[CinCV] Open Source
yes, it's probably (or absolutely) not correct to call Open Source the binary of a source (wich is not open at all and not to mention this binary is only for privative system) i agree that opensource, more than a brand is some kind of revolution. And we had to be carefull, when using this term, or we'll probably lost that sense. :) Vale And already there are lots of questions whether or not it really is open source (yet?) http://www.lightworksbeta.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=20&id=211&Itemid=202 -Heikki 2010/11/30 Raffaella Traniello : Ciao! If you are interested, Lightworks Open Source beta is out available for Windows to registered people. http://www.lightworksbeta.com/ Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra -- Ystävällisin terveisin, Heikki Repo ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Open Source
На Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:10:26 +0100 "Valentina Messeri" записано: Lat's wait one more year. Perhaps EditShare just need more time to replace some proprietary code. Codec support for example. IMHO they win much more by GPLing this code then lose. > yes, it's probably (or absolutely) not correct to call Open Source > the binary of a source (wich is not open at all and not to mention > this binary is only for privative system) > > i agree that opensource, more than a brand is some kind of revolution. > And we had to be carefull, when using this term, or we'll probably > lost that sense. > > :) > Vale > > > And already there are lots of questions whether or not it really is > > open source (yet?) > > > > http://www.lightworksbeta.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=20&id=211&Itemid=202 > > > > -Heikki > > > > 2010/11/30 Raffaella Traniello : -- Ильдар Ахметгалеев aka AkhIL Срд Дек 1 19:18:48 NOVT 2010 Wed Dec 1 13:18:48 UTC 2010 -- Visit my home page http://akhil.homelinux.org jabber: ak...@jabber.ru -- Ничего не важно, потому что ничто не может быть важнее чем что-то другое. -- Linux artstation 2.6.34-gentoo-r12 #1 SMP Fri Oct 29 10:37:51 NOVST 2010 x86_64 AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux up 11 days, 23:08, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.05, 0.01 ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Lightworks Open Source beta is out!
> > Maybe such doesn't do much harm, but such a condition is plain flat > tasteless > IMHO... > > "Plain flat tasteless", lol, agreed! I just downloaded it and started installing. Their license is clearly not GPL nor anything similar. There are things such as "you may only use one software in one machine", "you may not copy it rather than make a backup copy", the usual copyright stuff. You also have to register at their site to download it, which makes me feel at least suspicious... I mean, I hope they make it, but it certainly has that feeling of: "oh, let's become open souce, it seems catchy nowadays, how do we do it?" "maybe we put a link for people to download our software for free instead of pirating it?" "seems like a good idea! tell peter to do that on monday. that'd be all?" "yeah, pretty much! then we send a memo to the developers team. oh, and perhaps Ana, from the juridical department". then the devs and the JD freak out, call a meeting and step 2 seems suddenly further than initially thought...
