Re: help me pls [7:10938]
Where is the charity that pays for my CCIE written and lab? Is that you? ck - Original Message - From: NY50TT To: Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 12:27 AM Subject: Re: help me pls [7:10938] I run a charity for disadvantaged youths who want to take their CCNA test, and only have enough money to take the exam once. Unfortunately, even with their CCNA's they still can't find jobs, so I don't know if I'm doing any good. If you would like to explore this free option and help out my tax deduction this year, please post your email address so that I can send you some information. parky chan wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear, i am going to exam the CCNA 640-570 , can you give me some tips to exam this subject? i don't want to fail . because i no more money to exam again . Pls Help me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10955t=10938 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Layer3 switch vs Router [7:7406]
cisco also has this neat division called marketing which is paid to inflate specs and lie.. on their 12000 series routers they count packets coming in AND leaving the router as throughput even tho you can only push so much into it :) - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:01 AM Subject: RE: Layer3 switch vs Router [7:7406] So layer three switches are faster, 'eh? By orders of magnitude, 'eh? This calls for a bit of research on CCO. Hhhmmm Catalyst 8500 = 24 million PPS http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca8500c.htm#CJAEJHDF Catalyst 6509 = 170 million PPS http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca6000.htm Cisco 12000 = 375 million PPS http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/12000.htm Cisco 7600 - 30 million PPS http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/7600.htm so it would appear, based on Cisco's own product literature, that high end router versus high end switch, the edge most definitely goes to the product Cisco calls a router. and numbers are all over the place, to judge from the example I have looked at. Look, my point remains that any trickery, hardware or otherwise, can be applied to routers as well as switches. It most definitely is NOT enough to say that there is a difference and it is because of the hardware construction of a switch versus that of a router Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Layer3 switch vs Router [7:7406] Sergei Gearasimtchouk wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am sorry, should have said some thing meaningful. :( hypothetically speaking, if the ACLs are in place, wire speed is gone. The concept route one switch many is no longer holds its value. That's what I thought you meant. I'm glad you clarified your position. But it's incorrect. Multilayer switching ( therefore wire speed routing) are out the door only when you have an ACL applied to the MLS-RP interface as an incoming ACL. That's it. This is where flow masks come into play. There are 4 situations that need to be considered when using ACLs and Multilayer switching: 1) Where there is an incoming ACL on the MLS-RP interface, Multilayer switching is out the window because every incoming packet must be examined by the router. 2) If there is no access list, you can use a Destination IP flow mask, the simplest of the flow masks, where only the destination IP address is looked for in the MLS cache. 3) When there is a outgoing standard IP ACL applied to the MLS-RP interface, a Source-Destination IP flow mask needs to be used. This forces the MLS-SE to look for an entry with both the source and destination IP addresses in the MLS cache. Here's the reason why: If a packet has been sent from the MLS-SE to the MLS-RP, the packet gets routed, then the outgoing ACL is applied. If the packet makes it back to the MLS-SE, then the MLS-SE knows that the packet was allowed (not denied by the ACL) and it makes a MLS cache entry. Since a standard IP ACL uses source IP to permit/deny, the MLS-SE needs to look for the source IP as well as the destination IP in the MLS cache. Any subsequent packets from/to the same source/destination need not be compared to the ACL again as the criteria for the ACL on the original packet was satisfied. 4) When there is an outgoing extended IP ACL applied to the MLS-RP interface, an IP Flow mask needs to be used. An IP Flow masks instructs the MLS-SE to look for an entry that contains the source IP and port AND destination IP and port (basically Layers 3 AND 4). The MLS-SE must look for all of that information in the MLS cache because extended IP ACLs permit/deny using all of those criteria. Again, the same reasoning applies as far as the ACL goes, which is: if the first packet sent to the MLS-RP comes back to the MLS-SE, then the MLS-SE knows that the packet was allowed (not denied) by the ACL, and therefore it doesn't need to check the ACL for subsequent packet and Multilayer switching continues as normal. Most of the time an incoming ACL can be re-written as an outgoing ACL on other interfaces. Although it is usually recommended to use incoming ACLs over outgoing ACLs (so that traffic unwanted traffic doesn't get into the router's fabric just to be denied going out of another interface), in the case of Multilayer switching, the disadvantages caused by using outgoing ACLs are completely outweighed by the advantage of being able to use Multilayer switching. So, even with an ACL active, as long as it's an outgoing ACL on the MLS-RP interface, wire speed routing is still in tact. Anyhow, let routers do what they do best, and allow switches do their layer 2 stuff... Multilayer switching is an ingenious idea that allows
Re: Stop Sending me mails this is my fourth mail. [7:3280]
Why don't you check out the webpage for unsubscribe info, before you have a nervous breakdown there, buck-o. - Original Message - From: M. HASAN USMANI. To: Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 1:13 AM Subject: Stop Sending me mails this is my fourth mail. [7:3280] unsubscribe cisco STOP SENDING ME EMAILS!!! UNSUBSCRIBE CISCO UNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCOUNSUBSCRIBE CISCO ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3285t=3280 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFF TOPIC - BASIC compiler [7:2362]
I've got a copy of IBM DOS 5 on 5 1/4 floppies that I believe includes a gwbasic compiler... :) - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 2:55 AM Subject: OFF TOPIC - BASIC compiler [7:2362] Anyone know where I might find a freebie BASIC compiler? Or even interpreter? Don't seem to have my any of my Turbo BASIC, True BASIC or MS BASIC stuff any longer. Chuck One IOS to forward them all. One IOS to find them. One IOS to summarize them all And in the routing table bind them. -JRR Chambers- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2367t=2362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805]
He's trying to be all technical I wonder if he's ever used this pick-up line i'm going to route your packets, baby - Original Message - From: Donald B Johnson jr To: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:27 AM Subject: Re: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] huh - Original Message - From: Kim Edward B To: Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:33 PM Subject: RE: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] Why are you guys broadcasting your message to whole subnet (groupstudy) while you can use UNICAST or MULTICAST to specific host? Please take personal stuffs offline and stop using Broadcast. You are wasting our resources and everyone of us has to process it like broadcast) Oh, this is going to be a broadcast message too. Sorry everyone. Thanx. Edward -Original Message- From: Grad Alfons Kanon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] Hello Jim, I hope that you still keep your promise to send me the CVOICE material as the trade-off for MCNS that I have sent U. I have sent you the soft copy few months ago, but I STILL DIDN'T RECEIVE yours. regards Grad _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1854t=1805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
