RE: max number of Sub interfaces [7:45288]
check out the link below for your answer http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/idb_limit.html Matt Street -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: max number of Sub interfaces [7:45288] Is there a max number of subinterfaces a router can handle before it slows down? Is this number constrained by memory on a router? But from a general design perspecitive, is there a limit to the number? Could I do 1000 subinterfaces on a router with no performance degredation? -- RFC 1149 Compliant Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45290t=45288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 7400's [7:43536]
I am writing this wondering how many of you have installed the Cisco 7400's in your networks. We recently installed 2 in our network and we had nothing but hardware problems with them. One of the boxes had a bad etherent port and the other had a bad hssi card. Needless to say it was a nightmare. So now that we have the boxes installed they are re-booting from software forced crashes. We opened a case with Cisco and they acknowledged that the 7400's have hardware issues and they are sending us 2 of the newer models that resolve the initial models problems. Have any of you out there experienced the same problems as we have? And if so did the newer replacement boxes resolve the issues? Thanks for any input. Matt Street Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43536t=43536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco to Ravlin IPSEC Card [7:1868]
What model Ravlin are you using? I have never heard of a Ravlin having a IPSEC card. The most common way of having Ravlins communicate is Ravlin to Ravlin through a secure VPN between the two. The router just forwards the packets to the proper destination. (IE packets sent from the Ravlin use the Ravlins remote IP address in the header and thats what the router uses to determine where to send the packet.) I need some more information to know what exactly you want done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clare, Charles Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco to Ravlin IPSEC Card [7:1868] Has any one got a cisco router talking to a Ravlin IPSEC Card Running IPSEC ? Charles CCDP,CCNP+Voice, MCSE+I FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2086t=1868 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FECN's and Dropped Packets... [7:110]
How long ago where the counters cleared on the router. 27 dropped packets would not be a concern over a large period of time. Same goes for the FECN's. Tell us when the stats where last cleared. Matt Street Network Engineer USPS-Network Integration and Support 888-877-7662 ext 3798 pager 1800pagemci pin#3850330 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rizzo Damian Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FECN's and Dropped Packets... [7:110] Hi all...When I do a "show frame-relay pvc" on our Internet Router, the following statistics bother me; in FECN pkts 12974 dropped pkts 27 We have recently been experiencing some noticeable slow downs on our Internet connection, do these statistics prove that we have a problem somewhere, or should I not be so concerned with these? Thanks! -Rizzo FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=112t=110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Broadcast LMI Keepalives?
As for your CKT issues the router is dropping LMI packets. From just the output given below it looks like the local bell probably has a transmit issue from your site to the end carrier (ie WCOM). I suggest opening a tkt with your frame-relay provider to resolve the issue. As for your broadcast question I do not know the answer of the top of my head. Could luck with your Frame-Relay provider. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broadcast LMI Keepalives? We have a circuit that is having pretty severe problems. No errors are being seen at the router serial interface, but we are experiencing about 50% packet loss (500 byte packets) incoming. I've just noticed something else that is odd. For each incoming LMI response, the number of received broadcasts increments. Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is HD64570 Description: 24.YBGA.xx MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 2/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 235, LMI stat recvd 218, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 1135/0, interface broadcasts 1018 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:39:18 Input queue: 1/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/23/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 17000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 14000 bits/sec, 9 packets/sec 20505 packets input, 5242248 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 218 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 26000 packets output, 5145390 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Because some keepalives are being missed, does that cause the frame switch to change the way it sends them? I couldn't find any other example of LMI keepalives causing the broadcast counters to increase, and I checked this on interfaces using both Cisco and ANSI LMI. any ideas? thanks, John Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping! http://www.shopping.altavista.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
