Re: Simple Routing question... [7:33168]

2002-01-24 Thread Mike Taylor

It looks as if the device configured with the 64.114.57.1/29 address has no
route back to the 64.114.57.8/29 network.

If it were my problem, I'd check to see if a ping from 64.114.57.10 reaches
the 64.114.57.1 device and what that device does with it.

Good Luck

Mike Taylor


Keith Woodworth  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 7204 connected via Faste to another layer 3 device.

 IP on 7204: 64.114.57.2
 IP on other device: 64.114.57.1
 Subnet mask: 255.255.255.248

 One static route on 7204:
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 64.114.57.1

 7204 is working and fine and reachable.

 7204 has an ATM interface (oc3) to a 6260 DSlam.
 ATM 0/1 has a subif config'd P2P w/IP: 64.114.57.9
 ATM subif on 6260 has IP: 64.114.57.10

 Subnet mask is also a /29.

 Config one static route on 6260: 0.0.0.0/0 64.114.57.9

 Now from 6260 I can hit 64.114.57.2 but cannot get past that interface to
 64.114.57.1 which is the main gateway.

 What do I need on 6260 to route past the 7204? Ive added a few other
 routes on the 7204 using a statemnt to route the whole 64.114.57.0/24 out
 64.114.57.1 to no avail.

 Just started on this today so have had a whole lot of time to work on it
 yet but just thought I'd throw this out to see. No routing protocols
 running, just all static routes.

 Thanks for any input.
 Keith




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33175t=33168
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Win32 app to read/interpret tcpdump file [7:1568]

2001-04-23 Thread Mike Taylor

 the evidence without knowing it.  Anyone have a Win32 app that can read
 tcpdump raw capture files?


Try http://www.ethereal.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1570t=1568
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NAT: list or route-map? [7:1563]

2001-04-22 Thread Mike Taylor

Hi,

I have a question about the following configuration:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/quicktip.html

What is the benefit of using the route-map to define what/what not to
translate?  Maybe I'm missing something simple, but it seems that you could
simply use the list (175) to do the same thing, avoiding the extra route-map
config completely.

Thanks for any insight.

Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1563t=1563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]