Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]
Currently cisco claims that there are 6169 CCIEs according to their website: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html Justin Emilio Tech Support CCNP, CCDP, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "Leonardo Borda" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:17 AM Subject: CCIE Expertises [7:13545] > Does anyone know how many CCIE exist around the world? > Does cisco publish that information? > > Leonardo Borda Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13594&t=13545 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How Hard is Hard - Cisco Exams [7:9410]
BSCN - 5 BCMSN - 4 BCRAN - 8 CIT - 3 CID - 9 Justin Emilio Tech Support CCNP, CCDP, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "hal9001" To: Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:47 PM Subject: How Hard is Hard - Cisco Exams [7:9410] > Can I please canvass some opinion as to the relative difficulty of each of > the Routing and Switching CCNA/CCDA/CCNP/CCDP Exams. For example relatively > the CCNA Exam may be harder than say the Remote Access because you have to > cover a bigger ground or number of subjects albeit in lesser depth. > > I don't want to draw out a long thread of it but it may be of use (and > interest) personally and to other members who are planning their exams. If > you could rate on a scale of 1-10 the following I'd be grateful; > > CCNA - ICND > CCDA - DCN > CCNP - BSCN > - BCMSN > - BCRAN > - CIT > CCDP - CID > > Thanks - Karl > IMPORTANT NOTICE: > This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or > organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or > confidential information. If you have received this message in error, > please notify the originator immediately. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or > disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions > expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and > are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. > Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility > for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9455&t=9410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How Hard is Hard - Cisco Exams [7:9410]
BSCN - 5 BCMSN - 4 BCRAN - 8 CIT - 3 CID - 9 Justin Emilio Tech Support CCNP, CCDP, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "hal9001" To: Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:47 PM Subject: How Hard is Hard - Cisco Exams [7:9410] > Can I please canvass some opinion as to the relative difficulty of each of > the Routing and Switching CCNA/CCDA/CCNP/CCDP Exams. For example relatively > the CCNA Exam may be harder than say the Remote Access because you have to > cover a bigger ground or number of subjects albeit in lesser depth. > > I don't want to draw out a long thread of it but it may be of use (and > interest) personally and to other members who are planning their exams. If > you could rate on a scale of 1-10 the following I'd be grateful; > > CCNA - ICND > CCDA - DCN > CCNP - BSCN > - BCMSN > - BCRAN > - CIT > CCDP - CID > > Thanks - Karl > IMPORTANT NOTICE: > This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or > organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or > confidential information. If you have received this message in error, > please notify the originator immediately. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or > disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions > expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and > are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. > Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility > for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9454&t=9410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Load Balancing for Applications [7:8260]
I have a home lab that I use for studying and I work for a DSL company. I have a cable modem connection that gets great download speeds (Like 3Mbps) but has horrible latency. I love to play video games that require low ping times. To take care of this my company gives me dsl for free, so I have cable modem for downloading and other internet uses and DSL for video games. Anyways, my question is this: how could I implement some sort of load balancing feature that would allow me to play games (I know the ports they use) over the DSL line, and everything else on the cable modem? Justin Emilio Tech Support CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:02 PM Subject: More about Route Caching [7:8255] > Since we were discussing fast switching earlier I thought I'd post > something I found on CCO that was really interesting. At least I think > it's interesting, and it would be good to understand this for > troubleshooting purposes. Or troubleshooting porpoises. Either one. > :-) > > > > Packet Routing When Using Both Fast Switching and Process Switching > > Question: I have four equal cost parallel paths to the same > destination. I am doing fast switching on two links and process > switching on the other two. How will the packets be routed in this > situation? > > Answer: > > Assuming that there are four equal cost paths to some set of IP > networks, with > > interfaces one and two fast switching, and three and four not, the > router will: > > > > Establish the four equal cost paths in a list. Call them path 1, 2, 3, > and 4. > > When you do a show ip route x.x.x.x, the four "next hops" to "x.x.x.x" > > will display. > > > Start with the pointer, called the "interface_pointer" on interface 1. > The > > "interface_pointer" cycles through the interfaces in some orderly > fashion, such > > as 1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4-1, and so on. The output of show ip route x.x.x.x > will > > include a "*" to the left of the "next hop" that the > "interface_pointer" will use > > for a destination address not found in the cache. Each time that the > "interface_ > > pointer" is used, it advances to the next interface. > > > > To illustrate this, repeat the following loop: > > A packet comes in, destined for a network serviced by the four > parallel paths. > > Check to see if it is in the cache. (The cache starts off empty.) > > If it is in the cache, send it to the interface stored in the cache. > > Otherwise, send it to the interface where the "interface_pointer" is > and > move the "interface_pointer" to the next interface in the list. > > If the interface over which we just sent the packet is running > route-cache, populate the cache with that interface id and the > destination > IP address. > > > > > Over time, the interfaces running route-cache will carry all the > traffic except > > destinations not in the cache. In the case of two route-cache and two > > > non-route cache, there is a fifty percent chance that an uncached entry > will hit > > an interface that caches entries, thereby nailing that destination to > that > > interface. > > > > Also, if no interface is running route-cache, the traffic will > round-robin on a > > packet-by-packet basis. The result is that either all have route-cache > or no > > route-cache on all interfaces in parallel paths, or expect that the > interfaces > > with caching enabled will carry all of the traffic over time. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8260&t=8260 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP NAT Issue [7:3073]
I still don't understand why I shouldn't be able to translate an address from one interface and out the same interface. I use that interface as my gateway for private addresses, so it will obviously will not be able to use the hub to get out on the internet. It seems like a limitation from Cisco that will not allow the "ip nat inside" and "ip nat outside" command to be placed on one interface. If I am wrong and this logically cannot work please fill me in. I just don't understand why I couldn't do that. Justin Emilio Tech Support CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cotts" To: Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 11:10 AM Subject: RE: IP NAT Issue [7:3073] > No you can't. The hub is just that - a hub. There is only one interface. If > you connected to the Internet via your serial port then the following config > should work. If you need ethernet on the Internet side, then time to buy a > router with two ethernet interfaces. > > ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial0 overload > > interface serial 0 > ip address aaa.xxx.yyy.zzz 255.255.255.0 > ip nat outside > > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 9.114.11.39 255.255.255.0 > ip nat inside > > access-list 1 permit 9.114.11.0 0.0.0.255 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Justin Emilio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:46 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: IP NAT Issue [7:3073] > > > > > > I am using a Cisco 2505 router which has a built in 8 port > > hub. This hub > > acts as 1 ethernet interface and I would like to use NAT to > > allow a network > > that is connected to the built in hub to be able to connect out to the > > internet through another port on the hub using 1 globally > > routable address > > with overloading. I tried using both "ip nat inside" and "ip > > nat outside" on > > the ethernet interface, but you can only use one of those > > commands on an > > interface. I played with different configurations yesterday > > and couldn't get > > any to work correctly. Should I be able to accomplish this? > > If anyone could > > help that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks > > > > > > Justin Emilio > > Tech Support > > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, CSE > > MM Internet 888-654-4971 > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct > > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3084&t=3073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP NAT Issue [7:3073]
I am using a Cisco 2505 router which has a built in 8 port hub. This hub acts as 1 ethernet interface and I would like to use NAT to allow a network that is connected to the built in hub to be able to connect out to the internet through another port on the hub using 1 globally routable address with overloading. I tried using both "ip nat inside" and "ip nat outside" on the ethernet interface, but you can only use one of those commands on an interface. I played with different configurations yesterday and couldn't get any to work correctly. Should I be able to accomplish this? If anyone could help that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Justin Emilio Tech Support CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3073&t=3073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Star Wars
Very true Justin Emilio CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Star Wars > In the Star Wars universe, the Force: > > Has a light side > Has a dark side > Holds the universe together. > > In our universe, this is a fair description of duct tape. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Star Wars
I couldn't agree more. But Jar Jar will unfortunately be in the next episode and probably the last one too. Theforce.net has posted many rumors from sources that are very accurate saying that Jar Jar will not be a huge part in the movie as well as being more mature and not as stupid/annoying. Justin Emilio CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "Denis A. Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Bradley J. Wilson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'cisco'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:47 AM Subject: RE: OT: Star Wars > Not at all. Kill the bastard. He is a poor C3PO replacement and deserves a > slow and agonizing death. "Me no feel so good wit spear through mine chest" > style. > > Denis > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Bradley J. Wilson > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 1:25 PM > To: cisco > Subject: Re: OT: Star Wars > > > I just want Jar Jar dead. Am I asking too much here? ;-) > > BJ > > > - Original Message - > From: W. Alan Robertson > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:05 PM > Subject: Re: OT: Star Wars > > > Understand this... I am a Star Wars freak. > > I haven't a clue how Lucas is going to pull this off... > > Here are the timetable problems that he faces: > > Anakin obviously has to grow up and undergo Jedi training. He also has to > fight > in the 'Clone Wars' along with Kenobi and the rest of the Jedi. He needs to > mature to the point where he can develop the love interest with Queen > Amadala > (Luke and Leia's mother). > > Presumably, all of this must happen in the Second Movie, because by the time > Episode III is completed, Amadala must be pregnant, Anakin must have his > accident and be lost to the dark side, and Kenobi must secret Amadala away > to > have the twins. Luke has to be delivered to Owen and Beru on Tatooine, and > Leia > must be taken to Bail Organa on Alderaan. > > Vader must also become Senator Palpatine's servant, Palpatine must dissolve > the > Senate, annointing himself Emperor, and together, the Emperor and Vader must > conduct the great Jedi purge. > > These are simply the storylines which reasonably must be satisfied based on > what > we know to be History from the Episode IV, V, and VI perspective. > > Of course, some people think I take this all too seriously. > > Alan > (Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > - Original Message - > From: "Dan West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:14 AM > Subject: Re: Star Wars > > > > No No No I want him to turn at the end of II. Like > > the dark twist in Empire with Luke/Vader. that's > > better... :> > > > > --- Justin Emilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think he will turn to the dark side in Episode > > > III. George Lucas is going > > > to make us wait another 3 years to see what we are > > > waiting for. > > > > > > > > > Justin Emilio > > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE > > > MM Internet > > > 888-654-4971 > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:34 PM > > > Subject: Re: Star Wars > > > > > > > > > > You've got to be kidding me...good topic, lol... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been an Eyez Only streaming e-mail > > > broadcast...We are watching. > > > > > > > > NetEyez ~ CCNP, CCDA > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:21 PM > > > > Subject: Star Wars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is Anakin Skywalker going to fall to the > > > dark side by episode II? > > > > > > > > > > Justin Emilio > > > > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE > > > > > MM Internet > > > > > 888-654-4971 > >
Re: OT: Star Wars
I don't think you take it too seriously. I camped out for a week and a half for episode I. I love Star Wars. I agree with everything you said. A lot needs to happen in the next 2 episodes. Justin Emilio CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "W. Alan Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 9:05 AM Subject: Re: OT: Star Wars > Understand this... I am a Star Wars freak. > > I haven't a clue how Lucas is going to pull this off... > > Here are the timetable problems that he faces: > > Anakin obviously has to grow up and undergo Jedi training. He also has to fight > in the 'Clone Wars' along with Kenobi and the rest of the Jedi. He needs to > mature to the point where he can develop the love interest with Queen Amadala > (Luke and Leia's mother). > > Presumably, all of this must happen in the Second Movie, because by the time > Episode III is completed, Amadala must be pregnant, Anakin must have his > accident and be lost to the dark side, and Kenobi must secret Amadala away to > have the twins. Luke has to be delivered to Owen and Beru on Tatooine, and Leia > must be taken to Bail Organa on Alderaan. > > Vader must also become Senator Palpatine's servant, Palpatine must dissolve the > Senate, annointing himself Emperor, and together, the Emperor and Vader must > conduct the great Jedi purge. > > These are simply the storylines which reasonably must be satisfied based on what > we know to be History from the Episode IV, V, and VI perspective. > > Of course, some people think I take this all too seriously. > > Alan > (Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > - Original Message - > From: "Dan West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:14 AM > Subject: Re: Star Wars > > > > No No No I want him to turn at the end of II. Like > > the dark twist in Empire with Luke/Vader. that's > > better... :> > > > > --- Justin Emilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think he will turn to the dark side in Episode > > > III. George Lucas is going > > > to make us wait another 3 years to see what we are > > > waiting for. > > > > > > > > > Justin Emilio > > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE > > > MM Internet > > > 888-654-4971 > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:34 PM > > > Subject: Re: Star Wars > > > > > > > > > > You've got to be kidding me...good topic, lol... > > > > > > > > > > > > > ******** > > > > This has been an Eyez Only streaming e-mail > > > broadcast...We are watching. > > > > > > > > NetEyez ~ CCNP, CCDA > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:21 PM > > > > Subject: Star Wars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is Anakin Skywalker going to fall to the > > > dark side by episode II? > > > > > > > > > > Justin Emilio > > > > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE > > > > > MM Internet > > > > > 888-654-4971 > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations > > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > = > > from The Big Lebowski... > > > > The Dude: You sure he won't mind? > > Bunny: Dieter doesn't care about anything. He's a nihilist. > > The Dude: Ohhh, that must be exhausting... > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Star Wars
I think he will turn to the dark side in Episode III. George Lucas is going to make us wait another 3 years to see what we are waiting for. Justin Emilio CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:34 PM Subject: Re: Star Wars > You've got to be kidding me...good topic, lol... > > > This has been an Eyez Only streaming e-mail broadcast...We are watching. > > NetEyez ~ CCNP, CCDA > > - Original Message - > From: "Justin Emilio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:21 PM > Subject: Star Wars > > > > > > Is Anakin Skywalker going to fall to the dark side by episode II? > > > > Justin Emilio > > CCNA, CCDA, CSE > > MM Internet > > 888-654-4971 > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Star Wars
Is Anakin Skywalker going to fall to the dark side by episode II? Justin Emilio CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SNMP Server
Kiwi's Syslog is a great little program. You can download it for free from www.download.com. Justin Emilio CCNA, CCDA, CSE MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "Pierre-Alex GUANEL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 10:20 AM Subject: SNMP Server > HI All, > > I am looking for a SNMP server freeware that works with Windows 2000. I don't need anything fancy. I just want to collect traps from the network and examine them. > > Thank You, > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO Web Site
I can go to it. Justin Emilio CCNA, CCDA, CSE (Cisco Sales Expert) MM Internet 888-654-4971 - Original Message - From: "Tariq Bin Azad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 8:34 AM Subject: CISCO Web Site > Hi. > > Can anybody try to access cisco web site ?? > I tihnk that their site is down. > > Tazad > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
