Rip Timers??? [7:48179]

2002-07-05 Thread Giuseppe Citerna

Hi, the problem is:

neta netc 
A-B--C

well, all books of world state:

- when netc went down, router C delete it from RT and poisoned this route
(netc) to B.
B receives the poison update , triggers the Holddown timer (the netc is in
possibly down) and generates a poisoned routes to router A .
Router A go in holddown.
After holddown the route is purged from RT.
sound well ?

In my lab :

- when netc went down router c delete it from Rt and generates a poison
update to B.
But B dont get in holddown and delete quickly the route. B generates a
poison update to routerC .
Router C deletes immediatly the net.
And holddown ?!!!

To generate an holddown state in a router , i have configurated
passive-interfaces (to simulate a broken topology with no layer 1
disruption)on A per ex., and B after invalid timer time-out get in
holddown state. But always, B generates a poisoned route (16) to C that
deletes the network ( no holddown).

My question is :

Is that the really and good functionality of Rip or not?

thanks in advance 
giuseppe 


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48179t=48179
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Giuseppe Citerna

Hi ,
i have the lab at october, and i dont know what is switch , 5000 or 3550?!
It's true that CCIE must knowns every things, but the game must be equal for
all, and therefore the ccie candidate must known what is the equipment list.
what about?!
thanks





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46691t=46623
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]