Cisco tools for pocket pc 2002 [7:59465]
Hello all, I was wondering if anyone had come accross any useful tools for the pocket pc that are cisco related. Thanks in advance, Frank W. Dagenhardt [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Frank W. Dagenhardt (E-mail).vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59465t=59465 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FW: Storage Area Networking [7:56857]
TIA, You could use a server connected to a SAN as a sort of NAS. I do not know what you mean by sharing the data in a transparent way amoung n serversyes you could share data from a nas amoung n servers. This NAS / SAN combo is used by many vendors. Only one machine will see the lun as its own, that machine would then share it out to the other machines, unless you used a snapshot or a clone of that disk, but then the other servers would have to be connected to the SAN. Frank I have, related to this last part of NAS vs SAN. Can we use SAN as a NAS? I mean, can we share (the same) central data in a transparent way among n servers? Will this work as a NAS on steroids? Is this supported/used on any platform? Are we talking about exclusive or concurrential disk accesses? Does this bring problems on data consistency? (well, every machine sees the disks as their own...) Is it possible at all? TIA -- Jose Celestino || SysAdmin::SAPO.pt http://www.sapo.pt http://xpto.org/~japc - Lately, the only thing keeping me from becoming a serial killer is my distaste for manual labor.-- Dilbert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57054t=56857 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Storage Area Networking [7:56857]
There is no more risk in the san than would be in a normal array. You still have controllers and disks that can fail. Frank -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:sthurlow;webvein.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Storage Area Networking [7:56857] I agree with Steven, SAN's are really good to address a need, but for smaller companies, having all your storage eggs in one basket can (potentially) be a problem. I have done some work for a company that uses ESA1's, the old SCSI based storage works units. They had a few troubles with one of them, which has the data volumes for Exchange, the file server, database server etc etc. When that baby went down, so did EVERYTHING else. I guess it is a trade off between funcitonalty and risk. Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56903t=56857 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Storage Area Networking [7:56857]
Storage Area Netorking is just a way to enable storage to be used like a utility. It simplifies management by consolidating all of your storage into a virtual pool for you to be able to draw from at any time. Enabling you to get the full use out of the storage that you have paid for. Most SANS have the ability to take advantage of cloning, snapshots, replication and virtual disks. Network attached storage is more like an optimized file server. SANS present the storage to the servers as if they were actual physical disks on the server. If you have more questions I would be happy to answer. Frank -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Storage Area Networking [7:56857] Is anyone using Storage Area Networking? How do you use it? How well does it work? What problems does it solve for you? It it really networking, the way we know the term?? It sounds like it's sort of the next generation of file servers, but it also sounds like it's just a new way of managing hard drives. I'm having a difficult time figuring out what it is really. Thanks for helping me understand it. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56904t=56857 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terminal Server [7:56454]
Hi All, I was wondering if anyone had any advice on a good 8 port terminal server. I would prefer to get cisco but the cost is a little much. Does anyone have experience with a different brand that does the job at close to the same quality? Thank you in advance, Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56454t=56454 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6506 [7:50418]
Hi All, I was wondering if anyone had run into any problems when using a sup2 and the new 6148 board. Cisco says that we should be using 7.2.2, but we cannot get the sup to take it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, Frank W. Dagenhardt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50418t=50418 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
