FW: IOS
You need a CCO account. Anytime you need any software you can hop on there and get it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hans Schimek Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 4:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IOS i am in dire need of one of the following ios`s . 12.07T 12.11T or 12.05xk please help.. could you please send it to me. thanx === Hans Schimek Student Fachhochschule St. Pölten f. Telekommunikation und Medien mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gsm : +43 676 / 6389357 gsm : +43 699 / 10227980 icq : 22308773 fax : +43 3613 / 23114 www : www.schimek.net ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ethernet 2 rj45's on one cable :P ?
Could have some issues with crosstalk. I believe that the reason the IEEE went with 4 pair cat 5 is for the insulating capabilities of it as opposed to 2 pair cat 5. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Willard Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 11:04 AM To: Justin Marcus; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ethernet 2 rj45's on one cable :P ? It certainly -can- be done, but it isn't recommended. I've had cases where I needed to temporarily have two network jacks over one physical cat5 cable. For this, I just split off the other pairs and crimped another RJ45 connector onto them. I was even able to run fast ethernet over both of the runs, and it worked reliably for the time that it was needed - well over a month. I've even had instances when I needed to temporarily run a single fast ethernet connection over cat3 "phone" cable. Ethernet isn't as picky about signaling as the IEEE allows it to be, but I wouldn't make a habit of stretching its limits. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Justin Marcus" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 8:57 AM Subject: ethernet 2 rj45's on one cable :P ? hey :) in normal cat5 ethernet, 4 of the 8 wires are used correct ? if this is the case, would it be possible to have 2 physical links over the 1 cat5 cable. as in in 2 rj45's coming out of each end of the cat5, thus making 2 network connections over the 1 cable. anyone no if this has been done and how it worked, or if it cant be done, and why :) ? thanks :) Justin ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
looking for a study group in the Washington DC/ Annapolis Md area
for CCNP and or CCIE Thanks, Andrew ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
Don't worry about it. The 2.0 exam was easy I passed it Friday while only studying for 2 weeks. There is a lot less subnetting then 1.0 and more lan technologies (ie. vlan, trunking, etc...). I got a 946. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Nugent Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0 OK... I've been studying now for almost 4 months. I just want to make sure I do really well though and I don't feel like I'm quite ready just yet. But my concern is that I've been studying all of the 1.0 material and I've only got another month left to take it yes? So my question is this, is the 2.0 exam really THAT much more material? Is it significantly more difficult/tricky? I'm just trying to decide if I should rush in and take the 1.0 because it's what I know, or whether I should take a couple months more to learn the added 2.0 material. Any thoughts? Thanks all ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mac addresses
Try this: http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/index.shtml -Andrew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Dodds Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mac addresses Does any know if there is a website where you can search for the make of a peice of hardware from the mac address? Cheers George = George Dodds CCNA, MCP __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
