Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-15 Thread tridge
Hi Hongwei,

 >Thanks for your request.  We will work on it and let you know as
 >soon as we complete the investigation.

Any progress on this? Would you like us to give you a tool that
produces the appropriate output in LDIF format?

Cheers, Tridge
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-17 Thread tridge
Hi Bill,

Thanks for the LDIF!

Can we assume the license on this is the same as for the schema? For
the schema the version we got from MS had the license at the top,
which you can see here:

For the schema license, see this:

   
http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/samba_4_0_test/source4/setup/ad-schema/MS-AD_Schema_2K8_Classes.txt

I'm pretty sure you intend us to just use the same license, but I
thought I should check.

Cheers, Tridge
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-17 Thread Bill Wesse
You're completely welcome. The notice in the schema is not exactly the same as 
what is in our current document postings. For the moment, however, the below 
text is the notice I have been advised should apply.

I will ask for additional clarification on this today, since I think it would 
be *not a good idea* to make any assumptions about, given the textual 
discrepancies between the below and that provided in the schema.



Intellectual Property Rights Notice for Open Specifications Documentation

o Technical Documentation. Microsoft publishes Open Specifications 
documentation for protocols, file formats, languages, standards as well as 
overviews of the interaction among each of these technologies. 

o Copyrights. This documentation is covered by Microsoft copyrights. Regardless 
of any other terms that are contained in the terms of use for the Microsoft 
website that hosts this documentation, you may make copies of it in order to 
develop implementations of the technologies described in the Open 
Specifications and may distribute portions of it in your implementations using 
these technologies or your documentation as necessary to properly document the 
implementation. You may also distribute in your implementation, with or without 
modification, any schema, IDL's, or code samples that are included in the 
documentation. This permission also applies to any documents that are 
referenced in the Open Specifications. 

o No Trade Secrets. Microsoft does not claim any trade secret rights in this 
documentation. 

o Patents. Microsoft has patents that may cover your implementations of the 
technologies described in the Open Specifications. Neither this notice nor 
Microsoft's delivery of the documentation grants any licenses under those or 
any other Microsoft patents. However, a given Open Specification may be covered 
by Microsoft's Open Specification Promise (available here: 
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp) or the Community Promise (available here: 
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/cp/default.mspx). If you would prefer a 
written license, or if the technologies described n the Open Specifications are 
not covered by the Open Specifications Promise or Community Promise, as 
applicable, patent licenses are available by contacting i...@microsoft.com. 

o Trademarks. The names of companies and products contained in this 
documentation may be covered by trademarks or similar intellectual property 
rights. This notice does not grant any licenses under those rights. 
Reservation of Rights. All other rights are reserved, and this notice does not 
grant any rights other than specifically described above, whether by 
implication, estoppel, or otherwise. 

o Tools. The Open Specifications do not require the use of Microsoft 
programming tools or programming environments in order for you to develop an 
implementation. If you have access to Microsoft programming tools and 
environments you are free to take advantage of them. Certain Open 
Specifications are intended for use in conjunction with publicly available 
standard specifications and network programming art, and assumes that the 
reader either is familiar with the aforementioned material or has immediate 
access to it. 



Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606

-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org] 
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 5:39 AM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; m...@samba.org
Subject: RE: CAR - ldap display specifiers 

Hi Bill,

Thanks for the LDIF!

Can we assume the license on this is the same as for the schema? For
the schema the version we got from MS had the license at the top,
which you can see here:

For the schema license, see this:

   
http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/samba_4_0_test/source4/setup/ad-schema/MS-AD_Schema_2K8_Classes.txt

I'm pretty sure you intend us to just use the same license, but I
thought I should check.

Cheers, Tridge

___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-17 Thread Bill Wesse
Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property notice. 
So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and pertains only to 
the schema release that we provided (it can be obtained on the 'Microsoft Open 
Specification Support Team Blog' blog at):

Using the Windows Server Protocols documentation set to better understand the 
Active Directory Schema
http://blogs.msdn.com/openspecification/archive/2009/06/26/using-the-windows-server-protocols-documentation-set-to-better-understand-the-active-directory-schema.aspx

Once document development has detailed the precise nature of the final data we 
will be supplying, an IP notice will be attached!

Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606


-Original Message-
From: Bill Wesse 
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 7:18 AM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; m...@samba.org
Subject: RE: CAR - ldap display specifiers 

You're completely welcome. The notice in the schema is not exactly the same as 
what is in our current document postings. For the moment, however, the below 
text is the notice I have been advised should apply.

I will ask for additional clarification on this today, since I think it would 
be *not a good idea* to make any assumptions about, given the textual 
discrepancies between the below and that provided in the schema.



Intellectual Property Rights Notice for Open Specifications Documentation

o Technical Documentation. Microsoft publishes Open Specifications 
documentation for protocols, file formats, languages, standards as well as 
overviews of the interaction among each of these technologies. 

o Copyrights. This documentation is covered by Microsoft copyrights. Regardless 
of any other terms that are contained in the terms of use for the Microsoft 
website that hosts this documentation, you may make copies of it in order to 
develop implementations of the technologies described in the Open 
Specifications and may distribute portions of it in your implementations using 
these technologies or your documentation as necessary to properly document the 
implementation. You may also distribute in your implementation, with or without 
modification, any schema, IDL's, or code samples that are included in the 
documentation. This permission also applies to any documents that are 
referenced in the Open Specifications. 

o No Trade Secrets. Microsoft does not claim any trade secret rights in this 
documentation. 

o Patents. Microsoft has patents that may cover your implementations of the 
technologies described in the Open Specifications. Neither this notice nor 
Microsoft's delivery of the documentation grants any licenses under those or 
any other Microsoft patents. However, a given Open Specification may be covered 
by Microsoft's Open Specification Promise (available here: 
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp) or the Community Promise (available here: 
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/cp/default.mspx). If you would prefer a 
written license, or if the technologies described n the Open Specifications are 
not covered by the Open Specifications Promise or Community Promise, as 
applicable, patent licenses are available by contacting i...@microsoft.com. 

o Trademarks. The names of companies and products contained in this 
documentation may be covered by trademarks or similar intellectual property 
rights. This notice does not grant any licenses under those rights. 
Reservation of Rights. All other rights are reserved, and this notice does not 
grant any rights other than specifically described above, whether by 
implication, estoppel, or otherwise. 

o Tools. The Open Specifications do not require the use of Microsoft 
programming tools or programming environments in order for you to develop an 
implementation. If you have access to Microsoft programming tools and 
environments you are free to take advantage of them. Certain Open 
Specifications are intended for use in conjunction with publicly available 
standard specifications and network programming art, and assumes that the 
reader either is familiar with the aforementioned material or has immediate 
access to it. 



Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606

-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org] 
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 5:39 AM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; m...@samba.org
Subject: RE: CAR - ldap display specifiers 

Hi Bill,

Thanks for the LDIF!

Can we assume the license on this is the same as for the schema? For
the schema the version we got from MS had the license at the top,
which you can see here:

For the schema license, see this:

   
http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/samba_4_0_test/sour

Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
> Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property
> notice. So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and
> pertains only to the schema release that we provided (it can be
> obtained on the 'Microsoft Open Specification Support Team Blog' blog
> at):
> 
> Using the Windows Server Protocols documentation set to better understand the 
> Active Directory Schema
> http://blogs.msdn.com/openspecification/archive/2009/06/26/using-the-windows-server-protocols-documentation-set-to-better-understand-the-active-directory-schema.aspx
> 
> Once document development has detailed the precise nature of the final data 
> we will be supplying, an IP notice will be attached!

I'm confused.  What is the copyright licence applicable to the contents
of the zip file you just mailed?  


Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:15 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
> > Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property
> > notice. So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and
> > pertains only to the schema release that we provided (it can be
> > obtained on the 'Microsoft Open Specification Support Team Blog' blog
> > at):
> > 
> > Using the Windows Server Protocols documentation set to better understand 
> > the Active Directory Schema
> > http://blogs.msdn.com/openspecification/archive/2009/06/26/using-the-windows-server-protocols-documentation-set-to-better-understand-the-active-directory-schema.aspx
> > 
> > Once document development has detailed the precise nature of the final data 
> > we will be supplying, an IP notice will be attached!
> 
> I'm confused.  What is the copyright licence applicable to the contents
> of the zip file you just mailed?  

Also, if it is the licence you posted earlier in this thread, is this
considered 'schema'?  (Given we need to incorporate the whole file, I
need it to fall under the exception to the 'portions of' rule).

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning Andrew!

There is no copyright license for the attachments - yet; nevertheless, I expect 
the below text - or something like it - to apply. I cannot guarantee there will 
be no changes between now and when the CAR request is fulfilled. I certainly 
expect this will not take as long as it did with the schema.

Intellectual Property Rights Notice for Open Specifications Documentation

o Technical Documentation. Microsoft publishes Open Specifications 
documentation for protocols, file formats, languages, standards as well as 
overviews of the interaction among each of these technologies. 

o Copyrights. This documentation is covered by Microsoft copyrights. Regardless 
of any other terms that are contained in the terms of use for the Microsoft 
website that hosts this documentation, you may make copies of it in order to 
develop implementations of the technologies described in the Open 
Specifications and may distribute portions of it in your implementations using 
these technologies or your documentation as necessary to properly document the 
implementation. You may also distribute in your implementation, with or without 
modification, any schema, IDL's, or code samples that are included in the 
documentation. This permission also applies to any documents that are 
referenced in the Open Specifications. 

o No Trade Secrets. Microsoft does not claim any trade secret rights in this 
documentation. 

o Patents. Microsoft has patents that may cover your implementations of the 
technologies described in the Open Specifications. Neither this notice nor 
Microsoft's delivery of the documentation grants any licenses under those or 
any other Microsoft patents. However, a given Open Specification may be covered 
by Microsoft's Open Specification Promise (available here: 
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp) or the Community Promise (available here: 
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/cp/default.mspx). If you would prefer a 
written license, or if the technologies described n the Open Specifications are 
not covered by the Open Specifications Promise or Community Promise, as 
applicable, patent licenses are available by contacting i...@microsoft.com. 

o Trademarks. The names of companies and products contained in this 
documentation may be covered by trademarks or similar intellectual property 
rights. This notice does not grant any licenses under those rights. 
Reservation of Rights. All other rights are reserved, and this notice does not 
grant any rights other than specifically described above, whether by 
implication, estoppel, or otherwise. 

o Tools. The Open Specifications do not require the use of Microsoft 
programming tools or programming environments in order for you to develop an 
implementation. If you have access to Microsoft programming tools and 
environments you are free to take advantage of them. Certain Open 
Specifications are intended for use in conjunction with publicly available 
standard specifications and network programming art, and assumes that the 
reader either is familiar with the aforementioned material or has immediate 
access to it. 


Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:15 AM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: tri...@samba.org; m...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:15 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
> > Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual 
> > Property notice. So the notice that was included in the schema is 
> > unique, and pertains only to the schema release that we provided (it 
> > can be obtained on the 'Microsoft Open Specification Support Team 
> > Blog' blog
> > at):
> > 
> > Using the Windows Server Protocols documentation set to better 
> > understand the Active Directory Schema 
> > http://blogs.msdn.com/openspecification/archive/2009/06/26/using-the
> > -windows-server-protocols-documentation-set-to-better-understand-the
> > -active-directory-schema.aspx
> > 
> > Once document development has detailed the precise nature of the final data 
> > we will be supplying, an IP notice will be attached!
> 
> I'm confused.  What is the copyright licence applicable to the 
> contents of the zip file you just mailed?

Also, if it is the licence you posted earlier in this thread, is this 
considered 'schema'?  (Given we need to incorporate the whole file, I need it 
to fall under the exception to the 'portions of' rule).

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Deve

Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:30 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: 
> Good morning Andrew!
> 
> There is no copyright license for the attachments - yet; nevertheless, I 
> expect the below text - or something like it - to apply. 

Bill,

Honestly, this really isn't very useful.  I can search against an AD
server as well as you can, as can the users who have been bugging me to
include into Samba the results of their own searches. 

What we are asking for is this kind of output, but under a the
previously agreed licence, with the output defined as 'schema' (ie,
falling clearly under the inclusion exception).  

I think what we need is to get a procedure in place whereby we can get
this kind of thing released under a licence that works for both the PFIF
and Microsoft.  In particular it needs single licence, preferably the
one we have on the schema.  In particular it really does need not to be
unique per release - each new text has to be cleared by multiple Linux
vendors. 

I'm sure we can work something out.

Thanks,


Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122)

2009-07-21 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning once again Andrew.

Our document development folks (for [MS-ADTS], [MS-ADSC] & [MS-ADA(1,2,3)]) are 
currently working on ldif dumps for Windows 2000 and beyond; these, of course 
will omit domain specific information and replication metadata.

We will provide these as soon as possible, along with licensing information, of 
course. I have forwarded your comments to those involved in that.

Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:57 AM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: m...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:30 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: 
> Good morning Andrew!
> 
> There is no copyright license for the attachments - yet; nevertheless, I 
> expect the below text - or something like it - to apply. 

Bill,

Honestly, this really isn't very useful.  I can search against an AD server as 
well as you can, as can the users who have been bugging me to include into 
Samba the results of their own searches. 

What we are asking for is this kind of output, but under a the previously 
agreed licence, with the output defined as 'schema' (ie, falling clearly under 
the inclusion exception).  

I think what we need is to get a procedure in place whereby we can get this 
kind of thing released under a licence that works for both the PFIF and 
Microsoft.  In particular it needs single licence, preferably the one we have 
on the schema.  In particular it really does need not to be unique per release 
- each new text has to be cleared by multiple Linux vendors. 

I'm sure we can work something out.

Thanks,


Andrew Bartlett

--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122)

2009-07-24 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning again - just touching bases with you concerning the ldif dumps for 
the display specifiers.

The ldf files have been generated, and work on the licensing agreement is in 
progress. As soon as we have, I will provide the ldf content to you. Here is a 
list of covered versions (by platform):

Windows 2000
Windows 2003
Windows 2003R2
Windows 2008
Windows 2008R2

Public posting locations are still to be determined, but I do expect clearance 
to make them (unofficially) available on our blog, similar to where we have 
posted the previous schema content:

Using the Windows Server Protocols documentation set to better understand the 
Active Directory Schema 
http://blogs.msdn.com/openspecification/archive/2009/06/26/using-the-windows-server-protocols-documentation-set-to-better-understand-the-active-directory-schema.aspx

Thanks again for your patience!

Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606


-Original Message-
From: Bill Wesse 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:43 AM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: m...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org; 'tri...@samba.org'
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122)

Good morning once again Andrew.

Our document development folks (for [MS-ADTS], [MS-ADSC] & [MS-ADA(1,2,3)]) are 
currently working on ldif dumps for Windows 2000 and beyond; these, of course 
will omit domain specific information and replication metadata.

We will provide these as soon as possible, along with licensing information, of 
course. I have forwarded your comments to those involved in that.

Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:57 AM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: m...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:30 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: 
> Good morning Andrew!
> 
> There is no copyright license for the attachments - yet; nevertheless, I 
> expect the below text - or something like it - to apply. 

Bill,

Honestly, this really isn't very useful.  I can search against an AD server as 
well as you can, as can the users who have been bugging me to include into 
Samba the results of their own searches. 

What we are asking for is this kind of output, but under a the previously 
agreed licence, with the output defined as 'schema' (ie, falling clearly under 
the inclusion exception).  

I think what we need is to get a procedure in place whereby we can get this 
kind of thing released under a licence that works for both the PFIF and 
Microsoft.  In particular it needs single licence, preferably the one we have 
on the schema.  In particular it really does need not to be unique per release 
- each new text has to be cleared by multiple Linux vendors. 

I'm sure we can work something out.

Thanks,


Andrew Bartlett

--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122)

2009-08-10 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 06:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
> Good morning again - just touching bases with you concerning the ldif dumps 
> for the display specifiers.
> 
> The ldf files have been generated, and work on the licensing agreement is in 
> progress. As soon as we have, I will provide the ldf content to you. Here is 
> a list of covered versions (by platform):

This is all taking rather a long time, and is blocking us releasing the
next Samba4 alpha.

Can you please provide us with an ETA on the ldif dumps?  Should we
expect this to take just as long as the schema issue to resolve?

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol