Re: BGP Question -Help Pease [7:13934]
If you want to e-mail what you have in mind I will take a look at it. I happen to work for one of the afore mentioned companys, in the customer support division no less. -Michael ""Nabil Fares"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings, > > Need your expertise on some BGP Design issues. We currently have 2 T3 > connections, one to Sprint and the other to UUNet. We're getting a 3rd T3 > (internet connection from Sprint) to a new building on campus that's going > to be connected to the old building with existing internet connection (I > hope that made some sense!!!). What's the best way to design or setup BGP > with 3 internet connections. > > Thanks for your time, > > Nabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14023&t=13934 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
Please keep in mind that just because you have 2 links to the same provider, it does not necessarily mean that they are run to the same POP. this can cause some problems with load balancing 2 different links. -- Michael Damkot Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""Makarand Yerawadekar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > You may want to take a look at -- > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/mpp_serial.html > > Please watch the line wrap. > > > > Matt Goodhue wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have > a > > link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ > > > > We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. > > Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco > on > > bonding, but could not come up with anything. > > > > Thank you. > > Matt Goodhue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14024&t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T1 [7:14054]
What was it, please post for our education as well... -- Michael Damkot Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""Santosh Koshy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I found the answer > > Thanks, > > ""Santosh Koshy"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I keep hearing this all the time, but still have not found a definitive > > answer... > > can anyone explain the difference between chanellized / unchanellized T1. > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Santosh Koshy > > WAN Administrator Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14066&t=14054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE date swap [7:14072]
keep in mind that November is after the Date for the 1 day lab change.. -- Michael Damkot Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""Khalid, Mohammad"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Guys > I have CCIE date available for 18th and 19th of September, I want to > exchange with somebody who has date in November preferably in 3rd or 4th > week. > Please contact me. > Thanks > M. Khalid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14084&t=14072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access list w/ prime numers [7:14117]
There are ways to block via odd or even address, but I don't know of a short way to do it... if this is a serious question I can do a little thinking for you... -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II WorldCom Ashburn CTAC ""Patrick Bass"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq prime any > > > > > > > > > > > :) heheheheheheheheheh > > > > > > > > ""Alejandro Pelaez"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hola All! > > > > I want to set up an access list that do the following: > > deny all packets from subnet 192.168.1.0 with last octect a prime numer. > > > > Alejandro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14195&t=14117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access list w/ prime numers [7:14117]
Let me clarify, There are ways to block by odd or even address using one or 2 lines, I do not know of an easy way to write a list that blocks by integers only, without some serious typing... -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II WorldCom Ashburn CTAC ""Michael Damkot"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > There are ways to block via odd or even address, but I don't know of a short > way to do it... > if this is a serious question I can do a little thinking for you... > > -- > Michael Damkot CCNP > Technical Trainer > Network Support Engineer II > WorldCom > Ashburn CTAC > > > ""Patrick Bass"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq prime any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :) heheheheheheheheheh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Alejandro Pelaez"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hola All! > > > > > > I want to set up an access list that do the following: > > > deny all packets from subnet 192.168.1.0 with last octect a prime numer. > > > > > > Alejandro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14197&t=14117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LMI question [7:14206]
is this Frame-relay?? You must configure the same LMI type on all interfaces on a given Physical interface I believe.. it makes sense... -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II WorldCom Ashburn CTAC ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am trying to configure a specific sub-interface lmi type as ansi and I am > not finding it on the sub-interface but on the physical interface itself. Is > there something im missing? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14207&t=14206 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggested changes to the e-mail format of GroupStudy [7:14220]
I agree, I like the idea, it should help alleviate a lot of the 'crap' this group receives... -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II WorldCom Ashburn CTAC ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I like the idea. More often than not, responses to posts to the list > should be posted to the list as well. This will require a minuscule > amount of effort on our part if we want to respond to a poster directly, > but it's worth it to help clean up the list. > > John > > >>> "Paul Borghese" 7/30/01 11:03:31 AM >>> > I had a suggestion this morning to change the format of the return > address > in the e-mail. This will eliminate the autoresponder junk we have > been > receiving and the countless e-mail worms. > > I am thinking of changing the format from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: > > person-at-company.com > > If you wanted to reply to the individual, you would need to edit the > e-mail > address. > > Any opinions, suggestions? Like the idea, hate it? > > Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14220&t=14220 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
If this is the case, and you are adding more users to reach the average 70% benchmark remember that most service providers will grantee 50% of your total circuit, so anything over 50% could be tagged as discard eligible (red Frames) and dropped. Causing lots of re-sends to complete a TCP connection and thus latency... -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""Provost, Robert"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > scenerio - site A is on a 56k line using 10% of the bandwidth. If you add > more users and are now at 70% bandwidth, do the users notice slower > connections even though the line is not over utilized and you are getting no > FECN/BECN, or dropped packets? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 12:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] > > > auh-- > u have a big setup.. > most of the frame relay problem happens of remote site pushing too much data > that the central site can handle > u r using default queing strategy. > and u send me only the remote site config > > u need to ccalculate what is the total cir and Be(excess bust speed of all > remote sites comming into your vc > u need to provide fine details > > > Best Regards > > Have A Good Day!! > > *** > Farhan Ahmed* > MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCDA, CCNA, CSE > Network Engineer > Mideast Data Systems Abudhabi Uae. > > *** > > > > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or > Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do > not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, > Conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the > Official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor > Endorsed by it. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:22 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] > > > > > > Here is the sh int after cleared counters and 5 minute wait. > > We have 320+ > > sites. Most sites are 56k lines, some frac T1, some DSL. > > Most have one PVC > > back to HQ. HQ has three routers on the Frame w/a total of 7 T1s. > > > > Thanks for your help, > > > > Rob > > > > > > router#sh int > > Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up > > Hardware is QUICC Ethernet, address is 0001.42a5.c6ec (bia > > 0001.42a5.c6ec) > > Internet address is 10.253.X.X/24 > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, rely 255/255, > > load 1/255 > > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) > > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > > Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:13 > > Queueing strategy: fifo > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > > 186 packets input, 19777 bytes, 0 no buffer > > Received 177 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > > 438 packets output, 207446 bytes, 0 underruns > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred > > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > Serial0 is up, line protocol is up > > Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) > > Description: router DLCI 200 > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, > > load 1/255 > > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive > > set (10 sec) > > LMI enq sent 44, LMI stat recvd 44, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up > > LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 > > LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE > > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 25/0, > > interface broadcasts > > 18 > > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:14 > > Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 > >
Re: A post in alt.certification.cisco all should read [7:9286]
I read Alt.certification but which posting are you referring to? -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""John Tudong"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > www.dejanews.com (now Google) > > ""Vyacheslav Luschinsky"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Our provider does not have this news group. Do you know any free web > access > > to news or to this news group? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14697&t=9286 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Communicatoins and Services [7:14800]
My understanding was the Lab was 50% General, and 50% Specialization.. But after looking at the site I think your right... -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""Charlie Hartwell"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Michael, > I am interested in the Optical path but I'm not 100% sure about it > just yet. The certifications area on CCO gives some good links for > reading material for both paths and I believe they are both still in > beta.The blueprint for the Dial C&S is due in August. > It is worth noting that the C&S qualification written exam > (equivalent to the Drake) is the only time when the specialisation > will come into effect - the lab will be 100% based on "general" > networking. > > Regards > > Charlie > > --- Michael Damkot wrote: > Hea group, I was > curious if anyone is planning to pursue their CCIE > > in > > communications and services, specializing in either Optical or > > Cable. I > > plan to do both and would like to exchange information if at all > > possible. > > > > -- > > Michael Damkot CCNP > > Technical Trainer > > Network Support Engineer II > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk > or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14807&t=14800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dedicated T1 to Japan [7:15184]
They do, but you can get either from the U.S. depending on which pop and or provider. - Regards, Michael Damkot Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis Laganiere Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Dedicated T1 to Japan [7:15184] Doesn't Japan use E1's? --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Kenny Sallee To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 8/7/2001 4:25 PM Subject: Dedicated T1 to Japan [7:15184] Does anyone here know the approximate cost of a dedicated T1 from the west coast to Japan. Doesn't need to be exact I just need rough numbers. I apologize for being off subject. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15193&t=15184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DE bits [7:15210]
To Clarify, usually the DE bit is set at Half the CIR, since FR is usually only guaranteed to half the total bandwidth, therefore, the customer can use the total circuit, but if congestion occurs, Frames that are over half the CIR are the first to go.. But you also have to keep in mind there are other things in place to avoid lost data. IE BECN, FECN - Regards, Michael Damkot Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony van Ree Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DE bits [7:15210] Hi all, Put simply a DE (Discard Eligible) bit is set on anything above the CIR (Committed Information Rate) ie if it is not committed it is discard eligible. At least that's the way I understand it. Teunis, Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Wednesday, August 08, 2001 at 10:06:06 AM, Brian wrote: > I doubt the cir is set to zero, it almost certainly is set to a value below > the 1.5 meg value, I'd suspect 768k perhaps. Whomever is the circuit owner > can call the telco to find out. > > Brian > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Mandulak" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:16 PM > Subject: DE bits [7:15210] > > > > Do discard Eligible bits (DE) get set on lines that are full T1's? The > > circuit I'm looking at is a full T1 to one of my internet providers and > when > > looking at the frame stats (using cisco LMI) I see that that the cir is > set > > to zero which would mean that all frames leave my site with the DE bit > set. > > Am I misunderstanding this? > > > > MikeM -- www.tasmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15397&t=15210 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA exam [7:15284]
Hea gang, I got curious, so I looked it up. On the CCCA (Cisco Career Certifications Agreement,) (the newest revision, V.7 anyway), where the signature is required there is a check box for over 18 and a box for under 18. If you are under 18 you must have a parent or Guardian sign the CCCA as well.. This isn't necessarily a representation of the CCA (Cisco Confidentiality agreement) But if you can agree to the Certification agreement, you have to be able to take the tests... I would contact either Cisco or Prometric for sure. But I say go for it my man, most people say I'm doing well for so young, (22) but you'll have me beat by FAR!!! - Regards, Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bolton, Travis Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 5:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNA exam [7:15284] Wow I'm impressed with this young adult. If this type of field was available when I was his age I would have been studying for my CCNA as well. Glad to see some teens have ambition. Good luck to you and I would also recommend the Boson.com exams as well. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNA exam [7:15284] Why would a 14 year old take an exam. I don't think you can agree to the NDA. But good luck, let us know how you do. I would recommend the Boson tests #1 that should do you fine and fit in your budget - Original Message - From: "Artashes Kalantarian" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:23 AM Subject: CCNA exam [7:15284] > Hi All > I am new to this newsgroup > I am 14 and I am going to take the CCNA exam on the middle of this month. > Can anybody suggest me tests that I can use for checking my knowledge? > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15409&t=15284 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Connecting two Routers through their Serial Interfaces [7:16283]
see the thread: Associate and Professional Email Lists -- Michael Damkot CCNP Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""Hamid"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi group, > > Can anyone tell me if it's possible if you want to connect two routers > Bach-to Back using their serial interfaces. > > And if possible how should I configure the serial inetrfaces. > > Thanks in advace > > Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16283&t=16283 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Help [7:29650]
How many routes are you advertising, are your ISP's configured using the older revisions of max-prefix MD ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If you do a show ip bgp neighbors, what does it show as the reason for > the last reset? > > Are you experiencing congestion on that link, or any sign of dropped > packets? What model of routers are you using? How much DRAM do they > have? What IOS are you running? What is the speed of your access > links? > > Thanks, > John > > >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > 12/19/01 2:11:13 PM >>> > Routes renewing constantly. > > > > > > > > MADMAN > cc: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: BGP Help > [7:29650] > > 12/19/2001 > 02:54 > PM > > > > > > > > > > Describe what you mean by flapping. > > > Dave > > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > Greetings all, > > > I was wondering if you guys can help out with this problem. > We're > connected to both Sprint and UUnet and receiving full routes. > All > routers are peering with each other. My problem is with both > RTRA > and > RTRB, they're flapping constantly, RTRC and RTRD are very stable. > Is > there a knowing cause am missing here? any suggestions would be > great. > > > Thanks.Nabil > > > RTR A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RTRB > | | > | | > | | > | | > RTRC RTRD > Sprint UUNET > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > David Madland > CCIE# 2016 > Senior Network Engineer > Qwest Communications > 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29698&t=29650 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sniffing my broadband connection to my ISP ??? [7:30689]
Erick, you are seeing 224.0.0.1 Multicast Queries because 224.0.0.1 is reserved for "all systems on segment." This is the IP that the IGMP queries are going out to allowing the Router to determine if it needs to "request upstream" for any Multicast Streams. It is pretty common to see that.. Mike ""Erick B."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Just to expand on this... > > The 224.0.0.1 multicast query you're seeing is coming > from the cable modem I bet. I have a Surfboard 3100 > cable modem and it sends out IGMP queries on 224.0.0.1 > frequently. I'm not sure why the cable modem is doing > multicast and haven't really looked into it. I think > it may only be local to the LAN interface toward your > PC but not 100% positive. You can use your web browser > to view the log and status of the SB3100 cable modem > by the way, you can see the IP in the sniffer trace. > > If the ARP requests are originating from the ISP > default-gateway (first hop router for you) then maybe > they have proxy arp enabled. > > The DHCP requests could be from other users on your > segment, or maybe forwarded to a DHCP server on your > segment from another segment. > > Also, since you're on a shared segment with others > they may have set up their own networks, etc with > their own address space, etc that you might see > packets from. > > Erick > > --- Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > It sounds like you are sharing the broadcast domain > > with a bunch of other > > stations. The network is bridging on the edge. I > > think this is normal for > > cable modem systems. Is that what you are on? > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 12:23 PM 1/2/02, Phil Barker wrote: > > >Hi Group, > > > I have been sniffing my broadband connection > > to > > >my ISP today and have a few questions. > > > > > > My main gripe is that I'm being sent around > > 100 > > >Arp requests per minute, which obviously I cannot > > >resolve. These ARP requests are all originating > > from > > >my default G/W at the ISP trying to resolve MAC > > >addresses of various users. Can anyone confirm if > > this > > >is usual or unusual. I cannot see this being > > correct > > >since if I set my router up to be one of these IP > > >addresses I can resolve it to my MAC address Eth 0 > > >int' or any other mac-address for that matter. > > > > > > They also send me DHCP requests, IGMP > > requests > > >for group 224.0.0.1 (Which I wish I could join) but > > >cannot and lots of their private address > > information > > >via the above mentioned ARP's. > > > > > > I also captured an attemt at an inbound TCP > > >connection on a dynamic port which my router RST, > > >thankfully. > > > > > > Are they wasting my B/W ? > > > > > >Thanx, > > > > > >Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__ > > >Do You Yahoo!? > > >Everything you'll ever need on one web page > > >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > > >http://uk.my.yahoo.com > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30720&t=30689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
I couldn't help myself, I have done the "tech support" side of this for a while and now take escalations on issues such as these, as well as teach others how to troubleshoot theses issues, so I thought I'd throw my two cents in, late as it may be. Everything I have read on this thread thus far, is true. Testing a circuit can, many times, clear up the problems that the customer may be seeing. On the other side of the coin, because of the fluctuant nature of Layer 1 and 2 equipment in provider networks, this can often cause what appears to be a fix, and becomes a chronic issue since tech-support groups work on numbers as well as MTTR. More often than not if it's up and pingable for 1-2 hours, this issue is marked as resolved. With that said, as mentioned earlier, look for bipolar violations, this can be a sign of a few things, but the exact cause can be hard to track down. If the issue continues beyond this weekend, I would suggest that you contact your provider and have a dispatch sent to your premise. But once they are there and they check the common problems, make SURE, they run a HEAD-TO-HEAD test for at LEAST 3 minutes per test pattern using 0's, 1's and either 1 in 8 or 3 in 24. When they do this and run clean, make sure there are errors sent from the far end to the onsite tech's test unit, and vise versa. Since your ISP and the circuit provider are more than likely different providers, make sure both are on the phone to ensure end-to-end testing. I am available offline if you need anything further Mike ""Ole Drews Jensen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > They did another stress test last night at 11 PM together with the telco, > and this time they didn't find any errors. They promised to monitor the line > all night, and this morning when I checked the PVC, it had been up all > night. I am leaving the case open a little bit longer though. > > As I don't have other things to do, one of the other branch offices > connected the same way went down during the night. This office is located in > an area where they have a different telco, so I am finding this too odd to > be a coincidence, and it "smells" like a provider problem at this time. > > I have not heard back from their NOC yet, but I am warming up with cups of > coffee here... > > In the meantime, I've had them power off their router, reseat both cables, > and power it back on. Without any luck. With a telnet, their router shows > the LMI being down, and there has been one AIS alarm, which tells me that > some upstream equipment are faulty. > > Thanks for everyone's reply. > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > > -Original Message- > From: Lee James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829] > > > If this becomes persistent, along with having the tech check the sj, Have > them run head to head with his test set. Do it after hours if you do not > have a backup line. > > > > > Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > > > > Thanks Larry, > > > > I've asked the tech to call me anytime tonight when they've > > finished the > > test, and if the story is the same as earlier today, I will > > insist on having > > the telco dispatched to check the SmartJack. > > > > Ole > > > > ~~~ > > Ole Drews Jensen > > Systems Network Manager > > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ~~~ > > http://www.RouterChief.com > > ~~~ > > NEED A JOB ??? > > http://www.oledrews.com/job > > ~~~ > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:11 PM > > To: 'Ole Drews Jensen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829] > > > > > > Ole, just a word of experience here, don't let this drag on too > > long without > > insisting that telco goes to the site and checks the smart jack > > CHASSIS. I > > have seen a slot or the whole chassis be the problem with this > > symptom many > > times. There is something about them that gives clear loopback > > tests from > > the 'front' (entry point from telco) of the smart jack card but > > they can > > only hardwire a loopback from the 'back' (exit point towards > > CSU). Of > > course, they will be obstinate towards this request. > > > > Larry Puckette > > Network Analyst CCNA,MCP,LANCP > > Temple Inland > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 512/434-1838 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ole Drew
Cisco 1200 Catalyst switches [7:31548]
I have recently been given two 1200 switches but cannot access them. I am running Win2000 with Vandyke CRT3.4 and my co-worker is running win NT 4.0 with Hyperterm, neither one of us can get any response from either switch. Any suggestions?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31548&t=31548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
