Re: [CinCV] Compile error
07.10.2010 04:14, E Chalaron kirjoitti: I don't think it is up to Cinelerra to keep track of the various libx264-nnn versions that do exist. Believe me, if I can compile it everybody can ! I agree. My distro of choice is Ubuntu AMD64 10.10. Compile Cinelerra first with default x264 library and then upgrade x264 library, maybe that helps? My Cinlerra is about few weeks old. as...@ubuntu:~$ x264 --version x264 0.105.1724 b02df7b built on Sep 26 2010, gcc: 4.4.5 as...@ubuntu:~$ ffmpeg --version FFmpeg version SVN-r25211, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers built on Sep 26 2010 20:14:38 with gcc 4.4.5 as...@ubuntu:~$ cinelerra --version Cinelerra 2.1CV (C) 2006 Heroine Virtual Ltd. Compiled on su 26.9.2010 21.21.28 +0300 Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Compile error
On 2010-10-06 22:37, Frans de Boer wrote: Same result with various options. As I asked before: advancements in ffmpeg and x264 are not incorporated in the SVN repository? If so, it makes cinelerra only usable on old systems without any recent update. I use x264 version form git. Maybe I am missing something? Frans. Maybe silly answer but... make sure you have libx264 and libx264-devel installed. Why don't you use the packages provided by your distro instead of building the x264 git version? ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCV] Re: Viewer does not play any files
On 2010-10-07 03:24, David Koski wrote: I also have the same problem but with Cinelerra CV 4.1. More information: Version: 4.1-0.1 Debian Squeeze kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 This Cinelerra was installed from a debian package, not compiled from source. Regards, David Koski da...@??? http://e.kevb.net/lurker/search/20090926.140634.0...@ml:cinelerra,viewer,4.1.en.html ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] need clarification of user-manual comment
Hi, Am 07.10.2010 00:22, schrieb anyeos: It applies not only for OpenGL instead in video in general. There are some encoders that can only work in some width or height multiples, like 4. The usual 4:2:0 sampling requires that dimensions are multiples of 2. It's theoretically possible to support odd dimensions, but they many programs fail here. Usual compression methods work on 16x16 blocks internally, but all these codecs allow arbitrary *even* dimensions. They just pad the images internally. I'm not aware of any mainstream codec, which requires multiples of 4. So you can have: 320x240, 420x480, 640x480, and so, all divisible by 4. Take care too about the aspect ratio what it is width/height in the example of 420/480 it is 0,875 not an standard one (640/480 get 1,33 or 4:3, 320x480 the same, 720/480 is 16:9 or 1,777 standard NTSC and so). You also have nonsquare pixels. All modern codecs store the pixel aspect ratio instead of the display aspect ratio. Burkhard ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] need clarification of user-manual comment
--- On Thu, 10/7/10, Burkhard Plaum pl...@ipf.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: From: Burkhard Plaum pl...@ipf.uni-stuttgart.de Subject: Re: [CinCV] need clarification of user-manual comment To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thursday, October 7, 2010, 5:23 AM Hi, Am 07.10.2010 00:22, schrieb anyeos: It applies not only for OpenGL instead in video in general. There are some encoders that can only work in some width or height multiples, like 4. The usual 4:2:0 sampling requires that dimensions are multiples of 2. It's theoretically possible to support odd dimensions, but they many programs fail here. Usual compression methods work on 16x16 blocks internally, but all these codecs allow arbitrary *even* dimensions. They just pad the images internally. I'm not aware of any mainstream codec, which requires multiples of 4. So you can have: 320x240, 420x480, 640x480, and so, all divisible by 4. Take care too about the aspect ratio what it is width/height in the example of 420/480 it is 0,875 not an standard one (640/480 get 1,33 or 4:3, 320x480 the same, 720/480 is 16:9 or 1,777 standard NTSC and so). You also have nonsquare pixels. All modern codecs store the pixel aspect ratio instead of the display aspect ratio. Burkhard I read in mencoder documentation years ago that the codecs required the 16x16 blocks. that is partly why I was confused about what the cinelerra document said regarding the (size) of the project tracks...That really should be updated in the user-guide to be more explicit...and based on the discussion it has sparked, perhaps the developers need to reexamine the requirement and publish the real (current) requirement. :^) I'm working with 720p and 480p vertical but want to maintain close to a 16:9 aspect. 720p works ok at 1280x720 but 480 need 854 horizontal to achieve the correct aspect...I end up scaling to 848x480 to maintain the divisible by 16 constraint...that is acceptable... ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Compile error
Maybe silly answer but... make sure you have libx264 and libx264-devel installed. Why don't you use the packages provided by your distro instead of building the x264 git version? Frans, In my experience on both Ubuntu and Fedora (32 and 64bit versions), compiling X264 is a nightmare. Do yourself a favor and, as Roland suggests, use your distros' pre-compiled packages. scott ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] need clarification of user-manual comment
From: tempest...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] need clarification of user-manual comment To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 06:31:39 -0700 I'm working with 720p and 480p vertical but want to maintain close to a 16:9 aspect. 720p works ok at 1280x720 but 480 need 854 horizontal to achieve the correct aspect...I end up scaling to 848x480 to maintain the divisible by 16 constraint...that is acceptable... Also. I found that exporting to ogg from 1440x1080 m2t file from HDV dvgrab source doesn't work like you expect. On the bottom there was green stripe. I fixed this setting resolution to 1072. Ogg requires resolution of multitude of 16. and aspect was off by less than 1 %. Not very good solution but first that came in to my mind. Hannu Vuolasaho
Re: [CinCV] Compile error
On 10/07/2010 03:36 PM, sfrase6 wrote: Maybe silly answer but... make sure you have libx264 and libx264-devel installed. Why don't you use the packages provided by your distro instead of building the x264 git version? Frans, In my experience on both Ubuntu and Fedora (32 and 64bit versions), compiling X264 is a nightmare. Do yourself a favor and, as Roland suggests, use your distros' pre-compiled packages. scott ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra Sorry, but OpenSuse 11.3 does not have these libraries nor a compiled versions of Cinelerra, at least not that I can see. What else can I do, I will look into the code and if it gets to difficult, I just switch to another tool. Thanks for the remarks, I leave at that. Frans. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Compile error
Frans, dont give up on that... You probably need to add some packman repository to your Yast software management. I actually tried a precompiled version but gave up on it because of the histogram not working properly. What I suggest : - activate some packman repo - get a precompiled version of Cinelerra - it will (should) drag the appropriate libs to your sytem - try cinelerra - does not work to your liking ? then compile it As Scott suggested dont bother compiling every single lib, as far as I am concerned it does not make any difference. Another idea would be to compile with external ffmpeg but I have never done that. And yes I agree it is frustrating, but it eventually works Cheers E Sorry, but OpenSuse 11.3 does not have these libraries nor a compiled versions of Cinelerra, at least not that I can see. What else can I do, I will look into the code and if it gets to difficult, I just switch to another tool. Thanks for the remarks, I leave at that. Frans. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Compile error
07.10.2010 21:42, Frans de Boer kirjoitti: Sorry, but OpenSuse 11.3 does not have these libraries nor a compiled versions of Cinelerra, at least not that I can see. How about packman's repos? http://packman.links2linux.org/package/cinelerra openSUSE 11.3 i586 cinelerra-2.1.cv20100802-2.pm.9.6.i586.rpm 5 days ago openSUSE 11.3 x86_64 cinelerra-2.1.cv20100802-2.pm.9.5.x86_64.rpm 6 days ago http://packman.links2linux.org/search?scope=nameq=x264 http://packman.links2linux.org/search?scope=nameq=ffmpeg Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Re: Viewer does not play any files
Thanks. Everywhere I look it says 4.1 HV does not support the viewer. I am using CV, not HV. But it does not work. Regards, David Koski da...@kosmosisland.com On 2010-10-07 03:24, David Koski wrote: I also have the same problem but with Cinelerra CV 4.1. More information: Version: 4.1-0.1 Debian Squeeze kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 This Cinelerra was installed from a debian package, not compiled from source. Regards, David Koski da...@??? http://e.kevb.net/lurker/search/20090926.140634.0...@ml:cinelerra,viewe r,4.1.en.html ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
