energy source to work, though "it's still not enough to power my 
flashlight yet," he told the Deseret Morning News in interviews before he was 
suspended on Thursday. 
The newspaper reprinted some of Jones past comments on Saturday, casting him 
as isolated from fellow BYU professors who were said to be embarrassed by his 
association with a 9-11 conspiracy theory. 
At the University of Utah, Physics Department Chairman Pierre Sokolsky said 
destruction of the towers was a question best left to engineers, not physicists 
like Jones. 
Information from: Deseret Morning News, 
__._,_.___





Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM









   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Independent broker dealer
  
  
Independent director
  
  
Central intelligence agency
  
  


Central intelligence agency employment
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [cia-drugs] Experts Say Professor Wrong on World Trade Center Theory

2006-09-10 Thread Arlene Johnson
If anyone can reach Professor Jones, tell him that I published the first 
article on the fact that there were bombs in the WTC in my December 2001 
edition. He should, however, keep reading because there is more on the bombs in 
subsequent editions. I had him in my Address Book, but removed him and several 
other professors because they don't listen to me anyway.

As for that idiot who said how could it have been bombs in the buildings, he 
needs to read that the planes were used as a decoy on both the WTC and the 
Pentagon so they could blame Arabs so they would be able to go to war against 
them and Afghanis.

I have articles or information in the Did You Know? feature of every edition 
since that #4 December 2001 edition.

Peace,

Arlene Johnson
Publisher/Author
http://www.truedemocracy.net
Click on the icon that says Magazine to access my editions.
Password for the 2006 editions: message

-Original Message-
From: Vigilius Haufniensis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sep 10, 2006 8:23 AM
To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cia-drugs] Experts Say Professor Wrong on World Trade Center Theory

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148sid=480956

Experts Say Professor Wrong on World Trade Center Theory
September 9th, 2006 @ 9:10pm
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) -- A Utah professor's theory that the World Trade Center 
was brought down by explosives is nonsense, experts say. 

Physicist Steven Jones, co-chairman of a group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth, 
has been placed on paid leave by Brigham Young University while the Mormon 
church-owned school investigates the increasingly speculative and accusatory 
nature of his claims. 

Jones questions official findings that explosive jet fuel from hijacked 
airplanes turned steel floor supports rubbery and brought down the World Trade 
Center, suggesting hidden explosives imploded the skyscrapers. 

Number one, why would you bother with the planes if you could bring down the 
buildings with bombs? said William Connolly, director of New Jersey's 
Division of Codes and Standards and an advocate for strengthening buildings 
against terrorist attacks. 

Second, that whole theory is just utterly inconsistent with the evidence, 
Connolly told the Deseret Morning News of Salt Lake City. 

This happened in plain view. The National Institute of Standards and 
Technology had very detailed pictures analyzing it in a very detailed way. We 
know exactly what happened and exactly why they fell, and it has nothing to do 
with bombs, he said. 

Leslie Robertson, chief architectural engineer of the World Trade Center, said 
Jones' theory was utterly ridiculous. 

Connolly and Robertson were featured on the recent PBS program Nova: Building 
at Ground Zero, which examined why the buildings failed in a minute-by-minute 
re-creation. 

Jones, a physicist at BYU since 1985, remained in seclusion on Saturday, 
refusing interviews. 

In a CD recording of one of his lectures, obtained by The Associated Press, 
Jones said a puff of smoke that issued from under the impact zone of one of 
the towers as it gave way was evidence of an explosive charge. He discounted 
the chance the smoke was blown out by air pressure as the tower started 
collapsing. 

Jones showed side-by-side images of the collapsing World Trade Center towers 
and other buildings deliberately brought down by implosives, saying there was 
no difference in they way they fell. He gave the lecture Feb. 1 at Utah Valley 
State College. 

For years Jones has been working on cold fusion, claiming he's gotten the 
elusive energy source to work, though it's still not enough to power my 
flashlight yet, he told the Deseret Morning News in interviews before he was 
suspended on Thursday. 

The newspaper reprinted some of Jones past comments on Saturday, casting him 
as isolated from fellow BYU professors who were said to be embarrassed by his 
association with a 9-11 conspiracy theory. 

At the University of Utah, Physics Department Chairman Pierre Sokolsky said 
destruction of the towers was a question best left to engineers, not 
physicists like Jones. 

Information from: Deseret Morning News, 



Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/