Re: [CinCVS] (PATCH] SVN 950 failed to build (quicktime, wrong path to avcodec.h)

2006-10-29 Thread Pierre Dumuid

I committed the last patch, (which made the other patch not needed).

In terms of external libs: Compared to CinelerraHV, CinelerraCV builds 
primarily with external libs, except for ffmpeg, libmpeg and a possible 
few other directories..


In terms of external ffmpeg it is an option but not the default, and if 
a user realises an error, he should try build with internal ffmpeg 
before complaining..


I placed the text "internal / external ffmpeg" in the startup stdout so 
that if someone submits a bug report with external we can tell them to 
try internal for starters..


Pierre

Gour wrote:

On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 23:16 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:

  

Well, that's my fault because I didn't double check my external ffmpeg
patch before sending it. Applying this patch to configure.in fixed it
for me :



[...]

Are those patches going to be committed?

Is it advisable, concerning Cinelerra's stability, to build with
external libs?

In any case I see it would be easier to prepare Cinelerra with clear
deps on external libs...

Sincerely,
Gour


  



--
__

Get Firefox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/

Mr Pierre Dumuid
Phd Student

Active Noise and Vibration Control Group
School of Mechanical Engineering
The University of Adelaide 
SA 5005

AUSTRALIA

Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work:   +61 (0)8 8303 3847

Mobile: 0407 570 263

Web Page : http://www.mecheng.adelaide.edu.au/
__

CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
--- 


This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains
information that may be confidential and/or copyright.  If you are not
the intended recipient please notify the sender by reply email and
immediately delete this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this
email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
prohibited. No representation is made that this email or any attachments
are free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the
responsibility of the recipient.

begin:vcard
fn:Pierre Dumuid
n:Dumuid;Pierre
org:The University of Adelaide;Mechanical Engineering
adr:;;;Adelaide;South Australia;5005;Australia
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Postgraduate Student
tel;work:8303 3847
tel;home:8388 5727
tel;cell:0407570263
note:CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.adelaide.edu.au
version:2.1
end:vcard



Re: [CinCVS] (PATCH] SVN 950 failed to build (quicktime, wrong path to avcodec.h)

2006-10-29 Thread Gour
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 23:16 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:

> 
> Well, that's my fault because I didn't double check my external ffmpeg
> patch before sending it. Applying this patch to configure.in fixed it
> for me :

[...]

Are those patches going to be committed?

Is it advisable, concerning Cinelerra's stability, to build with
external libs?

In any case I see it would be easier to prepare Cinelerra with clear
deps on external libs...

Sincerely,
Gour




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [CinCVS] bclistbox.h:365: error: extra qualification 'BC_ListBox::' on member 'calculate_last_coords_recursive'

2006-10-29 Thread Pierre Marc Dumuid
It seems you checked out an incorrect branch in the repository since 
this error was fixed ages ago.  The reason the version in 950 is because 
svn increments the version across all branches (which I think is stupid!).

make sure you're checking out from:

svn://svn.skolelinux.org/cinelerra/trunk/hvirtual

Execute:
$ svn info 


to see where the repository is from... It should say:
URL: svn://svn.skolelinux.org/cinelerra/trunk/hvirtual
Repository Root: svn://svn.skolelinux.org/cinelerra/trunk/hvirtual

Pierre

mack allison wrote:
I'm building cinelerra (r950) on ubuntu 6.10-amd64, and this is what 
I've come to.  A search of lists and google for info related to 
guicast and bclistbox.h only yield svn links to the code itself (a 
little over my head) .


This one has got me stumped.  I've met all the dependancies looked for 
in configure. All of the dependancies were met from the 6.10 package 
tree except libquicktime, which is  libquicktime-0.9.10, compiled from 
thier latest sourceforge release tarball, and x264, which is r596 
--enable-pic.  I've run into this wall:


Making all in guicast
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/hvirtual/guicast'
if /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H 
-I. -I. -I.. -I../quicktime   -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -g -O2 -MT bcbitmap.lo 
-MD -MP -MF ".deps/bcbitmap.Tpo" \
  -c -o bcbitmap.lo `test -f 'bcbitmap.C' || echo 
'./'`bcbitmap.C; \

then mv -f ".deps/bcbitmap.Tpo" ".deps/bcbitmap.Plo"; \
else rm -f ".deps/bcbitmap.Tpo"; exit 1; \
fi
mkdir .libs
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../quicktime -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -O2 -MT bcbitmap.lo 
-MD -MP -MF .deps/bcbitmap.Tpo -c bcbitmap.C  -fPIC -DPIC -o 
.libs/bcbitmap.o
bclistbox.h:365: error: extra qualification 'BC_ListBox::' on member 
'calculate_last_coords_recursive'

make[2]: *** [bcbitmap.lo ] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hvirtual/guicast'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hvirtual'
make: *** [all] Error 2





___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] [Patches] Possibility to not build again ffmpeg in quicktime4linux

2006-10-29 Thread Alexis Ballier
Hi,

> committed (with adjustments)

Thanks, sorry that I didn't double check the patch before sending it
(see my other mail on compile failure with internal ffmpeg).


> Alexis,
> I just realised after commiting that I forgot to credit you with the
> creation of this patch!! I'm so sorry!


Bah, that's not important, you're really doing great work with
cinelerra. Reacting so quickly to users' feature requests is much more
important ;)


Alexis.


pgpD2J1XPDJTJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [CinCVS] (PATCH] SVN 950 failed to build (quicktime, wrong path to avcodec.h)

2006-10-29 Thread Alexis Ballier


Well, that's my fault because I didn't double check my external ffmpeg
patch before sending it. Applying this patch to configure.in fixed it
for me :

--- ../cinelerra-svn-checkout/configure.in  2006-10-29
22:10:16.851317167 +0100 +++ configure.in2006-10-29
22:51:18.520931568 +0100 @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
  FFMPEG_EXTERNALTEXT="External ffmpeg"
 else
  FFMPEG_FOLDER=ffmpeg
- FFMPEG_CFLAGS="-I$(srcdir)/ffmpeg/libavcodec"
+ FFMPEG_CFLAGS="-I\$(srcdir)/ffmpeg/libavcodec"
  FFMPEG_LIBS="ffmpeg/libavcodec/libavcodec.la"
  FFMPEG_EXTERNALTEXT="Internal ffmpeg"
 fi





This is because configure tries to replace $(srcdir) by its value but
it's not defined there, escaping the "$" restores the correct behavior.


Alexis.


pgp5ABQv6uBAI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [CinCVS] Licensing issues concerning HV's manual

2006-10-29 Thread Nicolas
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0200, Nicolas MAUFRAIS wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I continue to work on the HV manual. When it'll be "ready", I'll start
> to put CV-specific contents in it.
> 
> I think there's a MAJOR problem about the HV manual. We have no
> information about its license. It's written on the second page:
> "Copyright (C) 2006 Heroine Virtual Ltd"
> For the moment, we can't apply the GNU Free Documentation Licence to
> that manual.
> 
> I plan to ask Heroine Virtual about that licensing issue. Usually, the
> license has to be in the manual to apply. If I get a reply from HV
> saying they agree to release their manual under the GNU Free
> Documentation Licence, will such an email be sufficient? IANAL, and any
> help/advice is welcome...
> 
> IMO, HV can benefit from officialy stating their manual is realeased
> under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. We will work on the manual and
> improve it. We use the same Texinfo format, and it would be easy for HV
> to take any part of the CV manual to put it in the official HV manual.
> 
> What's your opinion?
> 
> Nicolas.

Hello,

I did not get any reply concerning that licensing issue on the ML.
Therefore, I did send an email to HV.

I had a look at the Twiki, to get some information about its licence.
It's written at the bottom of each page:

"Copyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this
collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors."

Erm... That's no good... :-/
Alex, could you please give us your opinion about the Twiki/Cinelerra
contents?

Nicolas.

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


[CinCVS] bclistbox.h:365: error: extra qualification 'BC_ListBox::' on member 'calculate_last_coords_recursive'

2006-10-29 Thread mack allison
I'm building cinelerra (r950) on ubuntu 6.10-amd64, and this is what I've come to.  A search of lists and google for info related to guicast and bclistbox.h only yield svn links to the code itself (a little over my head) . 
This one has got me stumped.  I've met all the dependancies looked for in configure. All of the dependancies were met from the 6.10 package tree except
libquicktime, which is  libquicktime-0.9.10, compiled from thier
latest sourceforge release tarball, and x264, which is r596 --enable-pic.  I've run into this wall:Making all in guicastmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/hvirtual/guicast'if /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../quicktime   -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -g -O2 -MT 
bcbitmap.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/bcbitmap.Tpo" \  -c -o bcbitmap.lo `test -f 'bcbitmap.C' || echo './'`bcbitmap.C; \    then mv -f ".deps/bcbitmap.Tpo" ".deps/bcbitmap.Plo"; \
    else rm -f ".deps/bcbitmap.Tpo"; exit 1; \    fimkdir .libs g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../quicktime -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -O2 -MT 
bcbitmap.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/bcbitmap.Tpo -c bcbitmap.C  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/bcbitmap.obclistbox.h:365: error: extra qualification 'BC_ListBox::' on member 'calculate_last_coords_recursive'make[2]: *** [bcbitmap.lo
] Error 1make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hvirtual/guicast'make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hvirtual'make: *** [all] Error 2


Re: [CinCVS] A short extract before/after motion effect

2006-10-29 Thread Nicolas Maufrais
Pierre-Marc,

By this email, I acknowledge releasing the three following videos under
the GPL licence:

Before: deinterlaced "Raw" DV footage
http://www.europephoto.com/info/cinelerra/200610/20061018_motion_effect_BEFORE.m2v
After: motion effect and zoom-in applied:
http://www.europephoto.com/info/cinelerra/200610/20061018_motion_effect_AFTER.m2v
And:
http://www.europephoto.com/info/cinelerra/test_motion.m2v

Therefore, you can use them on the cvs.cinelerra.org website. Just quote
my name: Nicolas Maufrais.

However, the total "weight" is almost 8Mb. Isn't it possible to host
them on the cinelerra website? I *could* keep them on my website, but
I'd prefer them to be hosted somewhere else, because I often have to
delete stuff on my website to make room for newer stuff.

BTW, I assume some more videos will have to be hosted on the
cinelerra.org website. I think some people are preparing cinelerra
tutorials...

Nicolas.

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:44:19AM +1030, Pierre Marc Dumuid wrote:
> Nicolas,
> di you mind leaving those clips there for a while? I was thinking of 
> linking to them from cvs.cinelerra.org as demonstration clips... Is that 
> o.k?
> 
> Nicolas wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:27:07PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >  
> >>Nicolas,
> >>Great analysis.  This will help me.  I will try to get to this 
> >>tonight/tomorrow.
> >>
> >>Do you have before and after vids?
> >>scott
> >>
> >
> >Scott,
> >
> >Here is a short extract...
> >
> >Before: deinterlaced "Raw" DV footage
> >http://www.europephoto.com/info/cinelerra/200610/20061018_motion_effect_BEFORE.m2v
> >
> >After: motion effect and zoom-in applied:
> >http://www.europephoto.com/info/cinelerra/200610/20061018_motion_effect_AFTER.m2v
> >
> >Nicolas.
> >
> >___
> >Cinelerra mailing list
> >Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> >https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> >  
> 
> 
> ___
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> 

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] ubuntu package maintainer

2006-10-29 Thread Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof
Here's the Debian guide for making deb packages. I think this is the way
to do it for Ubuntu too: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/

Bas Alphenaar wrote:
> What is the official way then?
>
> Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
>> I don't know much about packaging, but i heard that a checkinstall .deb
>> is
>> not recommended for sharing with other people. If you want to make a
>> cinelerra repo you should make the package the official way.
>>
>> Jeroen
>>
>> Bas Alphenaar wrote:
>>> I know how to compile Cinelerra (although I can't compile the latest
>>> revision, r950, right now but I see on top of the mailinglist that more
>>> people have this problem) and how to build Debian packages with
>>> checkinstall. I think I can make packages every 1 or 2 weeks or so. I
>>> would like to compile for x86_64 too but I am running 32 bit Ubuntu
>>> Edgy
>>> Eft right now, is it possible to compile for 64 bit too while running a
>>> 32 bit OS?
>>>
>>> Andraž Tori wrote:
 how good are you at package maintaining? how much time do you have on
 your hands - how often can you build it?

 would it be possible for you to build for x86_64 also?

 i do have space on kiberpipa.org for hosting.

 bye
 andraz

 On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 16:08 +0100, Bas Alphenaar wrote:
> I made a .deb some weeks ago and uploaded it somewhere but after that
> I
> didn't hear anything anymore from the person who offered me the FTP
> account. I still want to volunteer for this, I can compile for x386.
> If
> someone can help me hosting the packages or make a apt-get repository
> or
> whatever, I am willing to help.
>
> Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
>> There where some people who said they are willing to make debs and
>> put
>> them online. But they dn't repond to the ml anymore.
>>
>> Jeroen
>> KenSentMe
>>
>> Wesley T Allen wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 24 October 2006 7:43 pm, Andraž Tori wrote:
 we really need ubuntu package maintainer.
>>> Andraz, I can barely make it compile and know nothing about
>>> compiling
>>> for
>>> other architectures - or I'd at least ATTEMPT it.  I've also never
>>> created
>>> a .deb in my life.
>>>
>>> Didn't someone have some packages they were willing ot maintain a
>>> week or
>>> so
>>> ago?
>>>
>>> WEs
 bye
 andraz


 ___
 Cinelerra mailing list
 Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
 https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>>> --
>>> "The only way to stay sane in an insane world is to be insane."
>>>  --Me
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Cinelerra mailing list
>>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Cinelerra mailing list
>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>>
> ___
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

 ___
 Cinelerra mailing list
 Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
 https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

>>> ___
>>> Cinelerra mailing list
>>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Cinelerra mailing list
>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>>
>
> ___
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] DVD software

2006-10-29 Thread Nicolas
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:08:52PM +0900, Miha Kiti?? wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> I have a question...
> I was just wondering what software are you all
> using to:
> 
> a) burn video DVD's
> b) To run them on computer (with menu)
> 
> I have been using Nero and WinDVD for that
> so far. But I got a bit tired of jumping
> to Windows every time I want to burn or test
> something...
> 
> Is there a good Linux alternative?
> 
> Miha

Yes. It's dvdauthor, and it works very well. I suggest you don't use
QDVDAuthor, which is a GUI for dvdauthor. QDVDAuthor is very buggy, and
you can do more rigourous DVD menus by editing the .xml files used by
dvdauthor instead.
dvdauthor doesn't support multi-angles, unfortunately. :-/

Nicolas.

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] ubuntu package maintainer

2006-10-29 Thread Bas Alphenaar

What is the official way then?

Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:

I don't know much about packaging, but i heard that a checkinstall .deb is
not recommended for sharing with other people. If you want to make a
cinelerra repo you should make the package the official way.

Jeroen

Bas Alphenaar wrote:

I know how to compile Cinelerra (although I can't compile the latest
revision, r950, right now but I see on top of the mailinglist that more
people have this problem) and how to build Debian packages with
checkinstall. I think I can make packages every 1 or 2 weeks or so. I
would like to compile for x86_64 too but I am running 32 bit Ubuntu Edgy
Eft right now, is it possible to compile for 64 bit too while running a
32 bit OS?

Andraž Tori wrote:

how good are you at package maintaining? how much time do you have on
your hands - how often can you build it?

would it be possible for you to build for x86_64 also?

i do have space on kiberpipa.org for hosting.

bye
andraz

On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 16:08 +0100, Bas Alphenaar wrote:

I made a .deb some weeks ago and uploaded it somewhere but after that I
didn't hear anything anymore from the person who offered me the FTP
account. I still want to volunteer for this, I can compile for x386. If
someone can help me hosting the packages or make a apt-get repository
or
whatever, I am willing to help.

Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:

There where some people who said they are willing to make debs and put
them online. But they dn't repond to the ml anymore.

Jeroen
KenSentMe

Wesley T Allen wrote:

On Tuesday 24 October 2006 7:43 pm, Andraž Tori wrote:

we really need ubuntu package maintainer.

Andraz, I can barely make it compile and know nothing about compiling
for
other architectures - or I'd at least ATTEMPT it.  I've also never
created
a .deb in my life.

Didn't someone have some packages they were willing ot maintain a
week or
so
ago?

WEs

bye
andraz


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

--
"The only way to stay sane in an insane world is to be insane."
 --Me

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra





___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] ubuntu package maintainer

2006-10-29 Thread Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof
I don't know much about packaging, but i heard that a checkinstall .deb is
not recommended for sharing with other people. If you want to make a
cinelerra repo you should make the package the official way.

Jeroen

Bas Alphenaar wrote:
> I know how to compile Cinelerra (although I can't compile the latest
> revision, r950, right now but I see on top of the mailinglist that more
> people have this problem) and how to build Debian packages with
> checkinstall. I think I can make packages every 1 or 2 weeks or so. I
> would like to compile for x86_64 too but I am running 32 bit Ubuntu Edgy
> Eft right now, is it possible to compile for 64 bit too while running a
> 32 bit OS?
>
> Andraž Tori wrote:
>> how good are you at package maintaining? how much time do you have on
>> your hands - how often can you build it?
>>
>> would it be possible for you to build for x86_64 also?
>>
>> i do have space on kiberpipa.org for hosting.
>>
>> bye
>> andraz
>>
>> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 16:08 +0100, Bas Alphenaar wrote:
>>> I made a .deb some weeks ago and uploaded it somewhere but after that I
>>> didn't hear anything anymore from the person who offered me the FTP
>>> account. I still want to volunteer for this, I can compile for x386. If
>>> someone can help me hosting the packages or make a apt-get repository
>>> or
>>> whatever, I am willing to help.
>>>
>>> Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
 There where some people who said they are willing to make debs and put
 them online. But they dn't repond to the ml anymore.

 Jeroen
 KenSentMe

 Wesley T Allen wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 October 2006 7:43 pm, Andraž Tori wrote:
>> we really need ubuntu package maintainer.
> Andraz, I can barely make it compile and know nothing about compiling
> for
> other architectures - or I'd at least ATTEMPT it.  I've also never
> created
> a .deb in my life.
>
> Didn't someone have some packages they were willing ot maintain a
> week or
> so
> ago?
>
> WEs
>>
>> bye
>> andraz
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Cinelerra mailing list
>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> --
> "The only way to stay sane in an insane world is to be insane."
>  --Me
>
> ___
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>


 ___
 Cinelerra mailing list
 Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
 https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

>>> ___
>>> Cinelerra mailing list
>>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Cinelerra mailing list
>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>>
>
> ___
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
>



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] ubuntu package maintainer

2006-10-29 Thread Bas Alphenaar
I know how to compile Cinelerra (although I can't compile the latest 
revision, r950, right now but I see on top of the mailinglist that more 
people have this problem) and how to build Debian packages with 
checkinstall. I think I can make packages every 1 or 2 weeks or so. I 
would like to compile for x86_64 too but I am running 32 bit Ubuntu Edgy 
Eft right now, is it possible to compile for 64 bit too while running a 
32 bit OS?


Andraž Tori wrote:

how good are you at package maintaining? how much time do you have on
your hands - how often can you build it?

would it be possible for you to build for x86_64 also?

i do have space on kiberpipa.org for hosting.

bye
andraz

On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 16:08 +0100, Bas Alphenaar wrote:
I made a .deb some weeks ago and uploaded it somewhere but after that I 
didn't hear anything anymore from the person who offered me the FTP 
account. I still want to volunteer for this, I can compile for x386. If 
someone can help me hosting the packages or make a apt-get repository or 
whatever, I am willing to help.


Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:

There where some people who said they are willing to make debs and put
them online. But they dn't repond to the ml anymore.

Jeroen
KenSentMe

Wesley T Allen wrote:

On Tuesday 24 October 2006 7:43 pm, Andraž Tori wrote:

we really need ubuntu package maintainer.

Andraz, I can barely make it compile and know nothing about compiling for
other architectures - or I'd at least ATTEMPT it.  I've also never created
a .deb in my life.

Didn't someone have some packages they were willing ot maintain a week or
so
ago?

WEs


bye
andraz


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

--
"The only way to stay sane in an insane world is to be insane."
 --Me

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra




___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] ubuntu package maintainer

2006-10-29 Thread Andraž Tori
how good are you at package maintaining? how much time do you have on
your hands - how often can you build it?

would it be possible for you to build for x86_64 also?

i do have space on kiberpipa.org for hosting.

bye
andraz

On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 16:08 +0100, Bas Alphenaar wrote:
> I made a .deb some weeks ago and uploaded it somewhere but after that I 
> didn't hear anything anymore from the person who offered me the FTP 
> account. I still want to volunteer for this, I can compile for x386. If 
> someone can help me hosting the packages or make a apt-get repository or 
> whatever, I am willing to help.
> 
> Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
> > There where some people who said they are willing to make debs and put
> > them online. But they dn't repond to the ml anymore.
> > 
> > Jeroen
> > KenSentMe
> > 
> > Wesley T Allen wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 24 October 2006 7:43 pm, Andraž Tori wrote:
> >>> we really need ubuntu package maintainer.
> >> Andraz, I can barely make it compile and know nothing about compiling for
> >> other architectures - or I'd at least ATTEMPT it.  I've also never created
> >> a .deb in my life.
> >>
> >> Didn't someone have some packages they were willing ot maintain a week or
> >> so
> >> ago?
> >>
> >> WEs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> bye
> >>> andraz
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> Cinelerra mailing list
> >>> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> >>> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> >> --
> >> "The only way to stay sane in an insane world is to be insane."
> >>  --Me
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Cinelerra mailing list
> >> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> >> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Cinelerra mailing list
> > Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> > 
> 
> ___
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] ubuntu package maintainer

2006-10-29 Thread Bas Alphenaar
I made a .deb some weeks ago and uploaded it somewhere but after that I 
didn't hear anything anymore from the person who offered me the FTP 
account. I still want to volunteer for this, I can compile for x386. If 
someone can help me hosting the packages or make a apt-get repository or 
whatever, I am willing to help.


Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:

There where some people who said they are willing to make debs and put
them online. But they dn't repond to the ml anymore.

Jeroen
KenSentMe

Wesley T Allen wrote:

On Tuesday 24 October 2006 7:43 pm, Andraž Tori wrote:

we really need ubuntu package maintainer.

Andraz, I can barely make it compile and know nothing about compiling for
other architectures - or I'd at least ATTEMPT it.  I've also never created
a .deb in my life.

Didn't someone have some packages they were willing ot maintain a week or
so
ago?

WEs



bye
andraz


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

--
"The only way to stay sane in an insane world is to be insane."
 --Me

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra





___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCVS] (PATCH] SVN 950 failed to build (quicktime, wrong path to avcodec.h)

2006-10-29 Thread Gour
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 10:36 +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:

> SVN revision 950 doesnt build.

Same here.


> 
> Patch attached
> 
> This fixes the problem for me...

For me too.

Is it going to be committed soon?

Sincerely,
Gour



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [CinCVS] Loading mpeg2 eventually crashes cinelerra?

2006-10-29 Thread Andraž Tori
regarding the first problem... create a reproducable test case, upload
videos, file a bug

regarding the second, yes cinelerra is starting to need more and more
memmory, memory upgrade will help regarding speed, but not stability

bye
adnraz

On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 05:34 -0600, Andrew Leahy wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've been using the latest CVS version of cinelerra on my FC5 system to 
> clip together mpeg2 files for a DVD.  My workflow consists of 
> downloading DV files with Kino, converting the DV files to mpeg2 with 
> ffmpeg, using gimp and ffmpeg to create some mpeg2 title clips, and then 
> using cinelerra to merge them all together.  However, dragging these 
> mpeg2 files from the 'Media' clipboard to the timeline in Cinelerra is 
> unstable.  Eventually, after moving five or six clips, Cinelerra will 
> either crash with a segmentation fault or simply hang.  Is this a known 
> problem?  If so, are there any work-arounds?  In particular, is there a 
> better file format to work with when importing into Cinelerra?
> 
> Also, a while back I used a 1.X version of Cinelerra to create mpeg2 
> videos and one problem I've noticed since I've downloaded and compiled 
> the latest version of Cinelerra is that it is extremely sluggish and 
> much more memory intensive.  I have 500MB memory and I am well into swap 
> whenever I do anything with Cinelerra. (I also don't have an OpenGL 2.0 
> video card, if that makes a difference.)  I'm wondering if investing in 
> more memory or better video will help (with stability as well as 
> sluggishness) or if there are other tweaks to making Cinelerra run more 
> efficiently.
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> Andrew Leahy
> 
> 
> ___
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


[CinCVS] Loading mpeg2 eventually crashes cinelerra?

2006-10-29 Thread Andrew Leahy


Hello,

I've been using the latest CVS version of cinelerra on my FC5 system to 
clip together mpeg2 files for a DVD.  My workflow consists of 
downloading DV files with Kino, converting the DV files to mpeg2 with 
ffmpeg, using gimp and ffmpeg to create some mpeg2 title clips, and then 
using cinelerra to merge them all together.  However, dragging these 
mpeg2 files from the 'Media' clipboard to the timeline in Cinelerra is 
unstable.  Eventually, after moving five or six clips, Cinelerra will 
either crash with a segmentation fault or simply hang.  Is this a known 
problem?  If so, are there any work-arounds?  In particular, is there a 
better file format to work with when importing into Cinelerra?


Also, a while back I used a 1.X version of Cinelerra to create mpeg2 
videos and one problem I've noticed since I've downloaded and compiled 
the latest version of Cinelerra is that it is extremely sluggish and 
much more memory intensive.  I have 500MB memory and I am well into swap 
whenever I do anything with Cinelerra. (I also don't have an OpenGL 2.0 
video card, if that makes a difference.)  I'm wondering if investing in 
more memory or better video will help (with stability as well as 
sluggishness) or if there are other tweaks to making Cinelerra run more 
efficiently.


Thanks for your help.

Andrew Leahy


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


[CinCVS] (PATCH] SVN 950 failed to build (quicktime, wrong path to avcodec.h)

2006-10-29 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)

Hi,

SVN revision 950 doesnt build.
Several files in ./hvritual/quicktime include "avcodec.h"

#include "avcodec.h"


But tavcodec.h is built by configure in ./hvirtual/quicktime/ffmpeg
so the include should be

#include "ffmpeg/avcodec.h"


Patch attached

This fixes the problem for me...


Regards

Jean-Luc
diff -ruN hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/mpeg4.c hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/mpeg4.c
--- hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/mpeg4.c	2006-10-29 10:17:43.814959000 +0100
+++ hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/mpeg4.c	2006-10-29 10:19:06.760173620 +0100
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 
 
-#include "avcodec.h"
+#include "ffmpeg/avcodec.h"
 #include "colormodels.h"
 #include "funcprotos.h"
 #include "qtffmpeg.h"
diff -ruN hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/qtffmpeg.h hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/qtffmpeg.h
--- hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/qtffmpeg.h	2006-10-29 10:09:29.542484000 +0100
+++ hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/qtffmpeg.h	2006-10-29 10:19:25.985456407 +0100
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 
 
-#include "avcodec.h"
+#include "ffmpeg/avcodec.h"
 #include "qtprivate.h"
 
 
diff -ruN hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/qth264.c hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/qth264.c
--- hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/qth264.c	2006-10-29 10:22:13.389009258 +0100
+++ hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/qth264.c	2006-10-29 10:20:08.918407386 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#include "avcodec.h"
+#include "ffmpeg/avcodec.h"
 #include "colormodels.h"
 #include "funcprotos.h"
 #include 
diff -ruN hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/wma.c hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/wma.c
--- hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950.orig/quicktime/wma.c	2006-10-29 10:18:06.314752000 +0100
+++ hvirtual-2.0+svn20060929-950/quicktime/wma.c	2006-10-29 10:20:22.616482769 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#include "avcodec.h"
+#include "ffmpeg/avcodec.h"
 #include "funcprotos.h"
 #include "quicktime.h"
 #include 



pgpu21vpL8Qqv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [CinCVS] DVD software

2006-10-29 Thread Graham Evans
> I was just wondering what software are you all
> using to:
> 
> a) burn video DVD's

Hi Miha

There are many guides out there for this sort of information.  Here's a
start:

When working from footage created with cinelerra I use command line
tools.  While it might seem easier to use gui tools so far all the ones
I have found are not quite mature.  The command line tools are more
predictable and there is heaps of information out there on how to use
them.  This is a sequence that works for me:

>From cinelerra I render seperate audio video and audio streams.  Video
as mpeg2 and audio as ac3.

I use mplex to combine the renders. 
(for instance mplex -f 8 -o file.mpg file.m2v file.ac3)

I use dvdauthor to create a dvd folder structure and populate it.  You
need to do some googling on this step as there are so many
possibilities.  Here is a sequence I used recently to create a very
primitive dvd-compliant disc:

mkdir dvd
dvdauthor --video=pal+4:3 -o dvd/ -c 0:00,15:00,30:00,45:00 dw1CD.mpg
dvdauthor -T -o dvd/

mkisofs will turn that into an .iso file:

mkisofs -dvd-video -o dvd.iso dvd/

growisofs will burn that to a dvd: (In gnome/nautilus you can also right
click on an iso file and select 'write to cd')

growisofs -Z /dev/cdrom=dvd.iso

> b) To run them on computer (with menu)
> 
I generally use mplayer and don't bother with the menus.  If I need
menus I use xine.  I think ogle also does the job.

You could test a dvd before creating the iso or burning it like so:
xine dvd:dvd/VIDEO_TS/

> I have been using Nero and WinDVD for that
> so far. But I got a bit tired of jumping
> to Windows every time I want to burn or test
> something...
> 

Definitely no need to use windows you just need to spend a bit of time
to work out the tools.

> Is there a good Linux alternative?
> 
As I said Xine for WinDVD.  For Nero K3B is a brilliant program for
working with DVD and CD audio as well as data formats.

good luck

Graham E.



___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra