site-to-site VPN connection [7:9081]
Hey all, has anyone configured a site to site VPN configuration via two routers before? Is it the same basic configuration as a site-to-site VPN via two PIX's? Thank you! -G _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9081t=9081 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX and static routes [7:3484]
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was possible to add static routes on a PIX firewall?...For instance, if your outside interface's IP was 198.6.1.4 and your inside Interface's IP was 172.16.0.1, couldn't you add a static route to say for IP 172.24.9.0 255.255.255.0 go to 172.24.128.3 ? I know a PIX isn't a router, but I thought it could forward traffic based on a static route. Thanks!! -G _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3484t=3484 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spanning Tree Protocol [7:2564]
Hey all...we are having a problem where workstations sporatically will not be able to obtain an IP address from our DHCP server. After about 4 minutes, you can perform a manual renew from WINIPCFG and you get your IP address. This has baffled me for quite some time and I have recently been told it is our Cisco 2924 Switch to blame. The story I was told is below. I welcome any comments for or against this opinion. Thank you for your time. It appears the problem is connected to the spanning tree algorithm used by the CISCO switches. By default, ports on the switch block as they are initialised; during this phase the port is in its spanning tree algorithm learning and listening state - it is not forwarding. This is specifically aimed at ports that will be used to connect to other switches/routers in a stack. After a default time (4 mins?) they switch to the standard forwarding mode and everything seems normal, the problem is that you have missed all the important DHCP broadcast and acknowledgment from client to DHCP server during this period. You can change this default state by changing the PORT-FAST setting on each port. The port is then immediately in the FORWARDING mode as it is initialised. By default this setting is DISABLED, I have ENABLED all ports except the ports doing the linking to other switches _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2564t=2564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question regarding DLCI's...
From: "Steve Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "John Gotti" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question regarding DLCI's... Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:33:31 -0600 If they are doing global addressing then YES! -Original Message----- From: John Gotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question regarding DLCI's... Hi all...quick question; We have 4 offices, NY, Chicago, Stamford and San Francisco, we just got our T1 turned on and will have a point to point Frame-Relay connection between all of us in a Hub Spoke topology with Stamford being the Hub. The question I have is, our Frame-relay provider gaves us the following DLCI's; NY-104, CH-101, SF-103 and Stamford-100...When your configuring each locations' router, am I correct in assuming all the remote routers will have DLCI 100 pointing them to Stamford and Stamford would have 4 entries each with the remotes' respective DLCI's? Does this make sense? Thanks a bunch! JG _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
