RE: BGP Help! [7:70618]
Hi, I have come across that Cisco statement before: I guess it means that one AS does not influence the routing policies of another AS :) In other words (hoping I am right), AS1 implements its own internal routing policy, as will AS2 and AS1 will not dictate to AS2 how AS2 should route AS1's traffic through AS2. Honestly, I wish I could get clearer explanation from the members :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70619t=70618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596]
Yah you can use 1,2,4 and 5. Here 1,2 and 4,5 are Tx and Rx pairs and you have to reverse them once to have SPs Tx at your Rx and vice versa. HTH Vikram -Original Message- From: Scott Chau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596] A regular cat5 ethernet cable would work. It used pin 1,2,4,5. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas N Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596] Hi All, I am wondering what is the difference between the RJ48 and RJ45 connector/cable? I am setting a router with a integrated CSU/DSU (WIC-1DSU-T1) with a T1 RJ48 connection hand off by the ISP. They however do not provide the cable. Could I make a cable with RJ45 connectors for this? What would be the pinout for both end of the cable? Does the direction of the cable connection matter? It's urgent. Please help. Thanks in advance! Thomas. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70620t=70596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590]
I will post the config, as soon as I am able, but I have a route on both sides, and can ping, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70621t=70590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLNA ISSUE [7:70174]
Hi Milind, And in case if you wanna be a bit more dynamic, :) try looking for URT solution on CCO. It integrates with your PDC, domain controller on windows, and lets you have the VLANs as per user IDs configured on NT domain. HTH Vikram -Original Message- From: milind tare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VLNA ISSUE [7:70174] hi Ralf, u right ralf...then same thing which i required..can u explain me in detail how can i proceed. or if any more informaition regarding my setup u need pls let me know i will mail u.pls suggest me any cisco link also. Thanks Regards, Milind Tare --- Ralf van Dooren wrote: Milind, Maybe I don't understand your question entirely correct, but VMPS may be your solution. With VMPS, you can make a database of mac addresses and the vlan it needs to be in. When one of your HOD's plug their laptop in a switch, the switch sees the mac address, consults the VMPS table and puts the port in the correct VLAN. No need to reconfigure the laptop, the HoD will keep its static IP address. Is this what you need? If you need to know more, just let me know. I'm glad to help. Ralf On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:07:36AM +, milind tare wrote: Dear All, I hv following setup in my company. 6506---6506 2 nos. back to back connected. 8 nos. 3508 connected to core.redundancy network. and the 3500 series for Accesses swith's. my boss requirment is as follows;- i hv configures 20 VLAN's in my network and assigne static IP addresses to All users. Now our Company HOD's r roaming around the anywhere to give presentation or to attend the meetings with there LAPTOP's. So now requirmnet is my boss need Floating Ip addresses for all HoD's. so if HoD go anyway where in the company everytime he can't change his IP address.coz there LAPTOP's r configures in there Respective VLAN's. Can anyone give me suggestion..is it possible in the setup. please reply. Thanks Regards, Milind Tare __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70624t=70174 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Help! [7:70618]
HI I believe this is about transit AS. If you are doing multihoming with 2-3 ISPs, you do not enable your AS to forward traffic from ISP1 to ISP2 or ISP3. This means you do not make your AS as transit AS. Doing this will enable for eg ISP1 to go to ISP2 using your AS, as that would be a shorter route. HOpe this clarifies Chirag Arora -Original Message- From: Tiongster 84 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Help! [7:70618] Hi guys, What does this mean BGP does not enable one AS to send traffic to a neighbor AS , intending that the traffic take a different route from that taken by traffic originating in the neighbor AS. Thank you very much! DISCLAIMER: Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70623t=70618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Policy routing with route map [7:70567]
In match IP address , which Ip address are you trying to match? ramesh ,ccnp Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com Bid for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to http://airsahara.indiatimes.com and Bid Now ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70627t=70567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590]
Try this URL pad pad pad http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk827/tk369/tech_protocol_family_home.html Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote: Hi all I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel Tunnel protocol/transport uninitialized and I can not get any traffic to flow through the tunnel, any thoughts ? -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master+ Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Office Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell Phone: 678-521-0360 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70630t=70590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Tests [7:70632]
Hi, I was wondering...for the CCNP tests, how long do I have inbetween each of the 4 tests to take them all before they expire? Or, how long do I have to take all 4 of them before the ones i've taken and passed are null and void? I took the CCNP Routing June of 2002 and passed it, and I'm now finding the time to move into switching and everything elsemy CCNA expires Dec. 7th 2004 so I am going for CCNP before CCNA expires (obviously obviously). So, does anyone know when I have to pass all 4 CCNP tests before they become null/void? I appreciate it! Jarred Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70632t=70632 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSTUN [7:70582]
The tunnel must be closed until the ATM opens the transaction. Check you hex address coming from the ATM. Terry Martin wrote: This is a good one. I have a 3640 and a 1721 connected over point-to-point T1. Everything is up and up, no problems. Each of the routers listed above have another serial port. The 3640 is connected to an IBM host (9000) and the 1721 is connected to an ATM cash money machine (Diebold) (located at a bank). Everything on that circuit, which uses BSTUN tunneling through the HDLC is up and up...but I can not get the BSTUN peer groups to talk. I know that this scenario is pretty vague, but any input would help. I have peer groups, and static routes. But when I do a show bstun all I get is the IP address of my peer, and the fact that the tunnel is closed. I can ping, telnet, everything else, but I can not get the BSTUN to show a valid connection. It is a simple point to point setup. Any ideas? When I do a debug BSTUN events, debug BSTUN packets, debug BSC events, and debug BSC packets on my router with the AS400 connected, I do not see any traffic. This is my secondary router. (Does the polling). Would this be a problem on the AS400 or router? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70631t=70582 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LAN to G703 converter [7:70178]
Cisco used to sell Lan Extenders which did pretty much the same thing (model numbers 1001 and 1002). They dont sell them any more but you could shop around. They are based on the lan extension options in PPP so are effectively a remote ethernet which you configure from the main router via PPP. TTFN Lauren Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70633t=70178 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Help! [7:70618]
Think of AS's as countries (not the best analogy but...) If you need to get to the UK from Japan thru the US, then the route would be from Japan USUK, right? Now once you land in the US, say in LA, then the US will decide how you will make it to the UK through the US. For ex. US might want you to fly straight to NY and then to London or US might want to first fly to Detroit, then NY and then London or some other way. Thus, AS1 (Japan) knows only of getting to the UK thru the US but cannot dictate how that traffic will get routed thru the US to reach the UK. A little clearer?? ;- From: Mwalie W Reply-To: Mwalie W To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Help! [7:70618] Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:05:42 GMT Hi, I have come across that Cisco statement before: I guess it means that one AS does not influence the routing policies of another AS :) In other words (hoping I am right), AS1 implements its own internal routing policy, as will AS2 and AS1 will not dictate to AS2 how AS2 should route AS1's traffic through AS2. Honestly, I wish I could get clearer explanation from the members :) _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70634t=70618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: number of CCIE [7:70151]
Folks, The CCIE certification has really depreciated in value. There was a time when I proudly used to adorn my designation with my CCIE number. Not any more. Its value to impress is diminishing every day. Anyways, that was expected. Aziz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n rf Sent: June 10, 2003 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: number of CCIE [7:70151] Mark E. Hayes wrote: I don't know why I am doing this but I am... As far as trading in numbers goes- It doesn't make a difference to me if I am #1100 or #11000. I am only a CCNA now and working on my NP. I feel the reason for the headhunters and HR types to value a lower number is due to pure ignorance. Like that matters. You know how it is. It doesn't matter whether you think they're being stupid or not. If they have the jobs and you want a job, then you have to play by their rules, simple as that. Whether you agree with those rules is beside the point. Think about it, when the rent comes due, you either have the money to pay or you don't. You really think your landlord wants to hear you whine that you're broke because you can't get a job because HR is stupid? That's my point exactly. I don't think they're being ignorant or stupid at all - but even if they were, that doesn't change much. At the end of the day you end up in the same place that I am - you admit to yourself that a lower number is better, it's just that we get to the same place for different reasons. My reason is that the lower number does tend to convey higher quality. Your reason is that while you think this is untrue, a lot of people who have hiring power believe it, so you prefer the lower number for yourself simply to satisfy those people. But so what? We still end up in the same place. Most of them can't find their own ass with both hands and a GPS receiver. So? The reality is that they still have power over you, because they have the power to determine who gets a job and who doesn't. You can whine and moan about it all you want, and they will still have power over you. You don't like it? Too bad. It is what it is. Again, I would ask you to be pragmatic. At the end of the day, you want something (a job) that they have the power to grant, and therefore you need to jump through their hoops, no matter how stupid you might think they are. That's life. This comment though insulting, is aimed at the hiring side of IT. This is not aimed at the rest of their functions. I personally feel corp America should move to Argentina and Ecuador and hang out with the rest of the surviving Nazis. 'Course then we'd have a Fourth Reich to contend with and anybody who tried to make a decent living with anything less than a Bachelor's Degree would be castrated or asked to take a shower. Heh! Well, tell us how you REALLY feel. Look, at the end of the day, there are things that corporate America dictates that they want out of their job candidates. Ranting and raving about it isn't going to change anything. They have the jobs so they set the rules. If you REALLY REALLY don't like the hiring practices of corporate America, then fine, start your own company and then you can dictate whatever terms you want out of the people you hire. I don't see anybody stopping you.. It's utter BS to believe a lower numbered CCIE is any better than a higher numbered CCIE. A lab is a lab is a lab of course. Right Wilbur? As far as I know (famous last words but I am not pussing out), there are no BootCamps for the lab portion. The test portion yes, the lab no. Ahem. Ahem. Are you serious?? Did you just seriously say that? Man, I had to check my news client several times to make sure I heard you right. Uh, I hate to be the one to have to tell you this, but groupstudy itself was essentially started by one of the bigger lab bootcamp vendors around - CCbootcamp. I don't even think that groupstudy would have gotten off the ground without ccbootcamp. It's now sponsored by not only ccbootcamp, but also by HelloComputers, cyscoexperts, and IPexperts who all make a lot of money off their lab bootcamps. Trust me, all these companies enjoy thriving business off their lab bootcamp sales. And second of all, a lab is not a lab is not a lab. The fact is, there have been constant fluctuations in the overall rigor of the lab. Labs are not created equal. I remember back in the old days when people would 'game' the lab by deliberately travelling to what they thought were easier test locations where the proctors and the test gear (back in the old days, each location had different racks) were reputedly easier. For example, I seem to recall people saying that if you didn't know SNA well, then don't even think of attempting the lab in RTP because that's where all the stud-SNA CCIE proctors were. This forced Cisco to standardize racks in each location and to rein in certain rogue proctors. There have been
Pix NAT Config Question for Current Secondary Addresses [7:70635]
Hello, We are in the plans to add a 525 to a customers network which is currently utilizing a 6509 with ACL's for all intra-campus routing and interfacing to the internet. The internet is provided by a special ISP of sorts as it serves connectivity to various school districts in the county. The 6509 is currently utilizing secondary addresses on the internet vlan for TCP/IP based printing through nat. (hard to explain) ie. Interface vlan100 ip address 63.x.x.x 255.255.255.x ip address 192.168.10.x 255.255.255.0 secondary ip nat outside ip nat inside source static 10.10.10.10 192.168.10.5 (NAT'd TCP/IP Printer) Basically the ISD (ISP for school districts) has their routers configured to forward traffic destine for 192.168.10.x to the 63.x.x.x address on VLAN100 which in turn has a secondary on the 192.168.10.x subnet. From there the NAT takes place to the 10.10.10.10 internal printer. With the plans to add a pix to the network, my plans are to move the 63.x.x.x network to the outside interface and the inside will reside on a 10.x.x.x network consistent with the campus IP schema. My question is can similar functionality be taken over for the 'secondary' addressing NATs? I read a similar post that stated that as long as the upstream router from the ISD is configured to route properly for the NAT'd 192.168.10.x subnet to the outside of the PIX interface, I can from there have static NATs in the form of: static (inside,outside) 192.168.10.5 10.10.10.10 (or similar) Otherwise is there another way to accomplish this functionality similar to secondary address functionality of the IOS based platforms? Possibly trunking with logical interfaces using the 6.3 code? Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70635t=70635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDA CCDP [7:70637]
Hello all - I am thinking about adding the CCDA and CCDP to my cisco cert arsenal. I was wondering what books the group would recommend for 640-861 and 640-901 (I believe these are the latest tests...) Thanks, Duncan Wallace Sr. Systems Engineer Pacific Star Communications 15714 SW 72nd Ave. Portland, OR 97224 Work:503-403-3000 Cell:971-506-8164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70637t=70637 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Host Route [7:70439]
Colin, Can't remember if you got a reply. The classic case they are talking about is the Loopback address. Unless you have ip ospf network point-to-multipoint Loopback address are advertised as /32 routes. This might be tough to set up adjacencies with (since the neighbor won't be on the same segment) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin Weiner Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF Host Route [7:70439] Ive been reading up on OSPF for the BSCI test and am confused as to what an OSPF Host Route is. RFC 2328 refers to OSPF host routes as Hosts attached directly to routers. Is host route a route to a host? Am I missing something? Colin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70638t=70439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ICMP question [7:70628]
Egidio Colombo wrote: Hi all question: when on my router arrive unwanted icmp packet how is possible to understand where they cames from and if is it possible to capture a trace. You can't capture a trace on a router without turning on debug, which could have a severe effect on performance, and also won't catch packets that are fast switched. Routers don't really make very good troubleshooting tools. Are these packets that you are denying with an access list? If yes, you can add the log keyword to the access list. Then you can see some info about the packets that were filtered by the list on the console, or wherever you send your logging messages. In general, what you want to do is better handled by an Intrustion Detection System (IDS), than a router. A router forwards (or blocks) packets. It should be optimized to do this. It doesn't make a good troubleshooting or logging tool. It's not supposed to. Ciao, Priscilla Ciao from Italy and thank in advance [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Egidio Colombo.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70639t=70628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN and VoIP [7:70640]
Hi, Cisco IP phones can be used as remote extensions in which case you can have a Cisco IP phone at home and have the same extension as you have in the office. Can this be done with the following setup. DSL modem at home connected to a small switch. The home PC and the IP phone connect to the Switch which connects to the DSL modem. The PC has Cisco VPN client installed and can connect to the Head-office where the VPN concentrator is. Now for the IP Phone, how will it connect,. It will have a private IP address but , doesn't have a VPN client like the PC has. What is the solution for this type of application. Comments? thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70640t=70640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN and VoIP [7:70640]
neil K 6/13/03 2:30:54 PM Hi, Cisco IP phones can be used as remote extensions in which case you can have a Cisco IP phone at home and have the same extension as you have in the office. Can this be done with the following setup. DSL modem at home connected to a small switch. The home PC and the IP phone connect to the Switch which connects to the DSL modem. The PC has Cisco VPN client installed and can connect to the Head-office where the VPN concentrator is. Now for the IP Phone, how will it connect,. It will have a private IP address but , doesn't have a VPN client like the PC has. What is the solution for this type of application. Comments? thanks, neil Can you get Cisco SoftPhone software and run it from your PC? That option works pretty well. In fact, our Cisco account manager called me from home yesterday from her softphone over a pretty crazy connection. Her PC with the VPN software connects via wireless to a wireless hub and then to a cable modem. She was connecting from Denver all the way to San Jose to their concentrator, and then hopped onto another high-speed connection back to Cisco's offices in Denver to hop onto the PSTN. I was pretty impressed with the sound quality considering that network path! John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70641t=70640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDP Recertification [7:69911]
Just to update this thread with my CCDP recert story. Today I surprisingly passed the exam. I scheduled the exam as a recce (to just see it) and guage where I was for further study. I had gone once through the Boson CCDP practice but I felt I needed to see the real thing since I had problems with the CCNP recert. So what I'm saying is that without much specific CCDP study, I passed with 829, pass is 768. With more study a higher mark probably could have been had - but, it's over now! Most of the previous comments on the exam are accurate except Priscilla mentioned that there wasn't any BGP. I had at least 6 BGP questions - which wasn't a problem with my study from the CCNP recert. The material is OLD. Many design ideas would not be considered today. Anyway, I'm good for both CCNP/CCDP for another 3 years. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:45 PM Subject: Re: CCDP Recertification [7:69911] jeff sicuranza wrote: There was only one appletalk quesiton on the NP recert probably from one of old questions from the routing pool. I think the AppleTalk questions (if you get any) in the CCNP recert are from the Support exam which hasn't been updated much. As for the 700 series nothing like that on the NP recert. The NP recert exam is one of the more updated newer exams with ios simulation for hands on testing. It is the DP recert exam that has all the old junk. Indeed, the CCDP recert exam is ancient, making you wonder what the point is. It can't be to show that the candidate is keeping up with new stuff!? ;-) I almost wonder if it's some sort of mistake. CCNP isn't quite so ancient, except for the BCRAN part which is still ancient. I did get some 700 questions. But Routing and Switching were updated and did give Cisco proof that I was keeping up with new Cisco requirements. Routing included BGP and IS-IS, for example, which weren't on the test 3 years ago. One would think it would be easy to use the same pool of questions for CCDP, but they don't. No BGP or IS-IS for example. SNA and StrataCom though! Oh boy! :-) Priscilla Good luck.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70644t=69911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN and VoIP [7:70640]
The best solution for this would be a hardware VPN client so both devices can take advantage of the VPN tunnel or use a router and terminate it on the VPN concentrator, the hardware client is a no-brainer to setup. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of neil K Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN and VoIP [7:70640] Hi, Cisco IP phones can be used as remote extensions in which case you can have a Cisco IP phone at home and have the same extension as you have in the office. Can this be done with the following setup. DSL modem at home connected to a small switch. The home PC and the IP phone connect to the Switch which connects to the DSL modem. The PC has Cisco VPN client installed and can connect to the Head-office where the VPN concentrator is. Now for the IP Phone, how will it connect,. It will have a private IP address but , doesn't have a VPN client like the PC has. What is the solution for this type of application. Comments? thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70645t=70640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EIGRP OSPF DUAL MUTUAL REDISTRIBUTION [7:70643]
Can't figure this one out. I am mutually redistributing eigrp into ospf (dual redistribution points) and vice versa, I also have a separate redistribution point in the eigrp domain which introduces external (AD170) routes into the Eigrp domain, upon redistribution into OSPF these (external eigrp) routes are given an AD of 110, creating suboptimal routing. The only solution I could devise was based on modifying the distance of the external routes in the eigrp domain. What would be the best approach to tackle the problem, Any insight would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70643t=70643 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN and VoIP [7:70640]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Cisco IP phones can be used as remote extensions in which case you can have a Cisco IP phone at home and have the same extension as you have in the office. Can this be done with the following setup. DSL modem at home connected to a small switch. The home PC and the IP phone connect to the Switch which connects to the DSL modem. The PC has Cisco VPN client installed and can connect to the Head-office where the VPN concentrator is. Now for the IP Phone, how will it connect,. It will have a private IP address but , doesn't have a VPN client like the PC has. What is the solution for this type of application. Comments? thanks, neil Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neil, Have a look at V3PN's on CCO. You can configure the router as a EZ VPN client. When you attempt to make a connection via the router it will ask for username and password, then authenticate you to the VPN Headend allowing all traffic to pass. It is also possible to configure this so that the Phones are always on, and only users have to authenticate. There are a number of design references. David -- David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70646t=70640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Tests [7:70632]
You have three years from the time you get your CCNA to pass all four CCNP tests. Good luck. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70647t=70632 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Lag on Cisco? [7:70648]
Our network is running a 3640 as a core router and several other smaller routers plus an HP Procurve for the Servers and LAN. We run BGP across two upstream networks. Now, for a long time we have had a slight lag on our network. For example, whenever I am logged into our Linux servers, I will be typing something and I will lose the cursor, then suddenly a bunch of letters will appear at the cursor. There are other examples. We have hunted up and down and not found a problem/solution. Now comes the interesting part. A friend of mine who has been running Linux for years used a Linux machine as a router for the last 3.5 years. At my urging he decided to try a Cisco because his server was getting old and needed an overhaul. Yesterday he did and now has the same problem. His config is very simple - he has a 2640 router running IOS 12.1 - one T-1 and one Ethernet port to which he has connected his Dialup equipment (he is a Dialup ISP). What gives? He is now bad mouthing Cisco even more than he did before! Any ideas appreciated. Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70648t=70648 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
