Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other good alternatives for the 2900XL series? I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The budget for switches is around $4K. The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. Thanks Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42687&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: About Catalyst Switch 8540 rumour [7:42651]
8540 is very expensive compared to the 6500 series which has most of the features as 8540 and is way cheaper then the 8540, the 6500 series is preferred more. You can substitute the 8540 with a 6500 series. I'll like to know more about it too... Simer -Original Message- From: Engelhard M. Labiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: About Catalyst Switch 8540 rumour [7:42651] Dear members, I would like to ask about the rumour I heard regarding Catalyst Switch 8540. According to the rumour Cat 8540 is a "big failure product" of Cisco switch line-up. I have a catalog of Catalyst switches, this 8540 is not shown on the catalog. Does anyone have information or an experience with 8540 ? Thanks for any information Best Regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42674&t=42651 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPP on 2514 [7:41973]
I'm trying to configure PPP on a 2514 router. The ISP wants me to use a public IP address on both e0 and s0. The previous ISP had frame-relay and I was using private IP addresses for e0 and NAT overloading. I want to configure extended NAT on the router but not sure how i can do this if i'm using public IP addresses for both e0 and s0. The internal network is on private IP addresses and configuring a firewall behind the router is not in the budget. New config: (From the ISP) interface Serial0 ip address 162.16.34.94 255.255.255.252 encap hdlc <---default interface FastEthernet0 ip address 164.65.13.89 255.255.255.252 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.16.34.93 Old config: (with the previous ISP) interface s0 ip address 167.129.130.198 255.255.255.252 encap frame-relay ietf ip nat outside interface e0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip nat pool Mypool 167.129.130.198 167.129.130.198 netmask 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside source list 100 pool MyPool overload access-list 100 permit Thanks for your help. Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41973&t=41973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: frame-relay switch [7:41899]
Hope this helps: On the Switch: FRswitch(config)#frame-relay switching FRswitch(config)#interface serial 0/0 FRswitch(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay FRswitch(config-if)#frame-relay interface-type dce !---Frame Relay switches identify inbound frames by their DLCI. The DLCI is then referenced in a switching table to determine the outbound port. !---Configure a static route for each serial interface to define an end-to-end PVC: FRswitch(config)#interface serial 0/0 FRswitch(config-if)#frame-relay route 18 interface serial 0/1 17 FRswitch(config-if)#interface serial 0/1 FRswitch(config-if)#frame-relay route 16 interface serial 0/0 19 On router 1: RTR1(config)#interface serial 0/0 RTR1(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay RTR1(config-if)#ip address 192.168.192.1 255.255.255.0 RTR1(config-if)#exit Specify the DLCI number on both routers. Simer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: frame-relay switch [7:41899] Does anyone know how to connect and configure two (2) 2513 as a frame-relay switch? Please send me the config file. mike - Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41900&t=41899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Robotics modem to Cisco 2514 [7:41894]
I'm trying to connect a US Robotics sportster modem to a Cisco 2514 thru the aux port. The dip switches on the modem: one, three and eight are down and all others are up. Config: line aux 0 login password password modem inout modem autoconfigure type usr_sportster transport input all flowcontrol hardware stopbits 1 speed 38400 When i reverse telnet into the modem it prompts for the password and OK but after that i cant type anything. The only way out is cancel the session (Ctrl+Shft+6..x) and then disconnect. I have tried using the modem autoconfigure discovery but it couldn't find the modem...i checked this debuging confmodem On sh line 1: Modem state: Ready Modem hardware state: noCTS noDSR DTR RTS: Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41894&t=41894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
I had already tested all the configs (with WINS server and other) earlier but it didn't worked out. Resolution: I had on the following entry on e0/0 on Network 1 router: no ip directed-broadcast Once i enabled it, it started working. Thanks again for your help. I did learned few more troubleshooting tips. Simer Mayo 'Each failure is a stepping stone towards bettering oneself' -Original Message- From: Joseph Brunner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 12:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] wins is a directed tcp connection. wins dosent need ip helper address. most likely his wins is incorrectly configured. he should have a push (and or pull) relation defined in wins manager between the two servers. I didnt get what he said about adding the ports. maybe his access lists are killing wins replication. Joseph Brunner ASN 21572 MortgageIT MITLending New York, NY 10038 (212) 651 - 7695 Voice -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm sure someone can provide a more detailed and accurate answer, but hopefully I can help. WINS is a TCP and UDP protocol. I imagine an IP HELPER-ADDRESS command might be of use here. Try a search for WINS on CCO at www.cisco.com. hth, Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mayo, Simer Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see network 2. I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no success. The network is NT 4 domain. Thanks in advance for help Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41434&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see network 2. I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no success. The network is NT 4 domain. Thanks in advance for help Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41410&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Network Designer [7:40547]
Its a good designing tool. Depends what are you looking for? -Original Message- From: Richard Tufaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Network Designer [7:40547] Anyone ever use this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40549&t=40547 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
It should work with IP feature. IP Plus is not mandatory but recommended. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP Plus feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotqIs this absolutely true that you need IP PlusHas anyone got it working with just the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my 2620Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. That could have helped :-) Thank you. >From: "James Wilson" >Reply-To: "James Wilson" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and >it >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, >though. > >-- >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP >Sr. Network/Security Engineer >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Rik Guyler >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Another bit of good info to know: > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid >the >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 >and >1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. > >Rik > >-Original Message- >From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work >in a 2600 router at 10mb > > > > >Larry Letterman >Cisco Systems >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked >with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. > >If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. >You >could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for >the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years >ago, >given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost >about $1000 per port. > >Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast >ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable >option. > >Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port >connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, >all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with >subinterfaces >on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route >between these vlans. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39926&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
