Re: Secondary ip address and ip helper-address [7:35601]
Make sure your Microcrap server is using a superscope to encompass both your DHCP scopes. ""J-B"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Team, > I have the following problem: > > Our network has 10 sites, I am in the process of readdressing current > network. I have setup secondary ip address on every site, At the present > time I am setting up a wk2000 dhcp/win server in one site. The problem is > that I am not able to obtain ip address from the DHCP server via the WAN, it > works fine in the site where it is locate. The layout is the following: > > Hub site > > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 192.168.13.1 255.255.255.0 secondary > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ip helper-address 192.168.12.17 > ip directed-broadcast > no cdp enable > > interface Serial0 > no ip address > ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > no ip mroute-cache > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > interface Serial0.3 point-to-point > description Spoke site > bandwidth 384 > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > ip helper-address 192.168.12.17 > ip directed-broadcast > frame-relay interface-dlci 26 > > Spoke site > > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.0 secondary > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 > > interface Serial0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > no fair-queue > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > ! > interface Serial0.1 point-to-point > description connection to Hub > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > bandwidth 384 > frame-relay interface-dlci 16 > ! > > The ip address of the DHCP sever is 192.168.12.17 > > Be aware that I have not problem pinging to the DHCP server from the Hub > site. > > Team, what I am doing wrong here...HELP > > > Thanks (nothing can replace experiencewo) > > > JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35601&t=35601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448]
In a former lifetime, I worked for one of the nation's largest ISPs. We replaced all our Cisco access/distribution routers with Foundry equipment. Excellent product at a super price. One of our demands was that Foundry be 'IOS-like', - if you know IOS you can work on Foundry. The L2 and L4 products rock also. -- George Hellinger, CCNP ""Washington Rico"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Cisco people I would like to know your impression of Foundry Networks. Are > they something to worry about? > > Regards, > Eric Washington > > _ > $B$+$o(B & > $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36575&t=36448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: User access accounting [7:26472]
Although not an easy solution, you could assign department/group users to VPNs and use Netflow accounting for the aggregate use per VPN. This would allow you to track resource usage per group VPN and may be applicable to reporting requirements in the future also. ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > PVC monitoring and such are easily done through many SNMP packages. > > But you seem to be asking for something different - for "user" accounting. > That, unfortunately, can only be easily done if those users are reliably > using the same addresses all the time. If that is the case, then something > like Netflow accounting would probably seve you well. > > If that is not the case (those users are constantly changing their > addresses), then you the situation is indeed problematic. If you are using > DHCP to assign such addresses, then perhaps you could take lease information > and correlate that with Netflow accounting logs. But if users are assigning > themselves addresses, then your only choice is to user some kind of > authentication scheme that asks for username/password information before > anybody can use the PVC. Things like the auth-proxy feature (with > accounting) or firewall AAA per-user accounting might work, but indeed, it's > really a klugy solution. > > > > > > ""Paul Watson"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Thank you for the suggestion. To clarify: These are PVC's so they are > nailed > > up. Also, I use Openview to manage my network but what I need is not usage > > of a particular PVC but a packet count/percent usage of the bandwidth for > a > > particular user on that PVC so I can bill that user a proper percentage of > > the cost for that bandwidth. I have not been able to find a way to do this > > with NNM. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Paul > > > > ""VoIP Guy"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > CiscoWorks 2000 > > > MRTG > > > HP Openview > > > > > > and countless others. Not cheap though. > > > > > > only question i have is how are you being charged for the links? Aren't > > > they always nailed up of they are PVC's? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26600&t=26472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CPU Usage - How Much Is Too Much? [7:26739]
At my former employer, we monitored routers for CPU peaks above 80%. We had several (~20-40) 7500 & 12000 routers that routinely reported this high utilization. The thing to keep in mind is the duration of the utilization spike and the root cause. ""Andrew Michael"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everyone. > > Percentage-wise, what is the general consensus on excessive CPU usage on a > router? > > Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26754&t=26739 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ohio [7:26942]
Hi James, Delaware, OH checking in! -- George A. Hellinger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I would like to know if there are any user on this board from Central Ohio. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26951&t=26942 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sybex CCNA lab simulator int f0/0 [7:27080]
'fa' = fast ethernet, 'f' is ambiguous, remember fddi? ""anil"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Please can someone tell me the correct syntax.. > The Sybex CCNA lab simulator does not like my syntax for > #int fastethernet > I can get it to work with int f0/0 > Is this a simulator bug or am I doing something wrong? > Thanks > -Anil > > > Router#config t > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > Router(config)#hostname 2621A > 2621A(config)#int fas > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 >^ > > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0? > % Unrecognized command > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f 0/0 >^ > > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > > 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 >^ > > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > > 2621A(config)#int f0/0 > 2621A(config-if)# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27094&t=27080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIT question [7:27964]
"baseline" ""Vajira Wijesinghe"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In a recent sitting for the CIT paper I found a question asking to name > the "profile" which network engineers maintain, objective being to > monitor/record a certain type of network activity over a period of time > so that it could be useful in arriving into conclusions in a problematic > situation. > Does any one could give some clue as to what this "profile"is? > > Thanks > - (on postoffice) > > The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be > read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit > http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire > confidentiality clause. > > - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27981&t=27964 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
